NURS 6052 WU Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry & Systematic Reviews PPT

NURS 6052 WU Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry & Systematic Reviews PPT NURS 6052 WU Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry & Systematic Reviews PPT Your quest to purchase a new car begins with an identification of the factors important to you. As you conduct a search of cars that rate high on those factors, you collect evidence and try to understand the extent of that evidence. A report that suggests a certain make and model of automobile has high mileage is encouraging. But who produced that report? How valid is it? How was the data collected, and what was the sample size? In this Assignment, you will delve deeper into clinical inquiry by closely examining your PICO(T) question. You also begin to analyze the evidence you have collected. NURS 6052 WU Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry & Systematic Reviews PPT To Prepare: Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry. Develop a PICO(T) question to address the clinical issue of interest you identified in Module 2 for the Assignment. This PICOT question will remain the same for the entire course. Use the key words from the PICO(T) question you developed and search at least four different databases in the Walden Library. Identify at least four relevant systematic reviews or other filtered high-level evidence, which includes meta-analyses, critically-appraised topics (evidence syntheses), critically-appraised individual articles (article synopses). The evidence will not necessarily address all the elements of your PICO(T) question, so select the most important concepts to search and find the best evidence available. Reflect on the process of creating a PICO(T) question and searching for peer-reviewed research. The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project) Part 3: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews Create a 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following: Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest. Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest. Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected. Provide APA citations of the four relevant peer-reviewed articles at the systematic-reviews level related to your research question. If there are no systematic review level articles or meta-analysis on your topic, then use the highest level of evidence peer reviewed article. Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, including an explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be specific and provide examples. I UPLOADED MY ASSIGNMENTS FROM MODULE 2 WITH THE RESOURCES USED AND CLINICAL ISSUE. LOOKS LIKE SOME TWEAKS NEED TO BE MADE THIS IS THE FEEDBACK I RECEIVED: Qualitative studies are not the best to use in EBP. Qualitative study the specific group of people but cannot be used to generalize results. You need quantitative studies for that. Some of the strengths you have in the first article are actually weaknesses for generalizability. For instance, samples should be random and purposeful can be biased. If the sample is from one hospital in one unit, it is difficult to generalize the results to a larger population. Please select quantitative studies, this will assist you in determining if your PICOT is acceptable. NURS 6052 WU Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry & Systematic Reviews PPT PART 3: ADVANCED LEVELS OF CLINICAL INQUIRY AND SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS CREATE A 6- TO 7-SLIDE POWERPOINT PRESENTATION IN WHICH YOU DO THE FOLLOWING: · IDENTIFY AND BRIEFLY DESCRIBE YOUR CHOSEN CLINICAL ISSUE OF INTEREST. · DESCRIBE HOW YOU DEVELOPED A PICO(T) QUESTION FOCUSED ON YOUR CHOSEN CLINICAL ISSUE OF INTEREST. · IDENTIFY THE FOUR RESEARCH DATABASES THAT YOU USED TO CONDUCT YOUR SEARCH FOR THE PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLES YOU SELECTED. · PROVIDE APA CITATIONS OF THE FOUR PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLES YOU SELECTED. · DESCRIBE THE LEVELS OF EVIDENCE IN EACH OF THE FOUR PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLES YOU SELECTED, INCLUDING AN EXPLANATION OF THE STRENGTHS OF USING SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS FOR CLINICAL RESEARCH. BE SPECIFIC AND PROVIDE EXAMPLES. — Excellent 81 (81%) – 90 (90%) The presentation clearly and accurately identifies and describes in detail the chosen clinical issue of interest. The presentation clearly and accurately describes in detail the developed PICO(T) question. The presentation clearly and accurately identifies four or more research databases used to conduct a search for the peer-reviewed articles selected. The presentation clearly and accurately provides full APA citations for at least four peer-reviewed articles selected, including a thorough and detailed explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. The presentation includes specific and relevant examples that fully support the research. The presentation provides a complete, detailed, and accurate synthesis of two outside resources related to the peer-reviewed articles selected, and fully integrates at least two outside resources and two or three course-specific resources that fully support the presentation. Good 72 (72%) – 80 (80%) The presentation