LIU NUR 363 Pressure Injury Prevention Practices in ICU

LIU NUR 363 Pressure Injury Prevention Practices in ICU ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS ON LIU NUR 363 Pressure Injury Prevention Practices in ICU The one that you are going to work on is the file that name (Actual Assignment). You are going to do it based on article name WOUNDS_0818_Pickham.pdf. LIU NUR 363 Pressure Injury Prevention Practices in ICU You are going to follow the file that name (Prof. Example), and the file that name (Student example) was the one that a student had done before but in a different article which is opioid, but you are not going to do it on opioid article which I don’t upload to you. So, you are instead going to do it on the “WOUNDS_0818_Pickham.pdf.” article which I uploaded to you. In the file that name (Actual Assignment) there is a part that highlighted blue and green these parts have done already, you may probably take a look at it to see if there is any correction that is needed, but if you see it’s good, you can just leave it like that and just do those that highlighted in yellow which are the “Evidence Appraisals”, the “Article 1 Appraisal” and the “Synthesis, Conclusion, and Recommendations.” You don’t have to worry about the reference because I already have the reference for it which is: Pickham, D., Pihulic, M., Valdez, A., Mayer, B., Duhon, P., & Larson, B. (2018). Pressure Injury Prevention Practices in the Intensive Care Unit: Real-world Data Captured by a Wearable Patient Sensor. Wounds: A Compendium Of Clinical Research And Practice, 30(8), 229-234. attachment_1 attachment_2 attachment_3 attachment_4 Pressure Ulcer Student’s Name: NUR 363 Research/Evidence for Nursing Long Island University – Brooklyn School of Nursing Your Professor’s Spring 2020 Pressure Ulcer The incidents of pressure Ulcer are most prevalent in patients who are hospitalized in acute care or become mobility impaired like, nursing homes. As a result, an estimate of 1 million pressure ulcers injuries occurs in the United States of America. 2.7% are patients in acute care in ICU and an increase of 2% to 28% in nursing homes (2004 CDC). Research is continuously being reviewed, therefore, new methods and advanced innovations are considered throughout the years. In a recent study researchers have concluded that managing pressure ulcers injuries are different depending on the patients health condition. This research will illustrate q2 hours vs q1 hour turning and positioning patients who are mobility impaired. Moreover, this paper will Explain the effectiveness of managing pressure ulcers by standard of care every 2 hours by nurses and the care team and practising safer methods to reduce pressure ulcer injuries . In this assignment the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Model tools were used( see Appendix A). PICO and Evidence-Based Practice Question As researchers, nurses have proven to be ones to shape the quality of care given to our patients at a satisfactory level therefore, they are the problem solvers and can shape health care policies in the clinical setting by using literature to help identify evidence base questions. There are four components in clinical research base evidence, these are known as PICO. PICO has proven to be effective throughout clinical study and has been used as a guide to help nursing researchers to help address many complex clinical questions. In this study PICO was established to determine if frequent (q1 hour) and positioning decreases pressure ulcer incidence in mobility imparied patients more effectively than standard q2 turning and positioning.. P (population) are mobility imparied patients, I ( intervention) q1 hour turning and position, C (comparison) standard of care every 2 hours, and O (outcome) decrease pressure ulcer incidents (Appendix A). Evidence Appraisals In one paragraph introduce this section. Explain what evidence appraisals are and why they are a part of EBP. CITE textbook. Explain the concept of determining the Level and appraising the Quality of the evidence. Article 1 Appraisal This section is from the appraised article itself, and the Appraisal Tool’s Level rating and Quality rating and narrative “How it answered the EBP question” section . Each team member will write about his/her article appraisal. Note this is a discussion of your APPRAISAL not a review of the article . If you did a good job on your Appraisal you have already written most of the content for this section. See the Example. First, in ONE (or two shorter) paragraph(s) give the title and authors ( see below for APA instructions ). Explain in a few BRIEF sentences the purpose of your article/research – be concise because you will write more about it in the quality appraisal section. Include setting. Don’t put the conclusion here, add that later with the quality section and “how it answered the EBP question” sections. Second, from the Appraisal TOOL describe how/why the level was determined very simply. Cite your Appendix here (your Appraisal Tool). Then in TWO paragraphs, and with details from the article, explain the quality rating – highlight your YES and NO responses to the quality appraisal. This is the main part of the appraisal report. Take this from your quality appraisal section of the Tool. Finally in ONE concise paragraph provide clear details about how the evidence helps answer the EBP question. This IS NOT a summary of the whole article! It is a description of your appraisal of the article. This should be 480-500 words (around 1½) pages per article. Points will be deducted for too short or too long. For APA formatting introduce the article at the beginning of the first paragraph using this format: Example: Smith and Tennant (2015), in the article “Interpreting the Effect of Music Therapy on Older Adults,” identified the key interventions that improved outcomes for care home residents. Since the reader knows you are only writing about the one article you do not need to keep citing throughout your section. Just cite again in the last paragraph using normal in-text citation to close out like this: (Smith & Tennant, 2015). IMPORTANT: the actual completed 5 or 6 appraisal tools will be included in the Appendices at the end of the paper, so reference the specific Appendix early in your section. Article 2 Appraisal Evidence-based practice is used in clinical sitting to help solve problems and to approach or integrate healthcare training and professional experience in patient care. There are criterias on which we need to acknowledge when appraising; the quality, validity and the size of the research. Repeat as abov Article 3 Appraisal Article 4 Appraisal Article 5 Appraisal Article 6 Appraisal (if 6 team members) Synthesis, Conclusion, and Recommendations In one or two paragraphs synthesize and summarize your findings (bring everything together, do not restate each article’s information separately). Then provide a recommendation as to whether the team discovered evidence supporting a full evidence-based practice project to be initiated (which may lead to a change in practice). Your evidence may not support a change. Explain this. You do not need a reference in this paragraph. There should not be any new information in the conclusion. SEPARATE PAGE References In APA format, all sources in paper must appear here. SEPARATE PAGE Appendices That’s all that goes on this page. SEPARATE PAGE LIU NUR 363 Pressure Injury Prevention Practices in ICU Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10