Grand Canyon University NUR 674 Personal Model of Leadership Discussion

Grand Canyon University NUR 674 Personal Model of Leadership Discussion ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS ON Grand Canyon University NUR 674 Personal Model of Leadership Discussion As a nurse leader, it is important to understand a variety of leadership models and styles. This will help you adapt to different settings and apply strategies to support and inspire others. It may also be necessary to apply models in different professional settings to satisfy certification requirements. Write a 1,000-1,250 word paper about your personal model of leadership, including the following: Grand Canyon University NUR 674 Personal Model of Leadership Discussion How might your personal model of leadership be applied in your professional setting? Compare your personal leadership model to servant leadership, transformational leadership, and at least one other model of leadership. Describe your personal worldview, including the religious, spiritual, and cultural elements that you think most influence your personal philosophy of practice and attitude towards leadership. Describe how your professional leadership behaviors can inspire others. Use a minimum of three peer-reviewed resources (published within the last 5 years) as evidence to support your views. Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. attachment_1 Course Code NUR-674 Class Code NUR-674-O501 Criteria Content Percentage 70.0% Personal Model of Leadership 15.0% Application in Professional Setting (C: 6.3) 15.0% Leadership Model Comparison 15.0% Personal Worldview 15.0% Inspiration (C: 6.7) 10.0% Organization and Effectiveness 20.0% Thesis Development and Purpose 7.0% Argument Logic and Construction 8.0% Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Format 10.0% Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Total Weightage 100% Assignment Title Benchmark – Personal Worldview and Model of Leadership Paper 1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%) A description of the personal model of leadership is not present. A description of how the personal model of leadership will be applied in the professional setting is not present. A comparison of the personal leadership style to at least one other leadership style is not present. A description of how the personal worldview will influence the personal philosophy of practice and attitude towards leadership is not present. A description of how the personal leadership behaviors can inspire others is not present. Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Sources are not documented. Total Points 105.0 2: Less Than Satisfactory (80.00%) A description of the personal model of leadership is incomplete or incorrect. A description of how the personal model of leadership will be applied in the professional setting is incomplete or incorrect. A comparison of the personal leadership style to at least one other leadership style is incomplete or incorrect. A description of how the personal worldview will influence the personal philosophy of practice and attitude towards leadership is incomplete or incorrect. A description of how the personal leadership behaviors can inspire others is incomplete or incorrect. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Grand Canyon University NUR 674 Personal Model of Leadership Discussion Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. 3: Satisfactory (88.00%) A description of the personal model of leadership is included but lacks supporting details. A description of how the personal model of leadership will be applied in the professional setting is included but lacks supporting details. A comparison of the personal leadership style to at least one other leadership style is included but lacks supporting details. A description of how the personal worldview will influence the personal philosophy of practice and attitude towards leadership is included but lacks supporting details. A description of how the personal leadership behaviors can inspire others is included but lacks supporting details. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. 4: Good (92.00%) A description of the personal model of leadership is complete and includes supporting details. A description of how the personal model of leadership will be applied in the professional setting is complete and includes supporting details. A comparison of the personal leadership style to at least one other leadership style is complete and includes supporting details. A description of how the personal worldview will influence the personal philosophy of practice and attitude towards leadership is complete and includes supporting details. A description of how the personal leadership behaviors can inspire others is complete and includes supporting details. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. Grand Canyon University NUR 674 Personal Model of Leadership Discussion The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. 5: Excellent (100.00%) A description of the personal model of leadership is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details. A description of how the personal model of leadership will be applied in the professional setting is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details. A comparison of the personal leadership style to at least one other leadership style is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details. A description of how the personal worldview will influence the personal philosophy of practice and attitude towards leadership is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details. A description of how the personal leadership behaviors can inspire others is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. Comments Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. All format elements are correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. Points Earned … Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10

