Nursing homework help

COMPETENCIES
________________________________________
7002.1.1 : Pathophysiology
The graduate evaluates high volume, high impact disease processes, including associated pharmacological interventions and implications for advanced practice.
7002.1.2 : Evaluation of Pharmaceutical Impact
The graduate analyzes pharmaceutical impacts, including physiological, psychological, financial, and lifestyle factors on the selected disease processes.
7002.1.3 : Managing Care Transitions
The graduate evaluates salient pharmacological issues in managing patient care transitions.
7002.1.4 : Salience
The graduate distinguishes between general information and relevant assessment findings to manage and minimize pathologies and risk factors to promote optimal patient outcomes.
7002.1.5 : Care Management
The graduate integrates relevant patient and population data to develop pathopharmacological management strategies for populations.
INTRODUCTION
________________________________________
As an advanced practice nurse, it is important to diagnose, treat, and evaluate patients who have chronic disease. A nurse must understand how pathology, treatment, regimens, and psycho-social issues affect patients and the care they receive. Disease management is more than just monitoring a medication or treatment; it is evaluating the disease process from the micro to macro level. As a nurse with an advanced degree, you will be expected to assess patients and individual and population responses to chronic illness.

For this assessment, you will investigate pathopharmacological issues related to a specific disease process. You may choose to investigate traumatic brain injury, depression, obesity, asthma, or heart failure. As part of this assessment, you will analyze the various impacts the disease process has on the patients, their families, and populations at a local, national, and international level.

REQUIREMENTS
________________________________________
Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. An originality report is provided when you submit your task that can be used as a guide.

Professional Communications is a required aspect to pass this task. Completion of a spell check and grammar check prior to submitting your final work is strongly recommended.

You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.

A. Investigate one of the following disease processes: traumatic brain injury, depression, obesity, asthma, or heart failure.
1. Analyze the pathophysiology of the disease process you selected in part A.
2. Discuss the standard of practice for the selected disease process.
a. Discuss the evidence-based pharmacological treatments in your state and how they affect management of the selected disease in your community.
b. Discuss clinical guidelines for assessment, diagnosis, and patient education for the selected disease process.
c. Compare the standard practice for managing the disease within your community with state or national practices.
3. Discuss characteristics of and resources for a patient who manages the selected disease well, including access to care, treatment options, life expectancy, and outcomes.
a. Analyze disparities between management of the selected disease on a national and international level.
4. Discuss three or four factors (e.g., financial resources, access to care, insured/uninsured, Medicare/Medicaid) that contribute to a patient being able to manage the selected disease.
a. Explain how a lack of the factors discussed in part A4 leads to an unmanaged disease process.
i. Describe characteristics of a patient with the selected disease that is unmanaged.

B. Analyze how the selected disease process affects patients, families, and populations in your community.
1. Discuss the financial costs associated with the selected disease process for patients, families, and populations from diagnosis to treatment.

C. Discuss how you will promote best practices for managing the selected disease in your current healthcare organization.
1. Discuss three strategies you could use to implement best practices for managing the selected disease in your current healthcare organization.
2. Discuss an appropriate method to evaluate the implementation of each of the strategies from part C1.

