Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome Current Event

Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome Current Event ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS ON Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome Current Event FIRST PART: -Find an article with “current” information. Use the guideline of “within the last 5 years.” A quick Google search should be helpful for you. Add “in the news” or “research” to help retrieve current events. (Example search: Parkinson’s disease in the news, or Autism research). Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome Current Event -In the Initial discussion post, describe the disorder (1-2 paragraphs) and give a brief summary of the article (1-2 paragraphs). The article might include new advancements in care or new treatment options. -Give an open ended question, which will aid your classmates in adding to your discussion. -Cite (in the text) AND Reference (at the end of the text) your article in APA format. If you are tech savvy, a link to the article might be helpful for classmates. -See the rubric for grading details SECOND PART: In a separate paper answer the following question to discuss it with the class. Minimum one paragraph -How does an insulin pump compare/contrast to multiple insulin injections? attachment_1 Current Event Grading Rubric Current Event Grading Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts Substantial post Selection of appropriate topic. Use of “topic save” by posting early the intended content to be covered, so classmates will not choose the same topic. Use of “current” (published within the last 5 years) article. Clearly summarizes the article. Discusses all new advancements in care or treatment options. 3.0 pts Full Marks All assignment instructions met for selecting, saving, and summarizing current (within 5 years) article. Provides clear, concise summary discussing both the pathophysiology of the disease/condition AND the advances in treatment or care discussed by the article. 2.0 pts Good All assignment instructions met for selecting, saving, and summarizing current (within 5 years) article. However, summary lacks discussion of BOTH the pathophysiology of the disease/condition AND advances in treatment or care. OR Assignment instructions not met (posting/saving and/or current–within 5 years– article used). (1 missing element = 2 points) 1.0 pts Fair Assignment instructions not met (saving topic choice, article is not current–within last 5 years), AND Summary is lacking clarity AND/OR does not provide information about pathophysiology of the condition AND/OR does not provide new trends in treatment or care of the disorder. (3 elements missing = 1point) 0.0 pts Poor Assignment instructions not followed. Summary is short, not descriptive, does not define disease/condition/ AND does not describe new trends in treatment and care. 3.0 pts Citations and References Citations and references are correct including adequate number of in-text citations to clearly delineate intellectual property. 2.0 pts Full Marks Both the current event article, and the supporting references are BOTH cited appropriately throughout the text (in-text) and in the reference section. If article does not well define the pathophysiology, outside source (textbook ok) was used and correctly cited, so article is substantive. Summary is provided in student’s OWN WORDS with limited use of quotes, but is appropriately cited. 1.5 pts Good 1-2 mistakes in citations in text or in reference section OR Missing 1 appropriate reference (reference provided for article but not for any other information cited that was not referenced in the article). AND/OR summary is not provided in student’s OWN WORDS or Many direct quotes used. (1 element missing = 1.5) 1.0 pts Fair 3 or more mistakes in citations in text or in reference section AND/OR inappropriate references provided (citation does not match information in article). AND/OR Missing 1 appropriate reference (reference provided for article but not for any other information cited that was not referenced in the article). AND/OR summary is not provided in student’s OWN WORDS AND/Or Many direct quotes used. (2-3 elements missing = 1) 0.0 pts Poor 3 or more mistakes in citations in text or in reference section AND inappropriate references provided (citation does not match information in article). AND Missing 1 appropriate reference (reference provided for article but not for any other information cited that was not referenced in the article). ANDsummary is not provided in student’s OWN WORDS ANDMany direct quotes used. (4 elements missing = 0) 2.0 pts Open-ended question provided Original post is concluded with the use of an open-ended question to promote discussion within the group. 1.0 pts Full Marks Question provided is BOTH open-ended AND substantive enough to elicit active discussion from classmates. 0.5 pts Fair Question provided is missing one element: Either not truly open-ended or not substantive enough to elicit active discussion from classmates. (example of not substantive: ‘Thoughts?’ “What do you think?”–should be more specific to the content) 0.0 pts No Marks Question missing 1.0 pts Spelling/Grammar Less than three spelling, grammar or formatting mistakes in the Initial post and Reply Post. Posts are in the Discussion Area (NOT as attachments). 1.0 pts Full Marks No more than 2 spelling, grammar or formatting mistakes in the Initial post and Reply Post AND posts are submitted in the Discussion Area (NOT as attachments). 0.5 pts Good 3 or more spelling, grammar or formatting mistakes in the Initial post and Reply Post OR posts are not appropriately submitted in the Discussion Area, but are attached instead. 0.0 pts Poor 3 or more spelling, grammar or formatting mistakes in the Initial post and Reply Post AND posts are not appropriately submitted in the Discussion Area, but are attached instead. 1.0 pts Reply to classmates’ post Reply is provided to a classmate who wrote on a different topic than the student’s. AND the reply is substantial and adds new or alternating information to the discussion. Citations are appropriately used and are current. 3.0 pts Full Marks Reply is provided to a classmate who wrote on a different topic than the student’s. AND the reply is substantial and adds new or alternating information to the discussion. Citations are appropriately used and are current. 2.0 pts Good Reply i is substantial and adds new or alternating information to the discussion. Citations are appropriately used and are current, BUT student replied to same topic as was covered in original project. 1.0 pts Fair Reply is provided for differing topic than student’s original post, but lacks substantive evidence. Does not provide new or alternating information, and/or does not facilitate in-depth discussion. 0.0 pts No Marks Reply missing OR Reply involves only 1-2 sentences. 3.0 pts Total Points: 10.0 Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10