WGU XAP10 Task 1 Evidence Based Practice and Applied Nursing Research

WGU XAP10 Task 1 Evidence Based Practice and Applied Nursing Research WGU XAP10 Task 1 Evidence Based Practice and Applied Nursing Research Permalink: https://nursingpaperessays.com/ wgu-xap10-task-1…nursing-research / ? Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. An originality report is provided when you submit your task that can be used as a guide. You must use the rubric to direct the creation of yoursubmission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinksto relevant portions of the course. Note: Research evidence must not be more than five years old. Note: Upload a copy of the full text of the articles with yoursubmission. Note: You may use the same topic and research articles on both Task 1: Analyzing Research Articles and Task 2: Evidence-Based Practice Change. WGU XAP10 Task 1 Evidence Based Practice and Applied Nursing Research **A. Evaluate a primary, quantitative research, peer-reviewed journal article (suggested length of 3–5 pages) that has healthcare implications by doing the following: Note: You may select an article focusing on a healthcare topic of your choice or an article focusing on one of the following topics: falls and fall prevention, pain management in children, opioid abuse, hepatitis C, catheter-associated urinary tract infections, or hand hygiene and infectionsin hospitals. 1. Describe how the researcher addresses the following four areas in the selected journal article: background or introduction (e.g., the purpose of the study) review of the literature (e.g., research used to support the study) data analysis (e.g., how the researcher analyzed the data) methodology (e.g., research type and sampling methods) 2. Evaluate whether the evidence presented in each of the four areas of the journal article from part A1 supports the outcome of the study and implications for future research. 3. Explain how the protection of human subjects and cultural considerations were addressed by the researcher, using specific information from the journal article from part A. 4. Describe one strength and one limitation of the study. 5. Describe how the evidence from the article in part A informs current nursing practices. B. Evaluate a primary, qualitative research, peer-reviewed journal article (suggested length of 3–5 pages) that has healthcare implications by doing the following: Note: You may select an article focusing on a healthcare topic of your choice or an article focusing on one of the following topics: falls and fall prevention, pain management in children, opioid abuse, hepatitis C, catheter associated urinary tract infections, or hand hygiene and infectionsin hospitals. You may use the same topic that was used in part A. 1. Describe how the researcher addresses the following four areas in the selected journal article: background or introduction (e.g., the purpose of the study) review of the literature (e.g., research used to support the study) data analysis (e.g., how the researcher analyzed the data) methodology (e.g., research type and sampling methods) 2. Evaluate whether the evidence presented in each of the four areas of the journal article from part B1 supports the outcome of the study and implications for future research. WGU XAP10 Task 1 Evidence Based Practice and Applied Nursing Research 3. Explain how the protection of human subjects and cultural considerations were addressed by the researcher, using specific information from the journal article from part B. 4. Identify one strength and one limitation of the study. 5. Describe how the evidence from the article in part B informs current nursing practices. C. Acknowledge sources, using APA-formatted in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized. D. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission. task_1__apa_template_1_xap1_0219.docx c361task_1.pdf WGU Performance Assessment XAP1 — XAP TASK 1 EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE AND APPLIED NURSING RESEARCH — C361 PRFA — XAP1 COMPETENCIES 724.8.5 : Foundations of Inquiry The graduate differentiates between quality improvement processes, evidence based practice, and research. 724.8.6 : Literature Review and Analysis The graduate demonstrates knowledge of the process and outcomes of conducting a literature review. 724.8.7 : Ethics and Research The graduate demonstrates understanding of the ethics of nursing research, particularly human subjects’ protections, informed consent, and alignment with patient and family values and preferences. 724.8.8 : Patient Outcomes The graduate discriminates between identi?ed standards and practices that do not provide improvements in patient outcomes utilizing relevant sources of evidence and the application of nursing theory. 724.8.9 : Data Collection, Analysis, and Dissemination The graduate describes the process of data collection, analysis, and implementation of evidence that can improve clinical practice from an interprofessional perspective. WGU XAP10 Task 1 Evidence Based Practice and Applied Nursing Research INTRODUCTION There are many sources of information available on the web and in journals relating to the nursing discipline. Therefore, it is of pivotal importance to understand the basic tenets of critical appraisal of research for its use in interprofessional healthcare practices. The aim of evidence-based practice (EBP) is to employ a three-pronged approach, blending the best available research evidence, patient values and preferences, and clinical expertise. In this task, you will critique two primary research evidence sources. You will select one quantitative and one qualitative peer-reviewed journal