Biology

Pick a region of the body (e.g., pectoral girdle, hand, neck, thigh, etc.) and prepare a written paper of at least 1000 words on the following bullet points: Describe the type(s) of muscle, patterns of fascicle organization, actions, and attachment points for the muscles present in your chosen region. Trace the pathways by which the presence of a sensory stimulus (e.g., a bug crawling across your skin) in your chosen region is processed and the subsequent motor behavior that carried out. Be sure to identify the initiation and termination points of the tracts, where the cell bodies of the neurons present in the pathway are located, along with locations of any synapses that occur along the tract. Focusing on one specific movement performed by muscles in your chosen region, identify the prime mover, synergists, and antagonists. Predict how a stroke in the primary somatosensory cortex would affect both the anatomy and function of your chosen region differently than a stroke in the primary motor cortex.

What other animal materials harvested or purchased by humans besides meat/blood may serve as viable transmission for zoonoses? That is my question.  I have already picked what I want to look into which is animal skin are viable transmission    I just can’t find scholarly articles from a database, I will need a database for the rationale in the introduction and the background. The methods part I have the section done. Provide articles for me to provide in my final.

Fungi tend to reproduce sexually when nutrients are limited or other conditions are unfavorable, but they reproduce asexually in more ideal conditions. Why is this strategy successful?

7. Defend or refute this statement “Stem cell biotechnologically has the potential to produce revolutionary therapies for the treatment of some human diseases”. (Clearly explain biotechnological concepts and techniques, inclusive of legal and ethical constraints)

The critique must include the following points: You will be graded for each of these points. I will pay particular attention to G)   A)     Brief introduction of the scientific process being investigated   B)     Objective of the Study-  What was the goal of the study? What question(s) did the author(s) ask?   C)     What was their hypothesis?   D)     Key observations:  What were their most important findings?   E)      What techniques were used: Materials and Methods.   F)      How did this work help advance our understanding of the topic?   G)     What is the conclusion?   H)     Your own perspective – were the data convincing? What other experiments would you have done?   Formatting     •      Double space, using Times New Roman or Arial font   •      Font size should be 12   Structure the critique using the points I have given (A through G). Please separate them out under headings.

What risk are associated with high cholesterol intake? The RDA for protein intake is 0.8 grams per 1 kilogram (kg) of body weight. Calculate body weight in kilograms then multiply that by 0.8 to obtain the recommended grams of protein Body weight is 160.

Evolution vs. Creation This one can be very challenging.  Evolution is a primary tenant of Biology, so why is there such a push-back and denial about evolution (especially in the USA)?  For this essay, you may want to define both of these ideas and then compare and contrast the arguments about these ideas.  As a scientist, we evaluate evidence and create falsifiable hypotheses to test our ideas.  Are there scientific arguments to be made about these ideas?  Is Creation really related to Evolution or are they separate things? Essays (~1-1.5 page, single space):  Essays are short written assignments about a specific lecture related topic.  These essays will be graded on content, writing clarity, and scientific merit or validity.  *I HAVE ATTACHED A FILE WITH THE SOURCES THAT NEED TO BE USED IN THE ESSAY* PLEASE DO A WORK CITED PAGE WITH THE SOURCES USED PROPERLY IN TEXT CITATION AND PARAPHRASE IF NEED* PLEASE BE PLGARISM FREE 😉 THANK YOU WILL GIVE BIG BONUS $$ WITH THIS

