Walden NURS6052 Essentials of EvidenceBased Practice Conduct Critical Appraisal

Walden NURS6052 Essentials of EvidenceBased Practice Conduct Critical Appraisal ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS ON Walden NURS6052 Essentials of EvidenceBased Practice Conduct Critical Appraisal To Prepare: Review the Resources and consider the importance of critically appraising research evidence.Walden NURS6052 Essentials of EvidenceBased Practice Conduct Critical Appraisal Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you selected in Module 2 and analyzed in Module 3. THESE ARTICLES HAVE BEEN INPUT INTO THE TEMPLATE FOR YOUR CONVENIENCE Review and download the Critical Appraisal Tools document provided in the Resources. THAT TOOL IS BELOW The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project) Part 4A: Critical Appraisal of Research Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected and analyzed by completing the Critical Appraisal Tools document. Be sure to include: An evaluation table A levels of evidence table An outcomes synthesis table Part 4B: Critical Appraisal of Research Based on your appraisal, in a 1-2-page critical appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges from the research you reviewed. Briefly explain the best practice, justifying your proposal with APA citations of the research. Critical Appraisal Tools Worksheet Template Evaluation Table Use this document to complete the evaluation table requirement of the Module 4 Assessment, Evidence-Based Project, Part 4A: Critical Appraisal of Research Full citation of selected article Article #1 Article #2 Article #3 Article #4 Cotogni , P., Barbero, C., & Rinaldi, M. (2015). Deep sternal wound infection after cardiac surgery: Evidences and controversies. World journal of critical care medicine , 4 (4), 265–273. doi:10.5492/wjccm. v4.i4.265. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles /PMC4631871/ Kubota, H., Miyata, H., Motomura , N., Ono, M., Takamoto, S., Harii , K., … Kyo, S. (2013). Deep sternal wound infection after cardiac surgery. Journal of cardiothoracic surgery , 8 , 132. doi:10.1186/1749-8090-8-132. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pmc/articles/PMC3663691/ Simek, M., Chudoba , A., Hajek, R., Tobbia , P., Molitor, M., & Nemec, P. (2018). From open packing to negative wound pressure therapy: A critical overview of deep sternal wound infection treatment strategies after cardiac surgery. Biomedical Papers Of The Medical Faculty Of The University Palacky , Olomouc, Czechoslovakia . doi:10.5507/bp.2018.053. https://org.exp.waldenulibrary.org/ doi:10.5507/bp.2018.053 Simor, A. E. (2011). Staphylococcal decolonisation : An effective strategy for prevention of infection? The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 11 (12), 952-62. Retrieved from https://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?url= https://search-proquest-com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/ docview/906522531?accountid=14872 Conceptual Framework Describe the theoretical basis for the study Design/Method Describe the design and how the study was carried out Sample/Setting The number and characteristics of patients, attrition rate, etc. Major Variables Studied List and define dependent and independent variables Measurement Identify primary statistics used to answer clinical questions Data Analysis Statistical or qualitative findings Findings and Recommendations General findings and recommendations of the research Appraisal Describe the general worth of this research to practice. What are the strengths and limitations of study? What are the risks associated with implementation of the suggested practices or processes detailed in the research? What is the feasibility of use in your practice? General Notes/Comments Levels of Evidence Table Use this document to complete the levels of evidence table requirement of the Module 4 Assessment, Evidence-Based Project, Part 4A: Critical Appraisal of Research Author and year of selected article Article #1 Article #2 Article #3 Article #4 Study Design Theoretical basis for the study Sample/Setting The number and characteristics of patients Evidence Level * (I, II, or III) Outcomes General Notes/Comments * Evidence Levels: Level I Experimental, randomized controlled trial (RCT), systematic review RTCs with or without meta-analysis Level II Quasi-experimental studies, systematic review of a combination of RCTs and quasi-experimental studies, or quasi-experimental studies only, with or without meta-analysis Level III Nonexperimental, systematic review of RCTs, quasi-experimental with/without meta-analysis, qualitative, qualitative systematic review with/without meta-synthesis Level IV Respected authorities’ opinions, nationally recognized expert committee/consensus panel reports based on scientific evidence Level V Literature reviews, quality improvement, program evaluation, financial evaluation, case reports, nationally recognized expert(s) opinion based on experiential evidence. Walden NURS6052 Essentials of EvidenceBased Practice Conduct Critical Appraisal Outcomes Synthesis Table Use this document to complete the outcomes synthesis table requirement of the Module 4 Assessment, Evidence-Based Project, Part 4A: Critical Appraisal of Research Author and year of selected article Article #1 Article #2 Article #3 Article #4 Sample/Setting The number and characteristics of patients Outcomes Key Findings Appraisal and Study Quality General Notes/Comments Part 4B: Critical Appraisal of Research Based on your appraisal, in a 1-2-page critical appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges from the research you reviewed. Briefly explain the best practice, justifying your proposal with at least 3 to 5 APA citations of the research. Walden NURS6052 Essentials of EvidenceBased Practice Conduct Critical Appraisal Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10