D. When you use sources, include all in-text citations and references in APA format.

Note: When using sources to support ideas and elements in an assessment, the submission MUST include APA formatted in-text citations with a corresponding reference list for any direct quotes or paraphrasing. It is not necessary to list sources that were consulted if they have not been quoted or paraphrased in the text of the assessment.
File Restrictions
File name may contain only letters, numbers, spaces, and these symbols: ! – _ . * ‘ ( )
File size limit: 200 MB
File types allowed: doc, docx, rtf, xls, xlsx, ppt, pptx, odt, pdf, txt, qt, mov, mpg, avi, mp3, wav, mp4, wma, flv, asf, mpeg, wmv, m4v, svg, tif, tiff, jpeg, jpg, gif, png, zip, rar, tar, 7z
RUBRIC
________________________________________
ARTICULATION OF RESPONSE (CLARITY, ORGANIZATION, MECHANICS):
UNSATISFACTORY / NOT PRESENT
The candidate provides unsatisfactory articulation of response. DOES NOT MEET STANDARD
The candidate provides weak articulation of response. MINIMALLY COMPETENT
The candidate provides limited articulation of response. COMPETENT
The candidate provides adequate articulation of response. HIGHLY COMPETENT
The candidate provides substantial articulation of response.
A. INVESTIGATED DISEASE PROCESS:
UNSATISFACTORY / NOT PRESENT
The candidate does not investigate 1 of the given disease processes. DOES NOT MEET STANDARD
Not applicable. MINIMALLY COMPETENT
Not applicable. COMPETENT
Not applicable. HIGHLY COMPETENT
The candidate investigates 1 of the given disease processes.
A1. PATHOPHYSIOLOGY:
UNSATISFACTORY / NOT PRESENT
The candidate does not provide a plausible analysis of the pathophysiology of the disease process selected in part A. DOES NOT MEET STANDARD
The candidate provides a plausible analysis, with no detail, of the pathophysiology of the disease process selected in part A. MINIMALLY COMPETENT
The candidate provides a plausible analysis, with limited detail, of the pathophysiology of the disease process selected in part A. COMPETENT
The candidate provides a plausible analysis, with adequate detail, of the pathophysiology of the disease process selected in part A. HIGHLY COMPETENT
The candidate provides a plausible analysis, with substantial detail, of the pathophysiology of the disease process selected in part A.
A2. STANDARD OF PRACTICE:
UNSATISFACTORY / NOT PRESENT
The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of the standard of practice for the selected disease process. DOES NOT MEET STANDARD
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no detail, of the standard of practice for the selected disease process. MINIMALLY COMPETENT
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of the standard of practice for the selected disease process. COMPETENT
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of the standard of practice for the selected disease process. HIGHLY COMPETENT
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial detail, of the standard of practice for the selected disease process.
A2A. PHARMACOLOGICAL TREATMENTS:
UNSATISFACTORY / NOT PRESENT
The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of the evidence-based pharmacological treatments in the candidate’s state and how they affect management of the selected disease in the candidate’s community. DOES NOT MEET STANDARD
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no detail, of the evidence-based pharmacological treatments in the candidate’s state and how they affect management of the selected disease in the candidate’s community. MINIMALLY COMPETENT
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of the evidence-based pharmacological treatments in the candidate’s state and how they affect management of the selected disease in the candidate’s community. COMPETENT
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of the evidence-based pharmacological treatments in the candidate’s state and how they affect management of the selected disease in the candidate’s community. HIGHLY COMPETENT
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial detail, of the evidence-based pharmacological treatments in the candidate’s state and how they affect management of the selected disease in the candidate’s community.
A2B. CLINICAL GUIDELINES:
UNSATISFACTORY / NOT PRESENT
The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of clinical guidelines for assessment, diagnosis, and patient education for the selected disease process. DOES NOT MEET STANDARD
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no detail, of clinical guidelines for assessment, diagnosis, and patient education for the selected disease process. MINIMALLY COMPETENT
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of clinical guidelines for assessment, diagnosis, and patient education for the selected disease process. COMPETENT
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of clinical guidelines for assessment, diagnosis, and patient education for the selected disease process. HIGHLY COMPETENT
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial detail, of clinical guidelines for assessment, diagnosis, and patient education for the selected disease process.
A2C. STANDARD PRACTICE OF DISEASE MANAGEMENT:
UNSATISFACTORY / NOT PRESENT
The candidate does not provide an appropriate comparison of standard practice for managing the disease within the candidate’s community with state or national practices. DOES NOT MEET STANDARD
