Communication paper
Communication paper
Communication paper Communication paper I need to get this paper paraphrase everything, ignore the reference. paper_123.docx Argumentative Essay against Euthanasia Argumentative Essay against Euthanasia Is euthanasia ethically and morally right? Euthanasia is the practice of knowingly ending a persons life to spare her or him from having to deal with more pain and suffering (Griffiths, Bood, & Weyers, 2010). If the laws are changed to allow active euthanasia, it will be hard to control because abuses and mistakes cannot be completely wiped out (Aghababaei, Hatami, & Rostami, 2011). Furthermore, today knowledge of medicine is not perfect, and discipline of science is continually upgrading. Thus, some may be situations where either malady may be wrongly diagnosed or researches being conducted to find new ways of curing. Moreover, there is a distinction between killing people without clear comprehension as a result of drugs and guilty feeling resulting from financial and social hardship (Yun et al., 2010). Also under applicable circumstances killing people who ask for death. Finally, statistics shows that mercy killing is allowed in this four places; Belgium, Oregon, Netherlands and Switzerland and in Belgium five people die daily due to assisted suicide. Euthanasia is a wrong practice since there is no surety that an individuals consent is voluntary, life is a gift from God and constant advancements in health care, therefore, medical legislation should set the required measures to ban the practice. Constant Innovations and Improvements in Health Care and Medicine An argument against euthanasia is that there are constant innovations and improvements in health care and medicine, thus, illogical to implement euthanasia as an option (Powell et al., 2012) . Medical experts want to make sure that healthy people are healthier and patients recover faster through them creating upgraded medicines, medical technologies and treatment methods (Topol & Hill, 2012). Therefore, doctors will not have an excuse for not giving their patients best services since they can access upgraded medicines, medical technologies, and treatment methods and have no compelling reason to perform euthanasia to the patient. Life as a Precious Gift from God and Preserving the Sanctity of Life. Euthanasia is clearly against viewing life as a precious gift from God and preserving the sanctity of life. God has a purpose for every season in a mans life may it be good or difficult times (Apple, 2013). In fact, God has given human intellectual abilities to make their lives better but not through practicing euthanasia because will be going against nature (Wilson, 2018). If suicide regarded as a bad act, then it is impossible to perceive euthanasia as a right act. Communication paper ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS Human beings are not allowed to take their own lives in their hands; their lives belong to a Supreme Being, God. Life is a present from God, and it should be viewed as a blessing but not terminating it when it becomes difficult. No Surety of the Fact that a Persons Consent is Voluntary. Lastly, euthanasia is not necessary because there is no surety of the fact that a persons consent is voluntary, perhaps someone has just given up in life emanating from emotions however he/she does not mean it in real (Hess & Bacigalupo, 2011). Moreover, individuals agree that majority of the cases where someone is suffering from a terminal sickness requests their lives taken. However, sick people are at times in a disoriented and confused state; may have psychiatric sicknesses or hearing impairment. The patient requesting their lives taken may not mean they want euthanasia, maybe they are emotional. Furthermore, a doctors diagnosis may be incorrect, but they have already told the patient he is terminally ill (Graber, 2013). The patient loses hope of living and requests for euthanasia; thus one would be unwise to lose his life because of a huge probability that one may be suffering from an incurable disease. Conclusion Euthanasia needs to be banned due to; first, life is a blessing from our Source. Second, no assurance whether the patients decision is real or just out of emotions resulting from pain. Thirdly, continuous advancement in health care. It has no space in the human society since no human should end another persons life. Also, doctors must exhaust all alternatives to provide chances for their patients to recover and survive and no matter how hopeless the situation may appear, they must never give up on their patients. References 1. Aghababaei, N., Hatami, J. A. V. A. D., & Rostami, R. (2011). The role of individual characteristics and judgment pattern in attitude towards euthanasia. Iran J Crit Care Nurs, 4(1), 23-32. 2. Apple, M. W. (2013). Educating the right way: Markets, standards, God, and inequality. Routledge. 3. Graber, M. L. (2013). The incidence of diagnostic error in medicine. BMJ Qual Saf, bmjqs-2012. 4. Griffiths, J., Bood, A., & Weyers, H. (2010). Euthanasia and law in the Netherlands (p. 382). Amsterdam University Press. 5. Hess, J. D., & Bacigalupo, A. C. (2011). Enhancing decisions and decision-making processes through the application of emotional intelligence skills. Management Decision, 49(5), 710-721. 6. Powell, B. J., McMillen, J. C., Proctor, E. K., Carpenter, C. R., Griffey, R. T., Bunger, A. C., & York, J. L. (2012). A compilation of strategies for implementing clinical innovations in health and mental health. Medical care research and review, 69(2), 123157. 7. Topol, E. J., & Hill, D. (2012). The creative destruction of medicine: How the digital revolution will create better health care (p. 2). New York: Basic Books. 8. Wilson, E. A. (2018). Acts against nature. Angelaki, 23(1), 19-31. 9. Yun, Y. H., Kwon, Y. C., Lee, M. K., Lee, W. J., Jung, K. H., Do, Y. R., & Park, S. Y. (2010). Experiences and attitudes of patients with terminal cancer and their family caregivers toward the disclosure of terminal illness. Journal of clinical Oncology, 28(11), 1950-1957. Purchase answer to see full attachment Student has agreed that all tutoring, explanations, and answers provided by the tutor will be used to help in the learning process and in accordance with Studypools honor code & terms of service . Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10
