LIU NUR 363 Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence Based Practice Worksheet

LIU NUR 363 Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence Based Practice Worksheet ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS ON LIU NUR 363 Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence Based Practice Worksheet Please, checkout the uploaded files below, where you will find information and instructions. Thank you example_spring_2020_nur_363_jhn_ebp_research_appraisal_tool.pdf spring_2020_nur_363_jhn_ebp_res NOTE: This assignment is worth 20% of the final grade. Put significant work into it – seek help if needed. There are FIVE PARTS. Follow instructions and rubric. Complete all sections thoroughly. Student Name Team Date Part 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Evidence level I II III (bold when complete level assessment) Quality Rating A B C (bold when complete quality appraisal) Article Citation (APA format) Study Setting (city/state/country, hospital/units/clinic, etc.) Study Sample (demographics & size) Team EBP Question Bold answer Yes No Is this article/report Quantitative Research (collection, analysis, and reporting of numerical data)? Measurable data (how many; how much; or how often) used to formulate facts, uncover patterns, and generalize results from a larger sample population; provides observed effects of a program, problem, or condition, measured precisely, rather than through researcher interpretation of data. Common methods of data collection are surveys, face-to-face structured interviews, observations, and reviews of records or documents. Statistical tests are used in data analysis. This is NOT just a literature review, NOT a systematic review, and NOT a qualitative research article. Quantitative Research INSTRUCTIONS: FOR EVERY QUESTION ANSWER YES OR NO AND IN THE BOX WITH THE QUESTION WRITE A RESPONSE IF YES ANSWER IN THIS SECTION. DO NOT COPY AND PASTE. PARAPHRASE ANSWERS. YOU WILL USE THIS INFORMATION TO WRITE YOUR PAPER. Part 2. LEVEL Determine the LEVEL of this Research (Study Design) Bold answers 1. Was there manipulation of an independent variable (Intervention)? If so, what was the independent variable: Yes No 2. Was there a control group (a structured comparison group)? Describe: Yes No 3. Were participants randomly assigned to intervention or control groups? Describe: Yes No Based on the answers choose the LEVEL of this research study: Bold answers If Yes to questions 1, 2, & 3, this is a randomized controlled trial (RCT) or experimental study . LEVEL I If Yes to questions 1 & 2 and No to question 3 or Yes to question 1 and No to questions 2 & 3, this is quasi-experimental (manipulation of an independent variable, lacks random assignment to groups, and may lack a control group). LEVEL II If No to questions 1, 2, & 3, this is nonexperimental (No manipulation of independent variable (no experiment); can be observational or descriptive; may use secondary data). LEVEL III ENTER LEVEL AT THE TOP OF TOOL Part 3. HOW DOES RESEARCH HELP ANSWER THE EBP QUESTION? Include all relevant details – use bullets. Do not just copy and paste – use your own words: Highlight what you learned from this research article that can influence nursing practice related to the EBP question. THIS IS NOT A SUMMARY. PUT SIGNIFICANT THOUGHT INTO THIS SECTION. Erase these instructions after completing this section. SEE EXAMPLE. Part 4. APPRAISE THE QUALITY OF THE RESEARCH ARTICLE THIS SECTION FOLLOWS THE ARTICLE – START AT THE BEGINNING AND MOVE THROUGH IT. BOLD YES OR NO ANSWERS AND DESCRIBE/EXPLAIN THE DETAILS FOR EVERY QUESTION WHETHER THE ANSWER IS YES OR NO . N/A DOES NOT COUNT AS “NO” ANSWER. Was the purpose of the study clearly presented? Describe the purpose: Yes No In the Introduction/Literature Review section is it identified what is known and not known about the problem? Does it state how the study will address any gaps in knowledge? Explain details of the literature review and answer question thoroughly: Yes No Was the literature review (references used) current (most references within the past five years OF PUBLICATION)? (Hint – information is in Introduction/Literature Review section AND references) Explain: Yes No Was the sample size sufficient based on the study design & rationale? How do you know? (Check your textbook/class notes for sample size info) Explain: Yes No Was there a control group? If YES answer these 3 questions. If NO BOLD N/A for these 3 questions – N/A are NOT NO answers Yes Were the characteristics and/or demographics similar in the control and intervention groups? Describe: Yes No N/A If multiple settings were used, were the settings similar? (N/A if only one setting) Explain: Yes No N/A Were the control and intervention groups treated equally except for the intervention? Explain: Yes No N/A Are data collection methods (how they gathered the data) described clearly? Describe with detail how data collected: Yes No IF instruments/tools/surveys/questionnaires were used to collect data, were they stated as reliable (Cronbach’s [alpha] > 0.70)? (This is about the data collection NOT results) Explain: Yes No N/A IF instruments/tools/surveys/questionnaires were used to gather data, was validity discussed? (This is about the data collection NOT results) Explain: Yes No N/A IF surveys or questionnaires were sent out , how many were sent out and how many were returned? Was the response rate > 25%? Describe: Yes No N/A Were the results presented clearly? What were they? Explain thoroughly: Yes No IF tables were used, did they help you understand the results? Explain: Yes No N/A Were study limitations identified and addressed? (towards end of article) Explain: Yes No Were researchers’ conclusions and recommendations based on the results? Explain: Yes No Number of YES or NO answers Based on the number of “YES” answers and referring to table below, rate the QUALITY of this research evidence as A, B, or C (BOLD the rating below). (Hint the more “YES” answers, the higher the quality). A- High quality: Consistent, generalizable results; sufficient sample size for the study design; adequate control; definitive conclusions; consistent recommendations based on comprehensive literature review that includes thorough reference to scientific evidence. (All “yes” or almost all “yes”) B- Good quality : Reasonably consistent results; sufficient sample size for the study design; some control, and fairly definitive conclusions; reasonably consistent recommendations based on fairly comprehensive literature review that includes some reference to scientific evidence. (Majority “yes”) C- Low quality or major flaws : Little evidence with inconsistent results; insufficient sample size for the study design; conclusions cannot be drawn. (Many “no” answers) Part 5. EXPLAIN YOUR QUALITY RATING IN DETAIL. ENTER AT TOP OF TOOL. Use your own words, do not copy and paste. 125-150 words. b Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10

