South University PSY3011 Social Cognition Literature Review
South University PSY3011 Social Cognition Literature Review
South University PSY3011 Social Cognition Literature Review ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS ON South University PSY3011 Social Cognition Literature Review For this first milestone, you will prepare a draft of the literature review due as part of your Final Project. South University PSY3011 Social Cognition Literature Review I have uploaded the rubric and the template shot be in the rubric. psy_216_final_project_milestone_one_guidelines_and_rubric.pdf PSY 216 Final Project: Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric Prompt: For this milestone, due in Module Three, you will prepare a draft of the literature review due as part of your final research investigation using the three articles for your track that you selected in Module One. Rather than following the format of a typical lengthier APA literature review, you will instead prepare three shorter, adapted, individual literature reviews (one for each provided article). Each literature review should be one page in length. The final literature review will consist of a total of five literature reviews (based on the three articles provided in your track and two more articles found and selected by you). The final version of the literature review will be submitted in Module Seven as part of Final Project I. The final project is meant for you to propose a hypothetical study. You are not and should not be conducting human subjects research for this project. It is not necessary for the purposes of this assignment. All human subjects research requires written approval from the SNHU COCE Institutional Review Board in order to protect the welfare and ensure ethical treatment of the subjects. First, read and review the three provided articles for your track. Next, using the questions presented in the Module Two literature review practice journal assignment as a guide, you will draft three literature reviews of the articles provided in your track. The questions are provided here for your convenience: ? ? ? ? ? ? ? What is the title of the article? Provide a citation for the article in APA format. What is the purpose of the article? What is the hypothesis of the study? In other words, what claims do the authors make in the article? What variables (factors) are being looked at as an influence on personality? If these variables or the relationship between these variables have been studied before, what have other studies found? This shows historical significance. What type of research design is used in the study? Do you think the research in this article was conducted in an ethical manner? Why or why not? Use the Literature Review Template to complete this task. Refer to the Literature Review Example to assist you. Also: Consult the sections of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association that cover literature reviews: Section 1.02, Literature Reviews; Section 2.01, T itle; Section 2.02, Authors Name and Institutional Affiliation; and Section 2.05, Introduction. Refer also to the tutorials at the Smarthinking Online Tutoring Service to assist you in your writing and to the webpage SNHU Online Writing Center for proper APA formatting of sources. The following elements must be addressed (as also outlined in the Literature Review section of the Final Project I Guidelines and Rubric document): I. Literature Review: In this part of the assessment, you will analyze foundational research presented in the course for how the field of personality psychology has changed over time, how researchers have designed research to study personality, and how issues of ethics have been addressed historically in the field. A. Summarize the claims made by the authors of the foundational research presented in the course regarding how personality develops. In other words, what claims are made by the research about how human personality develops? B. Summarize the claims made by the authors of the foundational research presented in the course regarding how personality is assessed. In other words, what claims are made by the research about how personality has been determined by assessments? C. Explain how the view of personality has evolved over the history of personality psychology. Be sure to support with examples from research to support your claim. D. Explain the conclusions you can reach about research in personality psychology. In other words, explain what we know about personality, based on your review of the research presented in the course. Be sure to support your analysis with examples from research to support your claim. E. Describe the specific research designs used in the foundational research presented in the course used to address research questions. For example, what were the specific methods used to address their research question? What type of research design was used? F. Explain how research designs were used by authors to conduct research in personality psychology. In other words, how did the research designs used by researchers help in conducting research regarding personality psychology? G. Discuss how issues of ethics have been addressed in the foundational research presented in the course. For example, how did the authors inform the participants of what the experiment would entail? How did the authors account for any potential risks to participants associated with the study? H. Discuss how issues of ethics in personality psychology have been viewed historically. In other words, how have issues of ethics in the field been viewed over time? Has this view changed as the field has progressed? Be sure to support your response with examples from research to support your claims. Guidelines for Submission: Your literature review draft must be submitted with double spacing, 12-point T imes New Roman font, one-inch margins, and discipline-appropriate citations in APA format. Each of the three literature reviews should be one page in length. Rubric Critical Elements Literature Review: Personality Develops Proficient (100%) Summarizes the evidence presented in the foundational research explored in the course regarding how personality develops Needs Improvement (70%) Summarizes the evidence presented in the foundational research explored in the course regarding how personality develops, but summary is cursory or contains inaccuracies Not Evident (0%) Does not summarize the evidence presented in the foundational research explored in the course regarding how personality develops Value 12 Literature Review: Personality Assessed Summarizes the evidence presented in the foundational research explored in the