NURS 8502 Journal Entry 1

NURS 8502 Journal Entry 1
NURS 8502 Journal Entry 1
Submit a journal entry (along with your time log). The journal entry is your opportunity to be self-reflective and needs to connect your previous professional experience with your practice, competencies/concepts in the program, and the literature. See the Practicum Guidelines located in the Practicum area, and this week’s Learning Resources, for a complete description of the practicum.
Submit your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 3.
Photo Credit: Ellagrin / iStock / Getty Images Plus / Getty Images
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:
Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK3Assgn2+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
Click the Week 3 Assignment 2 Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
Click the Week 3 Assignment 2 link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK3Assgn2+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:
Week 3 Assignment 2 Rubric
Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity
To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:
Submit your Week 3 Assignment 2 draft and review the originality report.
Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 3
To participate in this Assignment:
NURS 8502 Journal Entry 1
Week 3 Assignment 2
Name: NURS_8502_Week3_Assignment2_Rubric
Grid View
List View
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Reflect on the practicum experience hours completed.
Points Range: 41 (41%) – 45 (45%)
The response comprehensively and clearly reflects on the practicum experience.
The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the reflection.
Points Range: 36 (36%) – 40 (40%)
The response clearly reflects on the practicum experience.
The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the reflection.
Points Range: 32 (32%) – 35 (35%)
The response inaccurately or vaguely reflects on the practicum experience.
The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the reflection.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 31 (31%)
The response inaccurately and vaguely reflects on the practicum experience, or it is missing.
The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support reflection, or it is missing.
Complete the Practicum Time Log.
Points Range: 40 (40%) – 40 (40%)
A completed Practicum Time Log is submitted.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
An incomplete Practicum Time Log is submitted, or it is missing.
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.
Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (? 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors. Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors. Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (? 5) APA format errors. Total Points: 100 Name: NURS_8502_Week3_Assignment2_Rubric