Assignment: Cancer Among Muslim Women in Canada Early Detects Research
Assignment: Cancer Among Muslim Women in Canada Early Detects Research
Assignment: Cancer Among Muslim Women in Canada Early Detects Researchv ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS ON Assignment: Cancer Among Muslim Women in Canada Early Detects Research The points to be edited based on instructor feedback are :(where only point 4 and point 6 were met) so 7 points need to be addressed: 1. COMPLETE? (not met) DOES THE PROSPECTUS CONTAIN ALL THE REQUIRED ELEMENTS? REFER TO THE ANNOTATED OUTLINE TO SEE THE REQUIRED PARTS OF THE DOCTORAL STUDY PROSPECTUS DOCUMENT. not met COMMENTS:IF NOT MET , WHICH ITEMS ARE MISSING? Assignment: Cancer Among Muslim Women in Canada Early Detects Research 2. MEANINGFUL? (not met) HAS A MEANINGFUL PROBLEM OR GAP IN PRACTICE AS SUPPORTED IN THE RESEARCH LITERATURE BEEN IDENTIFIED? IN OTHER WORDS, IS ADDRESSING THIS PROBLEM THE LOGICAL NEXT STEP, GIVEN THE PREVIOUS EXPLORATORY AND CONFIRMATORY RESEARCH (OR LACK THEREOF) ON THIS TOPIC? IT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE TO SIMPLY REPLICATE PREVIOUS RESEARCH FOR A DOCTORAL DEGREE. not met COMMENTS: IF NOT MET , WHAT IS THE REASONING FOR THIS ASSESSMENT? 3. JUSTIFIED?(not Met) IS EVIDENCE PRESENTED THAT THIS PROBLEM IS SIGNIFICANT TO THE DISCIPLINE AND/OR PROFESSIONAL FIELD? THE PROSPECTUS SHOULD PROVIDE RELEVANT STATISTICS AND EVIDENCE, DOCUMEN TABLE DISCREPANCIES, AND OTHER SCHOLARLY FACTS THAT POINT TO THE SIGNIFICANCE AND URGENCY OF THE PROBLEM. Not met COMMENTS: IF NOT MET , IN WHAT AREAS IS ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE NEEDED? 4. GROUNDED?(Met) IS THE PROBLEM FRAMED TO ENABLE THE RESEARCHER TO EITHER BUILD UPON OR COUNTER THE PREVIOUSLY PUBLISHED FINDINGS ON THE TOPIC? FOR MOST FIELDS, GROUNDING INVOLVES ARTICULATING THE PROBLEM WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF A THEORETICAL BASE OR CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK. ALTHOUGH MANY APPROACHES CAN GROUND A STUDY IN THE SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE, THE ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENT IS THAT THE PROBLEM IS FRAMED SUCH THAT THE NEW FINDINGS WILL HAVE IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PREVIOUS FINDINGS. met COMMENTS: IF NOT MET , WHAT OTHER THEORIES OR FRAMEWORKS MIGHT BE MORE APPROPRIATE? . 5-ORIGINAL?(notbMt) DOES THIS STUDY HAVE POTENTIAL TO MAKE AN ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION? THE PROBLEM MUST BE AN AUTHENTIC PUZZLE THAT NEEDS SOLVING, NOT MERELY A TOPIC THAT THE RESEARCHER FINDS INTERESTING. ADDRESSING THE PROBLEM SHOULD RESULT IN AN ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION TO THE FIELD OR DISCIPLINE. COMMENTS: IF NOT MET , HOW COULD THE STUDY MAKE A MORE ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION? not met 6. IMPACT? met DOES THIS STUDY HAVE POTENTIAL TO AFFECT POSITIVE SOCIAL CHANGE? AS DESCRIBED IN THE SIGNIFICANCE SECTION, THE ANTICIPATED FINDINGS HAVE POTENTIAL TO SUPPORT THE MISSION OF WALDEN UNIVERSITY TO PROMOTE POSITIVE SOCIAL CHANGE. COMMENTS: IF NO , HOW COULD THE STUDY ADDRESS SOCIAL CHANGE MORE DIRECTLY? 7. FEASIBLE? not met CAN A SYSTEMATIC METHOD OF INQUIRY BE USED TO ADDRESS THE PROBLEM; AND DOES THE APPROACH HAVE THE POTENTIAL TO ADDRESS THE PROBLEM WHILE CONSIDERING POTENTIAL RISKS AND BURDENS PLACED ON RESEARCH PARTICIPANTS? THE TENTATIVE METHODOLOGY DEMONSTRATED THAT THE RESEARCHER HAS CONSIDERED THE OPTIONS FOR INQUIRY AND HAS SELECTED AN APPROACH THAT HAS POTENTIAL TO ADDRESS THE PROBLEM. COMMENTS: IF NOT MET , WHAT OTHER APPROACHES TO RESEARCH SHOULD BE CONSIDERED? 8-ALIGNED? not met DO THE VARIOUS ASPECTS OF THE PROSPECTUS ALIGN OVERALL? THE NATURE OF THE STUDY SHOULD ALIGN WITH THE PROBLEM, RESEARCH QUESTIONS, AND TENTATIVE APPROACHES TO INQUIRY. COMMENTS:IF NO , IN WHAT WAYS COULD ASPECTS OF THE PROJECT BE BETTER ALIGNED? 9. OBJECTIVE? not met IS THE TOPIC APPROACHED IN AN OBJECTIVE MANNER? THE FRAMING OF THE PROBLEM SHOULD NOT REVEAL BIAS OR PRESENT A FOREGONE CONCLUSION. EVEN IF THE RESEARCHER HAS A STRONG OPINION ON THE EXPECTED FINDINGS, THE RESEARCHER MUST MAXIMIZE SCHOLARLY OBJECTIVITY BY FRAMING THE PROBLEM IN THE CONTEXT OF A SYSTEMATIC INQUIRY THAT PERMITS MULTIPLE POSSIBLE CONCLUSIONS. COMMENTS: IF NOT MET , PLEASE IDENTIFY THE POINTS OF SUBJECTIVITY. 