course regarding how personality is assessed Literature Review: History Explains how the view of personality has evolved over the history of the field using examples from the research Literature Review: Explains the conclusions that can Personality Psychology be reached about personality psychology, based on analysis of the research presented in the course using examples from the research Literature Review: Describes the specific research Research Designs designs in the foundational research presented in the course used to address research questions Literature Review: Conduct Research Explains how research designs were used by authors in the research presented in the course to conduct research Literature Review: Issues of EthicsSouth University PSY3011 Social Cognition Literature Review Discusses how issues of ethics have been addressed in the foundational research presented in the course using examples from the research Summarizes the evidence presented in the foundational research explored in the course regarding how personality is assessed, but summary is cursory or contains inaccuracies Explains how the view of personality has evolved over the history of the field, but explanation is cursory or lacks examples from research Explains the conclusions that can be drawn about personality psychology presented in the course, but explanation is cursory, contains inaccuracies, or lacks examples from research Describes the research designs in the foundational research presented in the course used to address research questions, but description is cursory, contains inaccuracies, or response does not reference specific research designs from the research Explains how research designs were used by authors in the research presented in the course to conduct research, but explanation is cursory or contains inaccuracies Discusses how issues of ethics have been addressed in the foundational research presented in the course but discussion is cursory, contains inaccuracies, or lacks examples from research Does not summarize the evidence presented in the foundational research explored in the course regarding how personality is assessed 12 Does not explain how the view of personality has evolved over the history of the field 12 Does not explain the conclusions that can be drawn about personality psychology 12 Does not describe the research designs in the foundational research presented in the course used to address research questions 12 Does not explain how research designs were used by authors in the research presented in the course to conduct research 10 Does not discuss how issues of ethics have been addressed in the foundational research presented in the course 10 Literature Review: V iewed Articulation of Response Discusses how issues of ethics in personality psychology have been viewed historically using examples from the research Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization Discusses how issues of ethics in personality psychology have been viewed historically, but discussion is cursory, contains inaccuracies, or lacks examples from research Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas Does not discuss how issues of ethics in personality psychology have been viewed historically 10 Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas Total 10 100% Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10
South University PSY3011 Social Cognition Literature Review
South University PSY3011 Social Cognition Literature Review ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS ON South University PSY3011 Social Cognition Literature Review For this first milestone, you will prepare a draft of the literature review due as part of your Final Project. South University PSY3011 Social Cognition Literature Review I have uploaded the rubric and the template shot be in the rubric. psy_216_final_project_milestone_one_guidelines_and_rubric.pdf PSY 216 Final Project: Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric Prompt: For this milestone, due in Module Three, you will prepare a draft of the literature review due as part of your final research investigation using the three articles for your track that you selected in Module One. Rather than following the format of a typical lengthier APA literature review, you will instead prepare three shorter, adapted, individual literature reviews (one for each provided article). Each literature review should be one page in length. The final literature review will consist of a total of five literature reviews (based on the three articles provided in your track and two more articles found and selected by you). The final version of the literature review will be submitted in Module Seven as part of Final Project I. The final project is meant for you to propose a hypothetical study. You are not and should not be conducting human subjects research for this project. It is not necessary for the purposes of this assignment. All human subjects research requires written approval from the SNHU COCE Institutional Review Board in order to protect the welfare and ensure ethical treatment of the subjects. First, read and review the three provided articles for your track. Next, using the questions presented in the Module Two literature review practice journal assignment as a guide, you will draft three literature reviews of the articles provided in your track. The questions are provided here for your convenience: ? ? ? ? ? ? ? What is the title of the article? Provide a citation for the article in APA format. What is the purpose of the article? What is the hypothesis of the study? In other words, what claims do the authors make in the article? What variables (factors) are being looked at as an influence on personality? If these variables or the relationship between these variables have been studied before, what have other studies found? This shows historical significance. What type of research design is used in the study? Do you think the research in this article was conducted in an ethical manner? Why or why not? Use the Literature Review Template to complete this task. Refer to the Literature Review Example to assist you. Also: Consult the sections of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association that cover literature reviews: Section 1.02, Literature Reviews; Section 2.01, T itle; Section 2.02, Authors Name and Institutional Affiliation; and Section 2.05, Introduction. Refer also to the tutorials at the Smarthinking Online Tutoring Service to assist you in your writing and to the webpage SNHU Online Writing Center for proper APA formatting of sources. The following elements must be addressed (as also outlined in the Literature Review section