Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health Discussion

Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health Discussion Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health Discussion When politics and medical science intersect, there can be much debate. Sometimes anecdotes or hearsay are misused as evidence to support a particular point. Despite these and other challenges, however, evidence-based approaches are increasingly used to inform health policy decision-making regarding causes of disease, intervention strategies, and issues impacting society. One example is the introduction of childhood vaccinations and the use of evidence-based arguments surrounding their safety. In this Discussion, you will identify a recently proposed health policy and share your analysis of the evidence in support of this policy. To Prepare: Review the Congress website provided in the Resources and identify one recent (within the past 5 years) proposed health policy in California. Review the health policy you identified and reflect on the background and development of this health policy. BY DAY 3 OF WEEK 7 Post a description of the health policy you selected and a brief background for the problem or issue being addressed. Explain whether you believe there is an evidence base to support the proposed policy and explain why. Be specific and provide examples. Rubric provided, APA format, use 3 credible sources (within 5 years). Please red carefully on the bolded instructions. rubric_detail_____blackboard_learn.pdf ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout. Name: NURS_6050_Module04_Week07_Discussion_Rubric Grid View EXIT List View Main Posting Excellent Good Fair Poor 45 (45%) – 50 (50%) 40 (40%) – 44 (44%) 35 (35%) – 39 (39%) 0 (0%) – 34 (34%) Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with re!ective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. Responds to the discussion question(s) and is re!ective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Responds to some of the discussion question(s). Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately. At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. Is somewhat lacking re!ection and critical analysis and synthesis. Supported by at least three credible sources. Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Supported by at least three current, credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. One or two criteria are not addressed or are super”cially addressed. Post is cited with two credible sources. Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Contains some APA formatting errors. Main Post: Timeliness 10 (10%) – 10 (10%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Posts main post by day 3. First Response Lacks depth or super”cially addresses criteria. Lacks re!ection and critical analysis and synthesis. Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Contains only one or no credible sources. Not written clearly or concisely. Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Does not post by day 3. 17 (17%) – 18 (18%) 15 (15%) – 16 (16%) 13 (13%) – 14 (14%) 0 (0%) – 12 (12%) Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Response is on topic and may have some depth. Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the discussion may lack e#ective professional communication. Responses posted in the discussion lack e#ective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Responses to faculty questions are missing. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. No credible sources are cited. Response is e#ectively written in standard, edited English. Response is e#ectively written in standard, edited English. Second Response 16 (16%) – 17 (17%) 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) 12 (12%) – 13 (13%) 0 (0%) – 11 (11%) Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Response is on topic and may have some depth. Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the discussion may lack e#ective professional communication. Responses posted in the discussion lack e#ective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Responses to faculty questions are missing. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. No credible sources are cited. Response is e#ectively written in standard, edited English. Response is e#ectively written in standard, edited English. Participation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Meets requirements for participation by posting on three di#erent days. 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 di#erent days. Total Points: 100 Name: NURS_6050_Module04_Week07_Discussion_Rubric EXIT … Purchase answer to see full attachment Student has agreed that all tutoring, explanations, and answers provided by the tutor will be used to help in the learning process and in accordance with Studypool’s honor code & terms of service . Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10

