Preventative Healthcare Presentation

Preventative Healthcare Presentation Preventative Healthcare Presentation The assignment is due on Saturday, January 2 2021 at 10 pm eastern time in the USA. Attached is a copy of the assignment, the clinical issue, the PICOT question, and the grading rubric. My Clinical Issue The clinical Issue I selected is the impact of preventive care in healthcare. Part 2: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews Create a 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following: Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest. Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest. Preventative Healthcare Presentation Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected. Provide APA citations of the four relevant peer-reviewed articles at the systematic-reviews level related to your research question. If there are no systematic review level articles or meta-analysis on your topic, then use the highest level of evidence peer reviewed article. Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, including an explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be specific and provide examples. nurs_5052_nurs_6052_essential_of_evidence_based_pract_week_5.docx ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS My Clinical Issue The clinical Issue I selected is the impact of preventive care in healthcare. PICOT Question In individuals with a predisposition to chronic diseases such as diabetes, hypertension, or obesity (P), does a preventive healthcare approach (such as dieting, exercising, no smoking or drinking, and adopting healthy habits) impact them on not acquiring the disease? Please include an introduction, conclusion and reference slide. Include additional 2-3 references To Prepare: ? Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry. ? Develop a PICO(T) question to address the clinical issue of interest you identified in Module 2 for the Assignment. This PICOT question will remain the same for the entire course. ? Use the key words from the PICO(T) question you developed and search at least four different databases in the Walden Library. Identify at least four relevant systematic reviews or other filtered high-level evidence, which includes metaanalyses, critically-appraised topics (evidence syntheses), critically-appraised individual articles (article synopsis). The evidence will not necessarily address all the elements of your PICO(T) question, so select the most important concepts to search and find the best evidence available. ? Reflect on the process of creating a PICO(T) question and searching for peerreviewed research. The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project) Part 2: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews Create a 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following: ? Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest. ? Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest. ? Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected. ? Provide APA citations of the four relevant peer-reviewed articles at the systematic-reviews level related to your research question. If there are no systematic review level articles or meta-analysis on your topic, then use the highest level of evidence peer reviewed article. ? Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, including an explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be specific and provide examples. Excellent Good Fair Poor Part 2: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews Create a 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following: · Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest. · Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest. · Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected. · Provide APA citations of 81 (81%) – 90 72 (72%) – 80 63 (63%) – 71 0 (0%) – 62 (90%) (80%) (71%) (62%) The presentation clearly and accurately identifies and describes in detail the chosen clinical issue of interest. NURS 5052 Walden University Week 5 Preventative Healthcare Presentation The presentation accurately identifies and describes the chosen clinical issue of interest. The presentation inaccurately or vaguely identifies and describes the chosen clinical issue of interest. The presentation inaccurately and vaguely identifies and describes the chosen clinical issue of interest or is missing. The presentation clearly and accurately describes in detail the developed PICO(T) question. The presentation clearly and accurately identifies four or more research databases used to conduct a search for the peer-reviewed articles selected. The presentation accurately describes the developed PICO(T) question focused on the chosen clinical issue of interest. The presentation accurately identifies at least four research databases used to conduct a search for the peer-reviewed articles selected. The presentation The presentation inaccurately or vaguely describes the developed PICO(T) question focused on the chosen clinical issue of interest. The presentation inaccurately or vaguely identifies at least four research databases used to conduct a search for the peer-reviewed articles selected. The presentation inaccurately and vaguely describes the developed PICO(T) question, or is missing. The presentation inaccurately and vaguely identifies less than four research databases used to conduct a search for the peer-reviewed articles selected or is missing. the four peerreviewed articles you selected. · Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peerreviewed articles you selected, including an explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be specific and provide examples. The presentation clearly and accurately provides full APA citations for at least four peer-reviewed articles selected, including a thorough and detailed explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. The presentation includes specific and relevant examples that fully support the research. The presentation provides a complete, detailed, and accurate synthesis of two outside resources accurately provides APA citations for at least four peerreviewed articles selected, including an adequate explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. The presentation includes relevant examples that support the research presented. The presentation provides an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource related to the peer-reviewed articles selected. The response The The presentation presentation inaccurately inaccurately or and vaguely vaguely provides APA provides APA citations for at citations for at least four peerleast four peer- reviewed reviewed articles articles selected, selected, including an including an inaccurate and inaccurate or vague vague explanation of explanation of the strengths of the strengths of using using systematic systematic reviews for reviews for clinical clinical research, or is research. missing. The presentation includes inaccurate or vague examples to support the research presented. The presentation provides a vague or inaccurate synthesis or outside The presentation includes inaccurate and vague examples to support the research presented or is missing. The presentation provides a vague and inaccurate synthesis of no related to the peer-reviewed articles selected, and fully integrates at least two outside resources and two or three course-specific resources that fully support the presentation. integrates at least one outside resource and two or three course-specific resources that may support the presentation. resources related to the peer-reviewed articles selected. NURS 5052 Walden University Week 5 Preventative Healthcare Presentation The response minimally integrates resources that may support the presentation. outside resources related to the articles selected and fails to integrate any resources to support the presentation or is missing. Written Expression and Formatting— Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support welldeveloped ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused— neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensiv e purpose statement and introduction is provided, which delineates all required criteria. 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided, which delineates all required criteria. 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated yet is brief and not descriptive. 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) (3.5%) Paragraphs Paragraphs and sentences and sentences follow writing follow writing standards for standards for flow, continuity, flow, continuity, and clarity < and clarity 60– 60% of the 79% of the time. time. No purpose Purpose, statement, introduction, introduction, or and conclusion conclusion are of the provided. assignment is vague or off topic. Written Expression and Formatting— English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation. Total Points: 100 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. … Purchase answer to see full attachment Student has agreed that all tutoring, explanations, and answers provided by the tutor will be used to help in the learning process and in accordance with Studypool’s honor code & terms of service . Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10