4 and 6 only met prospectus_checklist.docx prospectus_guide.pdf DHA and DrPH Prospectus Checklist The following checklist, like the DHA Doctoral Study Prospectus Guide , provides guidance to support prospectus development. Included are the basic expectations for the content of the prospectus from the annotated outline in the Guide. Please refer to the Guide for additional information on how the prospectus will be submitted and evaluated. The DHA Prospectus Rubric standards and a Site-Naming Self-Check are included at the end of this checklist. Not all checklist items may be relevant to your particular study; please consult with your chair for guidance. Instructions for students: Indicate on the checklist the page number where each heading is located. Respond to comments from the committee in each comment history box. Do not delete previous commentsjust add your response in the appropriate space. Upload this checklist into Taskstream with your prospectus document for each prospectus review. Instructions for the chair, second committee member, and Program Director Designee: Provide specific feedback in the comment history column. Do not delete previous commentsjust add your response in the appropriate space. If you made detailed comments are included on the prospectus draft (using track changes and comments), you can refer to the draft rather than restate comments in the checklist; upload both documents into Taskstream during rubric completion. Committee chairs should indicate their acceptance of each item by checking the appropriate checkbox by each checklist item . Date: (click here and type todays date ®) Students Name: Student ID: Committee Chairperson: Second Committee Member: PhD Program Director/Designee: Prospectus Checklist Checklist Items Page # Comment History Title Page Present your Title 12 words or fewer; include topic, variables and relationship between them, and most critical key words. Chair comments: (click here®) Second Member comments: (click here®) Student comments: (click here®) ?Chair accepts items as complete. Include your name, program of study (specialization if applicable) and Student ID. Use the DHA Prospectus Template. Problem Statement State the problem by presenting a logical argument for the need to address an identified gap in practice as supported in the research literature. Must be relevant to your discipline and area of practice (1-2 paragraphs). Chair comments: (click here®) Second Member comments: (click here®) Student comments: (click here®) ?Chair accepts items as complete. Provide evidence from scholarly and/or reputable sources that the problem is current, relevant, and meaningful to the professional field (3-5 key citations). Assure that the problem is framed within the discipline (program of study). Purpose of the Study Present a concise statement that discusses the overall purpose or intention of the study (1-2 paragraphs). Chair comments: (click here®) Second Member comments: (click here®) Student comments: (click here®) ?Chair accepts items as complete. In quantitative studies, state what needs to be studied by describing two or more factors (variables) and a conjectured relationship among them related to the identified gap or problem. Significance Identify a) how your study will contribute to filling the identified gap (the contribution to the discipline or practice this study will make) b) how your research will support professional practice or allow practical application (the So What? question), and c) how, through alignment with your problem statement to reflect the potential relevance to society, your findings might lead to positive social change (1-2 paragraphs). This is an elaboration of what the problem addresses. Chair comments: (click here®) Second Member comments: (click here®) Student comments: (click here®) ?Chair accepts items as complete. Background Provide a representative list of scholarship (or annotated bibliography) and findings that support and clarify the main assertions in your problem statement. Highlight their relationship to the topic (5-10 peer-reviewed articles; most from the last five years; some may have already been mentioned in the first two sections of the prospectus). Chair comments: (click here®) Second Member comments: (click here®) Student comments: (click here®) ?Chair accepts items as complete. Framework Describe (and cite) the framework that demonstrates an understanding of the theories and concepts relevant to your topic (1 paragraph). Provide the original scholarly literature on the theory or concepts, even if it is more than five years old. Do not cite secondary