Read more

Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health Discussion

Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health Discussion ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS ON Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health Discussion Instructions for week 9 sent in the file, open follow them closely. I also sent the week 8 Discussion (module 4) because it has some relation with last week in case you need to read about it to get connected with the topic. Thank you a lot. WU NURS 6050 Week 9 Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health Discussion attachment_1 Module 5: Program/Policy Evaluation (Weeks 9-10) Learning Objectives Students will: Analyze opportunities for RNs and APRNs to participate in program/policy evaluations. Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health Discussion Analyze strategies for overcoming challenges for participating in program/policy evaluations Recommend strategies to improve the advocacy and communication of program/policy evaluations Describe healthcare program/policy outcomes Analyze healthcare program/policy evaluations Analyze the role of the nurse advocate in program/policy evaluation Discussion: The Role of the RN/APRN in Policy Evaluation In the Module 4 (SEE BELOW) Discussion, you considered how professional nurses can become involved in policy-making. A critical component of any policy design is evaluation of the results. How comfortable are you with the thought of becoming involved with such matters? Some nurses may be hesitant to get involved with policy evaluation. The preference may be to focus on the care and well-being of their patients; some nurses may feel ill-equipped to enter the realm of policy and political activities. However, as you have examined previously, who better to advocate for patients and effective programs and polices than nurses? Already patient advocates in interactions with doctors and leadership, why not with government and regulatory agencies? In this Discussion, you will reflect on the role of professional nurses in policy evaluation. To Prepare: Again In the Module 4 Discussion, you considered how professional nurses can become involved in policy-making. Review the Resources and reflect on the role of professional nurses in policy evaluation. By Day X of Week 9 Discussion. Post an explanation of at least two opportunities that currently exist for RNs and APRNs to actively participate in policy review . – Explain some of the challenges that these opportunities may present – Describe how you might overcome these challenges. – Finally, recommend two strategies you might make to better advocate for or communicate the existence of these opportunities. Be specific and provide examples. Use 3 references. Learning Resources Note: To access this week’s required library resources, please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the Course Materials section of your Syllabus. Required Readings Milstead, J. A., & Short, N. M. (2019). Health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide (6th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning. Chapter 7, “Health Policy and Social Program Evaluation” (pp. 116–124 only) Glasgow, R. E., Lichtenstein, E., & Marcus, A. C. (2003). Why don’t we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition. American Journal of Public Health, 93 (8), 1261–1267. Shiramizu, B., Shambaugh, V., Petrovich, H., Seto, T. B., Ho, T., Mokuau, N., & Hedges, J. R. (2016). Leading by success: Impact of a clinical and translational research infrastructure program to address health inequities. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, 4 (5), 983–991. Williams, J. K., & Anderson, C. M. (2018). Omics research ethics considerations. Nursing Outlook, 66 (4), 386–393. doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2018.05.003 Document: Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Template (Word document) Rubric Detail Grading Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout. Name: NURS_6050_Module05_Week09_Discussion_Rubric Grid View Excellent Excellent !!! Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. Supported by at least three current, credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. STUDENT’S Discussion FOR THIS WEEK 9 “TO GET IDEA” Evaluation Evaluation in any setting is critical to measure the outcome. Policymaking is no different. Being involved in the evaluation of an existing or newly proposed policy is critical in healthcare. It is imperative that nurses know about evaluation principles and implements them in all healthcare programs. (Milstead & Short, 2019, p. 116). There are several opportunities for nurses to become involved in policy evaluation. First, the American Nurses Association is heavily involved in policymaking for healthcare. They also have the opportunity to be active in policy review and analysis of rules, decisions, and regulations affecting our profession. (American Nurses Association, n.d.). This is one reason we must join a professional nursing association and help shape our profession. Another way to participate in policy review is to be active in your workplace. Voicing concerns about newly imposed policies or programs is a great way to evaluate new programs’ implementation. This provides a direct effect on your current nursing practice. Some challenges exist for active participation in the policy review process. Many nurses are not members of a professional nurses association or do not know the importance of why to get involved for starters. Challenges also exist when nurses do not know the current hospital, federal, state, and local policies or procedures. Or when they are not well educated on the newly proposed policies. Evidence-based research is key to overcome some of these challenges. Researching professional nurses’ associations and what they stand for, newly proposed policies in your hospital, and understanding nurses’ vital role in healthcare policy formation and evaluation is key. Strategies to build awareness for policy evaluation opportunities starts with good communication. Effective