Identifying patients with high risk of readmission from the patient navigators’ perspectives

Identifying patients with high risk of readmission from the patient navigators’ perspectives Identifying patients with high risk of readmission from the patient navigators’ perspectives I’m studying for my Health & Medical class and don’t understand how to answer this. Can you help me study? annotated bibliography for the three pdf documents by completing the sample annotated bibliography word document identifying_readmitted_patients.pdf readmission_and_intervention_mapping.pdf strategies_to_reduce_readmission_rate.pdf sample_annotated_bibliography_6_16_16__5_.doc ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS 685340 research-article2016 PSH0010.1177/2010105816685340Proceedings of Singapore HealthcareMohd Razali et al. PROCEEDINGS Original Article OF SINGAPORE HEALTHCARE Identifying patients with high risk of readmission from the patient navigators’ perspectives: a descriptive qualitative study Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare 2017, Vol. 26(3) 166­–171 © The Author(s) 2016 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/2010105816685340 https://doi.org/10.1177/2010105816685340 journals.sagepub.com/home/psh Mas Rizalynda Mohd Razali, Yan Chew Chong, Nur Zarifah Mustapha, Yi Xu, Salimah Mohd Ayoob, Mei Ling Lim and Fazila Aloweni Abstract Background: Unplanned readmission incurs additional cost to patients and contributes to the rising healthcare cost of our nation. Although numerous studies have investigated the predicting factors that contribute to hospital readmission, the majority of the studies focused on clinical and patient-related factors, and were not from the perspectives of clinicians such as patient navigators (PNs). Aim: To understand factors that predict patients’ readmission risks from the PNs’ perspectives. Method: Using purposive sampling, PNs with a minimum of 10 years of clinical experience in the adult acute-care setting participated in the focus group interviews. Thematic analysis was adopted. Findings: All 10 PNs agreed that the readmission risk assessment tool was useful as a guide to assess patients’ risk of readmission; however, they also mentioned the use of clinical judgement and experience while assessing their patients. Three themes emerged from this study: (1) looking beyond medical-related issues; (2) social and community support; (3) functional status of patients. Conclusion: Predicting patients’ risk of readmission is closely tied to the patients’ current medical conditions and caregiving needs. Ensuring individualised readmission risk assessment and identifying social issues early are key in ensuring a holistic discharge planning. Keywords Readmission risk, unplanned hospital readmission, patient navigator, thematic analysis Introduction Unplanned hospital readmission shortly after discharge is a major concern for both clinicians and healthcare administrators. Unplanned readmission incurs additional cost to patients and contributes to the rising healthcare cost of our nation. In 2013, the readmission rate for patients within 30 days after discharge from Singapore General Hospital (SGH) was 13.4%; however, it was unclear whether these readmissions were preventable. Hospital administrators are always examining ways to prevent unplanned hospital readmission. For example, in our organisation, a new role called ‘Patient Navigator’ was introduced in 2013 to help curb the rising hospitalisation readmission rate by coordinating and facilitating smooth transition of patients into the community. Identifying patients with high risk of readmission from the patient navigators’ perspectives These patient navigators (PNs) are mostly senior nurses with at least 10 years of clinical experience. Their role is to manage and coordinate patients’ care between acute-care hospital and intermediate long-term care with the primary aim to reduce length of stay for patients and prevent unplanned readmissions. Subsequently, the National Nursing Division, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore Corresponding author: Mei Ling Lim, Nursing Division, Singapore General Hospital, Bowyers Block B Level 2, 31 Third Hospital Avenue, 168753, Singapore. Email: [email protected] Creative Commons Non Commercial CC-BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons AttributionNonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). 167 Mohd Razali et al. Table 1. Semi-structured interview questions for the focus groups. What do you think of the current NEHR readmission risk score for predicting readmission of patients? If you were not given any tool or scale, how would you assess your patients for risk of readmission? Electronic Health Record (NEHR) system was introduced in 2014 to integrate a seamless quality care for patients and to reduce the likelihood of predictable readmission. NEHR is a patient data exchange system that enables clinicians and health professionals to have a consolidated view of a patient’s health record across the national healthcare network.1 This system complements the PNs’ work as it provides a comprehensive overview of a patient’s admission and visit history, hospital inpatient discharge summary, laboratory results, medications history, past surgical and medical history and immunisation record. The PNs use this NEHR system in their daily work to assess and facilitate discharge care for their patients. NEHR also contains the readmission risk assessment scoring tool that helps the PN to determine which patients are at risk of readmission to the hospital. Unplanned hospital readmission is seen as a marker for inpatient care quality in Singapore.2 Factors contributing to hospital readmissions have been well documented in the literature. Many studies focused on predicting the factors associated with readmission using a retrospective case-control approach and were carried out mainly in western countries. A retrospective case-control database study done in the United States identified several factors that were predictive of 30 days readmission among patients with type 2 diabetes and they were diabetic treatment escalation; race; type 2 diabetes diagnosis prior to the index stay; pre-period heart failure; and number of pre-period, inpatient healthcare visits.3 Similarly, a case-control