article on a healthcare topic of interest. REQUIREMENTS Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. An originality report is provided when you submit your task that can be used as a guide. You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course. Note: Research evidence must not be more than ve years old. Note: Upload a copy of the full text of the articles with your submission. Note: You may use the same topic and research articles on both Task 1: Analyzing Research Articles and Task 2: Evidence-Based Practice Change. . A. Evaluate a primary, quantitative research, peer-reviewed journal article (suggested length of 3–5 pages) that has healthcare implications by doing the following: Note: You may select an article focusing on a healthcare topic of your choice or an article focusing on one of the following topics: falls and fall prevention, pain management in children, opioid abuse, hepatitis C, catheter-associated urinary tract infections, or hand hygiene and infections in hospitals. 1. Describe how the researcher addresses the following four areas in the selected journal article: background or introduction (e.g., the purpose of the study) review of the literature (e.g., research used to support the study) data analysis (e.g., how the researcher analyzed the data) methodology (e.g., research type and sampling methods) 2. Evaluate whether the evidence presented in each of the four areas of the journal article from part A1 supports the outcome of the study and implications for future research. 3. Explain how the protection of human subjects and cultural considerations were addressed by the researcher, using speci?c information from the journal article from part A. 4. Describe one strength and one limitation of the study. 5. Describe how the evidence from the article in part A informs current nursing practices. . B. Evaluate a primary, qualitative research, peer-reviewed journal article (suggested length of 3–5 pages) that has healthcare implications by doing the following: Note: You may select an article focusing on a healthcare topic of your choice or an article focusing on one of the following topics: falls and fall prevention, pain management in children, opioid abuse, hepatitis C, catheter associated urinary tract infections, or hand hygiene and infections in hospitals. You may use the same topic that was used in part A. 1. Describe how the researcher addresses the following four areas in the selected journal article: background or introduction (e.g., the purpose of the study) review of the literature (e.g., research used to support the study) data analysis (e.g., how the researcher analyzed the data) methodology (e.g., research type and sampling methods) 2. Evaluate whether the evidence presented in each of the four areas of the journal article from part B1 supports the outcome of the study and implications for future research. https://tasks.wgu.edu/student/000903425/course/4200002/task/617/overview 1/3 2/23/2020 WGU Performance Assessment 3. WGU XAP10 Task 1 Evidence Based Practice and Applied Nursing Research . Explain how the protection of human subjects and cultural considerations were addressed by the researcher, using speci?c information from the journal article from part B. 4. Identify one strength and one limitation of the study. 5. Describe how the evidence from the article in part B informs current nursing practices. C. Acknowledge sources, using APA-formatted in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized. D. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission. File Restrictions File name may contain only letters, numbers, spaces, and these symbols: ! – _ . * ‘ ( ) File size limit: 200 MB File types allowed: doc, docx, rtf, xls, xlsx, ppt, pptx, odt, pdf, txt, qt, mov, mpg, avi, mp3, wav, mp4, wma, ?v, asf, mpeg, wmv, m4v, svg, tif, tiff, jpeg, jpg, gif, png, zip, rar, tar, 7z RUBRIC A1:A1. QUANTITATIVE: ARTICLE AREAS NOT EVIDENT APPROACHING COMPETENCE COMPETENT An article is not provided. Does not identify a primary, quantitative research, Identi?es a primary, quantitative research, peer- peer-reviewed journal article (suggested length of 3–5 reviewed journal article (suggested length of 3–5 pages) that has healthcare implications. The pages) that has healthcare implications. Evaluates the description does not address all of the given points, or article by doing the following: The description the description of any point is not supported by the addresses all 4 of the given points, and the description article. of each point is supported by the article. NOT EVIDENT APPROACHING COMPETENCE COMPETENT An evaluation of evidence is not provided for each The evaluation of evidence presented for any area of The evaluation of evidence presented for each area of area of the journal article from part A1. the journal article from part A1 does not logically the journal article from part A1 logically shows show whether that section’s evidence supports the whether that section’s evidence supports the outcome outcome of the study and implications for future of the study and implications for future research. . A2:QUANTITATIVE: CRITIQUE OF EVIDENCE research. A3:QUANTITATIVE: PROTECTION AND CONSIDERATIONS NOT EVIDENT APPROACHING COMPETENCE COMPETENT An explanation of how the protection of human The explanation does not use speci?c information The explanation uses speci?c information from the subjects and cultural considerations were addressed from the journal article from part A to show how the journal article from part A to show how the protection by the researcher is not provided. protection of human subjects and cultural of human subjects and cultural considerations