Assignment: Enhancing Blood Transfusion Safety

Assignment: Enhancing Blood Transfusion Safety ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS ON Assignment: Enhancing Blood Transfusion Safety Literature Review of Primary Research and Synthesis Course Objective: Develop a problem statement and significance for an identified nurisng issuerequiring further investigation. Conduct a literature search of primary research reports and complete a written critical analysis of the literature search. Synthesize findings in closing summary and propose further research. Saint Cloud State University NURS 403 Enhancing Blood Transfusion Safety Discussion Fulfills course objectives 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 . This is a Program Benchmark Assignment and Total Points Possible from Paper Portion = 100 . Students must receive at least (77%) in order to pass the paper. Students must pass the paper in order to pass the course. Assignment: Enhancing Blood Transfusion Safety Overview: In a 10-12 page paper the student will introduce problem and significance, critique the primary research literature, summarize findings, and propose further research. Research Topic/Problem: Research topic/problems will be determined in class early in course. We would encourage you to identify the topic as one related to the populations you have been working with in previous courses. Components: (first part due – see drop box) Part One – Problem & Significance (20 ) Introduces the problem using 2 – 3 paragraphs. Give some background on the problem. Introduce why this issue is relevant to nursing. Write the PICO statement. Ends the introduction – by concisely writing a 1 -2 sentence “problem statement.” Assignment: Enhancing Blood Transfusion Safety Purpose States the purpose of the literature review. Part Two – The Literature Review ( Part Two Due later in semester – see drop box) (50 points) Introduces this section with an “introductory” paragraph. Avoids student language, rather uses professional language to introduce lit review based on problem identified in Part One. Outlines how the literature search was done; data bases used with rationale; search terms; inclusion criteria for keeping articles; limits, additional search terms used as search progressed. Identify the Level of Evidence Schema used to grade each article. Presents FOUR research studies (systematic review or meta analysis is acceptable) in which the identified problem was researched to learn more about the problem. GRADE the ARTICLE. Must use one qualitative and one quantitative study. Ech study should be presented separately and concisely: Briefly and professionally introduces the study and why included in review. Saint Cloud State University NURS 403 Enhancing Blood Transfusion Safety Discussion For each study discuss: Research design – qualitative; quantitative; mixed methods or systematic review Quantative or Qualitative include: Setting for study Target population and sample population Sample selection process, sample type, sample size, [Note – this is not inclusion/exclusion criteria] How was the sample recruited ? Major study variables for quantitative (not demographic variables – For quantitative state the Independent variable and dependent variables) Measures and/or measurement instruments used i n quantitative (reliability and validity discussed for each tool included for quantiative) For qualitative includ e type of research: How information was obtained (taped, interviews) How was coding completed ? How was reliability and rigour determined for qualitative ? For each study list 2-3 key findings, Systematic Review OR META ANALYSIS Purpose Inclusion Criteria Data Bases and Key words Analysis strategies Quality of evidence Findings Application to practice Level of evidence is identified for each article (based on schema identified above) Critiques each study by describing two strengths and one limitation Students may not repeat the same strengths or weaknesses for the four studies reviewed but consider/write a variety Connects each study to next one using linking sentences. Avoids student and casual language throughout paper. Part Three – The Summary (25 points) Summarizes the evidence or findings from part two using 4 – 6 paragraphs. Compares (similar) the findings identified in the 4 studies reviewed citing references to the studies Contrasts (different) the findings identified in the 4 studies reviewed citing references to the studies. Identifies what is now known (for sure) about the problem after reviewing these studies, citing references. In another 2 –3 paragraphs, describes at least 3 – 4 unknown or unanswered questions that still remain about the problem despite these 4 studies. In last 1 – 2 paragraphs, draws conclusion to the summary section and writes a purpose statement for needed research. The “purpose statement” is drawn from the unknown or unanswered questions and tells the reader what the next research should be that will help answer the unknown or unanswered questions (see textbook on purpose statements). Doesn’t go off topic by adding new problems, stays focused on THE problem (from Part 1) and literature reviewed (Part 2). No more than 2 – 3 pages. ENTIRE PAPER IS WRITTEN in APA 6th edition Writing Taboos : Casual language [Also, really, like, however, because, due]. Don’t use quotations – rather paraphrase. Don’t use questions, rather rephrase questions into statements. Evaluation – Major Benchmark Assignment See grading rubrics above The rubric is based on these outcome Criteria: In a formal written paper the student will: Identify a current nursing problem and explain the significance of the problem for the nursing profession. (10 points) PICO STATEMENT – (5 points) APA Part One (5 points) Critically review and critique at least four credible current research studies relevant to the nursing problem including data bases searched, search terms, setting, target population, sample selection, sample type and size, measurements used, 2 – 3 key findings, level of evidence and 3 strengths and limitations. (40 points) Part Two APA Part Two (10 points) Synthesize and summarize the research findings, identifying what is known and unknown about the nursing problem. (10 points) Part Three Draw a conclusion to the paper through a purpose statement. (5 points) Logically organize the paper, clearly present written information, use proper grammar, and spelling, in addition prepare the paper using the most current 6th edition Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (APA) in regards to formatting, citations, and references. (10 points). Saint Cloud State University NURS 403 Enhancing Blood Transfusion Safety Discussion parts_1_2.docx kangeroo_care_ebp_sample_417.docx pediatric_organ_transplant Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10

