article critique quantitative or qualitative research

article critique quantitative or qualitative research article critique quantitative or qualitative research hello i have attached an instruction for the paper in the box below. so the paper is basically a critique on an article, but it as to be in either quantitative or qualitative research and answer the question under it. below is a link to list of articles you can choose from to review. http://coursewareobjects.elsevier.com/objects/burn… i didnt pick an article because i want you to be in control of what you would like to write about. but if you want me to pick what article and research form (quantitative or qualitative) pls let me know asap (also let me know if the link opens or not) n400_articlecritiquecriteria_1___1_.doc ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS Bowie State University School of Professional Studies Bowie, Maryland 20715 Department of Nursing NURS 400 Quantitative Research Evaluation Listed below are criteria that you will use to critique your primary research article. Discuss how the investigator satisfied each criterion. Cite relevant passages in the articles, with reference to page number if appropriate. Don’t merely respond “yes” or “no’ to the presence or absence of each criterion—you must provide examples and rationale for your response. Introduction – 6 points 1. Is the purpose of the study presented? 2. Is the significance (importance) of the problem discussed? 3. Does the investigator provide a sense of what he or she is doing and why? Problem statement – 6 points 1. Is the problem statement clear? 2. Does the investigator identify key research questions and variables to be examined? 3. Does the study have the potential to help solve a problem that is currently faced in clinical practice? Literature review – 6 points 1. Does the literature review follow a logical sequence leading to a critical review of supporting and conflicting prior work? 2. Is the relationship of the study to previous research clear? 3. Does the investigator describe gaps in the literature and support the necessity of the present study? Theoretical framework and hypotheses – 6 points 1. Is a rationale stated for the theoretical/conceptual framework? 2. Does the investigator clearly state the theoretical basis for hypothesis formulation? 3. Is the hypothesis stated precisely and in a form that permits it to be tested? Methodology – 10 points 1. Are the relevant variables and concepts clearly and operationally defined? 2. Is the design appropriate for the research questions or hypotheses? 3. Are methods of data collection sufficiently described’? 4. What are the identified and potential threats to internal and external validity that were present in the study? 5. If there was more than one data collector, was inter-rater reliability adequate? Sample – 6 points 1. Are the subjects and sampling methods described? 2. Is the sample of sufficient size for the study, given the number of variables and design? 3. Is there adequate assurance that the rights of human subjects were protected? Instruments – 5 points 1. Are appropriate instruments for data collection used? 2. Are reliability and validity of the measurement instruments adequate? Data analysis – 5 points 1. Are the statistical tests used identified and the values reported? 2. Are appropriate statistics used, according to level of measurement, sample size, sampling method, and hypotheses/research questions? Results – 6 points 1. Are the results for each hypothesis clearly and objectively presented? 2. Do the figures and tables illuminate the presentation of results’? 3. Are results described in light of the theoretical framework and supporting literature? Conclusions/discussion –12points 1. Are conclusions based on the results and related to the hypotheses’? 2. Are study limitations identified? 3. Are generalizations made within the scope of the findings? 4. Are implications of findings discussed (i.e., for practice, education, and research)? 5. Are recommendations for further research stated? Research utilization implications – 15 points 1. Is the study of sufficient quality to meet the criterion of scientific merit’? 2. Is the study of relevance to practice? 3. Is the study feasible for nurses to implement? 4. Do the benefits of the study outweigh the risks? Use of proper format (APA), grammar, spelling, and punctuation – 17 points Student Paper General Requirements and Guidelines 1. All papers must be typewritten or printed on standard 81/2 x 11 inch white bond paper. The type-face should be times roman or courier. article critique quantitative or qualitative research Do not use bold or other styles of type. Limit the use of italicized words. 2. All papers must have a title page that includes a page header, running head, title and author’s name and affiliation. 3. All papers must have margins of at least 1 inch at the top, bottom, left, and right of every page. Do not justify the right margin and do not hyphenate words at the end of a line. 4. The entire paper must be double-spaced including the reference list. 5. The first line of every paragraph in the paper must be indented 5 spaces. 6. There must be only 1 space after commas, colons, semi-colons, punctuation marks at the end of sentences, and periods after initials. 7. Headings may be used to organize the paper into sections. 