NURS-6512 Week 1 Discussion Example

NURS-6512 Week 1 Discussion Example NURS-6512 Week 1 Discussion Example Week 1 Discussion Scenario 4 COLLAPSE Scenario 4 Discussion When building a history for the patient, it is vital to consider the patient’s culture, background and preferences. For the 40-year-old patient, the first thing would be to establish the language that the patient is fluent in. Limited English proficiency is a significant problem for immigrants. This would allow easy communication and better provision of personal history. More importantly, addressing a patient culture as the first step helps build a trusting relationship. As described by Ball et al. (2019), effective communication and cultural considerations in patient care are paramount. Based on the patient background, I will ensure that the interview emphasizes the cultural aspect as this will enable the patient to open up regarding various aspects, including the ability to afford healthcare. Given that the patient is from another country, providing him with special care and attention will promote better communication. Based on the patient’s social determinants of health, open-ended questions are ideal for this patient, as they will prompt direct and precise answers. NURS-6512 Week 1 Discussion Example ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS Lack of health insurance is a significant problem for the patient. Some of the questions that would be asked to assess the patient’s health risk include a) What is your educational attainment? b) What is your occupation? c) What are your earnings? d) What is your legal status? Considering the patient’s age and ethnicity, there is an increased risk for diabetes, high blood pressure and heart disease. A suitable health assessment instrument for this patient is the Refugee Health Screener (RHS) is an ideal tool for assessing the patient’s level of distress, anxiety, and depression, which is common and efficient among immigrants (“Refugee Health Screener – 15 (RHS-15),” n.d.). Some of the targeted questions for the patient include: How do you feel about moving to a new environment? Have you previously experienced any form of trauma in your previous country of residence? Are you able to cope with anything that comes to your life? Is your current environment eliciting feelings of nervousness? Who have been in your support system after your migration? References Ball, J. W., Dains, J. E., Flynn, J. A., Solomon, B. S., & Stewart, R. W. (2019). Seidel’s guide to physical examination: An interprofessional approach (9th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby. Refugee Health Screener – 15 (RHS-15). (n.d.). Refugee Health TA | Providing Technical Assistance and Support on Health and Mental Health of Refugees Resettled in the U.S. https://refugeehealthta.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/RHS15_Packet_PathwaysToWellness-1.pdf E: Week 1 Discussion Response 2 COLLAPSE Hello V, Thank you for sharing such an educative post. I have noted something interesting in the first paragraph where you have explained agonist to antagonist spectrum. You have stated that agonists elicit a physiological response when it binds to a receptor and antagonists block the action of the agonist. But in psychopharmacology, the blockage of agonists by antagonists causes a desirable response. For instance, the quetiapine is an antipsychotic drug that blocks the action of serotonin and dopamine resulting in a desirable outcome (Sanford & Keating, 2012). This knowledge is vital for psychiatric nurses during prescribing. On top of that, they ought to understand the mechanism of action of psychiatric drugs and how that relates to GPCR and Ion channels. This is because the majority of psychiatric drugs interact with GPCR, for example, buspirone that interact with 5-HT1A, aripiprazole interacts with monoamine GPCRs, and Fluoxetine influence the function of GPCR through the alteration of the levels of neurotransmitters (Senese, Rasenick & Traynor, 2018). Since also epigenetics plays a vital role in psychotherapy, it should be considered always. Epigenetics causes several disorders such as Alzheimer’s and also affects alters the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic of these drugs in the body (Rasool et al., 2015). In fact, psychiatric nurses have to acquire concrete knowledge on epigenetics, agonist to antagonist spectrum, GPCRs, and ion gated channels when prescribing medications to ensure that patients receive safe drugs with minimal adverse effects. But if there will be anticipated side effects, patients should be told and counseled to ensure drug compliance. References Rasool, M., Malik, A., Naseer, M., Manan, A., Ansari, S., & Begum, I. et al. (2015). The role of epigenetics in personalized medicine: challenges and opportunities. BMC Medical Genomics, 8(S1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1755-8794-8-s1-s5 Sanford, M., & Keating, G. (2012). Quetiapine. CNS Drugs, 26(5), 435-460. doi: 10.2165/11203840-000000000-00000 Senese, N., Rasenick, M., & Traynor, J. (2018). The Role of G-proteins and G-protein Regulating Proteins in Depressive Disorders. Frontiers In Pharmacology, 9. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.01289 Discussion: Building a Health History Effective communication is vital to constructing an accurate and detailed patient history. A patient’s health or illness is influenced by many factors, including age, gender, ethnicity, and environmental setting. As an advanced practice nurse, you must be aware of these factors and tailor your communication techniques accordingly. Doing so will not only help you establish rapport with your patients, but it will also enable you to more effectively gather the information needed to assess your patients’ health risks. For this Discussion, you will take on the role of a clinician who is building a health history for a particular new patient assigned by your Instructor. Photo Credit: Getty Images/Caiaimage To prepare: With the information presented in Chapter 1 of Ball et al. in mind, consider the following: By Day 1 of this week, you will be assigned a new patient profile by your Instructor for this Discussion. Note : Please see the “Course Announcements” section of the classroom for your new patient profile assignment. How would your communication and interview techniques for building a health history differ with each patient? How might you target your questions for building a health history based on the patient’s social determinants of health? What risk assessment instruments would be appropriate to use with each patient, or what questions would you ask each patient to assess his or her health risks? Identify any potential health-related risks based upon the patient’s age, gender, ethnicity, or environmental setting that should be taken into consideration. Select one of the risk assessment instruments presented in Chapter 1 or Chapter 5 of the Seidel’s Guide to Physical Examination text, or another tool with which you are familiar, related to your selected patient. Develop at least five targeted questions you would ask your selected patient to assess his or her health risks and begin building a health history. NURS-6512 Week 1 Discussion Example By Day 3 of Week 1 Post a summary of the interview and a description of the communication techniques you would use with your assigned patient. Explain why you would use these techniques. Identify the risk assessment instrument you selected, and justify why it would be applicable to the selected patient. Provide at least five targeted questions you would ask the patient. Note: For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the “Post to Discussion Question” link, and then select “Create Thread” to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Submit! Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses. By Day 6 of Week 1 Respond to at least two of your colleagues on 2 different days who selected a different patient than you, using one or more of the following approaches: Share additional interview and communication techniques that could be effective with your colleague’s selected patient. Suggest additional health-related risks that might be considered. Validate an idea with your own experience and additional research. Submission and Grading Information Grading Criteria To access your rubric: Week 1 Discussion Rubric Post by Day 3 of Week 1 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 1 To Participate in this Discussion: Week 1 Discussion Name: NURS_6512_Week_1_Discussion_Rubric. NURS-6512 Week 1 Discussion Example Grid View List View Excellent Good Fair Poor Main Posting 45 (45%) – 50 (50%) “Answers all parts of the Discussion question(s) with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. Supported by at least three current, credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. NURS-6512 Week 1 Discussion Example 40 (40%) – 44 (44%) “Responds to the Discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least three credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. 35 (35%) – 39 (39%) “Responds to some of the Discussion question(s). One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Post is cited with two credible sources. Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Contains some APA formatting errors. 0 (0%) – 34 (34%) “Does not respond to the Discussion question(s) adequately. Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Contains only one or no credible sources. Not written clearly or concisely. Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. Main Post: Timeliness 10 (10%) – 10 (10%) Posts main post by Day 3. 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) N/A 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) N/A 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Does not post main post by Day 3. First Response 17 (17%) – 18 (18%) “Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of Learning Objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. 15 (15%) – 16 (16%) “Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. 13 (13%) – 14 (14%) “Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. 0 (0%) – 12 (12%) “Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. NURS-6512 Week 1 Discussion Example Second Response 16 (16%) – 17 (17%) “Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of Learning Objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) “Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. 12 (12%) – 13 (13%) “Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. 0 (0%) – 11 (11%) “Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. Participation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days. 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) N/A 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) N/A NURS-6512 Week 1 Discussion Example 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on three different days. Total Points: 100 Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10

Read more

NURS-6512 Week 1 Discussion Example