sources. Chair comments: (click here®) Second Member comments: (click here®) Student comments: (click here®) ?Chair accepts items as complete. Ensure alignment with your problem, purpose, research questions, and background of your study. Explain how each theory or concept relates to the study approach and research questions. Research Question(s) and Hypotheses List the question(s) that will lead to what needs to be done and how it will be accomplished . Your questions must align with your study purpose and include the variables or concepts and how they will be examined. Chair comments: (click here®) Second Member comments: (click here®) Student comments: (click here®) ?Chair accepts items as complete. Ensure your research questions inform the research design by providing a foundation for generation of hypotheses and present the null and alternative hypothesis for each research question. Nature of the Study Provide 1 concise paragraph that discusses the quantitative approach that will be used to address your research question(s) and how this approach aligns with the problem statement and purpose. Chair comments: (click here®) Second Member comments: (click here®) Student comments: (click here®) ?Chair accepts items as complete. Secondary Data Types and Sources of Information Present a list of possible types and sources of data for this study, such as employee surveys, historical documents from state records, de-identified medical records, or statistics from a federal database. Identify data source, data points, and how data will be obtained or accessed to address the research question(s). Chair comments: (click here®) Second Member comments: (click here®) Student comments: (click here®) ?Chair accepts items as complete. Limitations, Challenges, and/or Barriers Provide information, such as limitations, challenges, and/or barriers that may need to be addressed when conducting this study. These may include access to data, data storage requirements, data access fees, etc. Chair comments: (click here®) Second Member comments: (click here®) Student comments: (click here®) ?Chair accepts items as complete. References On a new page, list your references formatted in APA style . Chair comments: (click here®) Second Member comments: (click here®) Student comments: (click here®) ?Chair accepts items as complete. DHA and DrPH Prospectus Rubric Quality Indicators Comment History 1. Complete Does the prospectus contain all the required elements? Comments: (click here®) 2. Meaningful Has a meaningful problem or gap in practice as supported in the research literature been identified? Comments: (click here®) 3. Justified Is evidence presented that this problem is significant to the discipline and/or professional field? Comments: (click here®) 4. Grounded Is the problem framed to enable the researcher to either build on or counter the previously-published findings on the topic? Comments: (click here®) 5. Original/Relevance to Area of Practice Does this project have potential to make an original contribution that has relevance to the discipline and/or area of practice? Comments: (click here®) 6. Impact Does this project have potential to affect positive social change? Comments: (click here®) 7. Feasible Can a systematic method of inquiry be used to address the problem; and does the approach have the potential to address the problem while considering potential risks and burdens placed on research participants? Comments: (click here®) 8. Aligned Do the various aspects of the prospectus align overall? Comments: (click here®) 9. Objective Is the topic approached in an objective manner? Comments: (click here®) Partner Site Masking Self-Check Walden capstones typically mask the identity of the partner organization. The methodological and ethical reasons for this practice as well as criteria for exceptions are outlined here (link to posted guidance). ? Check here to confirm that you will mask the identity of the organization in the final capstone that you publish in ProQuest. ? If you perceive that your partner organizations identity would be impossible to mask or if there is a strong rationale for naming the organization in your capstone, please check this box so that your Program Director can review your request for an exception. If granted, that exception must be confirmed by the IRB during the ethics review process. The IRB will also ensure that your consent form(s) and/or site agreement(s) permit naming the organization. Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10