Read more

LIU NUR 363 Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence Based Practice Worksheet

LIU NUR 363 Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence Based Practice Worksheet ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS ON LIU NUR 363 Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence Based Practice Worksheet Please, checkout the uploaded files below, where you will find information and instructions. Thank you example_spring_2020_nur_363_jhn_ebp_research_appraisal_tool.pdf spring_2020_nur_363_jhn_ebp_res NOTE: This assignment is worth 20% of the final grade. Put significant work into it – seek help if needed. There are FIVE PARTS. Follow instructions and rubric. Complete all sections thoroughly. Student Name Team Date Part 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Evidence level I II III (bold when complete level assessment) Quality Rating A B C (bold when complete quality appraisal) Article Citation (APA format) Study Setting (city/state/country, hospital/units/clinic, etc.) Study Sample (demographics & size) Team EBP Question Bold answer Yes No Is this article/report Quantitative Research (collection, analysis, and reporting of numerical data)? Measurable data (how many; how much; or how often) used to formulate facts, uncover patterns, and generalize results from a larger sample population; provides observed effects of a program, problem, or condition, measured precisely, rather than through researcher interpretation of data. Common methods of data collection are surveys, face-to-face structured interviews, observations, and reviews of records or documents. Statistical tests are used in data analysis. This is NOT just a literature review, NOT a systematic review, and NOT a qualitative research article. Quantitative Research INSTRUCTIONS: FOR EVERY QUESTION ANSWER YES OR NO AND IN THE BOX WITH THE QUESTION WRITE A RESPONSE IF YES ANSWER IN THIS SECTION. DO NOT COPY AND PASTE. PARAPHRASE ANSWERS. YOU WILL USE THIS INFORMATION TO WRITE YOUR PAPER. Part 2. LEVEL Determine the LEVEL of this Research (Study Design) Bold answers 1. Was there manipulation of an independent variable (Intervention)? If so, what was the independent variable: Yes No 2. Was there a control group (a structured comparison group)? Describe: Yes No 3. Were participants randomly assigned to intervention or control groups? Describe: Yes No Based on the answers choose the LEVEL of this research study: Bold answers If Yes to questions 1, 2, & 3, this is a randomized controlled trial (RCT) or experimental study . LEVEL I If Yes to questions 1 & 2 and No to question 3 or Yes to question 1 and No to questions 2 & 3, this is quasi-experimental (manipulation of an independent variable, lacks random assignment to groups, and may lack a control group). LEVEL II If No to questions 1, 2, & 3, this is nonexperimental (No manipulation of independent variable (no experiment); can be observational or descriptive; may use secondary data). LEVEL III ENTER LEVEL AT THE TOP OF TOOL Part 3. HOW DOES RESEARCH HELP ANSWER THE EBP QUESTION? Include all relevant details – use bullets. Do not just copy and paste – use your own words: Highlight what you learned from this research article that can influence nursing practice related to the EBP question. THIS IS NOT A SUMMARY. PUT SIGNIFICANT THOUGHT INTO THIS SECTION. Erase these instructions after completing this section. SEE EXAMPLE. Part 4. APPRAISE THE QUALITY OF THE RESEARCH ARTICLE THIS SECTION FOLLOWS THE ARTICLE – START AT THE BEGINNING AND MOVE THROUGH IT. BOLD YES OR NO ANSWERS AND DESCRIBE/EXPLAIN THE