NURS-6512 Week 1 Discussion Example NURS-6512 Week 1 Discussion Example Week 1 Discussion Scenario 4 COLLAPSE Scenario 4 Discussion When building a history for the patient, it is vital to consider the patient’s culture, background and preferences. For the 40-year-old patient, the first thing would be to establish the language that the patient is fluent in. Limited English proficiency is a significant problem for immigrants. This would allow easy communication and better provision of personal history. More importantly, addressing a patient culture as the first step helps build a trusting relationship. As described by Ball et al. (2019), effective communication and cultural considerations in patient care are paramount. Based on the patient background, I will ensure that the interview emphasizes the cultural aspect as this will enable the patient to open up regarding various aspects, including the ability to afford healthcare. Given that the patient is from another country, providing him with special care and attention will promote better communication. Based on the patient’s social determinants of health, open-ended questions are ideal for this patient, as they will prompt direct and precise answers. NURS-6512 Week 1 Discussion Example ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS Lack of health insurance is a significant problem for the patient. Some of the questions that would be asked to assess the patient’s health risk include a) What is your educational attainment? b) What is your occupation? c) What are your earnings? d) What is your legal status? Considering the patient’s age and ethnicity, there is an increased risk for diabetes, high blood pressure and heart disease. A suitable health assessment instrument for this patient is the Refugee Health Screener (RHS) is an ideal tool for assessing the patient’s level of distress, anxiety, and depression, which is common and efficient among immigrants (“Refugee Health Screener – 15 (RHS-15),” n.d.). Some of the targeted questions for the patient include: How do you feel about moving to a new environment? Have you previously experienced any form of trauma in your previous country of residence? Are you able to cope with anything that comes to your life? Is your current environment eliciting feelings of nervousness? Who have been in your support system after your migration? References Ball, J. W., Dains, J. E., Flynn, J. A., Solomon, B. S., & Stewart, R. W. (2019). Seidel’s guide to physical examination: An interprofessional approach (9th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby. Refugee Health Screener – 15 (RHS-15). (n.d.). Refugee Health TA | Providing Technical Assistance and Support on Health and Mental Health of Refugees Resettled in the U.S. https://refugeehealthta.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/RHS15_Packet_PathwaysToWellness-1.pdf E: Week 1 Discussion Response 2 COLLAPSE Hello V, Thank you for sharing such an educative post. I have noted something interesting in the first paragraph where you have explained agonist to antagonist spectrum. You have stated that agonists elicit a physiological response when it binds to a receptor and antagonists block the action of the agonist. But in psychopharmacology, the blockage of agonists by antagonists causes a desirable response. For instance, the quetiapine is an antipsychotic drug that blocks the action of serotonin and dopamine resulting in a desirable outcome (Sanford & Keating, 2012). This knowledge is vital for psychiatric nurses during prescribing. On top of that, they ought to understand the mechanism of action of psychiatric drugs and how that relates to GPCR and Ion channels. This is because the majority of psychiatric drugs interact with GPCR, for example, buspirone that interact with 5-HT1A, aripiprazole interacts with monoamine GPCRs, and Fluoxetine influence the function of GPCR through the alteration of the levels of neurotransmitters (Senese, Rasenick & Traynor, 2018). Since also epigenetics plays a vital role in psychotherapy, it should be considered always. Epigenetics causes several disorders such as Alzheimer’s and also affects alters the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic of these drugs in the body (Rasool et al., 2015). In fact, psychiatric nurses have to acquire concrete knowledge on epigenetics, agonist to antagonist spectrum, GPCRs, and ion gated channels when prescribing medications to ensure that patients receive safe drugs with minimal adverse effects. But if there will be anticipated side effects, patients should be told and counseled to ensure drug compliance. References Rasool, M., Malik, A., Naseer, M., Manan, A., Ansari, S., & Begum, I. et al. (2015). The role of epigenetics in personalized medicine: challenges and opportunities. BMC Medical Genomics, 8(S1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1755-8794-8-s1-s5 Sanford, M., & Keating, G. (2012). Quetiapine. CNS Drugs, 26(5), 435-460. doi: 10.2165/11203840-000000000-00000 Senese, N., Rasenick, M., & Traynor, J. (2018). The Role of G-proteins and G-protein Regulating Proteins in Depressive Disorders. Frontiers In Pharmacology, 9. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.01289 Discussion: Building a Health History Effective communication is vital to constructing an accurate and detailed patient history. A patient’s health or illness is influenced by many factors, including age, gender, ethnicity, and environmental setting. As an advanced practice nurse, you must be aware of these factors and tailor your communication techniques accordingly. Doing so will not only help you establish rapport with your patients, but it will also enable you to more effectively gather the information needed to assess your patients’ health risks. For this Discussion, you will take on the role of a clinician who is building a health history for a particular new patient assigned by your Instructor. Photo Credit: Getty Images/Caiaimage To prepare: With the information presented in Chapter 1 of Ball et al. in mind, consider the following: By Day 1 of this week, you will be assigned a new patient profile by your Instructor for this Discussion. Note : Please see the “Course Announcements” section of the classroom for your new patient profile assignment. How would your communication and interview techniques for building a health history differ with each patient? How might you target your questions for building a health history based on the patient’s social determinants of health? What risk assessment instruments would be appropriate to use with each patient, or what questions would you ask each patient to assess his or her health risks? Identify any potential health-related risks based upon the patient’s age, gender, ethnicity, or environmental setting that should be taken into consideration. Select one of the risk assessment instruments presented in Chapter 1 or Chapter 5 of the Seidel’s Guide to Physical Examination text, or another tool with which you are familiar, related to your selected patient. Develop at least five targeted questions you would ask your selected patient to assess his or her health risks and begin building a health history. NURS-6512 Week 1 Discussion Example By Day 3 of Week 1 Post a summary of the interview and a description of the communication techniques you would use with your assigned patient. Explain why you would use these techniques. Identify the risk assessment instrument you selected, and justify why it would be applicable to the selected patient. Provide at least five targeted questions you would ask the patient. Note: For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the “Post to Discussion Question” link, and then select “Create Thread” to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Submit! Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses. By Day 6 of Week 1 Respond to at least two of your colleagues on 2 different days who selected a different patient than you, using one or more of the following approaches: Share additional interview and communication techniques that could be effective with your colleague’s selected patient. Suggest additional health-related risks that might be considered. Validate an idea with your own experience and additional research. Submission and Grading Information Grading Criteria To access your rubric: Week 1 Discussion Rubric Post by Day 3 of Week 1 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 1 To Participate in this Discussion: Week 1 Discussion Name: NURS_6512_Week_1_Discussion_Rubric. NURS-6512 Week 1 Discussion Example Grid View List View Excellent Good Fair Poor Main Posting 45 (45%) – 50 (50%) “Answers all parts of the Discussion question(s) with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. Supported by at least three current, credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. NURS-6512 Week 1 Discussion Example 40 (40%) – 44 (44%) “Responds to the Discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least three credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. 35 (35%) – 39 (39%) “Responds to some of the Discussion question(s). One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Post is cited with two credible sources. Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Contains some APA formatting errors. 0 (0%) – 34 (34%) “Does not respond to the Discussion question(s) adequately. Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Contains only one or no credible sources. Not written clearly or concisely. Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. Main Post: Timeliness 10 (10%) – 10 (10%) Posts main post by Day 3. 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) N/A 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) N/A 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Does not post main post by Day 3. First Response 17 (17%) – 18 (18%) “Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of Learning Objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. 15 (15%) – 16 (16%) “Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. 13 (13%) – 14 (14%) “Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. 0 (0%) – 12 (12%) “Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. NURS-6512 Week 1 Discussion Example Second Response 16 (16%) – 17 (17%) “Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of Learning Objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) “Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. 12 (12%) – 13 (13%) “Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. 0 (0%) – 11 (11%) “Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. Participation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days. 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) N/A 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) N/A NURS-6512 Week 1 Discussion Example 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on three different days. Total Points: 100 Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10

Read more
Enjoy affordable prices and lifetime discounts
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Order Now Order in Chat

Start off on the right foot this semester. Get expert-written solutions at a 20% discount