8. The reference list must include only those references cited in the text of the paper. 9. All ideas that are not your own must be cited within the text of the paper and referenced in the reference list. Failure to do so is PLAGIARISM. 11. Limit the use of direct quotes by paraphrasing ideas taken from references. These paraphrases do need to include citation of the author(s). 12. The citation after direct quotes must include the page number of the reference that is being quoted. TOTAL POINTS ________ Qualitative Research Evaluation Listed below are criteria that you will use to critique your primary research article. Discuss how the investigator satisfied each criterion. Cite relevant passages in the articles, with reference to page number if appropriate. Don’t merely respond “yes” or “no’ to the presence or absence of each criterion—you must provide examples and rationale for your response. Statement of the phenomenon of interest – 6 points 1. Is the phenomenon of interest clearly identified? 2. Has the researcher identified why the phenomenon requires a qualitative format? 3. Has the researcher described the philosophic underpinnings of the research? Purpose – 5 points 1. Has the researcher made explicit the purpose of conducting the research? 2. Does the researcher describe the projected significance of the work to nursing? Method – 6 points 1. Is the method used to collect data compatible with the purpose of the research? 2. Is the method adequate to address the phenomenon of interest? 3. If a particular approach is used to guide the inquiry, does the researcher complete the study according to the processes described? Sampling – 9 points 1. Does the researcher identify the target and accessible population? 2. What sampling method was used? 3. What are the characteristics or inclusion criteria for the sample? Data collection – 15 points 1. Is data collection focused on human experience? 2. Does the researcher describe data collection strategies (i.e., interview, observation, field notes)? 3. Is protection of human participants addressed and if so how? 4. Is saturation of the data described? 5. Has the researcher made explicit the procedures for collecting data? Data analysis – 20 points 1. Does the researcher describe the strategies used to analyze the data? 2. Has the researcher remained true to the data? 3. Does the reader understand the procedures used to analyze the data? State the procedure 4. Does the researcher address the credibility, auditability, and fittingness of the data? Credibility a. Do the participants recognize the experience as their own? Auditability a. Can the reader follow the researcher’s thinking? b. Does the researcher document the research process? Fittingness a. Can the findings be applicable outside the study situation? b. Are the results meaningful to individuals not involved in the research? 5. Is the strategy used for analysis compatible with the purpose of the study? Findings – 10 points 1. Are the findings presented within a context? 2. Is the reader able to grasp the essence of the experience from the report of the findings? 3. Are the researcher’s conceptualizations true to the data? 4. Does the researcher place the report in the context of what already is known about the phenomenon? Conclusion, implications, and recommendations – 12 points 1. Do the conclusions, implications, and recommendations give the reader a context in which to use the findings? article critique quantitative or qualitative research 2. Do the conclusions reflect the study findings? 3. Does the researcher offer recommendations for future study? 4. Has the researcher made explicit the significance of the study to nursing? Use of proper format (APA), grammar, spelling, and punctuation – 17 points Student Paper General Requirements and Guidelines 1. All papers must be typewritten or printed on standard 81/2 x 11 inch white bond paper. The type-face should be times roman or courier. Do not use bold or other styles of type. Limit the use of italicized words. 2. All papers must have a title page that includes a page header, running head, title and author’s name and affiliation. 3. All papers must have margins of at least 1 inch at the top, bottom, left, and right of every page. Do not justify the right margin and do not hyphenate words at the end of a line. 4. The entire paper must be double-spaced including the reference list. 5. The first line of every paragraph in the paper must be indented 5 spaces. 6. There must be only 1 space after commas, colons, semi-colons, punctuation marks at the end of sentences, and periods after initials. 7. Headings may be used to organize the paper into sections. 8. The reference list must include only those references cited in the text of the paper. 9. All ideas that are not your own must be cited within the text of the paper and referenced in the reference list. Failure to do so is PLAGIARISM. 11. Limit the use of direct quotes by paraphrasing ideas taken from references. These paraphrases do need to include citation of the author(s). 12. The citation after direct quotes must include the page number of the reference that is being quoted. TOTAL POINTS ________ … Purchase answer to see full attachment Student has agreed that all tutoring, explanations, and answers provided by the tutor will be used to help in the learning process and in accordance with Studypool’s honor code & terms of service . Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10

