Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Case Study

Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Case Study ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS ON Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Case Study FIRST PART: Create a fictitious patient. Give history of present illness, including subjective (what the patient tells the nurse) and objective (what the nurse finds on assessment) information. University of Central Florida NUR 3125 Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Case Study -Give pertinent lab findings. -State disorder/medical diagnosis. -Discuss in 1-2 paragraphs the pathophysiology of the disorder. Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Case Study -Follow the rubic in order to get full points -Discuss treatment options. -Discuss what the nurse needs to educate the patient about (include any cultural, psychosocial, legal or ethical implications also) -End with an open ended question. -Give citations (in text) AND references (list at end) in APA format. SECOND PART: In a separate paper answer the following question to discuss it with the class. Minimum one paragraph -How can you tell the difference between cellulitis and lipodermatosclerosis? attachment_1 Case Study Grading Rubric Criteria Ratings Points Possible Substantial post: Has met all requirements outlined in assignment directions 5.0 pts Excellent Excellent creation of fictitious patient. Provides background, history of present illness (including both subjective and objective information. States disorder/medical diagnosis. Provides pertinent lab findings that match disease process. Provides 1-2 paragraphs regarding the pathophysiology of the disorder. Discusses treatment options. Identifies education that should be provided to the patient including cultural, psychosocial, legal or ethical implications). 4.0 pts Very Good Missing only one of these elements: Excellent creation of fictitious patient. Provides background, history of present illness (including both subjective and objective information. States disorder/medical diagnosis. Provides pertinent lab findings that match disease process. Provides 1-2 paragraphs regarding the pathophysiology of the disorder. Discusses treatment options. Identifies education that should be provided to the patient including cultural, psychosocial, legal or ethical implications). 3.0 pts Good Missing 2 of these elements: Excellent creation of fictitious patient. Provides background, history of present illness (including both subjective and objective information. States disorder/medical diagnosis. Provides pertinent lab findings that match disease process. Provides 1-2 paragraphs regarding the pathophysiology of the disorder. Discusses treatment options. Identifies education that should be provided to the patient including cultural, psychosocial, legal or ethical implications). 2 pts Fair Missing three to four of these elements: Excellent creation of fictitious patient. Provides background, history of present illness (including both subjective and objective information. States disorder/medical diagnosis. Provides pertinent lab findings that match disease process. Provides 1-2 paragraphs regarding the pathophysiology of the disorder. Discusses treatment options. Identifies education that should be provided to the patient including cultural, psychosocial, legal or ethical implications). 0 pts No Marks Five or more errors throughout. Lacks appropriate clinical information. 5 Spelling/Grammar Less than three spelling, grammar or formatting mistakes in the Initial post. Initial Post is in the Discussion Area (NOT as an attachment) 1.0 pts Full Marks 0-2 spelling, grammar or formatting mistakes in the Initial post. Initial Post is in the Discussion Area (NOT as an attachment). 0.5 pts Fair Three or more spelling, grammar or formatting mistakes in the Initial post OR the Initial Post is in the Discussion Area (NOT as an attachment) (Only one of these elements has issues for score of 1) 0.0 pts No Marks Three or more spelling, grammar or formatting mistakes in the Initial post AND the Initial Post is in the Discussion Area (NOT as an attachment) (Grading: both elements have issues for score of 0) 1 Promoting Group Discussion Post is concluded with an open-ended question to promote discussion within the group. 1.0 pts Excellent Original post is concluded with an open-ended question to promote discussion within the group. Question is specific to the case, and promotes thoughtful reflection and group discussion. 0.5 pts Fair Either question is not truly in the open ended format, or it lacks substance to promote thoughtful reflection and group discussion 0.0 pts No Marks Post not concluded with question to promote group discussion. 1 References and Citations Citations and references are correct including adequate number of in-text citations to clearly delineate intellectual property. 3.0 pts Full Marks Both in-text and reference section is appropriate and includes 0-2 mistakes. References are appropriate for creation of case. 2.0 pts Good Both in-text and reference section is appropriate but includes 3-4 mistakes OR references are not appropriate for creation of case (ex: lab source is not from research based evidence or textbook). 1.0 pts Fair Both in-text and reference section is appropriate but includes 3-4 mistakes AND references are not appropriate for creation of case (ex: lab source is not from research based evidence or textbook). (both of these elements have issues for rating of 1 fair) 0.0 pts No Marks References missing 3 Reply posts are substantial and add to the discussion topic. Replies of 1-2 sentence will earn zero points. 4.0 pts Full Marks Reply is substantial and adds new or alternating information to the discussion. Asks questions necessary for the care of the fictitious patient. Citations from evidence-based research are appropriately used and are current. 3.0 pts Good Reply is substantial but does not add new or alternating information to the discussion AND/OR does not questions necessary for the care of the fictitious patient AND/OR Citations from evidence-based research are appropriately used and are current. (1 issue with any of these elements = 3 good) 2.0 pts Fair Reply is substantial but does not add new or alternating information to the discussion AND does not questions necessary for the care of the fictitious patient AND Citations from evidence-based research are appropriately used and are current. (both elements have issues for grading of 2 fair) 0.0 pts No Marks Reply missing or includes only 1-2 sentences 4 Reply Post: spelling/grammar Less than three spelling, grammar or formatting mistakes in the Initial post and Reply Post. Posts are in the Discussion Area (NOT as attachments). 1.0 pts Full Marks No more than 1-2 spelling/grammar mistakes in reply to classmate. 0.5 pts Fair 3-4 spelling/grammar mistakes in the reply to a classmate. 0.0 pts No Marks 5 or more spelling/grammar mistakes in reply to classmate OR uploads as an attachment instead of submitting to discussion. 1 Total points earned 15 Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10