Communication paper
Communication paper Communication paper I need to get this paper paraphrase everything, ignore the reference. paper_123.docx Argumentative Essay against Euthanasia Argumentative Essay against Euthanasia Is euthanasia ethically and morally right? Euthanasia is the practice of knowingly ending a persons life to spare her or him from having to deal with more pain and suffering (Griffiths, Bood, & Weyers, 2010). If the laws are changed to allow active euthanasia, it will be hard to control because abuses and mistakes cannot be completely wiped out (Aghababaei, Hatami, & Rostami, 2011). Furthermore, today knowledge of medicine is not perfect, and discipline of science is continually upgrading. Thus, some may be situations where either malady may be wrongly diagnosed or researches being conducted to find new ways of curing. Moreover, there is a distinction between killing people without clear comprehension as a result of drugs and guilty feeling resulting from financial and social hardship (Yun et al., 2010). Also under applicable circumstances killing people who ask for death. Finally, statistics shows that mercy killing is allowed in this four places; Belgium, Oregon, Netherlands and Switzerland and in Belgium five people die daily due to assisted suicide. Euthanasia is a wrong practice since there is no surety that an individuals consent is voluntary, life is a gift from God and constant advancements in health care, therefore, medical legislation should set the required measures to ban the practice. Constant Innovations and Improvements in Health Care and Medicine An argument against euthanasia is that there are constant innovations and improvements in health care and medicine, thus, illogical to implement euthanasia as an option (Powell et al., 2012) . Medical experts want to make sure that healthy people are healthier and patients recover faster through them creating upgraded medicines, medical technologies and treatment methods (Topol & Hill, 2012). Therefore, doctors will not have an excuse for not giving their patients best services since they can access upgraded medicines, medical technologies, and treatment methods and have no compelling reason to perform euthanasia to the patient. Life as a Precious Gift from God and Preserving the Sanctity of Life. Euthanasia is clearly against viewing life as a precious gift from God and preserving the sanctity of life. God has a purpose for every season in a mans life may it be good or difficult times (Apple, 2013). In fact, God has given human intellectual abilities to make their lives better but not through practicing euthanasia because will be going against nature (Wilson, 2018). If suicide regarded as a bad act, then it is impossible to perceive euthanasia as a right act. Communication paper ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS Human beings are not allowed to take their own lives in their hands; their lives belong to a Supreme Being, God. Life is a present from God, and it should be viewed as a blessing but not terminating it when it becomes difficult. No Surety of the Fact that a Persons Consent is Voluntary. Lastly, euthanasia is not necessary because there is no surety of the fact that a persons consent is voluntary, perhaps someone has just given up in life emanating from emotions however he/she does not mean it in real (Hess & Bacigalupo, 2011). Moreover, individuals agree that majority of the cases where someone is suffering from a terminal sickness requests their lives taken. However, sick people are at times in a disoriented and confused state; may have psychiatric sicknesses or hearing impairment. The patient requesting their lives taken may not mean they want euthanasia, maybe they are emotional. Furthermore, a doctors diagnosis may be incorrect, but they have already told the patient he is terminally ill (Graber, 2013). The patient loses hope of living and requests for euthanasia; thus one would be unwise to lose his life because of a huge probability that one may be suffering from an incurable disease. Conclusion Euthanasia needs to be banned due to; first, life is a blessing from our Source. Second, no assurance whether the patients decision is real or just out of emotions resulting from pain. Thirdly, continuous advancement in health care. It has no space in the human society since no human should end another persons life. Also, doctors must exhaust all alternatives to provide chances for their patients to recover and survive and no matter how hopeless the situation may appear, they must never give up on their patients. References 1. Aghababaei, N., Hatami, J. A. V. A. D., & Rostami, R. (2011). The role of individual characteristics and judgment pattern in attitude towards euthanasia. Iran J Crit Care Nurs, 4(1), 23-32. 2. Apple, M. W. (2013). Educating the right way: Markets, standards, God, and inequality. Routledge. 3. Graber, M. L. (2013). The incidence of diagnostic error in medicine. BMJ Qual Saf, bmjqs-2012. 4. Griffiths, J., Bood, A., & Weyers, H. (2010). Euthanasia and law in the Netherlands (p. 382). Amsterdam University Press. 5. Hess, J. D., & Bacigalupo, A. C. (2011). Enhancing decisions and decision-making processes through the application of emotional intelligence skills. Management Decision, 49(5), 710-721. 6. Powell, B. J., McMillen, J. C., Proctor, E. K., Carpenter, C. R., Griffey, R. T., Bunger, A. C., & York, J. L. (2012). A compilation of strategies for implementing clinical innovations in health and mental health. Medical care research and review, 69(2), 123157. 7. Topol, E. J., & Hill, D. (2012). The creative destruction of medicine: How the digital revolution will create better health care (p. 2). New York: Basic Books. 8. Wilson, E. A. (2018). Acts against nature. Angelaki, 23(1), 19-31. 9. Yun, Y. H., Kwon, Y. C., Lee, M. K., Lee, W. J., Jung, K. H., Do, Y. R., & Park, S. Y. (2010). Experiences and attitudes of patients with terminal cancer and their family caregivers toward the disclosure of terminal illness. Journal of clinical Oncology, 28(11), 1950-1957. Purchase answer to see full attachment Student has agreed that all tutoring, explanations, and answers provided by the tutor will be used to help in the learning process and in accordance with Studypools honor code & terms of service . Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10
Use Promo Code: FIRST15