Read more

Grand Canyon University NUR 674 Personal Model of Leadership Discussion

Grand Canyon University NUR 674 Personal Model of Leadership Discussion ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS ON Grand Canyon University NUR 674 Personal Model of Leadership Discussion As a nurse leader, it is important to understand a variety of leadership models and styles. This will help you adapt to different settings and apply strategies to support and inspire others. It may also be necessary to apply models in different professional settings to satisfy certification requirements. Write a 1,000-1,250 word paper about your personal model of leadership, including the following: Grand Canyon University NUR 674 Personal Model of Leadership Discussion How might your personal model of leadership be applied in your professional setting? Compare your personal leadership model to servant leadership, transformational leadership, and at least one other model of leadership. Describe your personal worldview, including the religious, spiritual, and cultural elements that you think most influence your personal philosophy of practice and attitude towards leadership. Describe how your professional leadership behaviors can inspire others. Use a minimum of three peer-reviewed resources (published within the last 5 years) as evidence to support your views. Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. attachment_1 Course Code NUR-674 Class Code NUR-674-O501 Criteria Content Percentage 70.0% Personal Model of Leadership 15.0% Application in Professional Setting (C: 6.3) 15.0% Leadership Model Comparison 15.0% Personal Worldview 15.0% Inspiration (C: 6.7) 10.0% Organization and Effectiveness 20.0% Thesis Development and Purpose 7.0% Argument Logic and Construction 8.0% Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Format 10.0% Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Total Weightage 100% Assignment Title Benchmark – Personal Worldview and Model of Leadership Paper 1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%) A description of the personal model of leadership is not present. A description of how the personal model of leadership will be applied in the professional setting is not present. A comparison of the personal leadership style to at least one other leadership style is not present. A description of how the personal worldview will influence the personal philosophy of practice and attitude towards leadership is not present. A description of how the personal leadership behaviors can inspire others is not present. Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Sources are not documented. Total Points 105.0 2: Less Than Satisfactory (80.00%) A description of the personal model of leadership is incomplete or incorrect. A description of how the personal model of leadership will be applied in the professional setting is incomplete or incorrect. A comparison of the personal leadership style to at least one other leadership style is incomplete or incorrect. A description of how the personal worldview will influence the personal philosophy of practice and attitude towards leadership is incomplete or incorrect. A description of how the personal leadership behaviors can inspire others is incomplete or incorrect. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Grand Canyon University NUR 674 Personal Model of Leadership Discussion Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. 3: Satisfactory (88.00%) A description of the personal model of leadership is included but lacks supporting details. A description of how the personal model of leadership will be applied in the professional setting is included but lacks supporting details. A comparison of the personal leadership style to at least one other leadership style is included but lacks supporting details. A description of how the personal worldview will influence the personal philosophy of practice and attitude towards leadership is included but lacks supporting details. A description of how the personal leadership behaviors can inspire others is included but lacks supporting details. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. 4: Good (92.00%) A description of the personal model of leadership is complete and includes supporting details. A description of how the personal model of leadership will be applied in the professional setting is complete and includes supporting details. A comparison of the personal leadership style to at least one other leadership style is complete and includes supporting details. A description of how the personal worldview will influence the personal philosophy of practice and attitude towards leadership is complete and includes supporting details. A description of how the personal leadership behaviors can inspire others is complete and includes supporting details. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. Grand Canyon University NUR 674 Personal Model of Leadership Discussion The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. 5: Excellent (100.00%) A description of the personal model of leadership is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details. A description of how the personal model of leadership will be applied in the professional setting is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details. A comparison of the personal leadership style to at least one other leadership style is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details. A description of how the personal worldview will influence the personal philosophy of practice and attitude towards leadership is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details. A description of how the personal leadership behaviors can inspire others is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. Comments Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. All format elements are correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. Points Earned … Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10

Read more
Enjoy affordable prices and lifetime discounts
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Order Now Order in Chat

We now help with PROCTORED EXAM. Chat with a support agent for more details