Assignment: Enhancing Blood Transfusion Safety ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS ON Assignment: Enhancing Blood Transfusion Safety Literature Review of Primary Research and Synthesis Course Objective: Develop a problem statement and significance for an identified nurisng issuerequiring further investigation. Conduct a literature search of primary research reports and complete a written critical analysis of the literature search. Synthesize findings in closing summary and propose further research. Saint Cloud State University NURS 403 Enhancing Blood Transfusion Safety Discussion Fulfills course objectives 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 . This is a Program Benchmark Assignment and Total Points Possible from Paper Portion = 100 . Students must receive at least (77%) in order to pass the paper. Students must pass the paper in order to pass the course. Assignment: Enhancing Blood Transfusion Safety Overview: In a 10-12 page paper the student will introduce problem and significance, critique the primary research literature, summarize findings, and propose further research. Research Topic/Problem: Research topic/problems will be determined in class early in course. We would encourage you to identify the topic as one related to the populations you have been working with in previous courses. Components: (first part due – see drop box) Part One – Problem & Significance (20 ) Introduces the problem using 2 – 3 paragraphs. Give some background on the problem. Introduce why this issue is relevant to nursing. Write the PICO statement. Ends the introduction – by concisely writing a 1 -2 sentence “problem statement.” Assignment: Enhancing Blood Transfusion Safety Purpose States the purpose of the literature review. Part Two – The Literature Review ( Part Two Due later in semester – see drop box) (50 points) Introduces this section with an “introductory” paragraph. Avoids student language, rather uses professional language to introduce lit review based on problem identified in Part One. Outlines how the literature search was done; data bases used with rationale; search terms; inclusion criteria for keeping articles; limits, additional search terms used as search progressed. Identify the Level of Evidence Schema used to grade each article. Presents FOUR research studies (systematic review or meta analysis is acceptable) in which the identified problem was researched to learn more about the problem. GRADE the ARTICLE. Must use one qualitative and one quantitative study. Ech study should be presented separately and concisely: Briefly and professionally introduces the study and why included in review. Saint Cloud State University NURS 403 Enhancing Blood Transfusion Safety Discussion For each study discuss: Research design – qualitative; quantitative; mixed methods or systematic review Quantative or Qualitative include: Setting for study Target population and sample population Sample selection process, sample type, sample size, [Note – this is not inclusion/exclusion criteria] How was the sample recruited ? Major study variables for quantitative (not demographic variables – For quantitative state the Independent variable and dependent variables) Measures and/or measurement instruments used i n quantitative (reliability and validity discussed for each tool included for quantiative) For qualitative includ e type of research: How information was obtained (taped, interviews) How was coding completed ? How was reliability and rigour determined for qualitative ? For each study list 2-3 key findings, Systematic Review OR META ANALYSIS Purpose Inclusion Criteria Data Bases and Key words Analysis strategies Quality of evidence Findings Application to practice Level of evidence is identified for each article (based on schema identified above) Critiques each study by describing two strengths and one limitation Students may not repeat the same strengths or weaknesses for the four studies reviewed but consider/write a variety Connects each study to next one using linking sentences. Avoids student and casual language throughout paper. Part Three – The Summary (25 points) Summarizes the evidence or findings from part two using 4 – 6 paragraphs. Compares (similar) the findings identified in the 4 studies reviewed citing references to the studies Contrasts (different) the findings identified in the 4 studies reviewed citing references to the studies. Identifies what is now known (for sure) about the problem after reviewing these studies, citing references. In another 2 –3 paragraphs, describes at least 3 – 4 unknown or unanswered questions that still remain about the problem despite these 4 studies. In last 1 – 2 paragraphs, draws conclusion to the summary section and writes a purpose statement for needed research. The “purpose statement” is drawn from the unknown or unanswered questions and tells the reader what the next research should be that will help answer the unknown or unanswered questions (see textbook on purpose statements). Doesn’t go off topic by adding new problems, stays focused on THE problem (from Part 1) and literature reviewed (Part 2). No more than 2 – 3 pages. ENTIRE PAPER IS WRITTEN in APA 6th edition Writing Taboos : Casual language [Also, really, like, however, because, due]. Don’t use quotations – rather paraphrase. Don’t use questions, rather rephrase questions into statements. Evaluation – Major Benchmark Assignment See grading rubrics above The rubric is based on these outcome Criteria: In a formal written paper the student will: Identify a current nursing problem and explain the significance of the problem for the nursing profession. (10 points) PICO STATEMENT – (5 points) APA Part One (5 points) Critically review and critique at least four credible current research studies relevant to the nursing problem including data bases searched, search terms, setting, target population, sample selection, sample type and size, measurements used, 2 – 3 key findings, level of evidence and 3 strengths and limitations. (40 points) Part Two APA Part Two (10 points) Synthesize and summarize the research findings, identifying what is known and unknown about the nursing problem. (10 points) Part Three Draw a conclusion to the paper through a purpose statement. (5 points) Logically organize the paper, clearly present written information, use proper grammar, and spelling, in addition prepare the paper using the most current 6th edition Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (APA) in regards to formatting, citations, and references. (10 points). Saint Cloud State University NURS 403 Enhancing Blood Transfusion Safety Discussion parts_1_2.docx kangeroo_care_ebp_sample_417.docx pediatric_organ_transplant Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10