Opposition Analysis Paper

Opposition Analysis Paper Opposition Analysis Paper I need an Opposition Analysis for the 3 articles i have attached. 2 articles will will be listed below, while the other one will be attached as a document labeled “counter argument 1?. The instructions are also attached below labeled ” instructions for assignments. This paper will be done in APA format, and also do not forgot to cite the websites in APA format as well. Thanks in advance. I would also like for you to do the first body paragraph about the article discussing palliative care units. Opposition Analysis Paper ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS 1) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC31858… 2) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC32675… instructions_for_assignment.jpg counter_argument_1.pdf JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE Volume 11, Number 8, 2008 © Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2008.0093 Guest Editorial Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia Should Not Be Practiced in Palliative Care Units José Pereira, M.B.Ch.B., M.Sc.,1,2 Dominique Anwar, M.D.,3 Gerard Pralong, M.D.,4 Josianne Pralong, M.D.,5 Claudia Mazzocato, M.D.,2 and Jean-Michel Bigler, M.D.5 Introduction dorsement of a policy that runs counter to international norms and standards of palliative care practice. E UTHANASIA OR PHYSICIAN-SSISTED SUICIDE (PAS) have been legalized in a small number of jurisdictions. Oregon allows PAS, while in The Netherlands both PAS and euthanasia are legal. Belgium permits euthanasia and Luxembourg may follow suite. Although euthanasia is illegal in Switzerland, assisted suicide is allowed and may be performed by nonphysicians.1 In January 2006 the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV) in Lausanne became the first university hospital in Switzerland to allow, under exceptional circumstances, assisted suicide within its walls.2 Staff members, however, are not obliged to provide assisted suicide. In such circumstances, external persons, including members of rightto-die societies, are called in. In early 2007, The Hôpitaux Universitaires of Geneva (HUGE), made a similar decision. Other hospitals in the cantons of Vaud and Geneva are considering instituting similar policies. Current and future palliative care units in these hospitals would therefore be placed in a situation of conforming to these institutional directives. Opposition Analysis Paper. We defend the position that assisted suicide (and euthanasia) should not be allowed in palliative care units because it would place many units, their staff and, in some cases, their patients and families, in untenable positions. Reasons for Not Allowing Assisted Suicide or Euthanasia in Palliative Care Units Sends mixed message to a public that is already poorly informed about palliative care Many members of the public are unaware of palliative care or misinformed about what it represents.6,7 Only 30% of the Canadians could explain what it represented in a 1997 study.6 In a British study, only 18.7% of patients referred to a palliative care service could adequately define the term “palliative care.”7 Allowing assisted suicide and euthanasia within palliative care units, even if the units’ staff members are not directly involved in the practices, would send mixed messages to a public that is already misinformed about palliative care. Source of distress for some patients and families Not all members of the public endorse assisted suicide or euthanasia.8 Patients and families who disagree with assisted suicide or euthanasia may decline admissions to palliative care units for fear of being subjected, either directly or indirectly, to these practices. For some patients, the availability of assisted suicide or euthanasia on a palliative care unit may erode their trust in the unit and the treatments it offers. Source of tension and conflict between palliative care staff Intentionally hastening death is contrary to palliative care philosophy The World Health Organization’s definition states that palliative care does not intentionally hasten death.Opposition Analysis Paper 3 Most regional, national, and international palliative care organizations and societies have adopted this position.4 Several reasons are given to justify this stand, amongst which are the beliefs that these practices are intrinsically wrong, violate professional integrity and may endanger the relationship with the patient.5 Offering assisted suicide (or euthanasia) within palliative care units would therefore mean the en- Health care professionals are divided on the issue of assisted suicide and euthanasia. Although the extent of this division varies from country to country, at least a third to a half of physicians or nurses