The candidate provides an appropriate comparison, with no detail, of standard practice for managing the disease within the candidate’s community with state or national practices. MINIMALLY COMPETENT
The candidate provides an appropriate comparison, with limited detail, of standard practice for managing the disease within in the candidate’s community with state or national practices. COMPETENT
The candidate provides an appropriate comparison, with adequate detail, of standard practice for managing the disease within the candidate’s community with state or national practices. HIGHLY COMPETENT
The candidate provides an appropriate comparison, with substantial detail, of standard practice for managing the disease within the candidate’s community with state or national practices.
A3. MANAGED DISEASE PROCESS:
UNSATISFACTORY / NOT PRESENT
The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of characteristics of and resources for a patient who manages the selected disease well, including access to care, treatment options, life expectancy, and outcomes. DOES NOT MEET STANDARD
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no detail, of characteristics of and resources for a patient who manages the selected disease well, including access to care, treatment options, life expectancy, and outcomes. MINIMALLY COMPETENT
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of characteristics of and resources for a patient who manages the selected disease well, including access to care, treatment options, life expectancy, and outcomes. COMPETENT
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of characteristics of and resources for a patient who manages the selected disease well, including access to care, treatment options, life expectancy, and outcomes. HIGHLY COMPETENT
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial detail, of characteristics of and resources for a patient who manages the selected disease well, including access to care, treatment options, life expectancy, and outcomes.
A3A. DISPARITIES:
UNSATISFACTORY / NOT PRESENT
The candidate does not provide a plausible analysis of disparities between management of the selected disease on a national and international level. DOES NOT MEET STANDARD
The candidate provides a plausible analysis, with no support, of disparities between management of the selected disease on a national and international level. MINIMALLY COMPETENT
The candidate provides a plausible analysis, with limited support, of disparities between management of the selected disease on a national and international level. COMPETENT
The candidate provides a plausible analysis, with adequate support, of disparities between management of the selected disease on a national and international level. HIGHLY COMPETENT
The candidate provides a plausible analysis, with substantial support, of disparities between management of the selected disease on a national and international level.
A4. MANAGED DISEASE FACTORS:
UNSATISFACTORY / NOT PRESENT
The candidate does not provide a logical discussion, of any factors that contribute to a patient being able to manage the selected disease. DOES NOT MEET STANDARD
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with sufficient detail, of 1 or 2 factors that contribute to a patient being able to manage the selected disease. MINIMALLY COMPETENT
Not applicable. COMPETENT
Not applicable. HIGHLY COMPETENT
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with sufficient detail, of 3 or 4 factors that contribute to a patient being able to manage the selected disease.
A4A. UNMANAGED DISEASE FACTORS:
UNSATISFACTORY / NOT PRESENT
The candidate does not provide a logical explanation of how a lack of the factors discussed in part A4 leads to an unmanaged disease process. DOES NOT MEET STANDARD
The candidate provides a logical explanation, with no detail, of how a lack of the factors discussed in part A4 leads to an unmanaged disease process. MINIMALLY COMPETENT
The candidate provides a logical explanation, with limited detail, of how a lack of the factors discussed in part A4 leads to an unmanaged disease process. COMPETENT
The candidate provides a logical explanation, with adequate detail, of how a lack of the factors discussed in part A4 leads to an unmanaged disease process. HIGHLY COMPETENT
The candidate provides a logical explanation, with substantial detail, of how a lack of the factors discussed in part A4 leads to an unmanaged disease process.
A4AI. UNMANAGED DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
UNSATISFACTORY / NOT PRESENT
The candidate does not provide an appropriate description of the characteristics of a patient with the selected disease that is unmanaged. DOES NOT MEET STANDARD
Not applicable. MINIMALLY COMPETENT
The candidate provides an appropriate description, with insufficient detail, of the characteristics of a patient with the selected disease that is unmanaged. COMPETENT
Not applicable. HIGHLY COMPETENT
The candidate provides an appropriate description, with sufficient detail, of the characteristics of a patient with the selected disease that is unmanaged.
B. PATIENTS, FAMILIES, & POPULATIONS:
UNSATISFACTORY / NOT PRESENT
The candidate does not provide a plausible analysis of how the selected disease process affects patients, families, and populations in the candidate’s community. DOES NOT MEET STANDARD
The candidate provides a plausible analysis, with no detail, of how the selected disease process affects patients, families, and populations in the candidate’s community. MINIMALLY COMPETENT