accurately identifies and describes the chosen clinical issue of interest. The presentation accurately describes the developed PICO(T) question focused on the chosen clinical issue of interest. The presentation accurately identifies at least four research databases used to conduct a search for the peer-reviewed articles selected. The presentation accurately provides APA citations for at least four peer-reviewed articles selected, including an adequate explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. The presentation includes relevant examples that support the research presented. The presentation provides an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource related to the peer-reviewed articles selected. The response integrates at least one outside resource and two or three course-specific resources that may support the presentation. Fair 63 (63%) – 71 (71%) The presentation inaccurately or vaguely identifies and describes the chosen clinical issue of interest. The presentation inaccurately or vaguely describes the developed PICO(T) question focused on the chosen clinical issue of interest. The presentation inaccurately or vaguely identifies at least four research databases used to conduct a search for the peer-reviewed articles selected. The presentation inaccurately or vaguely provides APA citations for at least four peer-reviewed articles selected, including an inaccurate or vague explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. The presentation includes inaccurate or vague examples to support the research presented. The presentation provides a vague or inaccurate synthesis or outside resources related to the peer-reviewed articles selected. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the presentation. Poor 0 (0%) – 62 (62%) The presentation inaccurately and vaguely identifies and describes the chosen clinical issue of interest or is missing. The presentation inaccurately and vaguely describes the developed PICO(T) question, or is missing. The presentation inaccurately and vaguely identifies less than four research databases used to conduct a search for the peer-reviewed articles selected or is missing. The presentation inaccurately and vaguely provides APA citations for at least four peer-reviewed articles selected, including an inaccurate and vague explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research, or is missing. The presentation includes inaccurate and vague examples to support the research presented or is missing. The presentation provides a vague and inaccurate synthesis of no outside resources related to the articles selected and fails to integrate any resources to support the presentation or is missing. WRITTEN EXPRESSION AND FORMATTING—PARAGRAPH DEVELOPMENT AND ORGANIZATION: PARAGRAPHS MAKE CLEAR POINTS THAT SUPPORT WELL-DEVELOPED IDEAS, FLOW LOGICALLY, AND DEMONSTRATE CONTINUITY OF IDEAS. SENTENCES ARE CAREFULLY FOCUSED—NEITHER LONG AND RAMBLING NOR SHORT AND LACKING SUBSTANCE. A CLEAR AND COMPREHENSIVE PURPOSE STATEMENT AND INTRODUCTION IS PROVIDED, WHICH DELINEATES ALL REQUIRED CRITERIA. — Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided, which delineates all required criteria. Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated yet is brief and not descriptive. Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic. Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion are provided. NURS 6052 WU Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry & Systematic Reviews PPT WRITTEN EXPRESSION AND FORMATTING—ENGLISH WRITING STANDARDS: CORRECT GRAMMAR, MECHANICS, AND PROPER PUNCTUATION. — Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Total Points: 100 wk3assgnsingletaryn2.doc wk3assgnsingletaryn.pptx ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS Running head: IDENTIFYING RESEARCH METHODOLOGIES Matrix Worksheet Template Part 2: Identifying Research Methodologies Nikki Singletary Walden University June 2020 IDENTIFYING RESEARCH METHODOLOGIES 2 Matrix Worksheet Template Part 2: Research Methodologies Article #1 Article #2 Article #3 Article #4 Augustine, L., Brown, R., & Hallam, J., Crawford, H., Sands, M., & Aunger, R. (2020). Simone, E. D., Petrelli, E., McCollum, W. (2019). A Nolan, R., DeBois, K., & Determinants of hand hygiene Cammilletti, V., & Muzio, D. Qualitative Case Study Chatfield, S. L. (2017). Hand compliance among nurses in US (2015). Hand Hygiene in Exploring Hand-Hygiene hygiene among healthcare hospitals: A formative research Preventing Nosocomial Standards in an Intensive Care workers: A qualitative meta study. Plos one, 15(4), e0230573. Infections. A Nursing Unit. International Journal of summary using the GRADE- Research, 27(2), 485- Applied Management and CERQual process. Journal of 491. https://doi.org/10.7416/ai.20 Technology, 18(1), 126- Infection Prevention, 18(3), 104- 15.2035 Full citation of selected article 141. https://doi.org/10.5590/IJA 120. https://doi.org/10.1177/17571 © 2018 Laureate Education Inc. 2 IDENTIFYING RESEARCH METHODOLOGIES 3 MT.2019.18.1.09 77416680443 Why you The article was chosen because The article was chosen because it The article was chosen because it chose this it explores the standard hand focuses on the importance of hand addresses hand washing as the best issue because it focuses on the article and/or hygiene that should be provided washing