University of Miami Scientific and Media Communication Comparative Discussion

University of Miami Scientific and Media Communication Comparative Essay University of Miami Scientific and Media Communication Comparative Essay Instructions: I’ve attached three documents to this posting (One pertains to 7th Edition APA. One is the instructions for the assignment. One is a PDF document of the ‘original publication’ which I included, because one of the links in the instructions document dose not work. Please make sure to make this paper look professional. Journal 2 Instructions The student will compose a brief essay comparing and contrasting scientific communication, including the role science plays in contemporary society (DSL 200.1), distinguishing between science and pseudoscience, and identifying when science is misrepresented in the media (DSL 200.3). The scientific data must be from reputable source(s) and must be accurately interpreted and cited (DSL 200.4). Additional reliable sources may be referred to, as needed or required. University of Miami Scientific and Media Communication Comparative Essay ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL NURSING PAPERS The first source listed at the bottom is a news article discussing the primary study listed below it. Students should read both sources thoroughly to achieve a good understanding of what the primary source says, and then be able to evaluate how the information is communicated to the lay public in the news article. Students should look for any inaccuracies, omissions, or misrepresentations in the news article and point them out with specific evidence. Students may also comment on how well the news article communicates the information citing any specific examples as supporting evidence. Students should cover the background problems or observations investigated by the study in the introductory paragraph. Students should state the hypothesis according to the primary source (scientific study) and then explain how well that hypothesis is communicated by the news article. Students should further address how the news article describes key results, conclusions, and how the information should be applied in the larger context of the problems/observations previously stated. Wherever possible, students should use the concepts described in the Communications Module on how proper scientific reporting should be conducted. Try to focus on examples of good scientific reporting illustrated while pointing out any areas of poor scientific reporting that deserve appropriate criticism. Evaluation The journal includes the following processes and requirements: Start with an engaging attention getter, identifying the observation/problem addressed by the media communication and in the scientific communication; Identify the media communication as a media communication/secondary source and the scientific communication as a scientific communication/primary source Write a valid hypothesis statement which is addressed by the research in the scientific article and explain if the hypothesis is presented correctly in the media source; Identify additional parts to the scientific method including research methods, results, and research conclusions comparing what is stated in the media source and the scientific source; End the journal definitively; Use paraphrased information, examples, and evidence to support all points; Properly organize information within and between paragraphs; Format layout, citations, and references in correct 7th Edition APA style (Font: Calibri 11). Include in-text citation. journal_2__help_instructions_.docx student_apa_paper_template___word_17.docx emission_budget Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10