Discussion: Isotonic Imbalances and Hyponatremia

Discussion: Isotonic Imbalances and Hyponatremia ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS ON Discussion: Isotonic Imbalances and Hyponatremia Week 2: Weekly Synchronous Session Reflection Due: Sep 15 at 11:59pm Calendar NUR-332-Z9 (PIE) Pathophysiology (16 Weeks-D3) Fall 2019 Details Week 2: Weekly Synchronous Session ReflectionAfter attending or watching the live session, pick two concepts discussed in the session that you found difficult or confusing. For each, clearly articulate what the content/concept was and note what slide the content was on. Any sources used, including your textbook, should be included as references in APA format. Next, select one of the options below, complete it, and submit by Sunday at 11:59 pm. St Petersburg College NUR332 Isotonic Imbalances and Hyponatremia Option A Using resources other than the course/textbook resources, find two NCLEX-style questions for each of the two-concepts/content areas (4 questions total) and cite where in your assigned readings the information to support each answer is. You may use “.com” websites to obtain these questions. Discussion: Isotonic Imbalances and Hyponatremia Option B For each of the two concepts you identified as difficult or confusing, find a scholarly resource (video, journal article, website) that helped you better understand the topic. Cite both sources in APA format and explain the concept/content in your own words. Finally, note where in your assigned readings that content is covered. *Please note, you should not use “.com” websites for this assignment, as they are not scholarly sources . ( The two concepts are dissucused after watching Isotonic Imbalances and Hyponatremia). St Petersburg College NUR332 Isotonic Imbalances and Hyponatremia Calendar Details Week 2 Reflection: The Image of Professional NursingAfter reading the AMA statement & the Nightingale Pledge, and viewing the “ Just a Nurse (Links to an external site.) ” video, do you think that history has helped or hurt the image of professional nursing in the U.S.? What about the media’s role in portraying an image of professional nursing? Provide examples as appropriate. Please make sure to review the grading rubric below before completing your reflection. Assignment Rubric Details close Discussion: Isotonic Imbalances and Hyponatremia true 27658 Can’t change a rubric once you’ve started using it. Find a Rubric Title: Find Rubric Discussion Rubric You’ve already rated students with this rubric. Any major changes could affect their assessment results. Discussion Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts Edit criterion description Delete criterion row This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Initial Post- Do you understand the topic of discussion? _6329 Range threshold: pts Edit rating Delete rating 12.0 to > 10.5 pts Excellent Demonstrates an excellent understanding of the topic. blank Edit rating Delete rating 10.5 to > 9.0 pts Good Demonstrates a good understanding of the topic. _7401 Edit rating Delete rating 9.0 to > 7.5 pts Fair Demonstrates partial understanding of the topic. _2225 Edit rating Delete rating 7.5 to > 0.0 pts Needs Improvement Demonstrates little to no understanding of the topic. _3232 Edit rating Delete rating 0.0 to > 0 pts Does Not Meet Criteria No initial post submitted. blank_2 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. pts / 12.0 pts — Edit criterion description Delete criterion row This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Assignment Criteria- Did you address all assignment criteria? _2135 Range threshold: pts Edit rating Delete rating 11.0 to > 9.5 pts Excellent Meets all assignment criteria. _2799 Edit rating Delete rating 9.5 to > 8.5 pts Good Meets most assignment criteria. _3290 Edit rating Delete rating 8.5 to > 6.5 pts Fair Partially meets assignment criteria. _8030 Edit rating Delete rating 6.5 to > 0.0 pts Needs Improvement Does not meet assignment criteria. _9329 Edit rating Delete rating 0.0 to > 0 pts Does Not Meet Criteria No initial post submitted. _3047 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. pts / 11.0 pts — Edit criterion description Delete criterion row This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Clarity- Is your content clear and logical? _3675 Range threshold: pts Edit rating Delete rating 11.0 to > 9.5 pts Excellent Content is well articulated, flows logically, and facilitates communication. _3319 Edit rating Delete rating 9.5 to > 8.5 pts Good Content usually flows logically and facilitates communication. _5707 Edit rating Delete rating 8.5 to > 6.5 pts Fair Content is sometimes difficult to understand and may inhibit communication. _6976 Edit rating Delete rating 6.5 to > 0.0 pts Needs Improvement Content is confusing and does not facilitate communication. _5029 Edit rating Delete rating 0.0 to > 0 pts Does Not Meet Criteria Does Not Meet Criteria _1690 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. pts / 11.0 pts — Edit criterion description Delete criterion row This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Participation- Are you responding regularly to peers? _7280 Range threshold: pts Edit rating Delete rating 11.0 to > 9.5 pts Excellent Postings (4-5) are well distributed throughout the module. _4206 Edit rating Delete rating 9.5 to > 8.5 pts Good Postings (3-4) are distributed throughout the module. _1858 Edit rating Delete rating 8.5 to > 