among health workers. measure for preventing hospital- correlation between the nurses’ how it relates in hospital ICUs. The emphasis According to the article, hand- related infections. According to hand hygiene and the preference to the clinical of the article is on hospital- hygiene is an effective way that the author, nurses have frequent for healthcare-associated issue of acquired infections due to poor controls infection transmissions by interaction with patients; thus, they infections. The article has interest hand-hygiene. The article health workers in health settings. need to practice high levels of demonstrated that most of the (include a recommends healthcare workers The article recommends access to hand-hygiene before attending to hospital-associated infections are brief to adhere to the CDC standards adequate training on the need for the patients. Besides, the article related to high nurse workload explanation of hand hygiene to minimize hand-hygiene. identifies the main determinants of and poor hand-hygiene. of the ethics infections in the hospitals. hand-hygiene compliance Intervention strategies such as © 2018 Laureate Education Inc. The article relates to the clinical 3 IDENTIFYING RESEARCH METHODOLOGIES 4 of research practices. related to your hygiene training, and use of hand sanitizer in patient’s rooms. clinical issue of interest) Brief The research article aims to The article aims to establish the The article aims to assess the The research aims to verify if description of explore how non-compliance compliance of hand-hygiene determinants of nurses’ there is a correlation between the the aims of with the CDC standards of among health workers. NURS 6052 WU Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry & Systematic Reviews PPT The article compliance to hand hygiene. Some nursing workload and hospital- the research hand-hygiene increases provides integrated findings from of the factors that have been acquired infections. The research of each peer- hospital-acquired infections. qualitative research reports on the evaluated in the article include demonstrated that there are high reviewed The author explores some of the compliance of hand hygiene by professional roles, social norms, levels of inconsistencies between article behavioral factors and practices nurses worldwide. The article and physical modifications of the healthcare workers and the that influence hand-hygiene establishes that health workers working environment. The author guidelines recommended by compliance in ICUs. believe they have enough hand- assesses how these factors affect WHO. The article indicated that hygiene training, but resource hand hygiene among nurses. the practices that are considered © 2018 Laureate Education Inc. 4 IDENTIFYING RESEARCH METHODOLOGIES 5 support sometimes lacks in health fundamental by WHO in facilities, which compromises the promoting hand-hygiene are hand hygiene. underrated by healthcare workers. Brief The methodology used in the The article used a qualitative The article used a quantitative The article used a qualitative description of article was qualitative research research methodology by research methodology, whereby, methodology that involved a the research that explored non-compliance to integrating various report findings as a sample of 540 surveys were questionnaire with 20 items and methodology the CDC hand-hygiene completed. The researcher used delivered to sample 70 used Be sure practices in the ICUs. The study hygiene. The researcher identified questionnaires to assess factors participants in the study. The to identify if used a sample population from about 36 reports that had such as the professional status, purposive sampling includes 33 the an ICU in a private hospital in qualitative studies on hand social norms, physical nurses and 37 nursing students. methodology Washington, DC. The hygiene among healthcare modifications of the working used was purposeful sample population workers. environment, and social qualitative, included doctors, nurses, and quantitative, patients care technicians in the or a mixed- ICU. from qualitative reports on hand affiliations. © 2018 Laureate Education Inc. 5 IDENTIFYING RESEARCH METHODOLOGIES 6 methods approach. Be specific. A brief The strength of the qualitative The strength of qualitative The strength of the quantitative The strength of the qualitative description of methodology in this research research in the article was to bring methodology in the article was the methodology involved the use of the strengths was because the aim was to a high level of confidence in the use of significant primary data. purposive sampling, which of each of the understand behavioral factors aggregated findings. The The research team was able to get involves nurses and medical research from the perspective of the researcher strengthened the comprehensive data about the nurses. Purposive sampling methodologie participants. Besides, qualitative methodology by using factors influencing hand hygiene improved the reliability and s used, qualitative design is best suited the Critical Appraisal Skills among health workers. The use of validity of the methodology including for studying the complex Program that addresses the design study questionnaires and increased because participants in the reliability and phenomenon in hospitals. The