polled express opposition to or support of the practices.9 Opposition to these practices is particularly strong amongst palliative care professionals; 92% of members of the United Kingdom Association for Palliative Medicine10 and approximately 72% of physicians of the Swiss Palliative Care Society11 do not support the legalization of PAS or euthanasia). However, a small minority are open to its legalization (18% in Switzerland).11 These senti- 1Palliative Medicine Program, University of Lausanne and University of Geneva, Switzerland. Soins Palliatifs, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland. 3Palliative Care Unit, Aubonne CTR, Vaud, EHLC Hôpital d’Aubonne, Unité de soins palliatifs, Aubonne, Switzerland. 4Palliative Care Unit, Lavaux CTR, Hôpital de Lavaux, Unité de soins palliatifs, Cully, Vaud, Switzerland. 5Fondation Rive Neuve Palliative Care Unit, Villeneuve, Vaud, Switzerland. 2Service 1074 ASSISTED SUICIDE IN PALLIATIVE CARE UNITS 1075 ments may mirror the position of Quill and Battin12 who contend that while good palliative care should be a standard of care for those who are dying, strong philosophical and ethical principles support access to PAS as a last resort in those rare circumstances where suffering becomes intolerable despite the best palliative care possible. These contrasting values and views may result in significant tension and conflict between staff members should assisted suicide or euthanasia be allowed on a palliative care unit if not all team members are of the same opinion. Wilkes and colleagues,13 for example, have described how varying views in a palliative care team towards these practices resulted in unresolved tensions that affected their relationship with patients and each other. underling problems. Anecdotal evidence suggests that the dynamics of care may change once patients make a final decision to proceed with assisted suicide or euthanasia.19 The focus changes to making practical preparations for receiving assisted suicide or euthanasia. This can derail the team’s efforts to ameliorate the sources of distress. Source of personal distress for some staff members Negative Repercussions of a Policy that Excludes Assisted Suicide or Euthanasia in Palliative Care Units Staff members with strong or even ambivalent views towards assisted suicide or euthanasia may find themselves in a dilemma.14,15 Hospice nurses and social workers in an Oregon-based study reported conflict between their personal beliefs against PAS and their advocacy for patient autonomy.15 The biggest dilemma arose from the conflict between two important hospice values: honoring patient autonomy versus promoting a death experience in which personal and spiritual transformation are possible. They reported other sources of distress, including a sense of “failure” if their patients ultimately chose to hasten death by PAS, conflicts over whether helping patients redefine quality of life impinges on their autonomy, and conflicts over whether to advocate for the patient when the family is against it. Several subjects felt that they had been drawn into an assisted suicide to a greater extent than they would have liked. Opposition Analysis Paper Stevens16 has highlighted the adverse psychological and emotional effects on some physicians who have participated in euthanasia and/or PAS. Caring for terminally ill patients on a daily basis can, at times, be emotionally taxing. The emotional effects of participating directly or indirectly in assisted suicide, particularly when it runs against ones values, may add additional burden. Professionals who do not support the practice may feel torn between nonabandonment and complicity if patients ask them to be present during the final act. Places palliative care teams in the position of gatekeepers Allowing assisted suicide or euthanasia on palliative care units could place the team in a position of gatekeepers for assisted suicide. The team, for example, may be drawn into mediating between a patient who has requested assisted suicide and a family that disagrees with the request.14 Dynamics of care altered once decision made to proceed with assisted suicide or euthanasia The reasons that prompt patients to request hastening of death are often complex. The wish to hasten death may also fluctuate.17,18 Responding to these underlying problems requires a combination of time, the appropriate interprofessional expertise, and therapeutic relationships between caregivers and patients. A decision to proceed with assisted suicide or euthanasia may halt attempts at addressing the Palliative care units may become “dumping sites” for assisted suicide (or euthanasia) Access to a palliative care unit that allows assisted suicide or euthanasia may prompt some hospital teams to transfer patients with such