Patients Involved in Their Own Treatment Plans

Patients Involved in Their Own Treatment Plans Patients Involved in Their Own Treatment Plans Assignment Content In this assignment you find evidence from literature and journals that supports the need for your proposed change. **see week 3 grading rubric FILLER TEXT Find a minimum of three original research articles (Original is defined as articles not utilized for week 1 or week 2 assignment) to support your project and summarize EACH article in no less than 350 words. ** Should be no less than three (3) separate 350 word summaries The articles must be:· Peer reviewed· Recent (published within 5 years)· Statistically significantFILLER TEXT Find current guidelines and summarize the clinical guidelines in no less than 350 words. ** Should be no less than one (1) summary of the most recent clinical guideline related to your topic · Consider processes, policies, and clinical guidelines that relate to your chosen issue or problem.FILLER TEXT Submit separate PDFs of the three original articles and a separate pdf of the current guidelines for your subject/problem as well as a reference page with an APA-formatted citation for each article.FILLER TEXT Format and Submit your assignment as the following:1. A word paper of article summaries and clinical guidelines formatted in APA format ( to include title page and reference page). Total of no less than four (4) separate summaries. **You can summarize all articles and clinical guidelines in one word document with reference page included.2. No less than four (4) separate Pdfs (this includes Three (3) pdfs of the original articles and a pdf of the current guidelines). These are the actual PDFs of the articles summarized.FILLER TEXT. NSG498 University of Phoenix Patients Involved in Their Own Treatment PlansI have attached a copy of my week 2 paper. definingthe_scope_wk2_nsg498.docx ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS Running head:PATIENT’S IN THEIR OWN TREATMENT PLANS Patients Involved in Their Own Treatment Plans Richard Davis 12/7/2019 1 PATIENTS IN THEIR OWN TREATMENT PLANS 2 Involving patients in their own treatment plans can be defined in many ways but it depends on the matter it is used. In this healthcare situation, the patient involvement is considered to mean that a patient will be getting involved in his or her own treatment plans. Participation by the patient is said to be, the time when the patient is diagnosed of their sickness and after, also at the time the practitioner identifies to the patient and explains to them what the diagnosis means and to what treatment plans are available to them. The practitioner may also explain the details to the patient on how the plan of treatment will work. The practitioner will go through a list of things like, possible side effects that could happen of each treatment, the advantages or disadvantages of the certain treatment pan. The reason the practitioner explains these things to the patient is so the patient will be able to make a complete informed decision. Several articles are out there that have reported on how patient’s involvement in their treatments has dramatically improved patients’ lives (Vahdat et al., 2014). This paper topic is to understand the idea of involving patients in their own choice of healthcare improves their care. The research will be by the reviewing of all sources of pertinent data. Any and all literature from other researchers will be taken into consideration to help determine whether the objective is achievable. It will consist of textbooks as well as reviewing any articles that is deemed relevant to accomplish this goal. These materials are available for anybody to search by searching ‘The involvement of the patient in making decisions regarding their treatment plans’ By using the internet search decision will work great by searching all the objectives in a single search it will also involve the ability to break down the objectives into separate and smaller portions. This would allow the searcher the ability to search each objective individually. Searches that could be searched individually consist of: involvement, participation, also qualitative and quantitative studies. PATIENTS IN THEIR OWN TREATMENT PLANS 3 Searching in this type of manner will show the overall results so this type of search would need to have some restrictions. Getting the results after reviewing the articles searched on the internet, there are six main areas that came up consistently they are as follows: practitipner involvement, patient involvement, the reason the patient wants to get involved in their treatment plans, tools for research, patient involvement and the effects. Patient involvement is to make it about the patient being able to participate in his or her own towards their treatment and their outcome. When it comes to patient involvement it is not mandatory that any patient needs to willingly participate in his or her treatment. Reading a research article by Picker Institute found that in order for quality healthcare, certain criteria needs to be met. One criteria should have the patient actively involved in saying how his or her treatment goes. By letting patients help pick what type of treatment they want it will drastically improve his or her healthcare outcome. When a patient is given an opportunity to voice his or her opinions and choose their treatment plan, they will tend to choose the best one that will match their needs. When a patient is involved, they tend to choose a treatment plan that fits within their financial status staying within their budget. By doing tis it will ensure that the patient will choose a treatment plan that they can afford, and they will tend to stick with treatment plan closer because the stress of not being able to afford it is not there. We could bring in the legal aspect of patient involvement.NSG498 University of Phoenix Patients Involved in Their Own Treatment Plans The patients bill of rights state; patients have a right to be given the information about their illness. The bill will also keep the practitioners protected even if there is a situation that the plan of choice does not work the way it should even when the patients made the decisions (Coulter & Ellins, 2007). PATIENTS IN THEIR OWN TREATMENT PLANS 4 There are numerous factors that help determine how much the patient needs to be involved if at all, in their care decisions. Some of these factors that are looked at are; patients knowledge, patients beliefs, patient deminer, type of sickness, severity of symptoms, culture, how the practitioner feels, care given to the patient among other factors. During the treatment it is wise to follow up on the patient to see if the participation of the patient in making a difference in their healthcare not. A couple of evaluation techniques are out there for us to use they are; quantitative and qualitative research tools. Quantitative research uses surveys, Patient Self-Advocacy Scale (PSAS), and Content Preference Scale (CPS) (Vahdat et al., 2014). Surveys tend to show the thoughts and beliefs of the system which make them very reliable. PSAS and CPS will decide at what level of control should the patient have. “Qualitative research uses tools such as debating and patient interviews within a focus groups (Vahdat et al., 2014)”. This is a good way of getting data because patients will express themselves fully by speaking. Quantitative data will be better used if the number of patients is higher, qualatative data methods are better used when the patient size is based on smaller groups. Researchers found patients involved in the decision making of their treatment is beneficial to them in several ways, they include; “increased satisfaction of the patients, ethical decision making due to the different views, increased understanding of the patient on their personal needs, positive feedback from the patients (Fowler, Levin & Sepucha, 2011)”. The outcome of the study shows that with a good relationship between patient and practitioner is cooperative and they can come to a good agreement. This type of relationship makes sure patients can talk with their practitioners who helped them choose the treatment plan they are doing and talk them through the treatment methods and how they work. PATIENTS IN THEIR OWN TREATMENT PLANS 5 During this study, it took reviewing some pertinent research papers and articles that were performed by researches other than our own healthcare team. Using this reviewed information it makes the results of the studies will be at a greater validity given that people who are of authority in the field have researched about it. If there is a weakness it would be that, secondary data that we have obtained may not be truly accurate due to the fact that the researcher may be biased to the study coming out a certain way which leads to the data be corrupt. References PATIENTS IN THEIR OWN TREATMENT PLANS 6 Coulter, A., & Ellins, J., (2007). Effectiveness of strategies for informing, educating, and involving patients. Bmj, 335(7609), 24-27. Fowler, F., Levin, C., & Sepucha, K. (2011). Informing And Involving Patients To Improve The Quality Of Medical Decisions | Health Affairs. Retrieved from https://www.healthaffairs.org/doi/full/10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0003 Vahdat S, Hamzehgardeshi L, Hessam S, Hamzehgardeshi Z. Patient involvement in health care decision making: a review. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014;16(1):e12454. doi:10.5812/ircmj.12454 … Purchase answer to see full attachment Student has agreed that all tutoring, explanations, and answers provided by the tutor will be used to help in the learning process and in accordance with Studypool’s honor code & terms of service . Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10

