[Solved] Movie Critique

HN3140 Moneyball Assignment #2Moneyball: Analytics Case StudyInstructions Write a critique of how Billy Beane adopted the use of analytics in managing the talent of the Oakland Athletics baseball team. Your critique should be no more than 500 words and no less than 300 words.Questions to answer in your critique:1. What was the difference between the business problem Billy Beane was trying to solve and the business problem his talent scouts were trying to solve?2. How did Peter Brand value baseball players? What key metric of a player did he determine won baseball games?3. Why was the team in last place in their division after they had started to implement the use of analytics in choosing their players?4. What issues did Billy Beane have in implementing the use of analytics? What should he have done differently?5. What superstition (irrational belief) did Billy Beane have?HN3140 Moneyball Assignment #2Expectations for FormatProfessional Very Good Acceptable At Risk Unacceptable 5 4 3 2 1AssignmentContent(10)All assignment requirements are fully met: o Critique covers allquestions o Critique detailed andmultifaceted o Demonstrates anunderstanding of case. All required content is fully developed No irrelevant contentAssignment requirements are adequately met: o Critique covers allquestions o Critique detailed ormultifaceted o Demonstrates anunderstanding of case. Content is adequately developedSome development of assignment requirements, but not fully met: o Critique covers 75% of allquestions o Critique detailed ormultifaceted o Demonstrates someunderstanding of case. Some content is not fully developed May contain some irrelevant contentMinimal development of assignment requirements: o Critique covers 50% ofall questions o Critique is broad andgeneral o Demonstrates a limitedunderstanding of the case.Content is insufficient and/or irrelevantLittle or no development of assignment requirements: o Critique covers less than50% of all questions o No demonstratedunderstanding of the organizationMinimal content and/or irrelevant content throughoutAssignment Format and Sections(5)Wordcount met Format is correct and professional throughoutMinimum Wordcount is met and overage is within 5% Format is mostly correct and professional, with some errorsMinimum Wordcount is met and overage is within 10% Some format errors such as unprofessional margins or spacing.Minimum Wordcount is met Weak, unprofessional format.Wordcount is not met No attempt at appropriate formattingFluencyand Tone(5)Ideas are logically arranged Paragraphing is skillfully managed, with natural transitions Sentences flow seamlessly and naturally Tone is professional throughoutIdeas are mostly logically arranged, well enough to allow reader comprehension Paragraphing is adequately managed, with some errors/awkwardness Sentences flow but lack seamless, natural quality of level 5 Tone is mostly professional, with some errors in registerSome ideas are logically arranged Paragraphing is poorly managed, possibly lacking in transitions Sentences flow somewhat awkwardly Tone is often unprofessional, with many errors in registerFew ideas are logically arranged Appropriate paragraphing is largely absent, with no transitions Sentences feel disjointed and awkwardly linked Tone is mostly unprofessional, often too casual and conversational, possibly with slangNo logical organization of paragraphs or sentences Difficult to follow ideas No paragraphing Sentences very and difficult to read Tone is slangy and unprofessional throughoutGrammar(5)A wide range of structures used Consistently correct Superior style, with impactful phrasing Less than 3 spelling, grammar or punctuation errorsSome variety of structures Generally correct; minor errors do not affect clarity or readability Adequate style, with some impactful phrasing Less than 5 spelling, grammar or punctuation errorsSomewhat limited variety of structures Errors are more frequent and somewhat affect clarity and readability Unimpactful style Less than 7 spelling, grammar or punctuation errorsLittle variety; structures are repetitious Errors are very frequent and limit clarity and readability. No demonstration of style More than 7 spelling, grammar or punctuation errorsNo variety; student demonstrates no knowledge of sentence structure and connectives Sentences are consistently incorrect and seriously distort clarity Spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors throughout the documentTotal /25 marks

So much stress and so little time? We’ve got you covered. Get your paper proofread, edited or written from scratch within the tight deadline.