Literature Evaluation Table

Literature Evaluation Table ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS ON Literature Evaluation Table Details: In nursing practice, accurate identification and application of research is essential to achieving successful outcomes. Being able to articulate the information and successfully summarize relevant peer-reviewed articles in a scholarly fashion helps to support the student’s ability and confidence to further develop and synthesize the progressively more complex assignments that constitute the components of the course change proposal capstone project. Literature Evaluation Table For this assignment, the student will provide a synopsis of eight peer-reviewed articles from nursing journals using an evaluation table that determines the level and strength of evidence for each of the eight articles. The articles should be current within the last 5 years and closely relate to the PICOT statement developed earlier in this course (see attachement). The articles may include quantitative research, descriptive analyses, longitudinal studies, or meta-analysis articles. A systematic review may be used to provide background information for the purpose or problem identified in the proposed capstone project. Use the “Literature Evaluation Table” resource to complete this assignment. While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. Literature Evaluation Table literatureevaluationtable__1_.docx rubric_literature_evaluation_table.docx picot_statement_and_literature_search_2.doc picot_statement_and_li Literature Evaluation Table Student Name: Change Topic (2-3 sentences): Criteria Article 1 Article 2 Article 3 Article 4 Article 5 Article 6 Article 7 Article 8 Author, Journal (PeerReviewed), and Permalink or Working Link to Access Article Article Title and Year Published Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative), and Purposes/Aim of Study Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative) Setting/Sample Methods: Intervention/Instruments Analysis Key Findings Recommendations Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone Project Criteria © 2015. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved. Author, Journal (PeerReviewed), and Permalink or Working Link to Access Article Article Title and Year Published Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative), and Purposes/Aim of Study Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative) Setting/Sample Methods: Intervention/Instruments Analysis Key Findings Recommendations Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone © 2017. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved. Literature Evaluation Table 2 1 Less Than Unsatisfactory 0Satisfactory 7271% 75% 0.00% 75.00% 100.0 %Article Selection 5.0 %Author, Journal (PeerReviewed), and Permalink or Working Link to Access Article Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is not included. 3 Satisfactory 7679% 79.00% 4 Good 80-89% 89.00% Author, journal Author, journal Author, journal (peer-reviewed), (peer-reviewed), (peer-reviewed), and permalink or and permalink or and permalink or working link to working link to working link to access article access article access article section is present, section is present. section is clearly but it lacks detail provided and well or is incomplete. developed. 5.0 %Article Title Article title and and Year Published year published section is not included. Article title and Article title and Article title and year published year published year published section is present, section is present. section is clearly but it lacks detail provided and well or is incomplete. developed. 10.0 %Research Questions (Qualitative) or Hypothesis (Quantitative), and Purposes or Aim of Study Research questions (qualitative) or hypothesis (quantitative), and purposes or aim of study section is not included. Research Research Research questions questions questions (qualitative) or (qualitative) or (qualitative) or hypothesis hypothesis hypothesis (quantitative), (quantitative), (quantitative), and purposes or and purposes or and purposes or aim of study aim of study aim of study section is present, section is present. section is clearly but it lacks detail provided and well or is incomplete. developed. 5.0 %Design (Type Design (type of of Quantitative, or quantitative, or Type of Qualitative) type of qualitative) section is not included. Design (type of Design (type of Design (type of quantitative, or quantitative, or quantitative, or type of type of type of qualitative) qualitative) qualitative) section is present, section is present. section is clearly but it lacks detail provided and well or is incomplete. developed. 5.0 %Setting or Sample Setting or sample Setting or sample Setting or sample Setting or sample section is not section is present, section is present. section is clearly included. but it lacks detail provided and well or is incomplete. developed. 5.0 %Methods: Intervention or Instruments Methods: Intervention or instruments section is not included. Literature Evaluation Table Methods: Methods: Methods: Intervention or Intervention or Intervention or instruments instruments instruments section is present, section is present. section is clearly but it lacks detail provided and well or is incomplete. developed. 