^The Assignment topic above, not the paper’s title. Instructions below -2 peer reviewed journal articles (Articles don’t need to be abut species and the trait, can include articles on other species in the genus or family or other species that have a similar trait) -TITLE: should be a research question -INTRO: Strong case for why the hypothesis should be tested, evidence from natural history information and published research will help the reader to understand the significant of your hypothesis. 1. a description of a trait of your species (Grapsus Grapsus) that you think could be an adaptation. Be sure to address the variation in the trait 2. Any natural history information that is relevant to the trait you have chosen (i.e. where does it live, what other species does it interact with, what does it eat and how does it feed) – why does this hypothesized adaptation make sense, given its natural history and ecology 3.What is known? Include the results from at least one experiment or observational study that relates to your hypothesis. These results must be reported in a peer reviewed journal article 4. What is not known? Include explanation of what is still unknown, or some aspect of the research you cite that could be improved. 5. A clear hypothesis stating how this trait may be an adaptation. The hypothesis you propose should build on what is not known about your species and/or trait. METHODS: Must write the experimental design in your own words and cite the article,1. State your independent variable and describe how you will manipulate or control it. 2. Identify any controls you may need to include in your experiment to ensure that your experiment tests your hypothesis 3. State your dependent variable and describe how you will measure it PREDICTIONS: State all possible results of your experiment, do NOT use this section to state what you expect will happen, nor provide any explanations for the results. 1. state null hypothesis 2.identify possible results of your experiment that would not reject the null hypothesis 3. identify possible results of your experiment that would reject the null hypothesis DISCUSSION: This is where you draw conclusions of your potential results and explore the implications of your experiment. Support the ideas in your discussion by citing at least one peer reviewed journal article. 1. What does it mean if the results of your experiment reject your null hypothesis? Explain the relationship between trait and fitness 2. What does it mean if the results of your experiment do not reject your null hypothesis? Why else might your species have this trait? LITERATURE CITED: 1. Your literature cited section should include every source you cite 2. CSE style 3. Must cite at least two peer reviewed journal articles 4. DO NOT SITE WEBSITES 5. DO NOT USE QUOTATIONS ANYWHERE IN YOUR PROPOSAL.

The critique must include the following points: You will be graded for each of these points.  I will pay particular attention to G) A) Brief introduction of the scientific process being investigated B) Objective of the Study-  What was the goal of the study? What question(s) did the author(s) ask?       What was their hypothesis? C) Key observations:  What were their most important findings? D) What techniques were used: Materials and Methods. E) How did this work help advance our understanding of the topic?  F) What is the conclusion? G) Your own perspective – were the data convincing? What other experiments would you have done?

Sociology final reflection papePAPER: THE REMEMBRANCE PROJECTYou will write a 2-3 page reflection as the final for this course, thus, 20% of your grade in this course depends on the precision, depth, and creativity demonstrated in this paper. Having dived into the study of society and discussed differences across hundreds of variables, the time has come to think about the one variable which is incontrovertible across time and space – death.Every person who has ever lived has had to contend with the facts of existence and no fact is more immutable than all who live will eventually pass away. The existential anUnit 7 DiscussionFungal PathogensChoose any one of the fungal pathogens and discuss its appearance, staining reaction, culturecharacteristics, disease caused, and epidemiologicalcharacteristics (where is it common, who is at risk).Unit 8 DiscussionDisease TransmissionExplain how nosocomial infections are becoming serious health threats within healthcare system. Discuss the known methods used for breaking the chains of disease transmission.Propose a way to educate the general public on their role in preventing disease transmission.Each discussion must be at least 100 wordsgst induced by such realizations often follows on the heels of a close friend or loved one passing away. Of course, just because all people pass away doesn’t mean they agree on what constitutes a life well lived. It is my hope that all of you will live a life that you can consider to be “well-lived” whatever that means to you personally.I think part of living such a life stems from having thought about what we value about ourselves and others, what we are most proud of and ashamed of, and what we hope our legacy will be after we are gone. To facilitate such thinking, I have created this journal exercise based on two thought experiences. All I ask is you sit there and think deeply about each experiment for a few minutes and then commit yourself to writing no less than one page about each one.Thought Experiment #1:Imagine that one of your close friends is talking to one of their friends, someone who knows nothing about you and who has never met you before. Having never encountered you before, this friend of your friend has no idea what you look like, what your voice sounds like, how you dress, what your beliefs are etc. How would you WANT your friend to describe you to their friend?Thought Experiment #2:Imagine that you lived to be 90 years old and passed away while you were sleeping. One hundred years after you die, a researcher begins writing a biography about your life. What would the researcher need to emphasize for you to feel like the biography did a good job of capturing your life?Again, please read the thought experiments carefully and think about them for several minutes before starting to write. You need only include half a page for each experiment, although you are certainly welcome to write as much as you want. The paper is due December 6.