study done in the United Kingdom found that patients aged age 80 years or older, five or more medical conditions, history of depression and lack of documented patient or family education were the risk factors associated with unplanned readmissions for patients aged 65 years or older.4 However, this study only looked at patients aged 65 years old and above and did not consider the primary diagnosis as a contributing factor to readmission risks. Most studies focused on determining clinical and patientcentred risk factors associated with readmission via predictive models. Only few have explored the viewpoints of healthcare professionals on the risk factors of unplanned readmissions. Identifying patients with high risk of readmission from the patient navigators’ perspectives A focus group interview was done in Portland to explore the perspectives of healthcare professionals and administrators on the discharge process of patients and drew recommendations from them to provide better transitions of care from hospital to home.5 In another qualitative study, nurses were interviewed on their perspectives on reasons for readmission of heart failure patients.6 Given the varying patient populations, treatment of care and hospital policies, it is challenging to establish a common set of factors for predicting readmissions in our patients. Therefore, there is a need to determine the risk factors associated with readmission pertaining to the local context in view of the different culture and health care structure. Nurses play a key role in the discharge planning of patients. The implementation of PNs in Singapore is an initiative to ensure a smooth transition of care from acute-care hospitals back into the community. There have been many studies that looked into factors predicting readmission; however, they were mainly focused on clinical and patient-centred factors and not from the perspectives of experienced clinicians. Hence, this study aimed to understand from the PNs’ perspectives the factors that are likely to accurately predict readmission risk. Given their clinical experience in managing patients’ discharge issues, it would be valuable to explore their viewpoints and elicit factors that are not already captured by previous studies. Method Design A descriptive qualitative study design was adopted. This study design is best suited for this qualitative inquiry because it provides a comprehensive summarisation, in everyday terms, of specific events experienced by individuals or groups of individuals.7 Thus a focus group using semistructured interview questions was conducted to elicit the PNs’ perspectives on the factors that were likely to predict patients’ readmission risk that were not captured by the NEHR risk assessment tool (Table 1). Participants Purposive sampling was used to recruit the participants. The inclusion criteria were PNs who managed patients in the medical and surgical adult inpatient wards in SGH, who had a minimum of eight months of experience using the NEHR system and had at least of 10 years of clinical experience. A total of 10 PNs were recruited. All of them had been in the PN role for at least a year. There were five PNs in each focus group. The first focus group interview involved PNs from the medical discipline and the second focus group PNs from the surgical discipline. Ethical considerations Ethics approval was obtained from the SingHealth Centralised Institutional Review Board. Written informed consent was obtained from all PNs before conducting the focus group interviews. Data collection Two focus group interviews were conducted. Each focus group consisted of five PNs from both the medical and surgical discipline respectively. Each focus group interview took about 45–60 min to conduct in order to allow every PN to share their views and to reach data saturation. One research team member carried out all interviews with another 168 member as her moderator. All interviews took place in a quiet meeting room in the hospital to ensure privacy. All interviews were audio-taped and transcribed verbatim. In order to increase credibility and dependability of data, all interviews began with this key question: “ Identifying patients with high risk of readmission from the patient navigators’ perspectives As a patient navigator, who has been handling the NEHR system, please share your experiences using the readmission risk assessment score.” Probing words such as ‘why’ and ‘how’ were used to elicit deeper understanding. Data analysis Thematic analysis is a principle method for qualitative data analysis through discovering, analysing and reporting themes which have been emerged from data.8 Using a thematic approach, an inductive content analysis was conducted to code data and analyse using the six steps of Braun and Clarke.8 The first step was familiarising with data. In this step, the content of recorded focus group interviews were transcribed verbatim and the researchers immerse themselves in the data by reading and rereading the transcribed audio recordings and making notes. The second step was initial coding. Participants’ statements were coded thoroughly and in accordance to the whole data. The third step was to look for themes in which the coded data were reviewed to identify areas of similarity and overlapping between codes and put them together to form the initial themes. The fourth step was reviewing themes in relation to the coded data and entire data set to generate a thematic map. The fifth step was defining and naming the themes in which the entire process of analysing was reviewed to refine the characteristics of each code in relation to the entire data. The last step was reporting the findings according to the research aim. With the transcriptions, the authors performed initial coding, formed the initial themes, and refined named the extracted themes. All themes were further clarified, discussed and agreed by all the authors in this paper. Rigour All authors had immersed themselves with the data during the transcription and coding process. The initial codes that were gathered were checked and confirmed among members before confirming on the final themes. To ensure dependability, the process of the data collection was similar for both the medical and surgical focus group. A pilot focus group was also conducted before