GCU NRS433V Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations

GCU NRS433V Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS ON GCU NRS433V Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations Prepare this assignment as a 1,500-1,750 word paper using the instructor feedback from the previous course assignments and the guidelines below. GCU NRS433V Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations PICOT Question Revise the PICOT question you wrote in the Topic 1 assignment using the feedback you received from your instructor. The final PICOT question will provide a framework for your capstone project (the project students must complete during their final course in the RN-BSN program of study). Research Critiques In the Topic 2 and Topic 3 assignments, you completed a qualitative and quantitative research critique on two articles for each type of study (4 articles total). Use the feedback you received from your instructor on these assignments to finalize the critical analysis of each study by making appropriate revisions. The completed analysis should connect to your identified practice problem of interest that is the basis for your PICOT question. GCU NRS433V Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations Refer to “Research Critiques and PICOT Guidelines – Final Draft.” Questions under each heading should be addressed as a narrative in the structure of a formal paper. Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Change Discuss the link between the PICOT question, the research articles, and the nursing practice problem you identified. Include relevant details and supporting explanation and use that information to propose evidence-based practice changes. General Requirements Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. rubric_print_format.xlsx rubric_print_format__2_.xlsx rubric_print_format__1_.xlsx research_paper_week_1picot_statement_and_literature_search__2_.docx nrs_433v_rs2_researchcritiqueguidelinespart_i.docx ti_research_week_2_qualitative_research_analysis_and_ethical_critique.docx nrs_433v_rs2_researchcritiqueguidelinespart_i__1_.docx quantitative_research_week_3_ Course Code NRS-433V Class Code NRS-433V-O501 Criteria Content Percentage 75.0% Qualitative Studies 5.0% Background of Study 10.0% Article Support of Nursing Practice Issue 15.0% Method of Study 15.0% Results of Study 15.0% Ethical Considerations 15.0% Organization and Effectiveness 15.0% Thesis Development and Purpose 5.0% Argument Logic and Construction 5.0% Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Format 10.0% Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Total Weightage 100% Assignment Title Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations 1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Only one article is presented. Neither of the articles presented use qualitative research. Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is incomplete. Discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is incomplete. Discussion on the method of study for each article is omitted. The comparison of study methods is omitted or incomplete. Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is incomplete. Discussion of ethical considerations when conducting nursing research is incomplete. A discussion on ethical considerations of the two articles presented in the essay is incomplete.GCU NRS433V Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Sources are not documented. Total Points 200.0 2: Less Than Satisfactory (75.00%) Two articles are presented. Of the articles presented, only one article is based on qualitative research. Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is included but lacks relevant details and explanation. A summary of how articles support the PICOT question is presented. It is unclear how the articles can be used to answer the proposed PICOT question. Significant information and detail are required. A partial summary of the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is incomplete. A benefit and a limitation of each method are omitted or incomplete. There are significant inaccuracies. A summary of the study results includes findings and implications for nursing practice but lacks relevant details and explanation. There are some omissions or inaccuracies. Discussion of ethical considerations when conducting nursing research is included but lacks relevant details and explanation. A discussion on ethical considerations of the two articles used in the essay is summarized but there are significant inaccuracies or omissions. GCU NRS433V Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present. Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. 3: Satisfactory (83.00%) N/A Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation. A general discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is presented. The articles demonstrate general support in answering the proposed PICOT question. It is unclear how the interventions and comparison groups in the articles compare to those identified in the PICOT question. Some rational or information is needed. A general discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is summarized. A benefit and a limitation of each method are summarized. There some inaccuracies or partial omissions. More information is needed. Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is generally presented. Overall, the discussion includes some relevant details and explanation. Discussion of ethical considerations when conducting nursing research is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation. GCU NRS433V Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations A discussion on ethical considerations of the two articles used in the essay is discussed but there are some inaccuracies, or some information is needed. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. 4: Good (94.00%) N/A Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation. A discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is presented. The articles demonstrate support in answering the proposed PICOT question. The interventions and comparison groups in the articles compare to those identified in the PICOT question. Minor detail or rational is needed for clarity or support. A discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is generally described. A benefit and a limitation of each method are presented. There minor are inaccuracies.GCU NRS433V Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations Some detail is required for accuracy or clarity. Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation. Discussion of ethical considerations when conducting nursing research is complete and includes relevant details and explanation. A discussion on ethical considerations of the two articles used in the essay is presented; some detail in needed for accuracy or clarity. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. 5: Excellent (100.00%) Two articles are presented. Both articles are based on qualitative research. Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation. A clear discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is presented. The articles demonstrate strong support in answering the proposed PICOT question. The interventions and comparison groups in the articles strongly compare to those identified in the PICOT question. A thorough discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is described in detail. A benefit and a limitation of each method are presented. The discussion demonstrates a solid understanding of research methods. GCU NRS433V Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation. Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation. A detailed discussion on ethical considerations of the two articles used in the essay is presented. Comments Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. Argument is clear and convincing and presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. All format elements are correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. Points Earned 10.00/10.00 20.00/20.00 30.00/30.00 30.00/30.00 30.00/30.00 30.00/30.00 9.40/10.00 9.40/10.00 9.40/10.00 9.40/10.00 9.40/10.00 197.00/200.0 Course Code NRS-433V Class Code NRS-433V-O501 Criteria Content Percentage 75.0% Quantitative Studies 5.0% Background of Study 10.0% Article Support of Nursing Practice 15.0% Method of Study 15.0% Results of Study 15.0% Anticipated Outcomes and Outcomes Comparison 15.0% Organization and Effectiveness 15.0% Thesis Development and Purpose 5.0% Argument Logic and Construction 5.0% Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Format 10.0% Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Total Weightage 100% Assignment Title Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations 1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Only one article is presented. GCU NRS433V Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations Neither of the articles presented use quantitative research. Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is incomplete. Discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is incomplete. Discussion on the method of study for each article is omitted. The comparison of study methods is omitted or incomplete. Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is incomplete. Anticipated outcomes for the PICOT are omitted or are unrealistic. Comparison of research article outcomes to anticipated outcomes is incomplete. Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Sources are not documented. Total Points 200.0 2: Less Than Satisfactory (75.00%) Two articles are presented. Of the articles presented, only one article is based on quantitative research. Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is included but lacks relevant details and explanation. A summary of how articles support the PICOT question is presented. It is unclear how the articles can be used to answer the proposed PICOT question. Significant information and detail is required. A partial summary of the method of study for each article is presented. GCU NRS433V Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations The comparison of study methods is incomplete. A benefit and a limitation of each method are omitted or incomplete. There are significant inaccuracies. A summary of the study results includes findings and implications for nursing practice but lacks relevant details and explanation. There are some omissions or inaccuracies. Anticipated outcomes for the PICOT are partially summarized. Comparison of research article outcomes to anticipated outcomes contains omissions of key information. It is unclear how the anticipated outcomes of the PICOT and those of the current research mentioned compare. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present. Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. 3: Satisfactory (83.00%) N/A Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation. A general discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is presented. The articles demonstrate general support in answering the proposed PICOT question. It is unclear how the interventions and comparison groups in the articles compare to those identified in the PICOT question. Some rational or information is needed. A general discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is summarized. A benefit and a limitation of each method are summarized. GCU NRS433V Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations There some inaccuracies or partial omissions. More information is needed. Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is generally presented. Overall, the discussion includes some relevant details and explanation. Anticipated outcomes for the PICOT are summarized. Comparison of research article outcomes to anticipated outcomes is generally presented. More information is needed to fully establish how the anticipated outcomes of the PICOT and those of the current research mentioned compare. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. 4: Good (94.00%) N/A Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation. A discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is presented. The articles demonstrate support in answering the proposed PICOT question. The interventions and comparison groups in the articles compare to those identified in the PICOT question. Minor detail or rational is needed for clarity or support. A discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is generally described. A benefit and a limitation of each method are presented. There minor are inaccuracies. Some detail is required for accuracy or clarity. Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation. Anticipated outcomes for the PICOT are discussed.GCU NRS433V Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations A comparison of research article outcomes to anticipated outcomes of the PICOT is presented. An explanation of how the anticipated outcomes of the PICOT and those of the current research mentioned compare is presented. Some detail is needed for clarity. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. : Excellent (100.00%) Two articles are presented. Both articles are based on quantitative research. Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation. A clear discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is presented. The articles demonstrate strong support in answering the proposed PICOT question. The interventions and comparison groups in the articles strongly compare to those identified in the PICOT question. A thorough discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is described in detail. A benefit and a limitation of each method are presented. The discussion demonstrates a solid understanding of research methods. Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation. Anticipated outcomes for the PICOT are thoroughly discussed. GCU NRS433V Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations A detailed comparison of research article outcomes to the anticipated outcomes of the PICOT is presented. An explanation of how the anticipated outcomes of the PICOT and those of the current research mentioned compare is presented in detail. Comments Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. Argument is clear and convincing and presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. All format elements are correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. Points Earned 0.00/10.00 18.80/20.00 28.20/30.00 28.20/30.00 28.20/30.00 28.20/30.00 9.40/10.00 9.40/10.00 9.40/10.00 9.40/10.00 9.40/10.00 178.60/200.0 Course Code NRS-433V Class Code NRS-433V-O501 Criteria Content Percentage 75.0% Qualitative Studies 5.0% Background of Study 10.0% Article Support of Nursing Practice Issue 15.0% Method of Study 15.0% Results of Study 15.0% Ethical Considerations 15.0% Organization and Effectiveness 15.0% Thesis Development and Purpose 5.0% Argument Logic and Construction 5.0% Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Format 10.0% Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Total Weightage 100% Assignment Title Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations 1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Only one article is presented. Neither of the articles presented use qualitative research. Background of study, including p … Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10

Read more

GCU NRS433V Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations

GCU NRS433V Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS ON GCU NRS433V Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations Prepare this assignment as a 1,500-1,750 word paper using the instructor feedback from the previous course assignments and the guidelines below. GCU NRS433V Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations PICOT Question Revise the PICOT question you wrote in the Topic 1 assignment using the feedback you received from your instructor. The final PICOT question will provide a framework for your capstone project (the project students must complete during their final course in the RN-BSN program of study). Research Critiques In the Topic 2 and Topic 3 assignments, you completed a qualitative and quantitative research critique on two articles for each type of study (4 articles total). Use the feedback you received from your instructor on these assignments to finalize the critical analysis of each study by making appropriate revisions. The completed analysis should connect to your identified practice problem of interest that is the basis for your PICOT question. GCU NRS433V Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations Refer to “Research Critiques and PICOT Guidelines – Final Draft.” Questions under each heading should be addressed as a narrative in the structure of a formal paper. Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Change Discuss the link between the PICOT question, the research articles, and the nursing practice problem you identified. Include relevant details and supporting explanation and use that information to propose evidence-based practice changes. General Requirements Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. rubric_print_format.xlsx rubric_print_format__2_.xlsx rubric_print_format__1_.xlsx research_paper_week_1picot_statement_and_literature_search__2_.docx nrs_433v_rs2_researchcritiqueguidelinespart_i.docx ti_research_week_2_qualitative_research_analysis_and_ethical_critique.docx nrs_433v_rs2_researchcritiqueguidelinespart_i__1_.docx quantitative_research_week_3_ Course Code NRS-433V Class Code NRS-433V-O501 Criteria Content Percentage 75.0% Qualitative Studies 5.0% Background of Study 10.0% Article Support of Nursing Practice Issue 15.0% Method of Study 15.0% Results of Study 15.0% Ethical Considerations 15.0% Organization and Effectiveness 15.0% Thesis Development and Purpose 5.0% Argument Logic and Construction 5.0% Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Format 10.0% Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Total Weightage 100% Assignment Title Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations 1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Only one article is presented. Neither of the articles presented use qualitative research. Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is incomplete. Discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is incomplete. Discussion on the method of study for each article is omitted. The comparison of study methods is omitted or incomplete. Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is incomplete. Discussion of ethical considerations when conducting nursing research is incomplete. A discussion on ethical considerations of the two articles presented in the essay is incomplete.GCU NRS433V Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Sources are not documented. Total Points 200.0 2: Less Than Satisfactory (75.00%) Two articles are presented. Of the articles presented, only one article is based on qualitative research. Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is included but lacks relevant details and explanation. A summary of how articles support the PICOT question is presented. It is unclear how the articles can be used to answer the proposed PICOT question. Significant information and detail are required. A partial summary of the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is incomplete. A benefit and a limitation of each method are omitted or incomplete. There are significant inaccuracies. A summary of the study results includes findings and implications for nursing practice but lacks relevant details and explanation. There are some omissions or inaccuracies. Discussion of ethical considerations when conducting nursing research is included but lacks relevant details and explanation. A discussion on ethical considerations of the two articles used in the essay is summarized but there are significant inaccuracies or omissions. GCU NRS433V Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present. Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. 3: Satisfactory (83.00%) N/A Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation. A general discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is presented. The articles demonstrate general support in answering the proposed PICOT question. It is unclear how the interventions and comparison groups in the articles compare to those identified in the PICOT question. Some rational or information is needed. A general discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is summarized. A benefit and a limitation of each method are summarized. There some inaccuracies or partial omissions. More information is needed. Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is generally presented. Overall, the discussion includes some relevant details and explanation. Discussion of ethical considerations when conducting nursing research is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation. GCU NRS433V Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations A discussion on ethical considerations of the two articles used in the essay is discussed but there are some inaccuracies, or some information is needed. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. 4: Good (94.00%) N/A Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation. A discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is presented. The articles demonstrate support in answering the proposed PICOT question. The interventions and comparison groups in the articles compare to those identified in the PICOT question. Minor detail or rational is needed for clarity or support. A discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is generally described. A benefit and a limitation of each method are presented. There minor are inaccuracies.GCU NRS433V Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations Some detail is required for accuracy or clarity. Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation. Discussion of ethical considerations when conducting nursing research is complete and includes relevant details and explanation. A discussion on ethical considerations of the two articles used in the essay is presented; some detail in needed for accuracy or clarity. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. 5: Excellent (100.00%) Two articles are presented. Both articles are based on qualitative research. Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation. A clear discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is presented. The articles demonstrate strong support in answering the proposed PICOT question. The interventions and comparison groups in the articles strongly compare to those identified in the PICOT question. A thorough discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is described in detail. A benefit and a limitation of each method are presented. The discussion demonstrates a solid understanding of research methods. GCU NRS433V Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation. Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation. A detailed discussion on ethical considerations of the two articles used in the essay is presented. Comments Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. Argument is clear and convincing and presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. All format elements are correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. Points Earned 10.00/10.00 20.00/20.00 30.00/30.00 30.00/30.00 30.00/30.00 30.00/30.00 9.40/10.00 9.40/10.00 9.40/10.00 9.40/10.00 9.40/10.00 197.00/200.0 Course Code NRS-433V Class Code NRS-433V-O501 Criteria Content Percentage 75.0% Quantitative Studies 5.0% Background of Study 10.0% Article Support of Nursing Practice 15.0% Method of Study 15.0% Results of Study 15.0% Anticipated Outcomes and Outcomes Comparison 15.0% Organization and Effectiveness 15.0% Thesis Development and Purpose 5.0% Argument Logic and Construction 5.0% Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Format 10.0% Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Total Weightage 100% Assignment Title Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations 1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Only one article is presented. GCU NRS433V Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations Neither of the articles presented use quantitative research. Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is incomplete. Discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is incomplete. Discussion on the method of study for each article is omitted. The comparison of study methods is omitted or incomplete. Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is incomplete. Anticipated outcomes for the PICOT are omitted or are unrealistic. Comparison of research article outcomes to anticipated outcomes is incomplete. Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Sources are not documented. Total Points 200.0 2: Less Than Satisfactory (75.00%) Two articles are presented. Of the articles presented, only one article is based on quantitative research. Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is included but lacks relevant details and explanation. A summary of how articles support the PICOT question is presented. It is unclear how the articles can be used to answer the proposed PICOT question. Significant information and detail is required. A partial summary of the method of study for each article is presented. GCU NRS433V Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations The comparison of study methods is incomplete. A benefit and a limitation of each method are omitted or incomplete. There are significant inaccuracies. A summary of the study results includes findings and implications for nursing practice but lacks relevant details and explanation. There are some omissions or inaccuracies. Anticipated outcomes for the PICOT are partially summarized. Comparison of research article outcomes to anticipated outcomes contains omissions of key information. It is unclear how the anticipated outcomes of the PICOT and those of the current research mentioned compare. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present. Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. 3: Satisfactory (83.00%) N/A Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation. A general discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is presented. The articles demonstrate general support in answering the proposed PICOT question. It is unclear how the interventions and comparison groups in the articles compare to those identified in the PICOT question. Some rational or information is needed. A general discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is summarized. A benefit and a limitation of each method are summarized. GCU NRS433V Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations There some inaccuracies or partial omissions. More information is needed. Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is generally presented. Overall, the discussion includes some relevant details and explanation. Anticipated outcomes for the PICOT are summarized. Comparison of research article outcomes to anticipated outcomes is generally presented. More information is needed to fully establish how the anticipated outcomes of the PICOT and those of the current research mentioned compare. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. 4: Good (94.00%) N/A Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation. A discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is presented. The articles demonstrate support in answering the proposed PICOT question. The interventions and comparison groups in the articles compare to those identified in the PICOT question. Minor detail or rational is needed for clarity or support. A discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is generally described. A benefit and a limitation of each method are presented. There minor are inaccuracies. Some detail is required for accuracy or clarity. Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation. Anticipated outcomes for the PICOT are discussed.GCU NRS433V Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations A comparison of research article outcomes to anticipated outcomes of the PICOT is presented. An explanation of how the anticipated outcomes of the PICOT and those of the current research mentioned compare is presented. Some detail is needed for clarity. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. : Excellent (100.00%) Two articles are presented. Both articles are based on quantitative research. Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation. A clear discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is presented. The articles demonstrate strong support in answering the proposed PICOT question. The interventions and comparison groups in the articles strongly compare to those identified in the PICOT question. A thorough discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is described in detail. A benefit and a limitation of each method are presented. The discussion demonstrates a solid understanding of research methods. Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation. Anticipated outcomes for the PICOT are thoroughly discussed. GCU NRS433V Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations A detailed comparison of research article outcomes to the anticipated outcomes of the PICOT is presented. An explanation of how the anticipated outcomes of the PICOT and those of the current research mentioned compare is presented in detail. Comments Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. Argument is clear and convincing and presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. All format elements are correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. Points Earned 0.00/10.00 18.80/20.00 28.20/30.00 28.20/30.00 28.20/30.00 28.20/30.00 9.40/10.00 9.40/10.00 9.40/10.00 9.40/10.00 9.40/10.00 178.60/200.0 Course Code NRS-433V Class Code NRS-433V-O501 Criteria Content Percentage 75.0% Qualitative Studies 5.0% Background of Study 10.0% Article Support of Nursing Practice Issue 15.0% Method of Study 15.0% Results of Study 15.0% Ethical Considerations 15.0% Organization and Effectiveness 15.0% Thesis Development and Purpose 5.0% Argument Logic and Construction 5.0% Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Format 10.0% Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Total Weightage 100% Assignment Title Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations 1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Only one article is presented. Neither of the articles presented use qualitative research. Background of study, including p … Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10

Read more
Enjoy affordable prices and lifetime discounts
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Order Now Order in Chat

Start off on the right foot this semester. Get expert-written solutions at a 20% discount