requests to the palliative care unit rather than be burdened with having to deal with the requests themselves. It would be important to consider the possible negative consequences of disallowing assisted suicide or euthanasia in palliative care units. The specialized interprofessional competencies that these units provide is often the very expertise that is required to address the reasons underlying patients’ requests for assisted suicide. A policy that excludes assisted suicide in these units may prevent some of these patients from being admitted and receiving care that could result in them rescinding their original requests. Patients whose wishes for assisted suicide (or euthanasia) despite palliative care will have to be transferred out of the unit again. This may be perceived as abandonment by patients and families.20 Professionals in the units patients are transferred to may feel unfairly burdened. One strategy to address this potential problem would be to inform patients early on in the relationship that the team does not provide assisted suicide or euthanasia. This would allow them to decide whether or not to continue the relationship or to seek other kinds of support. Conclusions Allowing assisted suicide or euthanasia in palliative care units or hospices is associated with considerable risks. Notwithstanding the respective strengths of the arguments for and against assisted suicide or euthanasia, not including these practices as part of palliative care would seem the most prudent approach at this time. This should not however stop an ongoing constructive and mutually respectful discourse between those against assisted suicide and euthanasia and those in favour of these practices.Opposition Analysis Paper In jurisdictions that allow assisted suicide or euthanasia, palliative care units should be exempted from allowing assisted suicide and euthanasia. As long as the moral permissibility of assisted suicide or euthanasia remain open questions, palliative care units must be permitted to stand outside of the debate, where they can focus on providing care and comfort for patients approaching death. This stand has recently been supported by the CHUV’s administration. Acknowledgment We would like to thank Dr. Harvey Chochinov for his input and advice in preparing the manuscript. 1076 PEREIRA ET AL. References 1. Hurst SA, Mauron A: Assisted suicide and euthanasia in Switzerland: Allowing a role for non-physicians. BMJ 2003;326:271–273. 2. Wasserfallen JB, Chioléro R, Stiefel F: Assisted suicide in an acute care hospital: An 18-month experience. Swiss Med Wkly 2008;138:239–242 3. Sepulveda C, Marlin A, Yoshida T, Ullrich A: Palliative care: The World Health Organization’s global perspective. J Pain Sympt Manage 2002;24:91–96. 4. Materstvedt LJ, Clark D, Ellershaw J, Førde R, Boeck Gravgaard AM, Muller-Busch HC, Porta i Sales J, Rapin CH; EAPC Ethics Task Force: Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide: A view from an EAPC Ethics Task Force. Palliat Med 2003;17:97–101. 5. Foley K, Hendin H:. Introduction: A medical, ethical, legal and psychosocial perspective. In: Foley K, Hendin H (eds): The Case Against Assisted Suicide: For the Right to End-of-Life Care. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2002, pp. 1–14. 6. Claxton-Oldfield S, Claxton-Oldfield J, Rishchynski G: Understanding of the term “palliative care”: A Canadian survey. Am J Hosp Palliat Med 2004;21:105–110. 7. Koffman J, Burke G, Dias A, Raval B, Byrne J, Gonzales J, Daniels C: Demographic factors and awareness of palliative care and related services. Palliat Med 2007;21:145–153. 8. Cohen J, Marcoux I, Bilsen J, Deboosere P, van der Wal G, Deliens L: Trends in acceptance of euthanasia among the general public in 12 European countries (1981–1999). Eur J Pub Health 2006;16:663–669. 9. van der Heide A, Deliens L, Faisst K, Nilstun T, Norup M, Paci E, van der Wal G, van der Maas PJ; EURELD consortium: End-of-life decision-making in six European countries: Descriptive study. Lancet 2003;362:345–350. 10. Finlay IG, Wheatley VJ, Izdebski C: The House of Lords Select Committee on the Assisted Dying for the Terminally Ill Bill: Implications for specialist palliative care. Palliative Medicine 2005;19:444–453. 11. Bittel N, Neuenschwander H, Stiefel F: Euthanasia: A survey by the Swiss Association for Palliative Care. Support Care Cancer 2002;10:265–271. 12. Quill TE, Battin MP: Excellent palliative care as the standard, physician-assisted dying as a last resort. In: Quill TE, Battin MP (eds): Physician Assisted Suicide: The Case For Palliative 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Care and Patient Choice. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2004, pp. 323–333. Wilkes L, White K, Tolley N: Euthanasia: A comparison of the lived experience of Chinese and Australian palliative care nurses. J Adv Nurs 1993;18:95–102. Harvath TA, Miller LL, Smith K, Clark L, Jackson A, Ganzini L: Dilemmas encountered by hospice workers when patients wish to hasten death. J Hosp Palliat Nurs 2006;8:200–209. Ganzini L, Harvath TA, Jackson A, Goy ER, Miller LL, Delorit MA:Experiences of Oregon nurses and social workers with hospice patients who requested assistance with suicide. N Engl J Med 2002;347:582–588. Stevens KR: Emotional and psychological effects of physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia on participating physicians. Issues Law Med 2006;21:187–200. Chochinov HM, Wilson KG, Enns M, Mowchun N, Lander S, Levitt M, Clinch JJ: Desire for death in the terminally ill. Am J Psychiatry 1995;152:1185–1191. Wilson KG, Scott JF, Graham ID, Kozak JF, Chater S, Viola RA, de Faye BJ, Weaver LA, Curran D: Attitudes of terminally ill patients toward euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. Arch Intern Med 2000;160:2454–2460. Zylicz Z: Palliative care and euthanasia in the Netherlands: Observations of a Dutch physician. In: Foley K, Hendin H (eds): The Case Against Assisted Suicide: For the Right to Endof-Life Care. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2002, pp. 122–143. Battin MP: Is a physician ever obligated to help a patient die? In: Emanuel LL (ed): Regulating How We Die: The Ethical, Medical and Legal Issues Surrounding Physician-Assisted Suicide. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998, pp. 21–47. Address reprint requests to: José Pereira, M.B.Ch.B. Service de Soins Palliatifs Hôpital Nestlé, 4émé étage, local 4005 CHUV Avenue Pierre-Decker 5 Lausanne CH -1011 Switzerland E-mail: [email protected] … Purchase answer to see full attachment. Opposition Analysis Paper Student has agreed that all tutoring, explanations, and answers provided by the tutor will be used to help in the learning process and in accordance with Studypool’s honor code & terms of service . Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Opposition Analysis Paper
Get a 15% discount on this Paper
Order Essay
Quality Guaranteed

With us, you are either satisfied 100% or you get your money back-No monkey business

Check Prices
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know that being a student these days is hard. Because of this, our prices are some of the lowest on the market.

Instead, we offer perks, discounts, and free services to enhance your experience.
Sign up, place your order, and leave the rest to our professional paper writers in less than 2 minutes.
step 1
Upload assignment instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
Get personalized services with My Paper Support
One writer for all your papers
You can select one writer for all your papers. This option enhances the consistency in the quality of your assignments. Select your preferred writer from the list of writers who have handledf your previous assignments
Same paper from different writers
Are you ordering the same assignment for a friend? You can get the same paper from different writers. The goal is to produce 100% unique and original papers
Copy of sources used
Our homework writers will provide you with copies of sources used on your request. Just add the option when plaing your order
What our partners say about us
We appreciate every review and are always looking for ways to grow. See what other students think about our do my paper service.
Human Resources Management (HRM)
Thank you for your service.
Customer 452701, March 6th, 2023
Criminal Justice
Looks good! Thank you Jason
Customer 452711, January 25th, 2022
Paid for the paper to be completed 5 days prior than the day I received the paper.
Customer 452693, July 13th, 2022
The skilled writer did a great job on assignment!! Thank you!!
Customer 452547, June 16th, 2021
Human Resources Management (HRM)
The paper was delivered on time and I am very pleased with the writer's work.
Customer 452701, June 21st, 2023
Human Resources Management (HRM)
Could've been more wordage but the paper is accepatable.
Customer 452701, August 23rd, 2023
Customer 452813, June 30th, 2022
Social Work and Human Services
Excellent Work!!!!
Customer 452587, November 29th, 2021
Social Work and Human Services
Excellent Work
Customer 452587, November 22nd, 2021
Human Resources Management (HRM)
Thanks for the paper.
Customer 452701, September 15th, 2023
Social Work and Human Services
Thank you for the great job
Customer 452469, February 3rd, 2021
Top notch quality!
Customer 452453, February 16th, 2023
Enjoy affordable prices and lifetime discounts
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Order Now Order in Chat

Ensure originality, uphold integrity, and achieve excellence. Get FREE Turnitin AI Reports with every order.