Assignment: Cancer Among Muslim Women in Canada Early Detects Research
Assignment: Cancer Among Muslim Women in Canada Early Detects Researchv ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS ON Assignment: Cancer Among Muslim Women in Canada Early Detects Research The points to be edited based on instructor feedback are :(where only point 4 and point 6 were met) so 7 points need to be addressed: 1. COMPLETE? (not met) DOES THE PROSPECTUS CONTAIN ALL THE REQUIRED ELEMENTS? REFER TO THE ANNOTATED OUTLINE TO SEE THE REQUIRED PARTS OF THE DOCTORAL STUDY PROSPECTUS DOCUMENT. not met COMMENTS:IF NOT MET , WHICH ITEMS ARE MISSING? Assignment: Cancer Among Muslim Women in Canada Early Detects Research 2. MEANINGFUL? (not met) HAS A MEANINGFUL PROBLEM OR GAP IN PRACTICE AS SUPPORTED IN THE RESEARCH LITERATURE BEEN IDENTIFIED? IN OTHER WORDS, IS ADDRESSING THIS PROBLEM THE LOGICAL NEXT STEP, GIVEN THE PREVIOUS EXPLORATORY AND CONFIRMATORY RESEARCH (OR LACK THEREOF) ON THIS TOPIC? IT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE TO SIMPLY REPLICATE PREVIOUS RESEARCH FOR A DOCTORAL DEGREE. not met COMMENTS: IF NOT MET , WHAT IS THE REASONING FOR THIS ASSESSMENT? 3. JUSTIFIED?(not Met) IS EVIDENCE PRESENTED THAT THIS PROBLEM IS SIGNIFICANT TO THE DISCIPLINE AND/OR PROFESSIONAL FIELD? THE PROSPECTUS SHOULD PROVIDE RELEVANT STATISTICS AND EVIDENCE, DOCUMEN TABLE DISCREPANCIES, AND OTHER SCHOLARLY FACTS THAT POINT TO THE SIGNIFICANCE AND URGENCY OF THE PROBLEM. Not met COMMENTS: IF NOT MET , IN WHAT AREAS IS ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE NEEDED? 4. GROUNDED?(Met) IS THE PROBLEM FRAMED TO ENABLE THE RESEARCHER TO EITHER BUILD UPON OR COUNTER THE PREVIOUSLY PUBLISHED FINDINGS ON THE TOPIC? FOR MOST FIELDS, GROUNDING INVOLVES ARTICULATING THE PROBLEM WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF A THEORETICAL BASE OR CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK. ALTHOUGH MANY APPROACHES CAN GROUND A STUDY IN THE SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE, THE ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENT IS THAT THE PROBLEM IS FRAMED SUCH THAT THE NEW FINDINGS WILL HAVE IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PREVIOUS FINDINGS. met COMMENTS: IF NOT MET , WHAT OTHER THEORIES OR FRAMEWORKS MIGHT BE MORE APPROPRIATE? . 5-ORIGINAL?(notbMt) DOES THIS STUDY HAVE POTENTIAL TO MAKE AN ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION? THE PROBLEM MUST BE AN AUTHENTIC PUZZLE THAT NEEDS SOLVING, NOT MERELY A TOPIC THAT THE RESEARCHER FINDS INTERESTING. ADDRESSING THE PROBLEM SHOULD RESULT IN AN ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION TO THE FIELD OR DISCIPLINE. COMMENTS: IF NOT MET , HOW COULD THE STUDY MAKE A MORE ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION? not met 6. IMPACT? met DOES THIS STUDY HAVE POTENTIAL TO AFFECT POSITIVE SOCIAL CHANGE? AS DESCRIBED IN THE SIGNIFICANCE SECTION, THE ANTICIPATED FINDINGS HAVE POTENTIAL TO SUPPORT THE MISSION OF WALDEN UNIVERSITY TO PROMOTE POSITIVE SOCIAL CHANGE. COMMENTS: IF NO , HOW COULD THE STUDY ADDRESS SOCIAL CHANGE MORE DIRECTLY? 7. FEASIBLE? not met CAN A SYSTEMATIC METHOD OF INQUIRY BE USED TO ADDRESS THE PROBLEM; AND DOES THE APPROACH HAVE THE POTENTIAL TO ADDRESS THE PROBLEM WHILE CONSIDERING POTENTIAL RISKS AND BURDENS PLACED ON RESEARCH PARTICIPANTS? THE TENTATIVE METHODOLOGY DEMONSTRATED THAT THE RESEARCHER HAS CONSIDERED THE OPTIONS FOR INQUIRY AND HAS SELECTED AN APPROACH THAT HAS POTENTIAL TO ADDRESS THE PROBLEM. COMMENTS: IF NOT MET , WHAT OTHER APPROACHES TO RESEARCH SHOULD BE CONSIDERED? 8-ALIGNED? not met DO THE VARIOUS ASPECTS OF THE PROSPECTUS ALIGN OVERALL? THE NATURE OF THE STUDY SHOULD ALIGN WITH THE PROBLEM, RESEARCH QUESTIONS, AND TENTATIVE APPROACHES TO INQUIRY. COMMENTS:IF NO , IN WHAT WAYS COULD ASPECTS OF THE PROJECT BE BETTER ALIGNED? 9. OBJECTIVE? not met IS THE TOPIC APPROACHED IN AN OBJECTIVE MANNER? THE FRAMING OF THE PROBLEM SHOULD NOT REVEAL BIAS OR PRESENT A FOREGONE CONCLUSION. EVEN IF THE RESEARCHER HAS A STRONG OPINION ON THE EXPECTED FINDINGS, THE RESEARCHER MUST MAXIMIZE SCHOLARLY OBJECTIVITY BY FRAMING THE PROBLEM IN THE CONTEXT OF A SYSTEMATIC INQUIRY THAT PERMITS MULTIPLE POSSIBLE CONCLUSIONS. COMMENTS: IF NOT MET , PLEASE IDENTIFY THE POINTS OF SUBJECTIVITY. 