[SOLVED] M1D2: What Kind of Terrorists are They?
This activity addresses module outcome 3. Upon completion of this activity, you will be able to:
MO3: Explain why the term terrorism is oftentimes used in a pejorative manner, despite the definitions we work with actually strive for objectivity. (CO1)
Respond to the following:
It is clear that historical circumstances and social context have had a powerful impact on the ways in which the term terrorism has been used. Often, it is used pejoratively as a political label. Yet, we know that many of terrorism’s actual practitioners have never shied away from its use. They have tended to be unapologetic about terrorism and justify it as being necessary.
Expanding upon your M1D1 discussion, explore the characteristics of terrorism that lend themselves toward pejorative connotations. Then define terrorism objectively, as a kind of ‘war-fighting strategy,’ enabling materially- or numerically-weaker forces to confront civil societies, and powerful nations and armies, through the use of ‘force-multipliers’ and the strategies and tactics of ‘asymmetric warfare’. Finally, discuss the traits that you would look for if you were building a terrorism database. What kinds of events would you include in the database? Which ones would you exclude?
Use the EC Library resources to properly cite your work (Login to the EC Library is required):
Homeland Security and Emergency Management Research Guide (Links to an external site.)
APA Citation Help (Links to an external site.)
Your main post should be at least 200 words in length, in APA format, and include citations and references, as needed. Post your primary response no later than Thursday of each module. This is a “post first” discussion forum, which means you must submit your initial post before you can view other students’ posts. Read any postings already provided by your instructor or fellow students. Read and respond to the conclusions drawn by at least two of your classmates. Remember to read the feedback to your own major postings and reply to it throughout the module.
Consult the Discussion Posting Guide for information about writing your discussion posts. It is recommended that you write your post in a document first. Check your work and correct any spelling or grammatical errors. When you are ready to make your initial post, click on “Reply.” Then copy/paste the text into the message field, and click “Post Reply.”
To respond to a peer, click “Reply” beneath her or his post and continue as with an initial post.
Evaluation
This discussion will be graded using the SPS Default Discussion Rubric. Please review this rubric, located on the Rubrics page within the Start Here module of the course, prior to beginning your work to ensure your participation meets the criteria in place for this discussion. All discussions combined are worth 20% of your final course grade.
Also Read: [Solved] Theory of Terrorism
With us, you are either satisfied 100% or you get your money back-No monkey business