Assignment: Evaluating Sources For Credibility

Assignment: Evaluating Sources for Credibility
Assignment: Evaluating Sources for Credibility
Assignment 1
To complete this assignment, please review the course text and the article “”. In addition, watch the videos and . Next, research for answers to the following questions in your required sources and on the Internet. Be sure to validate that the sources you use are credible. Also, keep a list of the sources you use to include at the bottom of your posting, so others can access them as well.
Click to view the Evaluating Sources for Credibility video. [ located under More option].
Analyze and discuss the following questions about cross-cultural and diversity training and share your findings with your classmates.
What are some of the training and development challenges associated with high employee turnover?
Why should a task analysis be performed to address the specific content addressed in a diversity training program?
Why would it be important to participate in a cross-cultural training before a business trip out of the country or an international assignment?
What are some critical success factors for these programs?
Do you have any personal experiences with diversity and/or cross-cultural training? If so, please share about your experience(s). If you do not, what reasons do you think that your past work experiences did not include such activities?
How important do you think this type of training is for you personally? What areas do you feel would be crucial for you to personally develop?
Your initial post should be between 350 and 400 words.
Assignment 2
To be effective, a company must learn to motivate its employees to efficiently and effectively meet the goals of the organization. After reading Chapter 6 in your text, the article “,” and watching the required videos, discuss the following:
Explain the difference between content theories of motivation and process theories of motivation. Why is it important to understand the differences?
Explain, in your own words (using citations), why motivation is suggested to affect individual performance and organizational outcomes.
Propose at least three strategies to motivate others in the workplace. Include an explanation of the theories that support our suggestions about why these would be productive options.
Note that extrinsic and intrinsic motivation are types of motivation and should not be presented as theories, but as variables within a theory.
Lastly, the text suggests that pay is not usually the driving factor in job satisfaction, but can prevent job dissatisfaction. Based on your reading this week, analyze and explain why you think this is and discuss the pros and cons of using financial incentives in the workplace that are discussed in your text?

Assignment: Evaluating Sources For Credibility ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS ON Assignment: Evaluating Sources For Credibility Quality of Information Paper The assignment will examine methods used to evaluate the quality of information. Nurses must be discerning and knowledgeable about how to choose credible sources of information. Healthcare professionals have an obligation to provide clients with accurate and evidence-based health information. Review Chapter 4 and view the videos posted. Assignment: Evaluating Sources for Credibility Paper Review the “Quick Check For Your Sources: the TRAAP Test” In the first paragraph discuss the similarities and differences between the TRAAP test, Evaluating Online Health Information from the National Library of Medicine, and the HONcode Principles. Choose an online patient education website that is used (or could be used) as a link for patients. Cite and reference the website including the link at the end of your reference. Write an evaluation for the chosen website using The Evaluation of Information Checklist provided below. Use APA format for this 750 to 800-word paper and review the grading rubric to identify the headings to use in this paper. The Evaluation of Information Checklist can be used to evaluate the quality found on the internet with these 5 criteria: Currency . Establish the Date of Publication. Examine creation and revision date, review facts and analysis in historical context, verify time-sensitive information (beware of descriptive words such as always, never, all, none and most), watch for scripting that creates the current date (display source code to check), and avoids updated information. Relevance . Identify the source (domain ownership). Practice how to decode a web address and to detect web site spoofing. Some links are clearly indicated, some are multi-sourced and differ from the site owner, and others are masked. Authority . Is the source an expert or authority? Examine authorship credentials, grammar and spelling, links to and from other websites, and other author publications. You can use other means (outside the internet) to verify credentials. Accuracy . Verify What the Information Claims. Use primary sources that originate information for facts. Secondary sources (that interpret facts) should provide cited references. Look for cited references and when sources are reliable they should meet all the quality criteria. Purpose . Determine the level of objectivity. Examine the writing style and see if it has a bias. Does advertising influence the content? Lack of objectivity doesn’t always correlate with substandard information if good facts and analysis are used. Some sites are balanced, some are clearly biased, and some present undocumented claims. https://youtu.be/PLTOVoHbH5c https://youtu.be/zzTBBm1HXvM This video will help you become a detective as you evaluate websites on healthcare information: https://medlineplus.gov/webeval/webeval_start.html# Healthcare Informatics Systems Rubric: Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Similarities and differences of guides for evaluating online websites 10.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Evaluation of Patient Education: Currency 13.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks 13.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Evaluation of Patient Education: Relevance 13.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks 13.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Evaluation of Patient Education: Authority 13.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks 13.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Evaluation of Patient Education: Accuracy 13.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks 13.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Evaluation of Patient Education: Purpose 13.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks 13.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome APA format: 750-800 words, in-text citations, references, headings, grammar/spelling 25.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks attachment_1 Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10