NURS-6521 Week 6: Neurologic and Musculoskeletal Disorders Papers

NURS-6521 Week 6: Neurologic and Musculoskeletal Disorders Papers NURS-6521 Week 6: Neurologic and Musculoskeletal Disorders Papers Sabrina is a 26 year old female who has just been diagnosed with multiple sclerosis. She has scheduled an appointment for a follow up with her physician but has several questions about her diagnosis and is calling the Nurse Helpline for her hospital network. As she talks with the advanced practice nurse, she learns that her diagnosis also impacts her neurologic and musculoskeletal systems. Although multiple sclerosis is an autoimmune disorder, both the neurologic and musculoskeletal systems will be affected by adverse symptoms that Sabrina needs to be aware of and for which specific drug therapy plans and other treatment options need to be decided on. NURS-6521 Week 6: Neurologic and Musculoskeletal Disorders Papers ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS As an advanced practice nurse, what types of drugs will best address potential neurologic and musculoskeletal symptoms Sabrina might experience? This week, you will evaluate patients for the treatment of neurologic and musculoskeletal disorders by focusing on specific patient case studies through a decision tree exercise. You will analyze the decisions you will make in the decision tree exercise and reflect on your experiences in proposing the recommended actions to address the health needs in the patient case study. Learning Objectives Students will: Evaluate patients for treatment of neurologic and musculoskeletal disorders Analyze decisions made throughout the diagnosis and treatment of patients with neurologic and musculoskeletal disorders Justify decisions made throughout the diagnosis and treatment of patients with neurologic and musculoskeletal disorders NURS-6521 Week 6: Neurologic and Musculoskeletal Disorders Papers Learning Resources Required Readings (click to expand/reduce) Rosenthal, L. D., & Burchum, J. R. (2018). Lehne’s pharmacotherapeutics for advanced practice providers . St. Louis, MO: Elsevier. Chapter 10, “Basic Principles of Neuropharmacology” (pp. 73–77) Chapter 11, “Physiology of the Peripheral Nervous System” (pp. 79–90) Chapter 12, “Muscarinic Agonists and Antagonists” (pp. 91–107) Chapter 13, “Adrenergic Agonists” (pp. 109–119) Chapter 14, “Adrenergic Antagonists” (pp. 121–132) Chapter 15, “Indirect-Acting Antiadrenergic Agents” (pp. 133–137) Chapter 16, “Introduction to Nervous System Pharmacology” (pp. 139–141) Chapter 17, “Drugs for Parkinson Disease” (pp. 143–158) Chapter 18, “Drugs for Alzheimer Disease” (pp. 159–166) Chapter 19, “Drugs for Epilepsy” (pp. 167–189) Chapter 20, “Drugs for Muscle Spasm and Spasticity” (pp. 191–201) Chapter 57, “Drug Therapy of Rheumatoid Arthritis” (pp. 629–641) Chapter 58, “Drug Therapy of Gout” (pp. 643–651) Chapter 59, “Drugs Affecting Calcium Levels and Bone Mineralization” (pp. 653–672) American Academy of Family Physicians. (2019). Dementia. Retrieved from http://www.aafp.org/afp/topicModules/viewTopicModule.htm?topicModuleId=5 This website provides information relating to the diagnosis, treatment, and patient education of dementia. It also presents information on complications and special cases of dementia. Document: Mid-Term Summary & Study Guide (PDF) Required Media (click to expand/reduce) Laureate Education (Producer). (2019b). Alzheimer’s disease [Interactive media file]. Baltimore, MD: Author. In this interactive media piece, you will engage in a set of decisions for prescribing and recommending pharmacotherapeutics to treat Alzheimer’s disease. Laureate Education (Producer). (2019e). Complex regional pain disorder [Interactive media file]. Baltimore, MD: Author. In this interactive media piece, you will engage in a set of decisions for prescribing and recommending pharmacotherapeutics to treat complex regional pain disorders. Disorders of The Nervous System Reflect on the comprehensive review of disorders of the nervous system and think about how you might recommend or prescribe pharmacotherapeutics to treat these disorders. (15m) Accessible player –Downloads– Download Video w/CC Download Audio Download Transcript Assignment: Decision Tree for Neurological and Musculoskeletal Disorders For your Assignment, your Instructor will assign you one of the decision tree interactive media pieces provided in the Resources. As you examine the patient case studies in this module’s Resources, consider how you might assess and treat patients presenting symptoms of neurological and musculoskeletal disorders. Photo Credit: Getty Images/Science Photo Library RF To Prepare Review the interactive media piece assigned by your Instructor. Reflect on the patient’s symptoms and aspects of the disorder presented in the interactive media piece. Consider how you might assess and treat patients presenting with the symptoms of the patient case study you were assigned. You will be asked to make three decisions concerning the diagnosis and treatment for this patient. Reflect on potential co-morbid physical as well as patient factors that might impact the patient’s diagnosis and treatment. By Day 7 of Week 8 Write a 1- to 2-page summary paper that addresses the following: Briefly summarize the patient case study you were assigned, including each of the three decisions you took for the patient presented. Based on the decisions you recommended for the patient case study, explain whether you believe the decisions provided were supported by the evidence-based literature. Be specific and provide examples. Be sure to support your response with evidence and references from outside resources. What were you hoping to achieve with the decisions you recommended for the patient case study you were assigned? Support your response with evidence and references from outside resources. Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with each of the decisions and the results of the decision in the exercise. Describe whether they were different. Be specific and provide examples. You will submit this Assignment in Week 8. Submission and Grading Information To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following: Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK8Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name. Click the Week 8 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment. Click the Week 8 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area. Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK8Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open . If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database . Click on the Submit button to complete your submission. Grading Criteria To access your rubric: Week 8 Assignment Rubric Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity To check your Assignment draft for authenticity: Submit your Week 8 Assignment draft and review the originality report. Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 8 To participate in this Assignment: Week 8 Assignment ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout. Name: NURS_6521_Week8_Assignment_Rubric. NURS-6521 Week 6: Neurologic and Musculoskeletal Disorders Papers Grid View List View Excellent Good Fair Poor Briefly summarize the patient case study you were assigned, including each of the three decisions you took for the patient presented. Be specific. 18 (18%) – 20 (20%) The response accurately and thoroughly summarizes in detail the patient case study assigned, including specific and complete details on each of the three decisions made for the patient presented. NURS-6521 Week 6: Neurologic and Musculoskeletal Disorders Papers 16 (16%) – 17 (17%) The response accurately summarizes the patient case study assigned, including details on each of the three decisions made for the patient presented. 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) The response inaccurately or vaguely summarizes the patient case study assigned, including details on each of the three decisions made for the patient presented. 0 (0%) – 13 (13%) The response inaccurately and vaguely summarizes the patient case study assigned, including details on each of the three decisions made for the patient presented, or is missing. Based on the decisions you recommended for the patient case study, explain whether you believe the decisions provided were supported by the evidence-based literature. Be specific and provide examples. Be sure to support your response with evidence and references from outside resources. 23 (23%) – 25 (25%) The response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail how the decisions recommended for the patient case study are supported by the evidence-based literature. The response includes specific and relevant outside reference examples that fully support the explanation provided. 20 (20%) – 22 (22%) The response accurately explains how the decisions recommended for the patient case study are supported by the evidence-based literature. The response includes relevant outside reference examples that lend support for the explanation provided that are accurate. 18 (18%) – 19 (19%) The response inaccurately or vaguely explains how the decisions recommended for the patient case study are supported by the evidence-based literature. NURS-6521 Week 6: Neurologic and Musculoskeletal Disorders Papers The response includes inaccurate or vague outside reference examples that may or may not lend support for the explanation provided or are misaligned to the explanation provided. 0 (0%) – 17 (17%) The response inaccurately and vaguely explains how the decisions recommended for the patient case study are supported by the evidence-based literature, or is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague outside reference examples that do not lend support for the explanation provided, or is missing.NURS-6521 Week 6: Neurologic and Musculoskeletal Disorders Papers What were you hoping to achieve with the decisions you recommended for the patient case study you were assigned? Support your response with evidence and references from outside resources. 18 (18%) – 20 (20%) The response accurately and thorough explains in detail what they were hoping to achieve with the decisions recommend for the patient case study assigned. The response includes specific and relevant outside reference examples that fully support the explanation provided. 16 (16%) – 17 (17%) The response accurately explains what they were hoping to achieve with the decisions recommended for the patient case study assigned. The response includes relevant outside reference examples that lend support for the explanation provided that are accurate. 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) The response inaccurately or vaguely explains what they were hoping to achieve with the decisions recommended for the patient case study assigned. The response includes inaccurate or vague outside reference examples that may or may not lend support for the explanation provided or are misaligned to the explanation provided. 0 (0%) – 13 (13%) The response inaccurately and vaguely explains what they were hoping to achieve with the decisions recommended for the patient case study assigned, or is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague outside reference examples that do not lend support for the explanation provided, or is missing. Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with each of the decisions and the results of the decisions in the exercise. Describe whether they were different. Be specific and provide examples. 18 (18%) – 20 (20%) The response accurately and clearly explains in detail any differences between what they expected to achieve with each of the decisions and the results of the decisions in the exercise. The response provides specific, accurate, and relevant examples that fully support whether there were differences between the decisions made and the decisions available in the exercise. 16 (16%) – 17 (17%) The response accurately explains any differences between what they expected to achieve with each of the decisions and the results of the decisions in the exercise. The response provides accurate examples that support whether there were differences between the decisions made and the decisions available in the exercise. 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) The response inaccurately or vaguely explains any differences between what they expected to achieve with each of the decisions and the results of the decisions in the exercise. The response provides inaccurate or vague examples that may or may not support whether there were differences between the decisions made and the decisions available in the exercise. 0 (0%) – 13 (13%) vaguely explains in detail any differences between what they expected to achieve with each of the decisions and the results of the decisions in the exercise, or is missing. The response provides inaccurate and vague examples that do not support whether there were differences between the decisions made and the decisions available in the exercise, or is missing. Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. NURS-6521 Week 6: Neurologic and Musculoskeletal Disorders Papers 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time. Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1–2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3–4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (? 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors. NURS-6521 Week 6: Neurologic and Musculoskeletal Disorders Papers 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1–2) APA format errors 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3–4) APA format errors 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (? 5) APA format errors Total Points: 100 Name: NURS_6521_Week8_Assignment_Rubric Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
NURS-6521 Week 6: Neurologic and Musculoskeletal Disorders Papers
Get a 15% discount on this Paper
Order Essay
Quality Guaranteed