5 Excellent 90100% 100.00% Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. Article title and year published section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. Research questions (qualitative) or hypothesis (quantitative), and purposes or aim of study section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. Design (type of quantitative, or type of qualitative) section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. Setting or sample section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. Methods: Intervention or instruments section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. 10.0 %Analysis Analysis section is Analysis section is Analysis section is Analysis section is not included. present, but it present. clearly provided lacks detail or is and well incomplete. developed. Analysis section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. 10.0 %Key Findings Key findings Key findings Key findings Key findings Key findings section is not section is present, section is present. section is clearly section is included. but it lacks detail provided and well comprehensive or is incomplete. developed. and thoroughly developed with supporting details. 10.0 Recommendations Recommendations Recommendations Recommendations Recommendations %Recommendations section is not section is present, section is present. section is clearly section is included. but it lacks detail provided and well comprehensive or is incomplete. developed. and thoroughly developed with supporting details. 10.0 %Explanation Explanation of Explanation of Explanation of Explanation of Explanation of of How the Article how the article how the article how the article how the article how the article Supports EBP or supports EBP or supports EBP or supports EBP or supports EBP or supports EBP or Capstone capstone section capstone section capstone section capstone section capstone section is not included. is present, but it is present. is clearly provided is comprehensive lacks detail or is and well and thoroughly incomplete. developed. developed with supporting details. 10.0 %Presentation The piece is not The work is not The overall The overall The work is well neat or organized, neat and includes appearance is appearance is presented and and it does not minor flaws or general, and generally neat, includes all include all omissions of major elements with a few minor required required required are missing. flaws or missing elements. Literature Evaluation Table The elements. elements. elements. overall appearance is neat and professional. 10.0 %Mechanics of Surface errors are Frequent and Some mechanical Prose is largely The writer is Writing (includes pervasive enough repetitive errors or typos are free of clearly in spelling, that they impede mechanical errors present, but they mechanical command of punctuation, communication of distract the are not overly errors, although a standard, written, grammar, and meaning. reader. distracting to the few may be academic English. language use) Inappropriate Inconsistencies in reader. Correct present. The word choice or language choice and varied writer uses a sentence (register) or word sentence structure variety of construction is choice are and audienceeffective sentence employed. present. Sentence appropriate structures and structure is language are figures of speech. correct but not employed. varied. 5.0 Sources are not Documentation of Sources are Sources are Sources are %Documentation of documented. sources is documented, as documented, as completely and Sources (citations, inconsistent or appropriate to appropriate to correctly footnotes, incorrect, as assignment and assignment and documented, as references, appropriate to style, although style, and format appropriate to bibliography, etc., assignment and some formatting is mostly correct. assignment and as appropriate to style, with errors may be style, and format assignment and numerous present. is free of error. style) formatting errors. 100 %Total Weightage Running Head: PICOT STATEMENT AND LITERATUR SEARCH PICOT Statement and Literature Search March 30, 2018 1 PICOT STATEMENT AND LITERATURE SEARCH 2 PICOT Statement In the modern healthcare, obesity among the adolescent has become one of defining issues. In the United States, the obesity among the youths has reached an alarming rate. As a result, more overweight and obese peoples are being surgically treated for weight loss, thus it makes it important for perioperative RNs to understand the effects of obesity on patient’s health, its contribution to significant comorbidities, the perioperative care requirements, and special needs of bariatric patients. It is important that the perioperative nurses should accurately assess the patients undergoing the bariatric surgery to offer appropriate and safe nursing interventions during the perioperative sequence of care. Literature Evaluation Table The purpose of this paper is to examine whether “does the bariatric adolescent undergoing gastric bypass have better continuity of care postoperatively and perioperatively when the nurse is a primary member of the multidisciplinary team as compared to when the nurses is a secondary member whose only role is to provide perioperative care and has no specialized training.” The paper is basically designed to examine the important roles of nurses in offering the perioperative and postoperative nursing care to bariatric surgical patients. In America, obesity is the