philosophy paper
You WILL HAVE TO read & understand Singer’s and O’Neill’s ethical point of view and apply it to the topic. Animal Rights Topic: You have decided to become an urban farmer and put a chicken coop in your backyard. You intend to use the chickens for their eggs, and once they stop producing eggs you will treat them as your friends until they become elderly. When they become elderly you intend to humanely kill them and eat them. What would Singer say about the ethics of this situation? What about ONeill? Below you will find an outline for a potential paper: OUTLINE FOR PAPER 2: X versus Ys View Introductory Paragraph (please look at your template below): Template: In this paper I will discuss (philosophers name)s argument in (article title) and (philosophers name)s argument in (article title). Specifically, I will discuss Xs and Ys view on (insert topic here). While X believes A, Y believes B. I will argue (X v Y) is right and that (A v B). I will first present Xs view that A. I will then present Ys view that B. After this exegesis, I will present my original argument that Bs view is better than As view. I will look at one objection to my view before responding to it. Finally I will draw some conclusions about this topic. Introductory Paragraph: __Introduction sentence (a): __Something brief about both views (c): __Thesis statement (d): __Roadmap (e): Exegesis / Background Section (each exegesis should be multi-paragraphs; 2 pages for each, minimum 800 words)? Exegesis on X: -What is their thesis? -How do they argue for this? -What terms will you have to define? Define all of your terms! Exegesis on Y: (2 pages) -What is their thesis? -How do they argue for this? -What terms will you have to define? Define all of your terms! III. Your Argument. (2 pages) My first premise is ..My support for this premise is . My second premise is .My support for this premise is . My third premise is My support for this premise is These reasons support my thesis statement that is that Xs account is better than Ys. Someone might object to my X premise by stating that This is not unreasonable because However, I would respond to my objector by saying that Conclusion: __Provide a multi-sentence conclusion detailing what you have done in the paper (following the guidelines below): In this paper, I argued that Xs account is better than Ys account. I did this by first presenting Xs account, followed by a rehearsal of Ys account. I then presented my argument that Xs account is superior for three reasons: first, Xs is better than Ys; second, Xs better than Ys; finally, Xs account does .While this debate might seem overly academic, if we are to understand the importance of morality in society, we need to figure out the correct moral principles.
With us, you are either satisfied 100% or you get your money back-No monkey business