NR 503 Week 1: Healthy People 2020 Impact Paper

NR 503 Week 1: Healthy People 2020 Impact Paper
The National HIV/AIDS Strategy has three primary goals: to reduce the number of new HIV infections, to improve HIV patients’ access to care and health outcomes, and to reduce HIV-related health inequities (HealthyPeople.gov, 2018). Routine HIV screening and diagnosis guidelines include the recommendation for anyone between the ages of 13 and 64 to be tested at least once a year (HealthyPeople.gov, 2018). HIV tests are classified into three types: nucleic acid tests (NAT), antigen/antibody tests, and antibody tests (HealthyPeople.gov, 2018). If a test results in a positive result, the person will be referred to a health care provider for further testing (Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention et al., 2018). ….
This assignment was completed on July 18 at 11:59 p.m.
At the end of Week 1, the Healthy People 2020 Impact Paper must be submitted by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT. This assignment’s
NR 503 Week 1 Healthy People 2020 Impact Paper
guidelines and grading rubric can be found in the Course resources section.
This assignment will follow the late assignment policy specified in the course syllabus.
Rubric
NR503 Week 1 Healthy People 2020
NR503 Week 1 Healthy People 2020
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction of the problem/concern
10.0 pts
Exceptional- Comprehensively identifies the problem/concern.
9.0 pts
Exceeds- Adequately identifies the problem/concern.
8.0 pts
Meets- Identification of problem/concern is limited.
4.0 pts
Needs Improvement- Identification of problem/concern is unclear.
0.0 pts
Developing- Identification of problem/concern is absent.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscussion of the problem
20.0 pts
Exceptional- Background is complete, presents risks, disease impact and includes a review of incidence and prevalence of the disease within the student’s local area, state, and nationally. Evidence supports background.
18.0 pts
Exceeds- Background is complete, presents risk, disease impact and at least one set of incidence and prevalence statistics are presented and supported by evidence.
16.0 pts
Meets- Background missing one or more key points and at least one set of incidence and prevalence statistics are presented. Lack of evidence or limited presentation of the background.
8.0 pts
Needs Improvement- Background missing more than one key point and at least one set of incidence and prevalence statistics are presented, or there is no supported evidence. Unclear conclusions or presentation.
0.0 pts
Developing- Background and significance of the disease is not provided.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentification of Epidemiological Data
20.0 pts
Exceptional- Comprehensive review and analysis of key descriptive epidemiological points of the identified disease and population most at risk, supported by scholarly evidence.
18.0 pts
Exceeds- Adequate review with some analysis of key descriptive epidemiological points of the identified disease and population most at risk supported by scholarly evidence.
16.0 pts
Meets- Limited review and analysis of key descriptive epidemiological points of the identified disease and at-risk population.
8.0 pts
Needs Improvement- Minimal analysis of key descriptive epidemiological points of the identified disease and at-risk population.
0.0 pts
Developing- No analysis of key descriptive epidemiological points of the identified disease and at-risk population is provided.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeHealthy People 2020 Goals
20.0 pts
Exceptional- Comprehensive review of Healthy People 2020 goals for problem.
18.0 pts
Exceeds- Adequate review of Healthy People 2020 goals for problem.
16.0 pts
Meets- Limited review of Healthy People 2020 goals for problem.
8.0 pts
Needs Improvement- Minimal or unclear review of Healthy People 2020 goals for problem.
0.0 pts
Developing- Review of Healthy People 2020 goals for problem not provided.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProgram Plan
20.0 pts
Exceptional- A comprehensive plan of action specific to the problem; including the actions that will be taken to address the impact, outcomes, or prevalence of the disease.
18.0 pts
Exceeds- An adequate, but not fully comprehensive, plan of action specific to the problem; including the actions that will be taken to address the impact, outcomes, or prevalence of the disease.
16.0 pts
Meets- A limited plan of action specific to the problem; including the actions that will be taken to address the impact, outcomes, or prevalence of the disease. The actions are presented with limited or little evidence.
8.0 pts
Needs Improvement- Actions are minimal or unclear, are not supported directly by evidence or are not actions specific to the problem.
0.0 pts
Developing- Plan of action not provided.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format / Writing Mechanics
10.0 pts
Exceptional- APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are accurate, or with zero to one errors.
9.0 pts
Exceeds- Two to four errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted.
8.0 pts
Meets- Five to seven errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted.
4.0 pts
Needs Improvement- Eight to nine errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted or the paper exceeds maximum of two (2) pages.
0.0 pts
Developing- Greater than ten errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation noted or repeatedly makes the same errors after faculty feedback.
10.0 pts
Total Points: 100.0