NURS 5051 Walden Week 4 Mod 8 Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes Paper

NURS 5051 Walden Week 4 Mod 8 Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes Paper NURS 5051 Walden Week 4 Mod 8 Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes Paper Literature Review: The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies Module4 Technologies Supporting Applied Practice and Optimal Patient Outcomes New technology—and the application of existing technology—only appears in healthcare settings after careful and significant research. The stakes are high, and new clinical systems need to offer evidence of positive impact on outcomes or efficiencies. Nurse informaticists and healthcare leaders formulate clinical system strategies. As these strategies are often based on technology trends, informaticists and others have then benefited from consulting existing research to inform their thinking. In this Assignment, you will review existing research focused on the application of clinical systems. After reviewing, you will summarize your findings. nurs_5051_module04_week08_assignment_rubric.docx ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS Name: NURS_5051_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric • • Grid View List View Excellent Good Fair Poor Points Range: 0 Points Range: 77 (0.00%) – 59 (77.00%) – 85 Points Range: 60 (59.00%) (85.00%) (60.00%) – 67 The responses The responses Points Range: 68 (67.00%) In a 4- to 5-page vaguely and accurately and (68.00%) – 76 The responses paper, synthesize inaccurately clearly identify 5 (76.00%) vaguely or the peeridentify less than peer-reviewed The responses inaccurately reviewed 5 peer-reviewed research articles identify 5 peeridentify 5 or less research you articles for the for the reviewed research peer-reviewed reviewed. Be Assignment, or Assignment. articles for the articles for the sure to address are missing. Assignment. Assignment. the following: The responses The responses accurately and The responses The responses · Properly vaguely and thoroughly summarize each summarize each identify 5 peerinaccurately summarize in study reviewed, study reviewed, reviewed articles summarize each detail each study explaining the explaining the selected. study reviewed, reviewed, improvement to improvement to · Summarize explaining the explaining in outcomes, outcomes, each study, improvement to detail the efficiencies, and efficiencies, and explaining the outcomes, improvement to lessons learned lessons learned improvement to efficiencies, and outcomes, from the from the outcomes, lessons learned efficiencies, and application of the application of the efficiencies, and from the lessons learned clinical system clinical system lessons learned application of the from the each peereach peerfrom the clinical system application of the reviewed article reviewed article application of the each peerclinical system described. described that is clinical system reviewed article each peervague or each peerdescribed, or are reviewed article Accurate inaccurate. reviewed article missing. described. examples are described. Be provided which Examples specific and Examples Specific, accurate, support the provided to provide provided to and detailed responses support the examples. support the examples are provided. responses are responses are provided which vague or vague and fully support the inaccurate. inaccurate, or are responses. missing. Written Points Range: 5 Points Range: 4 Points Range: 3.5 Points Range: 0 Expression and (5.00%) – 5 (4.00%) – 4 (3.50%) – 3.5 (0.00%) – 3 Formatting – (5.00%) (4.00%) (3.50%) (3.00%) Excellent Paragraph Paragraphs and Development and sentences follow Organization: writing standards for flow, Paragraphs continuity, and make clear clarity. points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. Written Expression and Points Range: 5 Formatting (5.00%) – 5 English writing (5.00%) standards: Uses correct grammar, Correct spelling, and grammar, punctuation with mechanics, and no errors. proper punctuation Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA Points Range: 5 format for title (5.00%) – 5 page, headings, (5.00%) font, Uses correct APA spacing, margins, format with no indentations, errors. page numbers, running head, parenthetical/intext citations, Good Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Fair Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time. Poor Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. Points Range: 0 Points Range: 4 Points Range: 3.5 (0.00%) – 3 (4.00%) – 4 (3.50%) – 3.5 (3.00%) (4.00%) (3.50%) Contains many (? Contains a few (1- Contains several 5) grammar, 2) grammar, (3-4) grammar, spelling, and spelling, and spelling, and punctuation errors punctuation punctuation that interfere with errors. errors. the reader’s understanding. Points Range: 4 (4.00%) – 4 (4.00%) Contains a few (12) APA format errors. Points Range: 3.5 (3.50%) – 3.5 (3.50%) Contains several (3-4) APA format errors. Points Range: 0 (0.00%) – 3 (3.00%) Contains many (? 5) APA format errors. Excellent Good Fair and reference list. Name:NURS_5051_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric Poor … Purchase answer to see full attachment Student has agreed that all tutoring, explanations, and answers provided by the tutor will be used to help in the learning process and in accordance with Studypool’s honor code & terms of service . Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10