NURS9123 USIU Diabetes Determinants of Health Essay

NURS9123 USIU Diabetes Determinants of Health Essay NURS9123 USIU Diabetes Determinants of Health Essay please make sure that the chosen literature are three PRIMARY RESEARCH ARTICLES that are conducted by the authors themselves and not reviews of related literature. Assignment 3: Essay Part A (1500 words) Search the literature and choose three (3) primary research articles (research that has been conducted by the authors) related to one of the nine Australian Health Priority areas< https://www.aihw.gov.au/getmedia/28c917f3-cb00-44dd-ba86-c13e764dea6b/education-resource-health-priority-areas.pdf.aspx >. ( https://www.aihw.gov.au/getmedia/28c917f3-cb00-44dd-ba86-c13e764dea6b/education-resource-health-priority-areas.pdf.aspx ) The chosen research must examine the health nurs_9123.docx nurs_9123_assignment_3_marking_rubricpdfcv__1_.pdf ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS Assignment 3: Essay Part A (1500 words) Search the literature and choose three (3) primary research articles (research that has been conducted by the authors) related to one of the nine Australian Health Priority areas. (https://www.aihw.gov.au/getmedia/28c917f3-cb00-44dd-ba86-c13e764dea6b/educationresource-health-priority-areas.pdf.aspx) The chosen research must examine the health priority area from a population health perspective, for example , specifically the relationship between the influence of determinants of health (https://www.who.int/hia/evidence/doh/en/) and the epidemiology of the disease (https://www.who.int/topics/epidemiology/en/). Use ONE of the following countries to base your assessment upon (using epidemiological primary research to support your assertions) United States of America United Kingdom Germany China Sweden Norway Assignment structure Provide the following: 1. An introduction that provides a brief general background about the health priority area within your chosen country. Your introduction should provide a brief outline of the content of the remainder of Parts A and B Part A (1,500 words) 2. The relevant determinants of health using evidence from contemporary (published within the last 5 years), primary epidemiological research (at least three (3) primary articles) Discussion of relevant health determinants specific to those with the identified disease must be provided. 3. A demonstration of an understanding of the epidemiological and statistical terms used in the chosen articles – provided in your own words. (please note text book definitions will not be accepted). This includes a discussion with regard to statistics such as odds ratios, relative risks, confidence intervals and p values. This discussion must demonstrate that you have an understanding of the statistical terms as they relate to the relationship between the health determinants and the disease. Part B (1500 words) 1. Based on the topic chosen in Part A, identify ONE (1) important current strategy used to address your chosen topic (health priority) in the particular country you have chosen. This strategy should aim to prevent the illness from occurring. Diagnostic procedures detect an illness and do not prevent it and therefore should not be used. In addition, your strategy should not merely aim to alleviate signs/symptoms or manage the health issue but be directed at preventing the occurrence of the chosen health priority.Your chosen strategy should relate to one or more determinants of health specific to the chosen health priority. DO NOT choose a large and complex government strategy over a number of years such as the Australian National Diabetes Strategy as you will not be able to provide specific details for part B.A simple and targeted strategy will allow scope to address the three asked for elements below. 2. Briefly outline what your chosen strategy is. You should include an argument of the importance of each of the following in relation to the success of the strategy in preventing the health priority identified. NURS9123 USIU Diabetes Determinants of Health Essay · Collaboration · Sustainability · Capacity building It is recommended that you use sub-headings for each of these to guide the reader to a focussed discussion. Ensure that your arguments are supported by evidence from peer-reviewed articles as well as other sources such as websites and government reports. You are encouraged to source the World Health Organization, and other similar sites. Please provide specific details in relation to the strategy and the three asked for elements above, for example, who, why, where and what. 3. Provide a conclusion that summarises the main points in both Parts A and B Please use the marking rubric provided to guide your preparation of this assessment. NURS 9123 Assignment 3 marking rubric Performance standard Assessment criteria Weighting Excellent Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory /20 Excellent background demonstrating key points of health priority issue under study in relation to chosen country. Good background demonstrating some key points of health priority issue under study in relation to chosen country. Satisfactory background demonstrating some key points of health