The candidate provides a plausible analysis, with limited detail, of how the selected disease process affects patients, families, and populations in the candidate’s community. COMPETENT
The candidate provides a plausible analysis, with adequate detail, of how the selected disease process affects patients, families, and populations in the candidate’s community. HIGHLY COMPETENT
The candidate provides a plausible analysis, with substantial detail, of how the selected disease process affects patients, families, and populations in the candidate’s community.
B1. COSTS:
UNSATISFACTORY / NOT PRESENT
The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of the financial costs associated with the selected disease process for patients, families, and populations from diagnosis to treatment. DOES NOT MEET STANDARD
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no detail, of the financial costs associated with the selected disease process for patients, families, and populations from diagnosis to treatment. MINIMALLY COMPETENT
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of the financial costs associated with the selected disease process for patients, families, and populations from diagnosis to treatment. COMPETENT
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of the financial costs associated with the selected disease process for patients, families, and populations from diagnosis to treatment. HIGHLY COMPETENT
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial detail, of the financial costs associated with the selected disease process for patients, families, and populations from diagnosis to treatment.
C. BEST PRACTICES PROMOTION:
UNSATISFACTORY / NOT PRESENT
The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of how the candidate will promote best practices for managing the selected disease in the candidate’s current healthcare organization. DOES NOT MEET STANDARD
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no detail, of how the candidate will promote best practices for managing the selected disease in the candidate’s current healthcare organization. MINIMALLY COMPETENT
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of how the candidate will promote best practices for managing the selected disease in the candidate’s current healthcare organization. COMPETENT
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of how the candidate will promote best practices for managing the selected disease in the candidate’s current healthcare organization. HIGHLY COMPETENT
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial detail, of how the candidate will promote best practices for managing the selected disease in the candidate’s current healthcare organization.
C1. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN:
UNSATISFACTORY / NOT PRESENT
The candidate does not provide a discussion of 3 strategies the candidate could use to implement best practices for managing the selected disease in the candidate’s current healthcare organization. DOES NOT MEET STANDARD
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no detail, of 3 strategies the candidate could use to implement best practices for managing the selected disease in the candidate’s current healthcare organization. MINIMALLY COMPETENT
The candidate provides logical discussion, with limited detail, of 3 strategies the candidate could use to implement best practices for managing the selected disease in the candidate’s current healthcare organization. COMPETENT
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of 3 strategies the candidate could use to implement best practices for managing the selected disease in the candidate’s current healthcare organization. HIGHLY COMPETENT
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial detail, of 3 strategies the candidate could use to implement best practices for managing the selected disease in the candidate’s current healthcare organization.
C2. EVALUATION METHOD:
UNSATISFACTORY / NOT PRESENT
The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of an appropriate method to evaluate the implementation of each of the strategies from part C1. DOES NOT MEET STANDARD
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no detail, of an appropriate method to evaluate the implementation of each of the strategies from part C1. MINIMALLY COMPETENT
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of an appropriate method to evaluate the implementation of each of the strategies from part C1. COMPETENT
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of an appropriate method to evaluate the implementation of each of the strategies from part C1. HIGHLY COMPETENT
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial detail, of an appropriate method to evaluate the implementation of each of the strategies from part C1.
D. SOURCES:
UNSATISFACTORY / NOT PRESENT
When the candidate uses sources, the candidate does not provide in-text citations and references. DOES NOT MEET STANDARD
When the candidate uses sources, the candidate provides only some in-text citations and references. MINIMALLY COMPETENT
When the candidate uses sources, the candidate provides appropriate in-text citations and references with major deviations from APA style. COMPETENT
When the candidate uses sources, the candidate provides appropriate in-text citations and references with minor deviations from APA style. HIGHLY COMPETENT
When the candidate uses sources, the candidate provides appropriate in-text citations and references with no readily detectable deviations from APA style, OR the candidate does not use sources.

