Discussion: Evidence Based Practice Project Evaluation Plan

Discussion: Evidence Based Practice Project Evaluation Plan ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS ON Discussion: Evidence Based Practice Project Evaluation Plan In 750 words, develop an evaluation plan to be included in your final evidence-based practice project. Provide the following criteria in the evaluation, making sure it is comprehensive and concise: Describe the rationale for the methods used in collecting the outcome data. Bowie State University NUR 3165 Evidence Based Practice Project Evaluation Plan Describe the ways in which the outcome measures evaluate the extent to which the project objectives are achieved. Describe how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the evidence. Address validity, reliability, and applicability. Discussion: Evidence Based Practice Project Evaluation Plan Describe strategies to take if outcomes do not provide positive results. Describe implications for practice and future research. You are required to cite 5 APA resources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. Bowie State University NUR 3165 Evidence Based Practice Project Evaluation Plan rubric_print_format_2.xlsx Discussion: Evidence Based Practice Project Evaluation Plan. Course Code NUR-590 Class Code NUR-590-O501 Criteria Content Percentage 70.0% Rationale for the Methods Used in Collecting the Outcome Data 10.0% Ways in Which the Outcome Measures Evaluate the Extent to Which the Project Objectives Are Achieved 10.0% How the Outcomes Will Be Measured and Evaluated Based on the Evidence, Including Validity, Reliability, and Applicability 20.0% Strategies to Take if Outcomes Do Not Provide Positive Results 10.0% Implications for Practice and Future Research 15.0% Required Sources 5.0% Organization and Effectiveness 20.0% Thesis Development and Purpose 7.0% Argument Logic and Construction 8.0% Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Format 10.0% Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Total Weightage 100% Assignment Title Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section F: Evaluation of Process Unsatisfactory (0.00%) A description of the rationale for the methods used in collecting the outcome data is not included. A discussion of ways in which the outcome measures evaluate the extent to which the project objectives are achieved is not included. A discussion of how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the evidence, including validity, reliability, and applicability, is not included. A discussion of strategies to take if outcomes do not provide positive results is not included. A discussion of implications for practice and future research is not included. Sources are not included. Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Sources are not documented. Total Points 100.0 Less than Satisfactory (80.00%) A description of the rationale for the methods used in collecting the outcome data is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A discussion of ways in which the outcome measures evaluate the extent to which the project objectives are achieved is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A discussion of how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the evidence, including validity, reliability, and applicability, is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A discussion of strategies to take if outcomes do not provide positive results is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A discussion of implications for practice and future research is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. Number of required sources is only partially met. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.Bowie State University NUR 3165 Evidence Based Practice Project Evaluation Plan Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Satisfactory (88.00%) A description of the rationale for the methods used in collecting the outcome data is present. A discussion of ways in which the outcome measures evaluate the extent to which the project objectives are achieved is present. A discussion of how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the evidence, including validity, reliability, and applicability, is present. A discussion of strategies to take if outcomes do not provide positive results is present. A discussion of implications for practice and future research is present. Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Good (92.00%) A description of the rationale for the methods used in collecting the outcome data is clearly provided and well developed. A discussion of ways in which the outcome measures evaluate the extent to which the project objectives are achieved is clearly provided and well developed. A discussion of how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the evidence, including validity, reliability, and applicability, is clearly provided and well developed. A discussion of strategies to take if outcomes do not provide positive results is clearly provided and well developed. A discussion of implications for practice and future research is clearly provided and well developed. Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. Bowie State University NUR 3165 Evidence Based Practice Project Evaluation Plan The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Excellent (100.00%) A comprehensive description of the rationale for the methods used in collecting the outcome data is thoroughly developed with supporting details. A comprehensive discussion of ways in which the outcome measures evaluate the extent to which the project objectives are achieved is thoroughly developed with supporting details. A comprehensive discussion of how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the evidence, including validity, reliability, and applicability, is thoroughly developed with supporting details. A comprehensive discussion of strategies to take if outcomes do not provide positive results is thoroughly developed with supporting details. A comprehensive discussion of implications for practice and future research is thoroughly developed with supporting details. Number of required resources is met. Sources are current, and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. Comments Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. All format elements are correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. Points Earned … Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10

