Ethical Debate Census Construction

Ethical Debate Census Construction Ethical Debate Census Construction Students will read/view each debate from all other groups and post a 100 – 200-word response to 2 other groups . (Points will be deducted for posts outside of the word parameters.) Each of the responses to the other groups must include: 1. How the student will be able to use the information provided in their practice and 2. At least one question that will stimulate further discussion on the topic. Ethical Debate Census Construction I have attached files of each group debate pick 2 groups to respond to. Ethical Debate Census Construction ethical_debate_census_instructions.docx group_a_.docx group_b_.docx group_c_.docx group_d.docx group_g.docx group_h.docx ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS Instructions: Students will read/view each debate from all other groups and post a 100 – 200-word response to 2 other groups. (Points will be deducted for posts outside of the word parameters.) Each of the responses to the other groups must include: 1. How the student will be able to use the information provided in their practice and 2. At least one question that will stimulate further discussion on the topic. I have attached files of each group debate pick 2 groups to respond to. RUNNING HEAD: CONSENSUS SHOULD A NURSE PROVIDE CARE THEY DO NOT AGREE WITH? Middle Georgia State University Group A 1 CONSENSUS The group came to the conclusion that regardless of what our personal beliefs are, it is our duty to provide care for all patients no matter what their difference in beliefs are. As a group we discussed how we are trained to be self-aware of our own beliefs in order to not be biased. We are sometimes naturally enlightened by our own upbringing and cultural belief, therefore in return has a strong impact on how we may respond to patient’s beliefs. It is our job to provide professional care to all individuals while demonstrating patience and kindness to those who need it. To try and reach this conclusion, the group decided to base its decision from the ANA Code of Ethics. The ANA Code of Ethics are ethical standards that are specifically created for the nursing profession and serve to help nurses use ethical examination and effective decisionmaking when it comes to patient care (“Code of Ethics” 2011). It encompasses the promotion and restoration of health and well-being, the prevention of illness or injury, and the relief of suffering in individuals of all ages, families, communities, and populations. Our review and discussion of this conclusion from the Code of Ethics helped lead us to our conclusion. The conclusion that nurses should provide care to patients with differing beliefs was the group consensus. Nurses are exposed to a wide variety of patients of different cultures, ethnicities, religions, and beliefs. Respect for these differing cultures and beliefs are vital in order to reduce health disparities and improve access to quality healthcare that meets patients’ personal needs. Nurses need to oblige by their patients’ cultural, religious, or personal beliefs in order to establish rapport with the patient as well as establish patient centered care. Patients 2 CONSENSUS should be a nurse’s number one priority. Patients put trust in nurses, and we can keep that trust by respecting their culture and beliefs whether they are different than our own. Nurses need to know how to appropriately care for patients psychically but also need to address their psychosocial needs. When we receive our licensure for nursing we take an oath to practice beneficence, fidelity, veracity, autonomy, and nonmaleficence. Thus after debating back and forth amongst ourselves, the group came to the conclusion that our personal beliefs should not factor into the care of a patient. While we might not agree with the patient’s choice of treatment we concluded that it is our job as a healthcare professional to still give the patient the best care possible under the circumstances. 3 CONSENSUS Citations Code of ethics for nurses with interpretive statements. (2011). American Nurses Association. Running head: CONSENSUS 1 Should Nurses Accept Gifts Consensus Group B Middle Georgia State University CONSENSUS 2 Should Nurses Accept Gifts Consensus Nurses work hard around the clock to provide the best patient care possible. People rely on nurses day in and day out to comfort them and care for all of their needs. Ethical Debate Census Construction These needs can range from the most basic and trivial to trusting them to handle a life or death situation. At times nursing can be physically and emotionally draining for everyone involved. Nurses need to take time to recharge and remember why they became nurses in the first place. For some families, after they have received care from a particularly influential nurse they want to be a part of what helps nurses recharge in giving them a gift. In our groups ethical debate we argued as to whether nurses should be able to receive gifts from patients or not. Each student chose a side and found research from a reputable source to support their opinion and further grow their theory. After each student presented their case and listened to the opposing opinion the general consensus of the group was that nurses should be able to receive gifts. The group felt that nurses work hard to provide the best care possible for their patients. If a nurse is receiving a gift from a patient this probably means the nurse went above and beyond the call of duty to care for the patient. Other arguments supporting this opinon were that it is rude and offensive to decline a gift from a patient, some gifts are trivial such as a box of doughnuts or a gift card to a specific location with a specific amount of money for the nurse, gifts can be harmless, and that nurses at the bachelorette level will be able to make a judgement call as to whether the gift is appropriate or not. Not everyone in the group agreed with the consensus that nurses should be able to accept gifts. A few members of the group felt that receiving gifts from patients can blur boundaries between the nurse and the patient. One student argued that nurses should not expect a gift for simply doing the job they are paid to do. Another student stated that it can put the nurse’s license CONSENSUS 3 in jeopardy if they accept a gift that later comes up as a violation of facility policy. Everyone that disagreed stated that it would be better to avoid the issue of a possible problem by declining the gift all together and explaining to the patient how this can affect the nurse patient relationship so the patient is not offended when the nurse declines the gift. One possible alternative to the situation was to suggest that that family make a donation to a charity that would honor their loved one that the nurse took care of. This would allow the family to be thankful and generous without jeopardizing the nurse. Overall each student used research, critical thinking skills, and group communication to form individual opinions about the ethical debate topic. The group came together to discuss a critical topic in current nursing practice that is important to address as we enter the nursing field. Running head: CONSENSUS 1 Group Consensus: Should a Nurse Participate in Assisted Suicide Group C Middle Georgia State University CONSENSUS 2 Group Consensus: Should a Nurse Participate in Assisted Suicide Nurses are the individuals most involved with patient care. They empathize with patients during difficult times and most importantly, nurses are a patient’s number one advocate. While it is important to advocate for the wishes of the patient, we as a group have made a unanimous decision that participation in assisted suicide is an endeavor that nurses should not endorse. After all, as nurses, we take an oath to do no harm — making assisting in a patient’s suicide entirely unethical. This decision was not made indisputably, as both sides of the debate brought forth valuable arguments. Our group is very diverse, with a varied generational gap and different opinions about suicide in general. Ultimately, we agreed that it is our job as nurses to advocate for our patients and their lives. Nurses take an oath of nonmaleficence, an obligation to avoid causing harm to the patient, and we feel that it would be unethical to take an oath and then assist in this act. Ethical Debate Census Construction While reaching our conclusion, we scoured literature that supported and rejected this practice. We examined