Instructions
you need to read Chapter 13 Injuries and Injury Prevention at Home, on the Road, at Work and at Play ( McKenzie, J.F., Pinger, R.R., & Kotecki, J.E. (2012). An Introduction to Community Health. Brief Edition. Sudbury, Massachusetts: Jones and Bartlett Publishers).

As you can see from the material, injuries play a big role in Public Health. For this assignment, you will create a chart with data specific to injuries and injury prevention. Your chart will have 5 rows, each with a different type of injury that impacts Public Health. Across the top of the chart, you will have 2 columns. You will populate the columns with 1. Data for the specific injury listed 2. Prevention strategies for the specific injury listed.

How will you know if you have been successful with this assignment:

By the end of the assignment, you will have identified 5 types of injuries, stated the rate they occur, and provided information on prevention strategies.

As you have found, lifespan development research has several renowned theorists who attempted to explain human behavior with different theories. Many people would argue that some theories explain human behavior, cognition and socioemotional development better than others. After your review of the theories, which theory do you think best explains your development thus far and why?

Examples:

Erikson’s theory
Freud’s theory
Bandura’s theory
Piaget’s theory

In this assignment, you will be writing a 1,000-1,250 word paper describing the differing approaches of nursing leaders and managers to issues in practice. To complete this assignment, do the following:

1. Select an issue from the following list: bullying, unit closers, and restructuring, floating, nurse turnover, nurse staffing ratios, use of contract employees (i.e., registry and travel nurses), or magnet designation.
2. Describe the selected issue. Discuss how it impacts the quality of care and patient safety in the setting in which it occurs.
3.  Discuss how professional standards of practice should be demonstrated in this situation to help rectify the issue or maintain a professional conduct.
4. Explain the differing roles of nursing leaders and nursing managers in this instance and discuss the different approaches they take to address the selected issue and promote patient safety and quality care. Support your rationale by using the theories, principles, skills, and roles of the leader versus manager described in your readings.
5. Discuss what additional aspects managers and leaders would need to initiate in order to ensure professionalism throughout diverse health care settings while addressing the selected issue.
6. Describe a leadership style that would best address the chosen issue. Explain why this style could be successful in this setting.
Use at least three peer-reviewed journal articles other than those presented in your text or provided in the course.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:

RN to BSN

1.1:      Exemplify professionalism in diverse health care settings.

1.3:      Exercise professional nursing leadership and management roles in the promotion of patient safety and quality care.

3.4:      Demonstrate professional standards of practice

Please follow rubric from start to finish. Simply answer the questions ON THE RUBRIC. do not make a separate page. Don’t put in essay/paragraph form. Just place the answer after each question. Put reference page on separate page. Reference the article and reference the grading tool. Dont worry about Flipgrid instructions. Please find an article about the treatment of Schizophrenia Disorder in children with antipsychotics such Abilify. Article need to be 5 years old or less.

Discussion Question – Clinical Experiences
Reflect on what you learned most from this clinical experience. What are some challenges you experienced and how did you overcome these challenges?

1. Choose one infectious disease from the list below and use the chain of infection to analyze how it is spread*.

2. Please provide a comprehensive description of the chain of infection that includes the pathogen, reservoir, means of transmission and susceptible host for your chosen disease.

3. Describe how one could break the chain of infection for that specific disease.

4. Include references

Select one of the following topics:
1. Black cohosh
2. Echinacea
3. Glucosamine
4. Melatonin
5. St. John’s Wort

Search the online library for at least two articles about your chosen topic. Read the articles, and decide whether you are for or against use of the herbal preparation. Write a 1-page paper (approximately 500 words) in which you provide information about your chosen topic and explain the reasons why it should or should not be taken, the effects on the body, and any interactions with other drugs or food.