second-leading cause of preventable deaths. About 68 percent of the Americans are considered overweight, which affects mostly the health of the patients. Moreover, more than 30 percent of the Americans are considered obese. Therefore, obesity is regarded as a major public health concern that needs to be addressed immediately to avoid further serious comorbidities. Hence, perioperative RNs must understand the unique problems this patient’s populations face to offer safe and adequate care. PICOT STATEMENT AND LITERATURE SEARCH 3 Unlike when the nurses are secondary members whose only role is to offer perioperative care, involving nurses as primary members in the multidisciplinary team approach in both perioperative and postoperative treatment of bariatric patients enhances better continuity of care. This is because coordination of nurses with other multidisciplinary team allows the patients to have access to effective and timely care. Using multidisciplinary team approach is mainly centered on the need-based of the customers as opposed to nursing acting as secondary caregivers. Literature Search Barreca, M., Renzi, C., Tankel, J., Shalhoub, J., & Sengupta, N. (2016). Is there a role for enhanced recovery after laparoscopic bariatric surgery? Preliminary results from a specialist obesity treatment center. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, 12(1), 119126. The article presents a well-researched Meta-Analysis study conducted by Barreca et al (2016) where sample population of 278 members was examined before and after undergoing a bariatric surgery.Literature Evaluation Table It was established that nurse involvement in postoperative treatments as primary care providers are more feasible as compared to when nurses are involved as secondary care providers. Barreca et al (2016) argue that nurses’ involvement in both perioperative and postoperative gastric bypass reduces readmission rates. The reduction in readmission rates emanates from the fact that postoperative care gives an opportunity for the patients to access to immediate care. The study further established that nurses’ involvement in postoperative care after bariatric patients underwent gastric bypass minimize acute postoperative complication that normally delays effective discharge of care. Out of 278 sample population, only 10 percent PICOT STATEMENT AND LITERATURE SEARCH 4 developed postoperative complications when nurses are involved as opposed to 28.5 percent when nurses are not involved. From this statistic, it is clear that nurses’ involvement boosts the recovery days of the patients as well as the satisfaction indexes. Cooley, M. (2017). Preventing Long-term Poor Outcomes in the Bariatric Patient Postoperatively. Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing, 36(1), 30-35. The article provides a systematic study conducted by Cooley (2017) to examine the critical role of nurses in postoperative gastric bypass. Cooley concluded that nurse involvement in postoperative operations is important not in managing acute pain but also in helping to prevent weight regain. With regular visits from nurses, they are in a position to identify the changes in weight and looks for ways of maintaining the right weight. Cooley argues that postoperative care is also important because it assists in early detection and prevention. The study further reveals that direct nurse involvement after gastric bypass is essential in avoiding acute pain. Dogan, K., Kraaij, L., Aarts, E. O., Koehestanie, P., Hammink, E., van Laarhoven, C. J., … & Berends, F. J. (2015). Fast-track bariatric surgery improves perioperative care and logistics compared to conventional care. Obesity surgery, 25(1), 28-35. Dogan et al (2015) provide a randomized controlled study where two groups of 75 consecutive morbidly obese patients were subjected to LRYGB. The study reveals that nurse involvement in both perioperative and postoperative operations reduces hospitalization time and complication rates. The reduced hospitalization originates from the fact that nurse involvement in a multidisciplinary team in postoperative nursing care help in rendering effective care to patients. Since patients have direct contact when nurses are primary care providers, its health and medical complications are minimal. Literature Evaluation Table PICOT STATEMENT AND LITERATURE SEARCH 5 Johnston, M. J., Davis, R. E., Arora, S., King, D., Reissis, Y., & Darzi, A. (2015). Raising the alarm: A cross-sectional study exploring the factors affecting patients’ willingness to escalate care on surgical wards. World journal of surgery, 39(9), 2207-2213. The article presents a cross-sectional study conducted by Johnston et al (2015) where a total of 155 surgical patients from three hospitals were subjected to similar questionnaires to examine their willingness to call for help from nurses as compared to doctors. The study reveals that gastric bypass patients were more willing to solicit the support of nurses as compared to doctors when receiving postoperative and perioperative care. As a result, nurses being a primary participant in both postoperative and perioperative are important because it offers an opportunity for patients to effectively solicit care. In this context, nurse’s involvement makes it easier for patients to access care. Shah, M. M., Hunter, B. W., Sweeney, J. F., Lin, E., Perez, S. D., Parker, C., & Davis