and implementation elements and the validity and reliability of the methodology had direct validity of methodology ensured the allows the researcher to develop a methodology. interaction with the patients. how the validity and reliability of the rating that reflects methodological Besides, the researcher used methodology data because it used purposive limitations. In ensuring the extensive research and literature © 2018 Laureate Education Inc. 6 IDENTIFYING RESEARCH METHODOLOGIES 7 was applied in sampling, whereby only the reliability and validity of the review to ensure that the results each of the participants were only people results, the researcher conducted and conclusions made were valid. NURS 6052 WU Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry & Systematic Reviews PPT peer-reviewed who are involved directly with additional direct research to see if articles you the patients. the findings in the qualitative selected. articles were reliable. Besides, the researcher eliminate all research articles that were not qualitative in design and analysis to increase validity. The article focuses on the need Just as the author concludes, there Based on the findings of the From the article, it can be for hand hygiene in ICUs. As is a need to increase healthcare article, the effective intervention concluded that quality healthcare the article indicates, hand hygiene training and increase of hand-hygiene in hospitals is starts from simple behaviors such washing is one of the effective hygiene resources in healthcare increasing training on hygiene as hand-hygiene. However, the ways that help in minimizing settings. Although healthcare practices. Healthcare facilities researcher indicated that nurse the transmissions of infections providers indicate they have need to establish motivation workload affects the hand- General Notes/Comme nts © 2018 Laureate Education Inc. 7 IDENTIFYING RESEARCH METHODOLOGIES 8 in healthcare settings. enough training on hygiene, it is factors that will encourage hygiene intervention. In my Healthcare providers should important to increase the healthcare workers to adopt hand- understanding, the health of adhere to the CDC guidelines of awareness of hand hygiene to washing behaviors. More hand patients cannot be compromised hand hygiene, especially in reduce hospital-acquired washing points should be due to the workload of nurses. It patients’ rooms. infections. Hospital management established in healthcare facilities is important for nurses who attend should also ensure there are and ensuring that all patient beds patients to adhere to all guidelines enough hand-washing sanitizers in have hand sanitizers to increase and standards of the World Health hospital settings. compliance. Organization to reduce hospitalacquired infections. © 2018 Laureate Education Inc. 8 Nikki Singletary Essentials of Evidence Based Practice Walden University June 2020 Clinical Issue of Interest ? Hand washing among health care workers. ? Hand hygiene should be practiced in all healthcare facilities, through a interventions such as specific training courses, the presence hand sanitizer near patient’s bed or in each patient’s rooms ? Hand washing is one of the effective ways to minimize the spread infections in health care settings Hallam,et al., 2017). ? Healthcare providers are recommended to wash their hands as many times as possible depending in the number of patients they attend and the intensity of healthcare they offer (Augustine, Brown & McCollum, 2019). How keywords were used to search the chosen clinical issue ? In searching relevant data in the chosen clinical issue, I began by formulating the PICOT to identify the keywords in the question. ? The keywords used include hand washing, health care settings, and the hospital- acquired infections ? The key words were used begin the search using the appropriate research databases in the Walden Library that contain different nursing related journals that were helpful in my research. Databases used to conduct the search ? PubMed ? Embase ? Medline ? CINAHL Citations ? Augustine, L., Brown, R., & McCollum, W. (2019). A Qualitative Case Study Exploring Hand-Hygiene Standards in an Intensive Care Unit. International Journal of Applied Management and Technology, 18(1), 126141. https://doi.org/10.5590/IJAMT.2019.18.1.09 ? Hallam, J., Crawford, H., Nolan, R., DeBois, K., & Chatfield, S. L. (2017). Hand hygiene among healthcare workers: A qualitative meta summary using the GRADE-CERQual process. Journal of Infection Prevention, 18(3), 104-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757177416680443 ? Sands, M., & Aunger, R. (2020). Determinants of hand hygiene compliance among nurses in US hospitals: A formative research study. Plos one, 15(4), e0230573. ? Simone, E. D., Petrelli, E., Cammilletti, V., & Muzio, D. (2015). Hand Hygiene in Preventing Nosocomial Infections. A Nursing Research, 27(2), 91-485. https://doi.org/10.7416/ai.2015.2035 … Purchase answer to see full attachment Student has agreed that all tutoring, explanations, and answers provided by the tutor will be used to help in the learning process and in accordance with Studypool’s honor code & terms of service . Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10

RECOMMENDED: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry & Systematic Reviews PPT