Read more

Patients Involved in Their Own Treatment Plans

Patients Involved in Their Own Treatment Plans Patients Involved in Their Own Treatment Plans Assignment Content In this assignment you find evidence from literature and journals that supports the need for your proposed change. **see week 3 grading rubric FILLER TEXT Find a minimum of three original research articles (Original is defined as articles not utilized for week 1 or week 2 assignment) to support your project and summarize EACH article in no less than 350 words. ** Should be no less than three (3) separate 350 word summaries The articles must be:· Peer reviewed· Recent (published within 5 years)· Statistically significantFILLER TEXT Find current guidelines and summarize the clinical guidelines in no less than 350 words. ** Should be no less than one (1) summary of the most recent clinical guideline related to your topic · Consider processes, policies, and clinical guidelines that relate to your chosen issue or problem.FILLER TEXT Submit separate PDFs of the three original articles and a separate pdf of the current guidelines for your subject/problem as well as a reference page with an APA-formatted citation for each article.FILLER TEXT Format and Submit your assignment as the following:1. A word paper of article summaries and clinical guidelines formatted in APA format ( to include title page and reference page). Total of no less than four (4) separate summaries. **You can summarize all articles and clinical guidelines in one word document with reference page included.2. No less than four (4) separate Pdfs (this includes Three (3) pdfs of the original articles and a pdf of the current guidelines). These are the actual PDFs of the articles summarized.FILLER TEXT. NSG498 University of Phoenix Patients Involved in Their Own Treatment PlansI have attached a copy of my week 2 paper. definingthe_scope_wk2_nsg498.docx ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS Running head:PATIENT’S IN THEIR OWN TREATMENT PLANS Patients Involved in Their Own Treatment Plans Richard Davis 12/7/2019 1 PATIENTS IN THEIR OWN TREATMENT PLANS 2 Involving patients in their own treatment plans can be defined in many ways but it depends on the matter it is used. In this healthcare situation, the patient involvement is considered to mean that a patient will be getting involved in his or her own treatment plans. Participation by the patient is said to be, the time when the patient is diagnosed of their sickness and after, also at the time the practitioner identifies to the patient and explains to them what the diagnosis means and to what treatment plans are available to them. The practitioner may also explain the details to the patient on how the plan of treatment will work. The practitioner will go through a list of things like, possible side effects that could happen of each treatment, the advantages or disadvantages of the certain treatment pan. The reason the practitioner explains these things to the patient is so the patient will be able to make a complete informed decision. Several articles are out there that have reported on how patient’s involvement in their treatments has dramatically improved patients’ lives (Vahdat et al., 2014). This paper topic is to understand the idea of involving patients in their own choice of healthcare improves their care. The research will be by the reviewing of all sources of pertinent data. Any and all literature from other researchers will be taken into consideration to help determine whether the objective is achievable. It will consist of textbooks as well as reviewing any articles that is deemed relevant to accomplish this goal. These materials are available for anybody to search by searching ‘The involvement of the patient in making decisions regarding their treatment plans’ By using the internet search decision will work great by searching all the objectives in a single search it will also involve the ability to break down the objectives into separate and smaller portions. This would allow the searcher the ability to search each objective individually. Searches that could be searched individually consist of: involvement, participation, also qualitative and quantitative studies. PATIENTS IN THEIR OWN TREATMENT PLANS 3 Searching in this type of manner will show the overall results so this type of search would need to have some restrictions. Getting the results after reviewing the articles searched on the internet, there are six main areas that came up consistently they are as follows: practitipner involvement, patient involvement, the reason the patient wants to get involved in their treatment plans, tools for research, patient involvement and the effects. Patient involvement is to make it about the patient being able to participate in his or her own towards their treatment and their outcome. When it comes to patient involvement it is not mandatory that any patient needs to willingly participate in his or her treatment. Reading a research article by Picker Institute found that