communication can help motivate others for action and build awareness. ( How Do I Advocate for Policy Change? , n.d.). Communicating on social media or networking at conferences is an excellent way to begin to inform nurses of opportunities that exist. Additionally, joining professional nursing associations can help broaden ones’ ability to reach more nurses and advocate for the importance of policy evaluation and review. References American Nurses Association. (n.d.). Ana advises federal agencies . ANA. Retrieved October 26, 2020, from https://www.nursingworld.org/practice-policy/advocacy/federal/agencies-regulations/ana-advises-federal-agencies/ How do I advocate for policy change? (n.d.). Prosperity Now. Retrieved October 26, 2020, from https://prosperitynow.org/putting-prosperity-within-reach-how-do-i-advocate-for-policy-change Milstead, J. A., & Short, N. M. (2019). Health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide (6th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. MODULE 4 MY WRINING DISCUSSION , BACK IN WEEK 8 “ TO REVIEW IF YOU NEED” Week 8 Discussion Florida is one of few states in the United States, where residents lack access to quality healthcare services because of some of its laws and regulations. It is one of those where the government is more concerned about political mandates than the health and wellbeing of the citizens despite the high shortage of clinicians and other healthcare workers to meet the needs of the population. In this regard, the state provides several opportunities for registered nurses (RNs) and advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) to fulfill their advocacy responsibilities and contribute to health promotion and disease prevention and management roles at the primary care level, The significance of permitting RNs and APRNs to engage in the scope of nursing practice that reflects their depth and breadth of their education, training, and experience is one of the major policymaking opportunities for these practitioners in Florida. According to Kaplan (2016), this legislation is required to increase access to care for rural populations, increase patient’s access to alternative care services, and reduce the cost of healthcare services by the government. Another policymaking opportunity in Florida is RNs and APRNs’ support for laws for increasing the number of federally-funded substance abuse prevention programs and strengthening the health systems’ capacity to prevent mental disorders in the state. In this regard, such initiatives would permit relevant stakeholders to identify and implement initiatives that deliver effective and preventive mental and physical health programs to all residents of the state. In essence, APRNs and RNs can support the current efforts of Florida’s Board of Nursing and Florida Nursing Association to ensure the passage of legislation that allows them to practice to the full extent of their training and increased number of federally-funded mental health programs. Meanwhile, registered nurses and their advanced practice counterparts must recognize some of the challenges that exist with active participation in policymaking. According to Kung and Rudner Lugo (2015), some of these challenges include limited resources, perception of the roles of nurses in healthcare, and lack of structures to support their involvement in the policy development process. Despite the pervasiveness of these challenges, RNs and APRNs can overcome them through the integration of their advocacy roles in their practice and education of the policymaking processes. Also, RNs and APRNs who are involved in nursing education and research activities to invest time and resources into policy development initiatives and use their experience to prepare future practitioners for the same engagement. Hence, nurses can overcome the challenges and barriers that exist in the different aspects of policymaking through their understanding of the procedures and facilitators and networking skills to liaise with relevant partners. Finally, RNs and APRNs can increase their advocacy or improve their communication of the opportunities for their colleagues to participate in policymaking through various strategies. According to Shariff (2015), nurses can enhance their participation in policy development through their partnerships with relevant healthcare stakeholders and active engagement in their professional associations. It is a strategy that requires identifying and supporting initiatives that increase the media coverage of their issues that are shaping legislative activities in Florida. An example of this strategy is RNs and APRNs’ support for legislators and the election of public health officials who share their interests and position on the issue. Another effective strategy is for communicating this opportunity is a knowledge sharing in the workplace. In this regard, nurse practitioners can share the advocacy campaigns and call-to-action information from the Florida Nurses Association and other relevant ones with their colleagues via their organization’s news bulletin board. Finally, this communication and advocacy strategy can be executed through presentations during meetings and permission junior cadre nurses to campaign for relevant policies by nurse leaders. WU NURS 6050 Week 9 Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health Discussion References Kaplan, L. (2016). Florida NPs advocate for controlled substance prescriptive authority. The Nurse Practitioner , 41 (5), 14-16. Kung, Y. M., & Rudner Lugo, N. (2015). Political advocacy and practice barriers: A survey of Florida APRNs. Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners , 27 (3), 145-151. Shariff, N. J. (2015). Empowerment model for nurse leaders’ participation in health policy development: an east African perspective. BMC Nursing , 14 (1), 31. Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10

Read more
Enjoy affordable prices and lifetime discounts
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Order Now Order in Chat

We now help with PROCTORED EXAM. Chat with a support agent for more details