Read more

Discussion: Evidence Based Practice Project Evaluation Plan

Discussion: Evidence Based Practice Project Evaluation Plan ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS ON Discussion: Evidence Based Practice Project Evaluation Plan In 750 words, develop an evaluation plan to be included in your final evidence-based practice project. Provide the following criteria in the evaluation, making sure it is comprehensive and concise: Describe the rationale for the methods used in collecting the outcome data. Bowie State University NUR 3165 Evidence Based Practice Project Evaluation Plan Describe the ways in which the outcome measures evaluate the extent to which the project objectives are achieved. Describe how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the evidence. Address validity, reliability, and applicability. Discussion: Evidence Based Practice Project Evaluation Plan Describe strategies to take if outcomes do not provide positive results. Describe implications for practice and future research. You are required to cite 5 APA resources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. Bowie State University NUR 3165 Evidence Based Practice Project Evaluation Plan rubric_print_format_2.xlsx Discussion: Evidence Based Practice Project Evaluation Plan. Course Code NUR-590 Class Code NUR-590-O501 Criteria Content Percentage 70.0% Rationale for the Methods Used in Collecting the Outcome Data 10.0% Ways in Which the Outcome Measures Evaluate the Extent to Which the Project Objectives Are Achieved 10.0% How the Outcomes Will Be Measured and Evaluated Based on the Evidence, Including Validity, Reliability, and Applicability 20.0% Strategies to Take if Outcomes Do Not Provide Positive Results 10.0% Implications for Practice and Future Research 15.0% Required Sources 5.0% Organization and Effectiveness 20.0% Thesis Development and Purpose 7.0% Argument Logic and Construction 8.0% Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Format 10.0% Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Total Weightage 100% Assignment Title Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section F: Evaluation of Process Unsatisfactory (0.00%) A description of the rationale for the methods used in collecting the outcome data is not included. A discussion of ways in which the outcome measures evaluate the extent to which the project objectives are achieved is not included. A discussion of how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the evidence, including validity, reliability, and applicability, is not included. A discussion of strategies to take if outcomes do not provide positive results is not included. A discussion of implications for practice and future research is not included. Sources are not included. Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Sources are not documented. Total Points 100.0 Less than Satisfactory (80.00%) A description of the rationale for the methods used in collecting the outcome data is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A discussion of ways in which the outcome measures evaluate the extent to which the project objectives are achieved is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A discussion of how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the evidence, including validity, reliability, and applicability, is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A discussion of strategies to take if outcomes do not provide positive results is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A discussion of implications for practice and future research is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. Number of required sources is only partially met. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.Bowie State University NUR 3165 Evidence Based Practice Project Evaluation Plan Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Satisfactory (88.00%) A description of the rationale for the methods used in collecting the outcome data is present. A discussion of ways in which the outcome measures evaluate the extent to which the project objectives are achieved is present. A discussion of how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the evidence, including validity, reliability, and applicability, is present. A discussion of strategies to take if outcomes do not provide positive results is present. A discussion of implications for practice and future research is present. Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Good (92.00%) A description of the rationale for the methods used in collecting the outcome data is clearly provided and well developed. A discussion of ways in which the outcome measures evaluate the extent to which the project objectives are achieved is clearly provided and well developed. A discussion of how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the evidence, including validity, reliability, and applicability, is clearly provided and well developed. A discussion of strategies to take if outcomes do not provide positive results is clearly provided and well developed. A discussion of implications for practice and future research is clearly provided and well developed. Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. Bowie State University NUR 3165 Evidence Based Practice Project Evaluation Plan The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Excellent (100.00%) A comprehensive description of the rationale for the methods used in collecting the outcome data is thoroughly developed with supporting details. A comprehensive discussion of ways in which the outcome measures evaluate the extent to which the project objectives are achieved is thoroughly developed with supporting details. A comprehensive discussion of how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the evidence, including validity, reliability, and applicability, is thoroughly developed with supporting details. A comprehensive discussion of strategies to take if outcomes do not provide positive results is thoroughly developed with supporting details. A comprehensive discussion of implications for practice and future research is thoroughly developed with supporting details. Number of required resources is met. Sources are current, and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. Comments Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. All format elements are correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. Points Earned … Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10

Read more
Enjoy affordable prices and lifetime discounts
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Order Now Order in Chat

Start off on the right foot this semester. Get expert-written solutions at a 20% discount