priority issue under study with some linkage to the chosen country. Inadequate or absent background Does not demonstrate adequate key points of health priority issue under study in relation to chosen country. Excellent discussion of relevant determinants of health particular to health priority and chosen country. Excellent choice of peer reviewed articles to support discussion. Good discussion of relevant determinants of health particular to health priority and chosen country. Good choice of peer reviewed articles to support discussion. Satisfactory discussion of relevant determinants of health particular to health priority and chosen country. Adequate choice of peer reviewed articles to support discussion. Inadequate or absent discussion of relevant determinants of health particular to health priority and chosen country. Inadequate or absent inclusion of peer reviewed articles to support discussion. Clearly demonstrates understanding of terms (including results relating to relative risk, odds ratios, confidence intervals and p values). Terms are excellently discussed in context of studies, country and health priority Demonstrates understanding of terms (including results relating to relative risk, odds ratios, confidence intervals and p values). Terms are discussed in context of studies, country and health priority Demonstrates some understanding of terms (including results relating to relative risk, odds ratios, confidence intervals and p values). Terms are discussed in context of studies, country and health priority Little or no demonstration of the understanding of terms (including results relating to relative risk, odds ratios, confidence intervals and p values). NURS9123 USIU Diabetes Determinants of Health Essay Terms are discussed with little or no context of studies, country and health priority Importance of issue excellently argued and appropriately supported by evidence from peer-reviewed articles Importance of issue well-argued and supported by evidence from peer-reviewed articles Introduction providing background of health priority within chosen country/Outline of the content of the assessment Relevant determinants of health discussed, supported by primary epidemiological research /10 Evidence of understanding of epidemiological and statistical terms paraphrased with demonstrated link between determinants and the health priority. /20 Importance of collaboration discussed /10 1 Importance of issue satisfactorily argued and supported by some evidence from peerreviewed articles Importance of issue poorly argued and minimal or no demonstration of evidence supported by peer-reviewed articles Notes Importance of sustainability discussed /10 Importance of capacity building discussed /10 Conclusion Importance of issue excellently argued and appropriately supported by evidence from peer-reviewed articles Importance of issue well-argued and supported by evidence from peer-reviewed articles Importance of issue satisfactorily argued and supported by some evidence from peerreviewed articles Importance of issue poorly argued and minimal or no demonstration of evidence supported by peer-reviewed articles Importance of issue excellently argued and appropriately supported by evidence from peer-reviewed articles Importance of issue well-argued and supported by evidence from peer-reviewed articles Importance of issue satisfactorily argued and supported by some evidence from peerreviewed articles Importance of issue poorly argued and minimal or no demonstration of evidence supported by peer-reviewed articles Excellent and clear summarisation of main points Good and clear summarisation of main points Basic summary main points Does not adequately summarise main points. Writing is very well structured with ideas linked and clearly expressed. Headings and subheadings used to guide reader, very few/no grammatical and spelling errors Excellent choice of peer reviewed articles incorporated well into the assessment. Good structure with most ideas linked and clearly expressed. Headings and subheadings used to guide reader, few grammatical and spelling errors. Good choice of peer reviewed articles incorporated into the assessment. /10 Structure and style of writing (grammar and readability) Choice of peer reviewed articles incorporated into the assessment /10 Deductions (if applicable) Total mark Overall comment Name of marker and date 2 Writing is reasonably structured and expressed. Some headings and subheadings used, some grammatical and spelling errors. Satisfactory choice of peer reviewed articles incorporated into the assessment. Writing is unclear or difficult to follow. Few or no headings, a number of grammatical and spelling errors. Inadequate or absent inclusion of peer reviewed articles poorly incorporated into the assessment. … Purchase answer to see full attachment Student has agreed that all tutoring, explanations, and answers provided by the tutor will be used to help in the learning process and in accordance with Studypool’s honor code & terms of service . Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10

Read more

NURS9123 USIU Diabetes Determinants of Health Essay

