Discussion: Evidence-Based Practice Reading Research

Discussion: Evidence-Based Practice Reading Research ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS ON Discussion: Evidence-Based Practice Reading Research The student will read research literature to determine the research purpose, question, design, population, sample, limitations, data collection and analysis. Discussion: Evidence-Based Practice Reading Research Course Discussion: Evidence-Based Practice Reading Research This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes: CO2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (PO4 and 8) CO4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and lab significance related to evidence-based practice. (PO4 and 8) Points: This assignment is worth 225 points. Due Date: Submit the completed Reading Research Literature form (Links to an external site.) Links to an external site. by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 5. Discussion: Evidence-Based Practice Reading Research Download the research articles from the Chamberlain library. Retrieve the following research articles: Make sure you are viewing the full text PDF. If you view the article in HTML format, you may not be able to see the tables and figures that are referenced in the questions. Velayutham, S. G., Chandra, S. R., Bharath, S., & Shankar, R. G. (2017). Quantitative balance and gait measurement in patients with frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer diseases: A pilot study. Indian Journal Of Psychological Medicine, 39 (2), 176-182. doi:10.4103/0253-7176.203132. http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=122248443&site=eds-live&scope=site (Links to an external site.) Links to an external site. Pals, R. S., Hansen, U. M., Johansen, C. B., Hansen, C. S., Jørgensen, M. E., Fleischer, J., & Willaing, I. (2015). Making sense of a new technology in clinical practice: A qualitative study of patient and physician perspectives. BMC Health Services Research , 15 (1), 1-10. doi:10.1186/s12913-015-1071-1 http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=her&AN=109884152&site=eds-live (Links to an external site.) Links to an external site. Download the Reading Research Literature form (Links to an external site.) Links to an external site. . Watch the video on how to complete this assignment at http://www.brainshark.com/devry/vu?pi=zGCzbNjK4zHr05z0. (Links to an external site.) Links to an external site. Type answers to the questions directly onto the form. Your form does NOT need to follow APA formatting; however, you are expected to use correct grammar, spelling, syntax, and write in complete sentences. Discussion: Evidence-Based Practice Reading Research Please post questions about this assignment to the Q & A Forum. Save the file by clicking Save as and adding your last name, e.g., NR439_W5_Reading_Research_Literature_Form_Smith.docx. Submit the completed form by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 5. Discussion: Evidence-Based Practice Reading Research NR439_Reading_Research_Literature NR439_Reading_Research_Literature Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Velayutham, et al article: Question 1 Purpose view longer description Correctly identifies the purpose of the research article. 10.0 pts Mostly identifies the purpose of the research article 9.0 pts Somewhat identifies the purpose of the research article. 8.0 pts Offers a purpose for the article, but incorrectly identifies it. 4.0 pts Does not identify any purpose for the research. 0.0 pts 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Question 2 Research Question view longer description Correctly identifies the research question in the study, or identifies the implied question, or indicates that no research question was given. 10.0 pts Mostly identifies the research question that the author described. 9.0 pts Somewhat identifies the research question that the author described. 8.0 pts Offers a research question, but incorrectly identifies it. 4.0 pts Does not identify any research question. 0.0 pts 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Question 3 Research Design view longer description Correctly describes the research design of the study. 10.0 pts Mostly describes the research design of the study. 9.0 pts Somewhat describes the research design of the study. 8.0 pts Offers a research design, but incorrectly identifies it. 4.0 pts Does not identify any research design. 0.0 pts 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Question 4 Population view longer description Correctly identifies and describes in detail the population of the research article. 10.0 pts Mostly describes identifies and describes the population of the research article. 9.0 pts Somewhat identifies and describes the population of the research article. 8.0 pts Offers a population, but incorrectly identifies it as the one in the research article. 4.0 pts Does not identify any population. 0.0 pts 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Question 5 Sample view longer description Correctly explains if the sampling approach was appropriate for the research design studied, and if it was adequate. Discussion: Evidence-Based Practice Reading Research 10.0 pts Correctly explains if the sampling approach was appropriate for the research design studied, but fails to correctly identify if it was adequate. 9.0 pts Correctly explains the sampling approach, but incorrectly identifies if it was, or was not, appropriate or adequate. 8.0 pts Misidentifies the sampling approach. 4.0 pts Doesn’t explain any sampling approach. 0.0 pts 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Question 6 Data Collection view longer description Correctly describes the data collection procedure in detail. 10.0 pts Correctly describes the data collection procedure in general. 9.0 pts Correctly describes most of the data collection procedure but fails to describe all of it. 8.0 pts Incorrectly describes the data collection procedure, or omits most of the information. 4.0 pts Does not describe any data collection procedures. 0.0 pts 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Question 7 Data Analysis view longer description Correctly describes how the all of the data were analyzed. 10.0 pts Correctly describes how most of the data were analyzed. 9.0 pts Describes how the data were analyzed, but may contain some misinformation. 8.0 pts Describes incorrectly how data were analyzed, or omitted large portions of the information. 4.0 pts Does not describe how data were analyzed. 0.0 pts 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Question 8 Limitations view longer description Correctly describes all of the limitations in the study. 10.0 pts Correctly describes most of the limitations in the study. 