were considerations were addressed by the researcher. addressed by the researcher. NOT EVIDENT APPROACHING COMPETENCE COMPETENT A submission is not provided, or the submission does The submission is missing relevant information about The submission provides relevant information about not identify 1 strength or 1 limitation of the study. the 1 identi?ed strength or the 1 identi?ed limitation the 1 identi?ed strength and the 1 identi?ed limitation of the study. of the study. . NOT EVIDENT APPROACHING COMPETENCE COMPETENT A submission is not provided. The submission does not describe how the evidence The submission accurately describes how the evidence from the article in part A informs current nursing from the article in part A informs current nursing practices. Or the description is not supported with practices. The description is supported with speci?c speci?c examples of currently used nursing practices. examples of currently used nursing practices. APPROACHING COMPETENCE COMPETENT A4:QUANTITATIVE: STRENGTH AND LIMITATION A5:QUANTITATIVE: EVIDENCE APPLICATION B1:QUALITATIVE: ARTICLE AREAS NOT EVIDENT An article is not provided. https://tasks.wgu.edu/student/000903425/course/4200002/task/617/overview 2/3 2/23/2020 WGU Performance Assessment Does not identify a primary, qualitative research, peer- Identi?es a primary, qualitative research, peer- reviewed journal article (suggested length of 3–5 reviewed journal article (suggested length of 3–5 pages) that has healthcare implications. The pages) that has healthcare implications. Evaluates the description does not address all of the given points, or article by doing the following: The description the description of any point is not supported by the addresses all 4 of the given points, and the description article. of each point is supported by the article. WGU XAP10 Task 1 Evidence Based Practice and Applied Nursing Research . NOT EVIDENT APPROACHING COMPETENCE COMPETENT An evaluation of evidence is not provided for each The evaluation of evidence presented for any area of The evaluation of evidence presented for each area of area of the journal article from part B1. the journal article from part B1 does not logically the journal article from part B1 logically shows show whether that section’s evidence supports the whether that section’s evidence supports the outcome outcome of the study and implications for future of the study and implications for future research. B2:QUALITATIVE: CRITIQUE OF EVIDENCE research. B3:QUALITATIVE: PROTECTION AND CONSIDERATIONS NOT EVIDENT APPROACHING COMPETENCE COMPETENT An explanation of how the protection of human The explanation does not use speci?c information The explanation uses speci?c information from the subjects and cultural considerations were addressed from the journal article from part B to show how the journal article from part B to show how the protection by the researcher is not provided. protection of human subjects and cultural of human subjects and cultural considerations were considerations were addressed by the researcher. addressed by the researcher. . NOT EVIDENT APPROACHING COMPETENCE COMPETENT A submission is not provided, or the submission does The submission is missing relevant information about The submission provides relevant information about not identify 1 strength or 1 limitation of the study. the 1 identi?ed strength or the 1 identi?ed limitation the 1 identi?ed strength and the 1 identi?ed limitation of the study. of the study. NOT EVIDENT APPROACHING COMPETENCE COMPETENT A submission is not provided. The submission does not describe how the evidence The submission describes how the evidence from the from the article in part B informs current nursing article in part B informs current nursing practices. The practices. Or the description is not supported with description is supported with speci?c examples of speci?c examples of currently used nursing practices. currently used nursing practices. NOT EVIDENT APPROACHING COMPETENCE COMPETENT The submission does not include in-text citations and The submission includes in-text citations and The submission includes in-text citations and references according to APA style for content that is references for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or references for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or quoted, paraphrased, or summarized. summarized but does not demonstrate a consistent summarized and demonstrates a consistent application application of APA style. of APA style. . NOT EVIDENT APPROACHING COMPETENCE COMPETENT Content is unstructured, is disjointed, or contains Content is poorly organized, is dif?cult to follow, or Content re?ects attention to detail, is organized, and pervasive errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar. contains errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar that focuses on the main ideas as prescribed in the task or Vocabulary or tone is unprofessional or distracts from cause confusion. Terminology is misused or chosen by the candidate. Terminology is pertinent, is the topic. ineffective. used correctly, and effectively conveys the intended B4:QUALITATIVE: STRENGTH AND LIMITATION B5:QUALITATIVE: EVIDENCE APPLICATION C.:APA SOURCES D.:PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION meaning. Mechanics, usage, and grammar promote accurate interpretation and understanding. https://tasks.wgu.edu/student/000903425/course/4200002/task/617/overview 3/3 … WGU XAP10 Task 1 Evidence Based Practice and Applied Nursing Research Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10

RECOMMENDED: Evidence Based Practice and Applied Nursing Research | Instant Homework Help