4 and 6 only met prospectus_checklist.docx prospectus_guide.pdf DHA and DrPH Prospectus Checklist The following checklist, like the DHA Doctoral Study Prospectus Guide , provides guidance to support prospectus development. Included are the basic expectations for the content of the prospectus from the annotated outline in the Guide. Please refer to the Guide for additional information on how the prospectus will be submitted and evaluated. The DHA Prospectus Rubric standards and a Site-Naming Self-Check are included at the end of this checklist. Not all checklist items may be relevant to your particular study; please consult with your chair for guidance. Instructions for students: Indicate on the checklist the page number where each heading is located. Respond to comments from the committee in each comment history box. Do not delete previous commentsjust add your response in the appropriate space. Upload this checklist into Taskstream with your prospectus document for each prospectus review. Instructions for the chair, second committee member, and Program Director Designee: Provide specific feedback in the comment history column. Do not delete previous commentsjust add your response in the appropriate space. If you made detailed comments are included on the prospectus draft (using track changes and comments), you can refer to the draft rather than restate comments in the checklist; upload both documents into Taskstream during rubric completion. Committee chairs should indicate their acceptance of each item by checking the appropriate checkbox by each checklist item . Date: (click here and type todays date ®) Students Name: Student ID: Committee Chairperson: Second Committee Member: PhD Program Director/Designee: Prospectus Checklist Checklist Items Page # Comment History Title Page Present your Title 12 words or fewer; include topic, variables and relationship between them, and most critical key words. Chair comments: (click here®) Second Member comments: (click here®) Student comments: (click here®) ?Chair accepts items as complete. Include your name, program of study (specialization if applicable) and Student ID. Use the DHA Prospectus Template. Problem Statement State the problem by presenting a logical argument for the need to address an identified gap in practice as supported in the research literature. Must be relevant to your discipline and area of practice (1-2 paragraphs). Chair comments: (click here®) Second Member comments: (click here®) Student comments: (click here®) ?Chair accepts items as complete. Provide evidence from scholarly and/or reputable sources that the problem is current, relevant, and meaningful to the professional field (3-5 key citations). Assure that the problem is framed within the discipline (program of study). Purpose of the Study Present a concise statement that discusses the overall purpose or intention of the study (1-2 paragraphs). Chair comments: (click here®) Second Member comments: (click here®) Student comments: (click here®) ?Chair accepts items as complete. In quantitative studies, state what needs to be studied by describing two or more factors (variables) and a conjectured relationship among them related to the identified gap or problem. Significance Identify a) how your study will contribute to filling the identified gap (the contribution to the discipline or practice this study will make) b) how your research will support professional practice or allow practical application (the So What? question), and c) how, through alignment with your problem statement to reflect the potential relevance to society, your findings might lead to positive social change (1-2 paragraphs). This is an elaboration of what the problem addresses. Chair comments: (click here®) Second Member comments: (click here®) Student comments: (click here®) ?Chair accepts items as complete. Background Provide a representative list of scholarship (or annotated bibliography) and findings that support and clarify the main assertions in your problem statement. Highlight their relationship to the topic (5-10 peer-reviewed articles; most from the last five years; some may have already been mentioned in the first two sections of the prospectus). Chair comments: (click here®) Second Member comments: (click here®) Student comments: (click here®) ?Chair accepts items as complete. Framework Describe (and cite) the framework that demonstrates an understanding of the theories and concepts relevant to your topic (1 paragraph). Provide the original scholarly literature on the theory or concepts, even if it is more than five years old. Do not cite secondary sources. Chair comments: (click here®) Second