DETAILS FOR EVERY QUESTION WHETHER THE ANSWER IS YES OR NO . N/A DOES NOT COUNT AS “NO” ANSWER. Was the purpose of the study clearly presented? Describe the purpose: Yes No In the Introduction/Literature Review section is it identified what is known and not known about the problem? Does it state how the study will address any gaps in knowledge? Explain details of the literature review and answer question thoroughly: Yes No Was the literature review (references used) current (most references within the past five years OF PUBLICATION)? (Hint – information is in Introduction/Literature Review section AND references) Explain: Yes No Was the sample size sufficient based on the study design & rationale? How do you know? (Check your textbook/class notes for sample size info) Explain: Yes No Was there a control group? If YES answer these 3 questions. If NO BOLD N/A for these 3 questions – N/A are NOT NO answers Yes Were the characteristics and/or demographics similar in the control and intervention groups? Describe: Yes No N/A If multiple settings were used, were the settings similar? (N/A if only one setting) Explain: Yes No N/A Were the control and intervention groups treated equally except for the intervention? Explain: Yes No N/A Are data collection methods (how they gathered the data) described clearly? Describe with detail how data collected: Yes No IF instruments/tools/surveys/questionnaires were used to collect data, were they stated as reliable (Cronbach’s [alpha] > 0.70)? (This is about the data collection NOT results) Explain: Yes No N/A IF instruments/tools/surveys/questionnaires were used to gather data, was validity discussed? (This is about the data collection NOT results) Explain: Yes No N/A IF surveys or questionnaires were sent out , how many were sent out and how many were returned? Was the response rate > 25%? Describe: Yes No N/A Were the results presented clearly? What were they? Explain thoroughly: Yes No IF tables were used, did they help you understand the results? Explain: Yes No N/A Were study limitations identified and addressed? (towards end of article) Explain: Yes No Were researchers’ conclusions and recommendations based on the results? Explain: Yes No Number of YES or NO answers Based on the number of “YES” answers and referring to table below, rate the QUALITY of this research evidence as A, B, or C (BOLD the rating below). (Hint the more “YES” answers, the higher the quality). A- High quality: Consistent, generalizable results; sufficient sample size for the study design; adequate control; definitive conclusions; consistent recommendations based on comprehensive literature review that includes thorough reference to scientific evidence. (All “yes” or almost all “yes”) B- Good quality : Reasonably consistent results; sufficient sample size for the study design; some control, and fairly definitive conclusions; reasonably consistent recommendations based on fairly comprehensive literature review that includes some reference to scientific evidence. (Majority “yes”) C- Low quality or major flaws : Little evidence with inconsistent results; insufficient sample size for the study design; conclusions cannot be drawn. (Many “no” answers) Part 5. EXPLAIN YOUR QUALITY RATING IN DETAIL. ENTER AT TOP OF TOOL. Use your own words, do not copy and paste. 125-150 words. b Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10

Read more
Enjoy affordable prices and lifetime discounts
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Order Now Order in Chat

Start off on the right foot this semester. Get expert-written solutions at a 20% discount