article critique quantitative or qualitative research article critique quantitative or qualitative research hello i have attached an instruction for the paper in the box below. so the paper is basically a critique on an article, but it as to be in either quantitative or qualitative research and answer the question under it. below is a link to list of articles you can choose from to review. http://coursewareobjects.elsevier.com/objects/burn… i didnt pick an article because i want you to be in control of what you would like to write about. but if you want me to pick what article and research form (quantitative or qualitative) pls let me know asap (also let me know if the link opens or not) n400_articlecritiquecriteria_1___1_.doc ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS Bowie State University School of Professional Studies Bowie, Maryland 20715 Department of Nursing NURS 400 Quantitative Research Evaluation Listed below are criteria that you will use to critique your primary research article. Discuss how the investigator satisfied each criterion. Cite relevant passages in the articles, with reference to page number if appropriate. Don’t merely respond “yes” or “no’ to the presence or absence of each criterion—you must provide examples and rationale for your response. Introduction – 6 points 1. Is the purpose of the study presented? 2. Is the significance (importance) of the problem discussed? 3. Does the investigator provide a sense of what he or she is doing and why? Problem statement – 6 points 1. Is the problem statement clear? 2. Does the investigator identify key research questions and variables to be examined? 3. Does the study have the potential to help solve a problem that is currently faced in clinical practice? Literature review – 6 points 1. Does the literature review follow a logical sequence leading to a critical review of supporting and conflicting prior work? 2. Is the relationship of the study to previous research clear? 3. Does the investigator describe gaps in the literature and support the necessity of the present study? Theoretical framework and hypotheses – 6 points 1. Is a rationale stated for the theoretical/conceptual framework? 2. Does the investigator clearly state the theoretical basis for hypothesis formulation? 3. Is the hypothesis stated precisely and in a form that permits it to be tested? Methodology – 10 points 1. Are the relevant variables and concepts clearly and operationally defined? 2. Is the design appropriate for the research questions or hypotheses? 3. Are methods of data collection sufficiently described’? 4. What are the identified and potential threats to internal and external validity that were present in the study? 5. If there was more than one data collector, was inter-rater reliability adequate? Sample – 6 points 1. Are the subjects and sampling methods described? 2. Is the sample of sufficient size for the study, given the number of variables and design? 3. Is there adequate assurance that the rights of human subjects were protected? Instruments – 5 points 1. Are appropriate instruments for data collection used? 2. Are reliability and validity of the measurement instruments adequate? Data analysis – 5 points 1. Are the statistical tests used identified and the values reported? 2. Are appropriate statistics used, according to level of measurement, sample size, sampling method, and hypotheses/research questions? Results – 6 points 1. Are the results for each hypothesis clearly and objectively presented? 2. Do the figures and tables illuminate the presentation of results’? 3. Are results described in light of the theoretical framework and supporting literature? Conclusions/discussion –12points 1. Are conclusions based on the results and related to the hypotheses’? 2. Are study limitations identified? 3. Are generalizations made within the scope of the findings? 4. Are implications of findings discussed (i.e., for practice, education, and research)? 5. Are recommendations for further research stated? Research utilization implications – 15 points 1. Is the study of sufficient quality to meet the criterion of scientific merit’? 2. Is the study of relevance to practice? 3. Is the study feasible for nurses to implement? 4. Do the benefits of the study outweigh the risks? Use of proper format (APA), grammar, spelling, and punctuation – 17 points Student Paper General Requirements and Guidelines 1. All papers must be typewritten or printed on standard 81/2 x 11 inch white bond paper. The type-face should be times roman or courier. article critique quantitative or qualitative research Do not use bold or other styles of type. Limit the use of italicized words. 2. All papers must have a title page that includes a page header, running head, title and author’s name and affiliation. 3. All papers must have margins of at least 1 inch at the top, bottom, left, and right of every page. Do not justify the right margin and do not hyphenate words at the end of a line. 4. The entire paper must be double-spaced including the reference list. 5. The first line of every paragraph in the paper must be indented 5 spaces. 6. There must be only 1 space after commas, colons, semi-colons, punctuation marks at the end of sentences, and periods after initials. 7. Headings may be used to organize the paper into sections. 8. The reference list must include only those references cited in the text of the paper. 