9.0 pts Correctly describes some of the limitations in the study, but may omit one or two. 8.0 pts Minimally describes the limitations of the study, or misidentifies them. 4.0 pts Does not describe any limitations for the study. 0.0 pts 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Question 9 Conclusions view longer description Correctly describes all of the authors’ conclusions. 10.0 pts Correctly describes most of the authors’ conclusions. 9.0 pts Correctly describes some of the authors’ conclusions, but may omit one or two. 8.0 pts Minimally describes the author’s conclusions, or misidentifies them. 4.0 pts Does not describe any author conclusions. 0.0 pts 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Question 10 Advances Knowledge view longer description Describes in-depth how this research advances knowledge in the field. 10.0 pts Generally, describes how this research advances knowledge. 9.0 pts Briefly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field. 8.0 pts Incorrectly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field. 4.0 pts Does not describe how the research advances knowledge in the field. 0.0 pts 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Pals et al article: Question 11 Purpose view longer description Correctly identifies the purpose of the research article. Discussion: Evidence-Based Practice Reading Research 10.0 pts Mostly identifies the purpose of the research article 9.0 pts Somewhat identifies the purpose of the research article. 8.0 pts Offers a purpose for the article, but incorrectly identifies it. 4.0 pts Does not identify any purpose for the research. 0.0 pts 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Question 12 Research Question view longer description Correctly identifies the research question in the study, or identifies the implied question, or indicates that no research question was given. 10.0 pts Mostly identifies the research question that the author described. 9.0 pts Somewhat identifies the research question that the author described. 8.0 pts Offers a research question, but incorrectly identifies it. 4.0 pts Does not identify any research question. 0.0 pts 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Question 13 Research Design view longer description Correctly describes the research design of the study. 10.0 pts Mostly describes the research design of the study. 9.0 pts Somewhat describes the research design of the study. 8.0 pts Offers a research design, but incorrectly identifies it. 4.0 pts Does not identify any research design. 0.0 pts 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Question 14 Population view longer description Correctly identifies and describes in detail the population of the research article. 10.0 pts Mostly describes identifies and describes the population of the research article. 9.0 pts Somewhat identifies and describes the population of the research article. 8.0 pts Offers a population, but incorrectly identifies it as the one in the research article. 4.0 pts Does not identify any population. 0.0 pts 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Question 15 Sample view longer description Correctly explains if the sampling approach was appropriate for the research design studied, and if it was adequate. 10.0 pts Correctly explains if the sampling approach was appropriate for the research design studied, but fails to correctly identify if it was adequate. 9.0 pts Correctly explains the sampling approach, but incorrectly identifies if it was, or was not, appropriate or adequate. 8.0 pts Misidentifies the sampling approach. 4.0 pts Doesn’t explain any sampling approach. 0.0 pts 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Question 16 Data Collection view longer description Correctly describes the data collection procedure in detail. 10.0 pts Correctly describes the data collection procedure in general. 9.0 pts Correctly describes most of the data collection procedure but fails to describe all of it. Discussion: Evidence-Based Practice Reading Research 8.0 pts Incorrectly describes the data collection procedure, or omits most of the information. 4.0 pts Does not describe any data collection procedures. 0.0 pts 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Question 17 Data Analysis view longer description Correctly describes how the all of the data were analyzed. 10.0 pts Correctly describes how most of the data were analyzed. 9.0 pts Describes how the data were analyzed, but may contain some misinformation. 8.0 pts Describes incorrectly how data were analyzed, or omitted large portions of the information. 4.0 pts Does not describe how data were analyzed. 0.0 pts 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Question 18 Limitations view longer description Correctly describes all of the limitations in the study. 10.0 pts Correctly describes most of the limitations in the study. 9.0 pts Correctly describes some of the limitations in the study, but may omit one or two. 8.0 pts Minimally describes the limitations of the study, or misidentifies them. 4.0 pts Does not describe any limitations for the study. 0.0 pts 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Question 19 Conclusions view longer description Correctly describes all of the authors’ conclusions. 10.0 pts Correctly describes most of the authors’ conclusions. 9.0 pts Correctly describes some of the authors’ conclusions, but may omit one or two. 8.0 pts Minimally describes the author’s conclusions, or misidentifies them. 4.0 pts Does not describe any author conclusions. 0.0 pts 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Question 20 Advances Knowledge view longer description Describes in-depth how this research advances knowledge in the field. 10.0 pts Generally, describes how this research advances knowledge. 9.0 pts Briefly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field. 8.0 pts Incorrectly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field. 4.0 pts Does not describe how the research advances knowledge in the field. 0.0 pts 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Style and Writing view longer description Correctly names file, includes name on paper. Writes in complete sentences with no grammar, spelling, or syntax errors. 25.0 pts One to four errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax. 22.0 pts Five to eight errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax. Discussion: Evidence-Based Practice Reading Research 20.0 pts Nine to twelve errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax 10.0 pts Thirteen or more errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax. 0.0 pts 25.0 pts Total Points: 225.0 Previous Next reading_research_lite Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10