anecdotal evidence and scrutinized several case studies of individuals who either used or were contemplating assisted suicide. We explored other options available for nurses which allow us to better support our patients. One of the options discussed was keeping the patients comfortable with pain medications and feedings. This simple approach can change the patient’s experience when approaching the end of their life. It permits the patient to have a peaceful death rather than dying in pain and agony. Care, support and comfort should always be a priority for any patient during palliative care. This allows them to know that they will be able to go peacefully and enjoy their last moments. CONSENSUS 3 Ultimately, one of the defining viewpoints of our decision to not support assisted suicide as nurses is knowing that injury, illness, and lack of or diminished homeostatic function can create a human state of confusion, indecisiveness and at times great suffering. It is ultimately the job of the nurse to continue to rekindle and maintain the flame of hope. By using all our knowledge, training, skill and confidence, nurses care for the sick, the confused, the poor the weak and the suffering just like Florence Nightingale in the late 1800s. Despite our disagreements and debates, our entire group came to the decision that ultimately it is not ethically sound for the nurse to assist in their patient’s suicide. As previously stated, one of our core values is to do no harm and after looking at all the facts we as a group believe that nurse assisted suicide will cause more harm than good. Nurses ultimately should want what is best for their patients and we feel assisted suicide conflicts with that philosophy. Running Head: CONSENSUS PAPER 1 Consensus Paper Group D Middle Georgia State University: NURS 4200 What conclusion did the group come to? CONSENSUS PAPER 2 Our group performed extensive research on the decision for families to be allowed to revoke a loved one’s wishes regarding a written order for a DNR. After receiving feedback from both the opposition and affirmative side, our group concluded that the family should not have the opportunity to disregard their loved one’s wish to have a natural death without life-saving preventative measures. How did you reach this conclusion? Every group member agreed that every individual has the right to decide what medical treatments, if any, should be performed. Various reasons, whether it be the patient’s culture, quality of life or religion was taken in account when making this decision. Patient care should not in any way be standardized but instead individualized due to the fact that everyone has their own outlook and values that they wish to apply toward their own specific lifestyle. Allowing the family to take away the patient’s final wish will in turn be a violation of the patient’s autonomy. Why did you reach this decision? We reached this decision because in the clinical world autonomy and veracity are two very important attributes. All healthcare providers should uphold these attributes, and this should also be the case when it comes to a DNR order. We agreed that a patient decision that is made when they are in the right mind should be upheld. Therefore, when the family or caregivers of said patient want to revoke a DNR, they in a sense are taking away that patient’s autonomy. Did the whole group reach this conclusion? If not, why? The group as a whole did come to this conclusion together. We weighed the facts and opinions on both sides, and ultimately concluded that patient autonomy is a very important right to uphold. Although there are many variables to consider when making this decision, we determined that the decision should ultimately be left to the patient. Ethical Debate Census Construction Therefore, the nurse in this CONSENSUS PAPER situation should be prepared to honor the clients wishes. Lastly, the nurse should be prepared to comfort and console the family in any way possible–as well as educate or explain what is being done in regards to their loved one. 3 Consensus paper Our ethical debate discussed if family should be present during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). After compiling research and becoming more familiar with the advantages and disadvantages, a consensus was developed. It was determined that family should be present during CPR. This conclusion was constructed through research from the works of current healthcare professionals as well as case studies that depicted patient experiences with family presence during CPR. Advantages that were discovered during this research include: families felt like from being present they got to see that healthcare professionals did everything they could to save their loved ones, and many patients felt more comfortable upon awakening when family was present. These advantages largely impacted the decision that was made advocating that family should be present. As nurses, we want families to feel that we did everything we could to save their loved ones, and with family present they have that peace of mind and reassurance. Also, as nurses, we want to help patients and do everything we can to make them feel comfortable and safe during their time in the hospital. If a patient wants their family to be present during CPR, then that is what should happen. The patient should have the ultimate say about if family should be present and what family members they want present. If the patient chooses they do not want family present, then that is their choice, and we support that. We will not encourage a patient not to have family present if that is their wish. These reasons and our own personal beliefs about having family present is why we came to the conclusion to be for having family in the room during CPR. Even though half of our group had to take the opposition side and argue against having family present, the whole group still came to the consensus that family should be present during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Running head: ETHICAL DEBATE CONSENSUS Ethical Debate Consensus Group H Middle Georgia State University 1 ETHICAL DEBATE CONSENSUS 2 Ethical Debate Consensus After thoroughly researching the benefits and negative effects of medical marijuana, we have come to the conclusion that though the nurse’s actions appear controversial, she is well within her role to recommend this therapy to her patients. In fact, we would even go so far as to argue that it is the nurse’s responsibility to properly advocate for the best possible treatment for her patient. It is necessary to understand that legality and ethicality are not always synonymous and legislation or lack thereof might be outdated. This is not to argue that each and every client needs access to marijuana, but therapeutic effects should be considered when weighing the risks. We recognize there are several concerns involving impaired adolescent cognitive development, effects to the patient’s intellect, and lack of research with supporting evidence. With each concern, we have conducted further research determining if the benefit is worth the risk or if these concerns were legitimate affecting the ethicality of the nurse’s actions. In regards to impaired adolescent cognitive development, there is no controlled study yet regarding medical marijuana use and adolescents (Koplewicz). If medical marijuana is treated like other pharmaceutical medications, there are controls with production, dosing, and administration. With appropriate screening, dosage, and physician oversight, low IQ and psychosis are unlikely to adverse effects to the patient. With these factors in consideration, as a group we agree the nurse acted appropriately and her actions were ethically and fundamentally sound. Despite this decision, we argue the importance of being consistently informed of changes within research and the medical community before making healthcare recommendations to clients. Had our research not been so supportive, our findings would have easily swayed against the nurse’s actions. ETHICAL DEBATE CONSENSUS 3 References Koplewicz, H. S., M.D. (n.d.). Does Teenage Marijuana Use Affect IQ? Retrieved April 3, 2019, from https://childmind.org/article/teenage-marijuana-use-affect-iq/ … Purchase answer to see full attachment Student has agreed that all tutoring, explanations, and answers provided by the tutor will be used to help in the learning process and in accordance with Studypool’s honor code & terms of service . Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10

