philosophy

A subjective claim that people might call “a fact”, An objective claim that people might call “an opinion”, What is the difference between a claim that is “objective” and a claim that is “subjective?”, Explain how mislabeling these claims could negatively impact the quality of a person’s thinking. You might try thinking of claims you could hear in a hospital or another work-related environment. If a person has confused objective with subjective or fact with opinion, what is the solution? In addition to your initial post, post two substantive peer responses that demonstrate how you connect to their explanations. Provide thoughts, insight, and analysis of their answers. Your response should extend the dialogue.

Please use Rubrics. Purpose the library essay fulfills its purpose of explaining how Rip Van Winkle reflects the emergence of American mythology. The essay contains a complete analysis of the characteristics and explains how these characteristics affect the story and the reader’s experience of the story. The literary essay presents a valid thesis and contains examples of three to four characteristics of stories that participate in the mythology of a nation. The essay identifies the title of the story and the name of the author and presents a thesis in the introductory paragraph, and ends with a concluding paragraph that summarizes the main points or restates the thesis of the essay. The essay uses the present tense when referring to the story. It is written in 3rd person. No slang expressions. Written in a formal style. Each sentence expresses a complete thought. And the essay contains exact words from the story and are punctuated correctly. The title of the story and the name of the author are capitalized correctly.

Exercise in conjunction with the following readings: See module guide: Donald, D., Lazarus, S. & Moolla, N. (2014). Chapter 3, 8 Landsberg, et al. (2019). Chapter 4.3 – 4.4 Tudge, et al. (2009) Drawing up an asset-based map: – Identify the proximal processes which can be characterized as assets or protective factors with a learner in your classroom you are currently supporting. – Group these factors into those that relate to the learner’s family, school, peer group, and the local community in which the learner grows up (interactive contexts, i.e. bioecological perspective). – What are the physical, socio-emotional, and scholastic problems that the learner is experiencing? – Now that you have drawn up an asset-based map, how will it influence the process of support to the relevant learner? – What did you learn from this exercise?

Exercise in conjunction with the following readings: See module guide: Donald, D., Lazarus, S. & Moolla, N. (2014). Chapter 3, 8 Landsberg, et al. (2019). Chapter 4.3 – 4.4 Tudge, et al. (2009) Drawing up an asset-based map: – Identify the proximal processes which can be characterized as assets or protective factors with a learner in your classroom you are currently supporting. – Group these factors into those that relate to the learner’s family, school, peer group, and the local community in which the learner grows up (interactive contexts, i.e. bioecological perspective). – What are the physical, socio-emotional, and scholastic problems that the learner is experiencing? – Now that you have drawn up an asset-based map, how will it influence the process of support to the relevant learner? – What did you learn from this exercise?

– 1500 words, Word limit may only be 10% over or under the specified number to fall within the requirements of the task. – Students must not use non-academic sources. An academic source is a peer-reviewed piece of writing, written by an expert in the fiel

Directions: Write a two-page paper identifying your personal leadership philosophy based on your new perspective of leadership from theories, textbook/article/videos, and other influencers that you have learned throughout the course that may have changed or expanded your draft personal leadership philosophy from week one.

Should abortion be legalized?

You should set out a draft outline of your proposed research, arranged under the following six headings: Title/Topic; Research questions and focus; Background to the proposal; Research methods to be used; Timetable; Short bibliography. The recommended length of the outline is two pages of A4 size, in single-spaced type Topic: The institutionalization of democracy in post-conflict situations case study of the Republic of South Sudan Referencing style is not mentioned can use the application used in the UK

Write a 2-4 page essay (in Word or Rich Text Format, double spaced, size 12 font) on one of the following topics. (Cite all sources you use to avoid plagiarism). Use the text as your primary source and at least one academic secondary source. 1.) Explain Descartes’ Method of doubt; what does he hope to accomplish from this method; is Descartes a sceptic? 2.)What is the significance of Descartes’ Cogito argument? How does it relate to the “evil demon” and dreaming doubt arguments? 3.) Does Descartes believe in God? If so discuss his argument(s) for the existence of God. Are they convincing? Why or why not? If you don’t think that Descartes actually believes in God defend your position. 4.) Discuss the so-called “Cartesian Circle”; (a good source for this discussion are the articles on Descartes at the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy; is Descartes guilty of begging the question or arguing in a circle in his discussion of God as the guarantor of clear and distinct ideas and his clear and distinct idea of God? 5.) Explain the relationship between satyagraha and swaraj for Gandhi. How does his concept of non-violent resistance relate to his beliefs about God and punishment? 6.)How widely and to what effect has Gandhi’s non-violent resistance been employed in political struggles? what are some of its advantages and disadvantages? 7.) Explain Gandhi’s contention that external independence (swaraj) depends upon internal swaraj. Do you think his reasoning is correct? why or why not? 8.) Compare and contrast Gandhi and Plato on the issue of appearance and reality. (Cite all sources you use to avoid plagiarism) Cite all sources with quotation marks for direct quotes and parenthetical references. Don’t place URLs in the body of your paper; cite online sources by author’s name or article title. Place urls at the end of the paper in the work cited page. Every student is encouraged to submit drafts of papers to Upswing under the tutoring tab for assistance with composition and proofreading.

(My topic is on Racism and the two philosophers that I would be applying in the paper, would be Saint Augustine and Plato and how would they address racism) The outline of your final project should contain your thesis statement, and the remainder should be a full-sentence outline where you specifically show how your paper will flow. Note: A full-sentence outline differs from bullet points because each section of the outline must be a complete sentence. Each part may only have one sentence in it. Capital letters are ideas that support the thesis. Your outline must contain a minimum of 12 full sentences as follows. The thesis statement of the paper (2 sentences minimum)4 key points to support the thesis statement: What is the issue and why is it significant?  (Racism) (2 full sentences minimum to clarify this point)How would your first philosopher address your issue? (2 full sentences minimum to clarify this point)How would your second philosopher address your issue? (2 full sentences minimum to clarify this point)How would you apply your philosophers’ principles to your issue in modern society? (2 full sentences minimum to clarify this point)Conclusion (2 sentences minimum)