Rational or political model of an organization Decision making

Rational or political model of an organization Decision making Rational or political model of an organization Decision making In a rapidly changing organization, are decisions more likely to be made using the rational or political model of organization The student must then post a reply of at least 400 words. For each thread, students must support their assertions with scholarly citations in APA format. Each reply must incorporate scholarly citations in APA format. Any sources cited must have been published within the last five years. • At least 1 scholarly article or biblical integration; Discussion Board 4 you think it is possible for an outsider to accurately discern about the underlying cultural values of an organization by analyzing symbols, ceremonies, dress, or other observable aspects of culture in comparison to an insider with several years of work experience? Select a percentage (e.g., 10%, 70%, etc.) and explain your reasoning. ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS It is possible for an outside to accurately discern and recognize the underlying cultural values of an organization by doing some research about the company and the culture within a particular country. It is challenging to put a direct percentage on an outsider’s perception because each person is different. There are two levels of corporate culture. The top level (surface) is where people observe the way people dress and act, the physical layouts of the company, power structures, symbols used by the company, stories and ceremonies that the employees share. The bottom level are those things that go deeper and under the surface. They are the underlying values (openness, relationship, fairness, and teamwork), assumptions, beliefs, attitudes, and feeling (Daft, 2016). What you see on the outside will expose what is going on under the surface. The scripture that comes to mind is Luke 6:45, “A good man out of the good treasure of his heart bringeth forth that which is good; and an evil man out of the evil treasure of his heart bringeth forth that which is evil: for of the abundance of the heart his mouth speaketh” (KJV). A noted organization theorist once said, ”Pressure for change originates in the environment. Pressure for stability originates within the organization.” Do you agree? Change means to make a shift from one thing to another or replacing something for another. Not everyone likes change. Some like things just the way they are, but in order to grow one must change. Many companies have a tendency to change when the environment forces them to change in order to handle the competition, technology advances, and other pressures. They must be willing to move with the times and adjust their operation process. The organization ought to change its approach to survive, thrive, and grow. There is a quote that I saw once, “If we don’t change, we don’t grow. If we don’t grow, we aren’t really living.” Changes in the environment usually create pressure for changes to be made whether it be in a business or our own personal lives. According to Daft, there are four types of innovation and change that managers focus on within an organization and they are strategy and structure, products and services, culture, and technology (2016). Stability is the ability to withstand a short-term problem for example, a reduction in sales or a loss of a significant employee or customer. A growing and prosperous company is one that can support the employees of the company well. Stability truly comes from the decisions made at the core of a company. This happens within so that growth and progress can occur (Daft, 2016). If managers frequently use experience and intuition to make complex, non-programmed decisions, how do they apply evidence-based management (which seems to suggest that managers should rely on facts and data)? Managers may have a situation that arises that they have never seen before and do not know exactly how to handle it so they use non-programmed decisions. They are based on judgment, intuition and creativity because the answer is not found in a procedures manual. It will require some assessing, brainstorming, observation and some trial and error (Wroblewski, 2019). Evidence-based management is an obligation is made to make more informed, educated and intelligent decisions based on evidence and facts. When managers seek out the evidence, they can avoid faulty assumptions. The financial and operation outcome will be better than making non-programmed decisions. A manager can create an environment which will allow them to make decisions based on experience and data that is collection in order for accurate reporting and accounting (Daft, 2016). In a rapidly changing organization, are decisions more likely to be made using the rational or political model of organization? Rapidly changing organizations must remain flexible and innovative while also maintaining stability through change. In order for an organization to improve the quality of decision making process you need both the rational and political model. A rational model is when a goal is consistent and clearly defined and problems can be logically solved. This model is limited to reasonably simple problems. A company can use this method when time is available and you can go through the systematic and logical process. There may be less rivalry and debate between the managers and others in the decision making process because everything is already outlined clearly. The political model of an organization is when goals are not specific or agreed upon because there are different views and values which bring about a conflict. This model may be detrimental to the company as a whole because it may bring about favoritism or unfair advantages (Daft, 2016). A study was used in The Netherlands on a particular decision making project. The political decision making process was used in the second phase and rational decision making was in the third phase (Kolbe, 2019). They were all a contribution to the different phase of decision making. An article stated that if people do not consider all the variables taking place in a situation than you take the risk of being wrong in our assumptions (Veiga, 2019). This is why it is good to use both models when making a decision.What biblical implications should be included/addressed? How can/should a biblical worldview be applied?The world is always changing and God commands us to change if we want to grow in Him. Just like a company needs to make some changes if they want to continue to grow and become successful with the competition. Change is an integral part of the personal and business development journey and should be embraced. The Bible teaches us the importance of changing and growing. One example is found in Romans 12:2, “And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God” (KJV). Another example is found in Ephesians 4:20-24, “But ye have not so learned Christ; If so be that ye have heard him, and have been taught by him, as the truth is in Jesus: That ye put off concerning the former conversation the old man, which is corrupt according to the deceitful lusts; And be renewed in the spirit of your mind; And that ye put on the new man, which after God is created in righteousness and true holiness” (KJV). There is another scripture reference that refers to providing evidence to back up the facts. Jesus provided proof to his apostles in Acts 1:3, “To whom also he shewed himself alive after his passion by many infallible proofs, being seen of them forty days, and speaking of the things pertaining to the kingdom of God” (KJV). There is proof that the Bible is true through archaeology findings and other historical writings. References Daft, R. L. (2016). Organization theory & design (12th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning. ISBN: 9781285866345. Kolbe, L. M., Bossink, B., & de Man, A. (2019). Contingent use of rational, intuitive and political decision-making in R&D. Management Decision, 58(6), 997-1020. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-02-2019-0261 Viega, H. (2019). The Neuroscience of Political Decision-Making. Foundation for Economic Education. Retrieved from https://fee.org/articles/the-neuroscience-of-political-decision-making/ Wroblewski, M.T. (2019). What is the Difference Between Programmed and Unprogrammed Decisions From a Business Perspective? Chron. Retrieved from https://smallbusiness.chron.com/difference-between-programmed-unprogrammed-decisions-business-perspective-25876.html Answer preview to in a rapidly changing organization, are decisions more likely to be made using the rational or political model of organization Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10