NURS9123 USIU Diabetes Determinants of Health Essay NURS9123 USIU Diabetes Determinants of Health Essay please make sure that the chosen literature are three PRIMARY RESEARCH ARTICLES that are conducted by the authors themselves and not reviews of related literature. Assignment 3: Essay Part A (1500 words) Search the literature and choose three (3) primary research articles (research that has been conducted by the authors) related to one of the nine Australian Health Priority areas< https://www.aihw.gov.au/getmedia/28c917f3-cb00-44dd-ba86-c13e764dea6b/education-resource-health-priority-areas.pdf.aspx >. ( https://www.aihw.gov.au/getmedia/28c917f3-cb00-44dd-ba86-c13e764dea6b/education-resource-health-priority-areas.pdf.aspx ) The chosen research must examine the health nurs_9123.docx nurs_9123_assignment_3_marking_rubricpdfcv__1_.pdf ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS Assignment 3: Essay Part A (1500 words) Search the literature and choose three (3) primary research articles (research that has been conducted by the authors) related to one of the nine Australian Health Priority areas. (https://www.aihw.gov.au/getmedia/28c917f3-cb00-44dd-ba86-c13e764dea6b/educationresource-health-priority-areas.pdf.aspx) The chosen research must examine the health priority area from a population health perspective, for example , specifically the relationship between the influence of determinants of health (https://www.who.int/hia/evidence/doh/en/) and the epidemiology of the disease (https://www.who.int/topics/epidemiology/en/). Use ONE of the following countries to base your assessment upon (using epidemiological primary research to support your assertions) United States of America United Kingdom Germany China Sweden Norway Assignment structure Provide the following: 1. An introduction that provides a brief general background about the health priority area within your chosen country. Your introduction should provide a brief outline of the content of the remainder of Parts A and B Part A (1,500 words) 2. The relevant determinants of health using evidence from contemporary (published within the last 5 years), primary epidemiological research (at least three (3) primary articles) Discussion of relevant health determinants specific to those with the identified disease must be provided. 3. A demonstration of an understanding of the epidemiological and statistical terms used in the chosen articles – provided in your own words. (please note text book definitions will not be accepted). This includes a discussion with regard to statistics such as odds ratios, relative risks, confidence intervals and p values. This discussion must demonstrate that you have an understanding of the statistical terms as they relate to the relationship between the health determinants and the disease. Part B (1500 words) 1. Based on the topic chosen in Part A, identify ONE (1) important current strategy used to address your chosen topic (health priority) in the particular country you have chosen. This strategy should aim to prevent the illness from occurring. Diagnostic procedures detect an illness and do not prevent it and therefore should not be used. In addition, your strategy should not merely aim to alleviate signs/symptoms or manage the health issue but be directed at preventing the occurrence of the chosen health priority.Your chosen strategy should relate to one or more determinants of health specific to the chosen health priority. DO NOT choose a large and complex government strategy over a number of years such as the Australian National Diabetes Strategy as you will not be able to provide specific details for part B.A simple and targeted strategy will allow scope to address the three asked for elements below. 2. Briefly outline what your chosen strategy is. You should include an argument of the importance of each of the following in relation to the success of the strategy in preventing the health priority identified. NURS9123 USIU Diabetes Determinants of Health Essay · Collaboration · Sustainability · Capacity building It is recommended that you use sub-headings for each of these to guide the reader to a focussed discussion. Ensure that your arguments are supported by evidence from peer-reviewed articles as well as other sources such as websites and government reports. You are encouraged to source the World Health Organization, and other similar sites. Please provide specific details in relation to the strategy and the three asked for elements above, for example, who, why, where and what. 3. Provide a conclusion that summarises the main points in both Parts A and B Please use the marking rubric provided to guide your preparation of this assessment. NURS 9123 Assignment 3 marking rubric Performance standard Assessment criteria Weighting Excellent Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory /20 Excellent background demonstrating key points of health priority issue under study in relation to chosen country. Good background demonstrating some key points of health priority issue under study in relation to chosen country. Satisfactory background demonstrating some key points of health priority issue under study with some linkage to the chosen country. Inadequate or absent background Does not