Assignment: Evaluation of Research
Assignment: Evaluation of Research
Assignment: Evaluation of Research ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS ON Assignment: Evaluation of Research Details: The purpose of this assignment is to evaluate empirical research as it relates to your PICOT question. Assignment: Evaluation of Research General Requirements: Doctoral learners are required to use Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Directions: Using feedback from your instructor on your PICOT question and annotated bibliographies, revise your PICOT question and annotations. Using your annotations, write a 1,250-1500 word paper, in which you evaluate the literature, including the study conclusions, merits, and shortcomings. Your evaluation should address the following questions, and your conclusions should be supported with appropriate citations. In which studies are the themes of the literature review similar? Different? In which studies do the data support the conclusion? In which studies do the conclusions answer the research question? What questions would you ask the authors? How might the evidence in these studies be of use to refining you PICOT question or perhaps formulating or implementing your DPI project? annotative_bibliography_julie_braylock.docx wk7dq1.docx Briefly describe what you have learned from feedback given by your instructor regarding your PICOT question. How will you frame your PICOT differently moving forward? Be specific about what components, if any, that you will change. The input that I received for my PICOT question was to be more specific about the patient outcomes. So I focused on the issue at hand, the quality of rest for the patient. It was also suggested that I be specific about the time for the data collection. Both of those suggestions were very relevant and drove me to look at my PICOT question again. I thank the instructor and my fellow classmates for their input. PICOT Question In adult critical care patients, how does a scheduled quiet time, compared with not implementing a scheduled quiet time, improve patient outcomes? Population: Adult critical care patients Intervention: Implementing a scheduled quiet time Comparison: Not implementing a scheduled quiet time Outcome: Improved patient outcomes Revised PICOT In adult critical care patients in the ICU, how does a scheduled quiet time, compared with not implementing a scheduled quiet time, improve patient rest periods? Population: Adult critical care patients Intervention: Implementing a scheduled quiet time Comparison: Not implementing a scheduled quiet time Outcome: Improved quality of patient rest periods Time: Over a three-month period Assignment: Evaluation of Research Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10
Assignment: Evaluation of Research
Assignment: Evaluation of Research ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS ON Assignment: Evaluation of Research Details: The purpose of this assignment is to evaluate empirical research as it relates to your PICOT question. Assignment: Evaluation of Research General Requirements: Doctoral learners are required to use Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Directions: Using feedback from your instructor on your PICOT question and annotated bibliographies, revise your PICOT question and annotations. Using your annotations, write a 1,250-1500 word paper, in which you evaluate the literature, including the study conclusions, merits, and shortcomings. Your evaluation should address the following questions, and your conclusions should be supported with appropriate citations. In which studies are the themes of the literature review similar? Different? In which studies do the data support the conclusion? In which studies do the conclusions answer the research question? What questions would you ask the authors? How might the evidence in these studies be of use to refining you PICOT question or perhaps formulating or implementing your DPI project? annotative_bibliography_julie_braylock.docx wk7dq1.docx Briefly describe what you have learned from feedback given by your instructor regarding your PICOT question. How will you frame your PICOT differently moving forward? Be specific about what components, if any, that you will change. The input that I received for my PICOT question was to be more specific about the patient outcomes. So I focused on the issue at hand, the quality of rest for the patient. It was also suggested that I be specific about the time for the data collection. Both of those suggestions were very relevant and drove me to look at my PICOT question again. I thank the instructor and my fellow classmates for their input. PICOT Question In adult critical care patients, how does a scheduled quiet time, compared with not implementing a scheduled quiet time, improve patient outcomes? Population: Adult critical care patients Intervention: Implementing a scheduled quiet time Comparison: Not implementing a scheduled quiet time Outcome: Improved patient outcomes Revised PICOT In adult critical care patients in the ICU, how does a scheduled quiet time, compared with not implementing a scheduled quiet time, improve patient rest periods? Population: Adult critical care patients Intervention: Implementing a scheduled quiet time Comparison: Not implementing a scheduled quiet time Outcome: Improved quality of patient rest periods Time: Over a three-month period Assignment: Evaluation of Research Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10
Use Promo Code: FIRST15