With us, you are either satisfied 100% or you get your money back-No monkey business

Check Prices
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
$0.00
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know that being a student these days is hard. Because of this, our prices are some of the lowest on the market.

Instead, we offer perks, discounts, and free services to enhance your experience.
Sign up, place your order, and leave the rest to our professional paper writers in less than 2 minutes.
step 1
Upload assignment instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
s
Get personalized services with My Paper Support
One writer for all your papers
You can select one writer for all your papers. This option enhances the consistency in the quality of your assignments. Select your preferred writer from the list of writers who have handledf your previous assignments
Same paper from different writers
Are you ordering the same assignment for a friend? You can get the same paper from different writers. The goal is to produce 100% unique and original papers
Copy of sources used
Our homework writers will provide you with copies of sources used on your request. Just add the option when plaing your order
What our partners say about us
We appreciate every review and are always looking for ways to grow. See what other students think about our do my paper service.
Social Work and Human Services
Great Work!
Customer 452587, November 2nd, 2021
Finance
Thank You
Customer 452643, October 24th, 2021
Other
GREAT
Customer 452813, June 25th, 2022
Other
nice
Customer 452813, June 25th, 2022
IT, Web
Excellent job on the paper!
Customer 452885, December 28th, 2022
Psychology
Thank you so very much!!!
Customer 452517, May 11th, 2021
Nursing
Thank you for the outstanding work .
Customer 452635, June 5th, 2022
Classic English Literature
Nicely done. Ty. Worth every penny.
Customer 452455, June 6th, 2021
Wellness
The skilled writer did a GREAT job on assignment. There are a few details I will add, but overall very happy with their work. Thank you
Customer 452547, June 13th, 2021
Social Work and Human Services
Excellent Work!!!!
Customer 452587, November 29th, 2021
Criminal law
Thank You!
Customer 452465, January 29th, 2021
Nursing
Thank you!!!
Customer 452557, June 26th, 2021
Enjoy affordable prices and lifetime discounts
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Order Now Order in Chat

Start off on the right foot this semester. Get expert-written solutions at a 20% discount