demonstrate adequate key points of health priority issue under study in relation to chosen country. Excellent discussion of relevant determinants of health particular to health priority and chosen country. Excellent choice of peer reviewed articles to support discussion. Good discussion of relevant determinants of health particular to health priority and chosen country. Good choice of peer reviewed articles to support discussion. Satisfactory discussion of relevant determinants of health particular to health priority and chosen country. Adequate choice of peer reviewed articles to support discussion. Inadequate or absent discussion of relevant determinants of health particular to health priority and chosen country. Inadequate or absent inclusion of peer reviewed articles to support discussion. Clearly demonstrates understanding of terms (including results relating to relative risk, odds ratios, confidence intervals and p values). Terms are excellently discussed in context of studies, country and health priority Demonstrates understanding of terms (including results relating to relative risk, odds ratios, confidence intervals and p values). Terms are discussed in context of studies, country and health priority Demonstrates some understanding of terms (including results relating to relative risk, odds ratios, confidence intervals and p values). Terms are discussed in context of studies, country and health priority Little or no demonstration of the understanding of terms (including results relating to relative risk, odds ratios, confidence intervals and p values). NURS9123 USIU Diabetes Determinants of Health Essay Terms are discussed with little or no context of studies, country and health priority Importance of issue excellently argued and appropriately supported by evidence from peer-reviewed articles Importance of issue well-argued and supported by evidence from peer-reviewed articles Introduction providing background of health priority within chosen country/Outline of the content of the assessment Relevant determinants of health discussed, supported by primary epidemiological research /10 Evidence of understanding of epidemiological and statistical terms paraphrased with demonstrated link between determinants and the health priority. /20 Importance of collaboration discussed /10 1 Importance of issue satisfactorily argued and supported by some evidence from peerreviewed articles Importance of issue poorly argued and minimal or no demonstration of evidence supported by peer-reviewed articles Notes Importance of sustainability discussed /10 Importance of capacity building discussed /10 Conclusion Importance of issue excellently argued and appropriately supported by evidence from peer-reviewed articles Importance of issue well-argued and supported by evidence from peer-reviewed articles Importance of issue satisfactorily argued and supported by some evidence from peerreviewed articles Importance of issue poorly argued and minimal or no demonstration of evidence supported by peer-reviewed articles Importance of issue excellently argued and appropriately supported by evidence from peer-reviewed articles Importance of issue well-argued and supported by evidence from peer-reviewed articles Importance of issue satisfactorily argued and supported by some evidence from peerreviewed articles Importance of issue poorly argued and minimal or no demonstration of evidence supported by peer-reviewed articles Excellent and clear summarisation of main points Good and clear summarisation of main points Basic summary main points Does not adequately summarise main points. Writing is very well structured with ideas linked and clearly expressed. Headings and subheadings used to guide reader, very few/no grammatical and spelling errors Excellent choice of peer reviewed articles incorporated well into the assessment. Good structure with most ideas linked and clearly expressed. Headings and subheadings used to guide reader, few grammatical and spelling errors. Good choice of peer reviewed articles incorporated into the assessment. /10 Structure and style of writing (grammar and readability) Choice of peer reviewed articles incorporated into the assessment /10 Deductions (if applicable) Total mark Overall comment Name of marker and date 2 Writing is reasonably structured and expressed. Some headings and subheadings used, some grammatical and spelling errors. Satisfactory choice of peer reviewed articles incorporated into the assessment. Writing is unclear or difficult to follow. Few or no headings, a number of grammatical and spelling errors. Inadequate or absent inclusion of peer reviewed articles poorly incorporated into the assessment. … Purchase answer to see full attachment Student has agreed that all tutoring, explanations, and answers provided by the tutor will be used to help in the learning process and in accordance with Studypool’s honor code & terms of service . Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10

Read more
Enjoy affordable prices and lifetime discounts
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Order Now Order in Chat

Start off on the right foot this semester. Get expert-written solutions at a 20% discount