Read more

Preventative Healthcare Presentation

Preventative Healthcare Presentation Preventative Healthcare Presentation The assignment is due on Saturday, January 2 2021 at 10 pm eastern time in the USA. Attached is a copy of the assignment, the clinical issue, the PICOT question, and the grading rubric. My Clinical Issue The clinical Issue I selected is the impact of preventive care in healthcare. Part 2: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews Create a 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following: Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest. Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest. Preventative Healthcare Presentation Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected. Provide APA citations of the four relevant peer-reviewed articles at the systematic-reviews level related to your research question. If there are no systematic review level articles or meta-analysis on your topic, then use the highest level of evidence peer reviewed article. Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, including an explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be specific and provide examples. nurs_5052_nurs_6052_essential_of_evidence_based_pract_week_5.docx ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS My Clinical Issue The clinical Issue I selected is the impact of preventive care in healthcare. PICOT Question In individuals with a predisposition to chronic diseases such as diabetes, hypertension, or obesity (P), does a preventive healthcare approach (such as dieting, exercising, no smoking or drinking, and adopting healthy habits) impact them on not acquiring the disease? Please include an introduction, conclusion and reference slide. Include additional 2-3 references To Prepare: ? Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry. ? Develop a PICO(T) question to address the clinical issue of interest you identified in Module 2 for the Assignment. This PICOT question will remain the same for the entire course. ? Use the key words from the PICO(T) question you developed and search at least four different databases in the Walden Library. Identify at least four relevant systematic reviews or other filtered high-level evidence, which includes metaanalyses, critically-appraised topics (evidence syntheses), critically-appraised individual articles (article synopsis). The evidence will not necessarily address all the elements of your PICO(T) question, so select the most important concepts to search and find the best evidence available. ? Reflect on the process of creating a PICO(T) question and searching for peerreviewed research. The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project) Part 2: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews Create a 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following: ? Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest. ? Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest. ? Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected. ? Provide APA citations of the four relevant peer-reviewed articles at the systematic-reviews level related to your research question. If there are no systematic review level articles or meta-analysis on your topic, then use the highest level of evidence peer reviewed article. ? Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, including an explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be specific and provide examples. Excellent Good Fair Poor Part 2: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews Create a 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following: · Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest. · Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest. · Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected. · Provide APA citations of 81 (81%) – 90 72 (72%) – 80 63 (63%) – 71 0 (0%) – 62 (90%) (80%) (71%) (62%) The presentation clearly and accurately identifies and describes in detail the chosen clinical issue of interest. NURS 5052 Walden University Week 5 Preventative Healthcare Presentation The presentation accurately identifies and describes the chosen clinical issue of interest. The presentation inaccurately or vaguely identifies and describes the chosen clinical issue of interest. The presentation inaccurately and vaguely identifies and describes the chosen clinical issue of interest or is missing. The presentation clearly and accurately describes in detail the developed PICO(T) question. The presentation clearly and accurately identifies four or more research databases used to conduct a search for the peer-reviewed articles selected. The presentation accurately describes the developed PICO(T) question focused on the chosen clinical issue of interest. The