in order for quality healthcare, certain criteria needs to be met. One criteria should have the patient actively involved in saying how his or her treatment goes. By letting patients help pick what type of treatment they want it will drastically improve his or her healthcare outcome. When a patient is given an opportunity to voice his or her opinions and choose their treatment plan, they will tend to choose the best one that will match their needs. When a patient is involved, they tend to choose a treatment plan that fits within their financial status staying within their budget. By doing tis it will ensure that the patient will choose a treatment plan that they can afford, and they will tend to stick with treatment plan closer because the stress of not being able to afford it is not there. We could bring in the legal aspect of patient involvement.NSG498 University of Phoenix Patients Involved in Their Own Treatment Plans The patients bill of rights state; patients have a right to be given the information about their illness. The bill will also keep the practitioners protected even if there is a situation that the plan of choice does not work the way it should even when the patients made the decisions (Coulter & Ellins, 2007). PATIENTS IN THEIR OWN TREATMENT PLANS 4 There are numerous factors that help determine how much the patient needs to be involved if at all, in their care decisions. Some of these factors that are looked at are; patients knowledge, patients beliefs, patient deminer, type of sickness, severity of symptoms, culture, how the practitioner feels, care given to the patient among other factors. During the treatment it is wise to follow up on the patient to see if the participation of the patient in making a difference in their healthcare not. A couple of evaluation techniques are out there for us to use they are; quantitative and qualitative research tools. Quantitative research uses surveys, Patient Self-Advocacy Scale (PSAS), and Content Preference Scale (CPS) (Vahdat et al., 2014). Surveys tend to show the thoughts and beliefs of the system which make them very reliable. PSAS and CPS will decide at what level of control should the patient have. “Qualitative research uses tools such as debating and patient interviews within a focus groups (Vahdat et al., 2014)”. This is a good way of getting data because patients will express themselves fully by speaking. Quantitative data will be better used if the number of patients is higher, qualatative data methods are better used when the patient size is based on smaller groups. Researchers found patients involved in the decision making of their treatment is beneficial to them in several ways, they include; “increased satisfaction of the patients, ethical decision making due to the different views, increased understanding of the patient on their personal needs, positive feedback from the patients (Fowler, Levin & Sepucha, 2011)”. The outcome of the study shows that with a good relationship between patient and practitioner is cooperative and they can come to a good agreement. This type of relationship makes sure patients can talk with their practitioners who helped them choose the treatment plan they are doing and talk them through the treatment methods and how they work. PATIENTS IN THEIR OWN TREATMENT PLANS 5 During this study, it took reviewing some pertinent research papers and articles that were performed by researches other than our own healthcare team. Using this reviewed information it makes the results of the studies will be at a greater validity given that people who are of authority in the field have researched about it. If there is a weakness it would be that, secondary data that we have obtained may not be truly accurate due to the fact that the researcher may be biased to the study coming out a certain way which leads to the data be corrupt. References PATIENTS IN THEIR OWN TREATMENT PLANS 6 Coulter, A., & Ellins, J., (2007). Effectiveness of strategies for informing, educating, and involving patients. Bmj, 335(7609), 24-27. Fowler, F., Levin, C., & Sepucha, K. (2011). Informing And Involving Patients To Improve The Quality Of Medical Decisions | Health Affairs. Retrieved from https://www.healthaffairs.org/doi/full/10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0003 Vahdat S, Hamzehgardeshi L, Hessam S, Hamzehgardeshi Z. Patient involvement in health care decision making: a review. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014;16(1):e12454. doi:10.5812/ircmj.12454 … Purchase answer to see full attachment Student has agreed that all tutoring, explanations, and answers provided by the tutor will be used to help in the learning process and in accordance with Studypool’s honor code & terms of service . Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10

Read more
Enjoy affordable prices and lifetime discounts
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Order Now Order in Chat

Start off on the right foot this semester. Get expert-written solutions at a 20% discount