6.5 pts Fair Postings (2-4) are somewhat distributed throughout the module. _8834 Edit rating Delete rating 6.5 to > 0.0 pts Needs Improvement Postings (1-4) are not distributed throughout the module. _658 Edit rating Delete rating 0.0 to > 0 pts Does Not Meet Criteria No peer responses. _449 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. pts / 11.0 pts — Edit criterion description Delete criterion row This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Quality of Responses- Does your content have depth and build on knowledge? _5466 Range threshold: pts Edit rating Delete rating 11.0 to > 9.5 pts Excellent Postings offer substantial contributions which integrate peer comments and build on knowledge. _4886 Edit rating Delete rating 9.5 to > 8.5 pts Good Most postings offer contributions which integrate peer comments and build prior knowledge. _6578 Edit rating Delete rating 8.5 to > 6.5 pts Fair Some postings offer contributions but others are limited in scope or depth and do not build on knowledge. _376 Edit rating Delete rating 6.5 to > 0.0 pts Needs Improvement Postings are not substantial, are often limited to statements of agreement, are incorrect, and/or do not build on knowledge. _3070 Edit rating Delete rating 0.0 to > 0 pts Does Not Meet Criteria Does not meet criteria _7544 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. pts / 11.0 pts — Edit criterion description Delete criterion row This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Use of Resources- Did you use appropriate resources to support the content? _225 Range threshold: pts Edit rating Delete rating 11.0 to > 9.5 pts Excellent Postings are supported by content from the nursing literature and other scholarly resources. _806 Edirating Delete rating 9.5 to > 8.5 pts Good Postings are mostly supported by content from the nursing literature and other scholarly resources. _1582 Edit rating Delete rating 8.5 to > 6.5 pts Fair Some posts are supported by content from the nursing literature and other scholarly resources. _1289 Edit rating Delete rating 6.5 to > 0.0 pts Needs Improvement Postings are rarely supported by content from the nursing literature or other scholarly resources. _6533 Edit rating Delete rating 0.0 to > 0 pts Does Not Meet Criteria Does not meet criteria _2028 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. pts / 11.0 pts — Edit criterion description Delete criterion row This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome APA Citations and References- Did you use proper APA format for all citations and references? _21 Range threshold: pts Edit rating Delete rating 11.0 to > 9.5 pts Excellent All citations and references are properly formatted. _9859 Edit rating Delete rating 9.5 to > 8.5 pts Good Citations and references are properly formatted with two or less errors. _4744 Edit rating Delete rating 8.5 to > 6.5 pts Fair Citations and references contain three or more errors. _6931 Edit rating Delete rating 6.5 to > 0.0 pts Needs Improvement Citation and reference errors detract from writing. _3355 Edit rating Delete rating 0.0 to > 0 pts Does Not Meet Criteria Does not meet criteria. _1313 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. pts / 11.0 pts — Edit criterion description Delete criterion row This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome APA Originality- Does your work contain original content? _7068 Range threshold: pts Edit rating Delete rating 11.0 to > 9.5 pts Excellent Writing is original with limited use of direct quotes. _8625 Edit rating Delete rating 9.5 to > 8.5 pts Good Writing is mostly original with some overuse of direct quotes. _42 Edit rating Delete rating 8.5 to > 6.5 pts Fair Writing lacks original content and contains excessive direct quotes. _9194 Edit rating Delete rating 6.5 to > 0.0 pts Needs Improvement Writing lacks original content and is suggestive of plagiarism. _236 Edit rating Delete rating 0.0 to > 0 pts Does Not Meet Criteria Evidence of plagiarism is present. _2646 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. pts / 11.0 pts — Edit criterion description Delete criterion row This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Mechanics- Did you use correct spelling, punctuation, and grammar? _4310 Range threshold: pts Edit rating Delete rating 11.0 to > 9.5 pts Excellent Postings are free of grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. _3567 Edit rating Delete rating 9.5 to > 8.5 pts Good Postings are largely free of grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. _8867 Edit rating Delete rating 8.5 to > 6.5 pts Fair Postings contain recurring grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. _6261 Edit rating Delete rating 6.5 to > 0.0 pts Needs Improvement Postings contain recurring and multiple grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. _8033 Edit rating Delete rating 0.0 to > 0 pts Does Not Meet Criteria Does not meet criteria. _2123 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. pts / 11.0 pts — Edit criterion description Delete criterion row This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Description of criterion Range threshold: 5 pts Edit rating Delete rating 5 to > 0 pts Full Marks blank Edit rating Delete rating 0 to > 0 pts No Marks blank_2 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. Discussion: Isotonic Imbalances and Hyponatremia pts / 5 pts — Total Points: 100.0 Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10