Member comments: (click here®) Student comments: (click here®) ?Chair accepts items as complete. Ensure alignment with your problem, purpose, research questions, and background of your study. Explain how each theory or concept relates to the study approach and research questions. Research Question(s) and Hypotheses List the question(s) that will lead to what needs to be done and how it will be accomplished . Your questions must align with your study purpose and include the variables or concepts and how they will be examined. Chair comments: (click here®) Second Member comments: (click here®) Student comments: (click here®) ?Chair accepts items as complete. Ensure your research questions inform the research design by providing a foundation for generation of hypotheses and present the null and alternative hypothesis for each research question. Nature of the Study Provide 1 concise paragraph that discusses the quantitative approach that will be used to address your research question(s) and how this approach aligns with the problem statement and purpose. Chair comments: (click here®) Second Member comments: (click here®) Student comments: (click here®) ?Chair accepts items as complete. Secondary Data Types and Sources of Information Present a list of possible types and sources of data for this study, such as employee surveys, historical documents from state records, de-identified medical records, or statistics from a federal database. Identify data source, data points, and how data will be obtained or accessed to address the research question(s). Chair comments: (click here®) Second Member comments: (click here®) Student comments: (click here®) ?Chair accepts items as complete. Limitations, Challenges, and/or Barriers Provide information, such as limitations, challenges, and/or barriers that may need to be addressed when conducting this study. These may include access to data, data storage requirements, data access fees, etc. Chair comments: (click here®) Second Member comments: (click here®) Student comments: (click here®) ?Chair accepts items as complete. References On a new page, list your references formatted in APA style . Chair comments: (click here®) Second Member comments: (click here®) Student comments: (click here®) ?Chair accepts items as complete. DHA and DrPH Prospectus Rubric Quality Indicators Comment History 1. Complete Does the prospectus contain all the required elements? Comments: (click here®) 2. Meaningful Has a meaningful problem or gap in practice as supported in the research literature been identified? Comments: (click here®) 3. Justified Is evidence presented that this problem is significant to the discipline and/or professional field? Comments: (click here®) 4. Grounded Is the problem framed to enable the researcher to either build on or counter the previously-published findings on the topic? Comments: (click here®) 5. Original/Relevance to Area of Practice Does this project have potential to make an original contribution that has relevance to the discipline and/or area of practice? Comments: (click here®) 6. Impact Does this project have potential to affect positive social change? Comments: (click here®) 7. Feasible Can a systematic method of inquiry be used to address the problem; and does the approach have the potential to address the problem while considering potential risks and burdens placed on research participants? Comments: (click here®) 8. Aligned Do the various aspects of the prospectus align overall? Comments: (click here®) 9. Objective Is the topic approached in an objective manner? Comments: (click here®) Partner Site Masking Self-Check Walden capstones typically mask the identity of the partner organization. The methodological and ethical reasons for this practice as well as criteria for exceptions are outlined here (link to posted guidance). ? Check here to confirm that you will mask the identity of the organization in the final capstone that you publish in ProQuest. ? If you perceive that your partner organizations identity would be impossible to mask or if there is a strong rationale for naming the organization in your capstone, please check this box so that your Program Director can review your request for an exception. If granted, that exception must be confirmed by the IRB during the ethics review process. The IRB will also ensure that your consent form(s) and/or site agreement(s) permit naming the organization. Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10
Use Promo Code: FIRST15