of the Final Project I Guidelines and Rubric document): I. Literature Review: In this part of the assessment, you will analyze foundational research presented in the course for how the field of personality psychology has changed over time, how researchers have designed research to study personality, and how issues of ethics have been addressed historically in the field. A. Summarize the claims made by the authors of the foundational research presented in the course regarding how personality develops. In other words, what claims are made by the research about how human personality develops? B. Summarize the claims made by the authors of the foundational research presented in the course regarding how personality is assessed. In other words, what claims are made by the research about how personality has been determined by assessments? C. Explain how the view of personality has evolved over the history of personality psychology. Be sure to support with examples from research to support your claim. D. Explain the conclusions you can reach about research in personality psychology. In other words, explain what we know about personality, based on your review of the research presented in the course. Be sure to support your analysis with examples from research to support your claim. E. Describe the specific research designs used in the foundational research presented in the course used to address research questions. For example, what were the specific methods used to address their research question? What type of research design was used? F. Explain how research designs were used by authors to conduct research in personality psychology. In other words, how did the research designs used by researchers help in conducting research regarding personality psychology? G. Discuss how issues of ethics have been addressed in the foundational research presented in the course. For example, how did the authors inform the participants of what the experiment would entail? How did the authors account for any potential risks to participants associated with the study? H. Discuss how issues of ethics in personality psychology have been viewed historically. In other words, how have issues of ethics in the field been viewed over time? Has this view changed as the field has progressed? Be sure to support your response with examples from research to support your claims. Guidelines for Submission: Your literature review draft must be submitted with double spacing, 12-point T imes New Roman font, one-inch margins, and discipline-appropriate citations in APA format. Each of the three literature reviews should be one page in length. Rubric Critical Elements Literature Review: Personality Develops Proficient (100%) Summarizes the evidence presented in the foundational research explored in the course regarding how personality develops Needs Improvement (70%) Summarizes the evidence presented in the foundational research explored in the course regarding how personality develops, but summary is cursory or contains inaccuracies Not Evident (0%) Does not summarize the evidence presented in the foundational research explored in the course regarding how personality develops Value 12 Literature Review: Personality Assessed Summarizes the evidence presented in the foundational research explored in the course regarding how personality is assessed Literature Review: History Explains how the view of personality has evolved over the history of the field using examples from the research Literature Review: Explains the conclusions that can Personality Psychology be reached about personality psychology, based on analysis of the research presented in the course using examples from the research Literature Review: Describes the specific research Research Designs designs in the foundational research presented in the course used to address research questions Literature Review: Conduct Research Explains how research designs were used by authors in the research presented in the course to conduct research Literature Review: Issues of EthicsSouth University PSY3011 Social Cognition Literature Review Discusses how issues of ethics have been addressed in the foundational research presented in the course using examples from the research Summarizes the evidence presented in the foundational research explored in the course regarding how personality is assessed, but summary is cursory or contains inaccuracies Explains how the view of personality has evolved over the history of the field, but explanation is cursory or lacks examples from research Explains the conclusions that can be drawn about personality psychology presented in the course, but explanation is cursory, contains inaccuracies, or lacks examples from research Describes the research designs in the foundational research presented in the course used to address research questions, but description is cursory, contains inaccuracies, or response does not reference specific research designs from the research Explains how research designs were used by authors in the research presented in the course to conduct research, but explanation is cursory or contains inaccuracies Discusses how issues of ethics have been addressed in the foundational research presented in the course but discussion is cursory, contains inaccuracies, or lacks examples from research Does not summarize the evidence presented in the foundational research explored in the course regarding how personality is assessed 12 Does not explain how the view of personality has evolved over the history of the field 12 Does not explain the conclusions that can be drawn about personality psychology 12 Does not describe the research designs in the foundational research presented in the course used to address research questions 12 Does not explain how research designs were used by authors in the research presented in the course to conduct research 10 Does not discuss how issues of ethics have been addressed in the foundational research presented in the course 10 Literature Review: V iewed Articulation of Response Discusses how issues of ethics in personality psychology have been viewed historically using examples from the research Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization Discusses how issues of ethics in personality psychology have been viewed historically, but discussion is cursory, contains inaccuracies, or lacks examples from research Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas Does not discuss how issues of ethics in personality psychology have been viewed historically 10 Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas Total 10 100% Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10
Use Promo Code: FIRST15