Final paper / Summative analysis: In this assignment, you will provide a 5 page analysis of the role of a family medical history form. Students will analyze the basis for questions asked on a family medical history form.

Items to consider for the analysis:
Lifestyle:
Why would it be important to ask that question?
Why may a patient not be truthful in answering that question?
What body systems may be affected by that activity?

Diseases:
What is the physiology of the disease?
What body systems are affected?
What may be the impact of viral, bacterial, genetic, and environmental diseases?
What is the genetic linkage for that disease?
If the disease is genetically linked, what is the basis for inheritance?

Format conditions: 5 pages including references (times new roman, 12 point font, 1.15 spacing), APA format

Please use the grading rubric to create an outline of your assignment. Each section of the rubric should be a section of your final paper and could become the headings. Your assignment will be graded based on each element of the rubric. Compare each section of your paper with the rubric to ensure all elements are covered. Then, include an introduction and conclusion to tie the paper together. If you have any questions regarding the assignment please contact your instructor using the Course Help forum.

Being a nurse means more than working in the nursing field. Being a nurse means being an active member of the profession and taking an active role in advocating for the specific area of nursing you currently work in as well as for the profession in general. For the final project of this course you will complete a poster project of your capstone project. You will present your project in a voice thread. Your poster project and presentation of information should be completed in a fashion similar to presentations that are accepted and presented at nursing conferences around the country.

Your poster project must include:

Title of capstone project topic
How the project will impact your own personal profession
How the project will impact the profession as a whole
Summary of the plan you wish to implement and the clearly defined location
Identify 3 outcomes for the proposed plan/strategies to meet the outcomes
Review of literature
Timeline for project
Budget for project
How you plan to assess the project once implemented
Competency

40 points

25 points

15 points

0 points

Points Earned

Students will develop a Poster Presentation of their Capstone Project

Students develop a Poster Presentation of their Capstone Project

Students develop a Poster Presentation of their Capstone Project with a minimum of errors

Students develop a Poster Presentation of their Capstone Project with a significant number of errors

Does not provide a poster presentation of their capstone project

/40

Your poster project must include:

Title of capstone project topic
How the project will impact your own personal profession
How the project will impact the profession as a whole
Summary of the plan you wish to implement and the clearly defined location
Identify 3 outcomes for the proposed plan/strategies to meet the outcomes
Review of literature
Timeline for project
Budget for project
How you plan to assess the project once implemented
Poster Presentation includes all of the required elements

Poster Presentation includes a minimum of 7 required elements

Poster Presentation includes a minimum of 4 required elements

Does not provide a poster presentation or includes fewer than four required elements

/40

Competency

3 points

2 points

1 points

0 points

Points Earned

Organization

Organization excellent, ideas clear and arranged logically, transitions smooth, no flaws in logic.

Organization good; ideas usually clear and arranged in acceptable sequence; transitions usually smooth, good support.

Organization minimally effective; problems in approach, sequence, support and transitions.

Organization does not meet requirements.

/3

Competency

5 points

2.5 points

1 points

0 points

Competency

Grammar

Grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and usage correct and idiomatic, consistent with Standard American English

Grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and usage good mostly consistent with Standard American English; errors do not interfere with meaning or understanding

Grammar, punctuation, mechanics and usage distracting and often interfere with meaning or understanding

Grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and usage interfere with understanding

/5

References

References are relevant, authoritative and contemporary.

Adequate references.

Minimal use of appropriate references.

Poor use and/or selection of references not relevant.

/5

Competency

7 points

5 points

2 points

0 points

Points Earned

APA Format

Demonstrates competent use of mechanics and APA.

Minimal APA errors.

Many APA errors.

Complete lack of understanding.

/7

Total

/100