9. All ideas that are not your own must be cited within the text of the paper and referenced in the reference list. Failure to do so is PLAGIARISM. 11. Limit the use of direct quotes by paraphrasing ideas taken from references. These paraphrases do need to include citation of the author(s). 12. The citation after direct quotes must include the page number of the reference that is being quoted. TOTAL POINTS ________ Qualitative Research Evaluation Listed below are criteria that you will use to critique your primary research article. Discuss how the investigator satisfied each criterion. Cite relevant passages in the articles, with reference to page number if appropriate. Don’t merely respond “yes” or “no’ to the presence or absence of each criterion—you must provide examples and rationale for your response. Statement of the phenomenon of interest – 6 points 1. Is the phenomenon of interest clearly identified? 2. Has the researcher identified why the phenomenon requires a qualitative format? 3. Has the researcher described the philosophic underpinnings of the research? Purpose – 5 points 1. Has the researcher made explicit the purpose of conducting the research? 2. Does the researcher describe the projected significance of the work to nursing? Method – 6 points 1. Is the method used to collect data compatible with the purpose of the research? 2. Is the method adequate to address the phenomenon of interest? 3. If a particular approach is used to guide the inquiry, does the researcher complete the study according to the processes described? Sampling – 9 points 1. Does the researcher identify the target and accessible population? 2. What sampling method was used? 3. What are the characteristics or inclusion criteria for the sample? Data collection – 15 points 1. Is data collection focused on human experience? 2. Does the researcher describe data collection strategies (i.e., interview, observation, field notes)? 3. Is protection of human participants addressed and if so how? 4. Is saturation of the data described? 5. Has the researcher made explicit the procedures for collecting data? Data analysis – 20 points 1. Does the researcher describe the strategies used to analyze the data? 2. Has the researcher remained true to the data? 3. Does the reader understand the procedures used to analyze the data? State the procedure 4. Does the researcher address the credibility, auditability, and fittingness of the data? Credibility a. Do the participants recognize the experience as their own? Auditability a. Can the reader follow the researcher’s thinking? b. Does the researcher document the research process? Fittingness a. Can the findings be applicable outside the study situation? b. Are the results meaningful to individuals not involved in the research? 5. Is the strategy used for analysis compatible with the purpose of the study? Findings – 10 points 1. Are the findings presented within a context? 2. Is the reader able to grasp the essence of the experience from the report of the findings? 3. Are the researcher’s conceptualizations true to the data? 4. Does the researcher place the report in the context of what already is known about the phenomenon? Conclusion, implications, and recommendations – 12 points 1. Do the conclusions, implications, and recommendations give the reader a context in which to use the findings? article critique quantitative or qualitative research 2. Do the conclusions reflect the study findings? 3. Does the researcher offer recommendations for future study? 4. Has the researcher made explicit the significance of the study to nursing? Use of proper format (APA), grammar, spelling, and punctuation – 17 points Student Paper General Requirements and Guidelines 1. All papers must be typewritten or printed on standard 81/2 x 11 inch white bond paper. The type-face should be times roman or courier. Do not use bold or other styles of type. Limit the use of italicized words. 2. All papers must have a title page that includes a page header, running head, title and author’s name and affiliation. 3. All papers must have margins of at least 1 inch at the top, bottom, left, and right of every page. Do not justify the right margin and do not hyphenate words at the end of a line. 4. The entire paper must be double-spaced including the reference list. 5. The first line of every paragraph in the paper must be indented 5 spaces. 6. There must be only 1 space after commas, colons, semi-colons, punctuation marks at the end of sentences, and periods after initials. 7. Headings may be used to organize the paper into sections. 8. The reference list must include only those references cited in the text of the paper. 9. All ideas that are not your own must be cited within the text of the paper and referenced in the reference list. Failure to do so is PLAGIARISM. 11. Limit the use of direct quotes by paraphrasing ideas taken from references. These paraphrases do need to include citation of the author(s). 12. The citation after direct quotes must include the page number of the reference that is being quoted. TOTAL POINTS ________ … Purchase answer to see full attachment Student has agreed that all tutoring, explanations, and answers provided by the tutor will be used to help in the learning process and in accordance with Studypool’s honor code & terms of service . Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10