RECOMMENDED: Clinical Decision Making for Tina Jones Paper

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Ethical Debate Census Construction
Get a 15% discount on this Paper
Order Essay

homeworkhelp

Quality Guaranteed

With us, you are either satisfied 100% or you get your money back-No monkey business

Check Prices
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
$0.00
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know that being a student these days is hard. Because of this, our prices are some of the lowest on the market.

Instead, we offer perks, discounts, and free services to enhance your experience.
Sign up, place your order, and leave the rest to our professional paper writers in less than 2 minutes.
step 1
Upload assignment instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
s
Get personalized services with My Paper Support
One writer for all your papers
You can select one writer for all your papers. This option enhances the consistency in the quality of your assignments. Select your preferred writer from the list of writers who have handledf your previous assignments
Same paper from different writers
Are you ordering the same assignment for a friend? You can get the same paper from different writers. The goal is to produce 100% unique and original papers
Copy of sources used
Our homework writers will provide you with copies of sources used on your request. Just add the option when plaing your order
What our partners say about us
We appreciate every review and are always looking for ways to grow. See what other students think about our do my paper service.
IT, Web
Paper was great and accomplished everything I needed.
Customer 452885, October 27th, 2022
Nursing
Amazing work! I passed the assignment!
Customer 452707, August 20th, 2022
Technology
Excellent job on the paper!
Customer 452885, December 28th, 2022
Nursing
Excellent work! Thank you again!
Customer 452707, December 20th, 2022
Technology
i would like if they would attach the turnin report with paper
Customer 452901, August 17th, 2023
Nursing
Thank you so much for being the best website for assignment help.
Customer 452635, June 24th, 2022
Business and administrative studies
Thanks
Customer 452701, August 16th, 2022
Nursing
Thank you so much for being the best website for assignment help.
Customer 452635, June 24th, 2022
Social Work and Human Services
Excellent Work!
Customer 452587, November 30th, 2021
Nursing
Thank you MyCoursebay team for your support. With your help I got an A for my past courses
Customer 452635, May 7th, 2022
Technology
Excelled job on the paper!
Customer 452885, December 28th, 2022
Nursing
Looks good. Thank you!!
Customer 452525, April 27th, 2022
Enjoy affordable prices and lifetime discounts
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Order Now Order in Chat

We now help with PROCTORED EXAM. Chat with a support agent for more details