Discussion: threats of the Center of Disease Control

Discussion: threats of the Center of Disease Control ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS ON Discussion: threats of the Center of Disease Control Review and synthesize the literature related to the problem as it relates to your selected public organization and cite at least five (5) academic-quality references. This section should be approximately 5 pages. Cite sources APA style. Discussion: threats of the Center of Disease Control In order to have more ideas let me know I can send you more attachments. marie_zanmi_enola_literature_review_.doc _swot_analysis_of_the_cdc. Literature Review Draft Section Review and synthesize the literature related to the problem as it relates to your selected public organization and cite at least five (5) academic-quality references. This section should be approximately 5 pages. Cite sources APA style Rubric PAD 4934 Draft Section Rubric PAD 4934 Draft Section Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent Knowledge Demonstrates an understanding of theoretical concepts, principles and practices, and historical foundations of public administration 1.5 to >1.25 pts Proficient Accurately and appropriately includes and applies relevant theories , principles and practices, historical foundations to conceptualize and communicate the depth and breadth of problem presented 1.25 to >1.0 pts Competent Identifies some major theoretical concepts pertaining to field of public administration but does not consistently apply where relevant; Includes some principles and practices but application is superficial; Some public administration history is included but important historical elements are missing 1.0 to >0 pts Novice Fails to incorporate and apply relevant theoretical concepts, principles and practices, historical foundations of public administration, nor appropriate research methodology Discussion: threats of the Center of Disease Control 1.5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking Identifies and summarizes the problem/question, presents historical analysis of the problem and organizational context, then applies appropriate analytical analysis to decide among competing alternative solutions 1.5 to >1.25 pts Proficient The main problem is identified and articulated in a manner that validates its significance; Principles and practices are incorporated and applied in a substantive manner; Historical foundations relevant for conceptualizing and communicating the depth and breadth of problem are presented; Selects and applies and appropriate method of analysis 1.25 to >1.0 pts Competent Defines the problem and locates it within the current organizational context, but fails to present relevant history; The analytical approach is only descriptive and is not appropriate nor adequate for deciding among competing alternative solutions; 1.0 to >0 pts Novice Fails to identify nor summarize the problem/question accurately, if at all; does not contextualize by presenting the history of the problem nor identify and present organizational context of problem; Fails to present appropriate analysis 1.5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Communication Demonstrate effective written communication by constructing a well-organized research paper in which the focus and content are clearly stated and defined using college-level language, vocabulary and writing conventions 1.0 to >0.75 pts Proficient Problem is clearly stated, defined and assessed; Demonstrates clarity and organization in the development of ideas; Organized transitions used that connect ideas, examples and theoretical concepts. Effective choice of language and vocabulary; Demonstrates competency and knowledge of standard writing conventions and uses these conventions to enhance logic, flow, and readability 0.75 to >0.5 pts Competent Offers reasonably clear ideas that are relevant and important but lacks a substantive assessment of the identified problem; A major portion of the paper presented in a clear, logical, and structured manner. It is generally organized & focused, demonstrating coherence & progression of ideas; Language and vocabulary used for the assignment is adequate.; Formatting appears to reflect attention to grammar, punctuation, spelling, and other conventions, but contains minor errors 0.5 to >0 pts Novice Ideas are poorly developed and vague; Fails to offer clear examples that support arguments; Disorganized and unfocused; Serious problems with clarity and progression of ideas; Fails to present the major components of the assignment in a clear and logical manner; Fails to select and use language and vocabulary appropriate for the assignment; Multiple grammatical and punctuation errors; Poorly formatted; Fails to incorporate and properly cite sources. 1.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Style and Formatting 1.0 to >0.75 pts Proficient The paper is organized and properly formatted based on APA style guidelines; 0.75 to >0.5 pts Competent Provided website links to sources, but does not use APA format consistently 0.5 to >0 pts Novice Did not cite any sources using APA format nor provide website links Discussion: threats of the Center of Disease Control 1.0 pts Total Points: 5.0 PREVIOUS NEXT Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10