Jr, S. S. (2017). Operating Room Efficiency in Bariatric Surgery: The Effect of Team Member Experience on Operative Times in Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass. Bariatric Surgical Practice and Patient Care, 12(3), 100-106. The article offers a randomized controlled study conducted by Shah et al (2017) where sample population of 179 consecutive LRYGB cases was analyzed, it was concluded that surgical times (STs) and total operation times (ORT) are reduced when nurses are involved in the postoperative and perioperative operation. According to Shah et al (2017), nurses involvement as a member of multidisciplinary to access to quick and timely care; hence, reduces the hospital stay. In order for patients to get prompt care, nurses must be knowledgeable about the effects of obesity and treatment options that are effective for the patients. Appropriate and accurate nursing care and interventions help in reducing the hospital stay.Literature Evaluation Table PICOT STATEMENT AND LITERATURE SEARCH 6 The study further reveals that nurse’s involvement as primary care providers helps to reinforce the confidence of patients towards care disseminated. It is clear from this study that the roles of nurses are not only centered on care delivery but also to motivate the patients to develop positive attitudes towards the care. Using the multidisciplinary approach enhances effective sharing of information that improves healthcare delivery. Therefore, the role of nurses should not be ignored. van der Beek, E. S., Monpellier, V. M., Eland, I., Tromp, E., & van Ramshorst, B. (2015). Nutritional deficiencies in gastric bypass patients; incidence, time of occurrence and implications for post-operative surveillance. Obesity surgery, 25(5), 818-823. In a study Meta-analysis study conducted by Van der Beek et al (2015) where a group of 427 gastric bypass patients was subjected to same conditions, it was established that nurse’s being a primary stakeholder is postoperative and perioperative care helps in minimizing nutritional deficiencies that are normally experienced during patient’s care. According to Beek et al, nutritional deficiencies originate from poor management of patients conditions after undergoing gastric bypass. The study emphasizes the importance of preoperative and postoperative assessments and treating patients with full consideration of nutritional deficiencies of patients undergoing gastric bypass surgery. They recommend postoperative and perioperative involvements in order to decrease the incidence of deficiencies. PICOT STATEMENT AND LITERATURE SEARCH 7 References Barreca, M., Renzi, C., Tankel, J., Shalhoub, J., & Sengupta, N. (2016). Is there a role for enhanced recovery after laparoscopic bariatric surgery? Preliminary results from a specialist obesity treatment center. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, 12(1), 119126. Cooley, M. (2017). Preventing Long-term Poor Outcomes in the Bariatric Patient Postoperatively. Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing, 36(1), 30-35. Dogan, K., Kraaij, L., Aarts, E. O., Koehestanie, P., Hammink, E., van Laarhoven, C. J., … & Berends, F. J. (2015). Fast-track bariatric surgery improves perioperative care and logistics compared to conventional care. Obesity surgery, 25(1), 28-35. Johnston, M. J., Davis, R. E., Arora, S., King, D., Reissis, Y., & Darzi, A. (2015). Raising the alarm: A cross-sectional study exploring the factors affecting patients’ willingness to escalate care on surgical wards. World journal of surgery, 39(9), 2207-2213. Shah, M. M., Hunter, B. W., Sweeney, J. F., Lin, E., Perez, S. D., Parker, C., & Davis Jr, S. S. (2017). Operating Room Efficiency in Bariatric Surgery: The Effect of Team Member Experience on Operative Times in Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass. Bariatric Surgical Practice and Patient Care, 12(3), 100-106. Van der Beek, E. S., Monpellier, V. M., Eland, I., Tromp, E., & van Ramshorst, B. (2015). Nutritional deficiencies in gastric bypass patients; incidence, time of occurrence and implications for post-operative surveillance. Obesity surgery, 25(5), 818-823. Literature Evaluation Table Running Head: PICOT STATEMENT AND LITERATUR SEARCH 1 Nice! Great PICOT! You included both qualitative and quantitative research articles! Please remember mechanics for your PICOT. PICOT Statement and Literature Search PICOT STATEMENT AND LITERATURE SEARCH 2 PICOT Statement In the modern healthcare, obesity among the adolescent has become one of defining issues. In the United States, the obesity among the youths has reached an alarming rate. As a result, more overweight and obese peoples are being surgically treated for weight loss, thus it makes it important for perioperative RNs to understand the effects of obesity on patient’s health, its contribution to significant comorbidities, the perioperative care requirements, and special needs of bariatric patients. It is important that the perioperative nurses should accurately assess the patients undergoing the bariatric surgery to offer appropriate and safe nursing interventions during the perioperative sequence of care. The purpose of this paper is to examine whether “does the bariatric adolescent undergoing gastric bypass have better continuity … Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10

RECOMMENDED: Assignment: Professional Nursing Issues