presentation accurately identifies at least four research databases used to conduct a search for the peer-reviewed articles selected. The presentation The presentation inaccurately or vaguely describes the developed PICO(T) question focused on the chosen clinical issue of interest. The presentation inaccurately or vaguely identifies at least four research databases used to conduct a search for the peer-reviewed articles selected. The presentation inaccurately and vaguely describes the developed PICO(T) question, or is missing. The presentation inaccurately and vaguely identifies less than four research databases used to conduct a search for the peer-reviewed articles selected or is missing. the four peerreviewed articles you selected. · Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peerreviewed articles you selected, including an explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be specific and provide examples. The presentation clearly and accurately provides full APA citations for at least four peer-reviewed articles selected, including a thorough and detailed explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. The presentation includes specific and relevant examples that fully support the research. The presentation provides a complete, detailed, and accurate synthesis of two outside resources accurately provides APA citations for at least four peerreviewed articles selected, including an adequate explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. The presentation includes relevant examples that support the research presented. The presentation provides an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource related to the peer-reviewed articles selected. The response The The presentation presentation inaccurately inaccurately or and vaguely vaguely provides APA provides APA citations for at citations for at least four peerleast four peer- reviewed reviewed articles articles selected, selected, including an including an inaccurate and inaccurate or vague vague explanation of explanation of the strengths of the strengths of using using systematic systematic reviews for reviews for clinical clinical research, or is research. missing. The presentation includes inaccurate or vague examples to support the research presented. The presentation provides a vague or inaccurate synthesis or outside The presentation includes inaccurate and vague examples to support the research presented or is missing. The presentation provides a vague and inaccurate synthesis of no related to the peer-reviewed articles selected, and fully integrates at least two outside resources and two or three course-specific resources that fully support the presentation. integrates at least one outside resource and two or three course-specific resources that may support the presentation. resources related to the peer-reviewed articles selected. NURS 5052 Walden University Week 5 Preventative Healthcare Presentation The response minimally integrates resources that may support the presentation. outside resources related to the articles selected and fails to integrate any resources to support the presentation or is missing. Written Expression and Formatting— Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support welldeveloped ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused— neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensiv e purpose statement and introduction is provided, which delineates all required criteria. 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided, which delineates all required criteria. 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated yet is brief and not descriptive. 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) (3.5%) Paragraphs Paragraphs and sentences and sentences follow writing follow writing standards for standards for flow, continuity, flow, continuity, and clarity < and clarity 60– 60% of the 79% of the time. time. No purpose Purpose, statement, introduction, introduction, or and conclusion conclusion are of the provided. assignment is vague or off topic. Written Expression and Formatting— English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation. Total Points: 100 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. … Purchase answer to see full attachment Student has agreed that all tutoring, explanations, and answers provided by the tutor will be used to help in the learning process and in accordance with Studypool’s honor code & terms of service . Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10

Read more
Enjoy affordable prices and lifetime discounts
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Order Now Order in Chat

Start off on the right foot this semester. Get expert-written solutions at a 20% discount