the actual focus group interviews to ensure that the interviewer and moderator were well-versed with the process and the same interviewer and moderator conducted both the focus group interviews. Findings A total of 10 PNs were interviewed. The PNs interviewed had varying clinical experience and their average years of experience were 23 years. The profiles of the PNs are presented in Table 2. All PNs in both focus groups agreed that the readmission risk assessment tool was useful as a starting guide to assess their patients’ risk of readmission; however, they have also Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare 26(3) Table 2. Profiles of the patient navigators (PNs). Participant Discipline Working experience Working experience as a nurse (years) as a PN (years) M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 Medical Medical Medical Medical Medical Surgical Surgical Surgical Surgical Surgical 15 >30 11 24 30 14 17 33 41 17 1.5 >1 >1 1.5 1.5 1 1.5 >1 1.5 1.5 Table 3. Schemes and subthemes that emerged from focus group interviews. Themes Subthemes Looking beyond medical-related issues Anticipate future needs due to medical complexity Patients’ ability to cope and manage Having a social support network Caregiver’s coping abilities Caregiver’s willingness to care Awareness and access to community resources (for both caregiver and patient) Assessing patient’s current needs Needing multiple service providers Social and community support Functional status of patients mentioned the use of their clinical judgement and experience to assess their patients further. Identifying patients with high risk of readmission from the patient navigators’ perspectives Three themes that emerged from the focus group interviews were: (1) looking beyond medical-related issues; (2) social and community support; (3) functional status of patients. Examples of each theme and subthemes are presented in Table 3. Theme 1: looking beyond medical-related issues Having chronic medical conditions is a strong indicator of patients having high risks of readmissions. PNs shared that nurses have to look beyond patient’s medical issues and problems to manage their care better. Patients’ conditions can be complex and many other factors could affect their medical and nursing management. Subtheme 1: Anticipate future needs due to medical complexity. Nurses need to look beyond patients’ current caregiving needs and home situation to determine if patients require additional help in managing their care. Certain group of patients such as oncology patients are anticipated to have more difficulties with coping at home and has higher chance of readmissions due to their disease process and the treatments they receive. On the other hand, even if a patient appeared to be at low risks of readmission, nurses should also anticipate potential caregiving needs and issues that might arise due to the patients’ conditions. Mohd Razali et al. Patient is under low risk when we enter the scoring (in the NEHR system), but when you look further into the patient, patient may have NGT (nasogastric tube), and then have IDC (indwelling catheter). So when patient has all these, I would think that the patient has high risk of readmission because NGT has high risk of aspiration. Because if the carer is not well versed with patient care, definitely you know patient will have you know (pause) … readmission into the hospital. [M1] Patient has cancer … they have the tendency to get … their condition become worse, every time. In fact, sometimes when their condition worsen, they may even get fracture, and so on … so these are already indicators that these patients requires care, more care, with cancer itself, with advanced stage of cancer, you probably requires more services, meaning to say, in terms of the home help needs, or in term of medical care, in term of the appointment consolidations, and so on. [S2] Subtheme 2: Patients’ ability to cope and manage. The ability of patients to cope and manage their medical condition at home is another crucial factor in predicting readmission risk. The PNs shared that although some patients may appear to be high risk of readmission according to the risk assessment score, the nurse still need to assess further on their ability to care for themselves, their attitudes towards self-care and the availability of resources to self-manage. For example: Is the patient psychologically strong enough to take care to learn to take care of herself? Is she the type who says anything wrong, go to hospital or she has got the mentality to say anything I won’t turn back to hospital. So it is two different things. Yah. So if those whom I think that they are emotionally not strong I will make sure I tag on the patient closely, call her very often just to give her that psychological support and then she won’t turn back. [M4] The thing is that nowadays we have seen more educated patients; they are more well versed in their medical condition. Identifying patients with high risk of readmission from the patient navigators’ perspectives So … because this kind of patient, they know how to manage their symptoms, they know what to do. So in term of interventions as PN trying to advise them, we only can reinforce to them. When we talk to them about education and all that, they are actually aware. There is not much help that they actually need. So sometimes I feel that some patients … to a certain level you meet the criteria (High readmission risk score), but they don’t really need much help … interventions from navigators. [S1] When patients cannot manage, their non-compliance to care can also increase their chances of readmission. However, sometimes most time of our cases are actually patients who are younger, they still readmitted, because more of their medical issues. They can’t manage their medical issues. For instance, issues like non-compliant to medication, or not compliant to their fluid restriction and all that, that’s the reason why they come in to the hospital. [S2] Theme 2: Social and community support Having the right social and community support is important to prevent patients from unnecessary readmissions. The PNs elaborated that having a discharge destination includes having an appropriate carer. The caregivers’ coping abilities and willingness to care for the patients should also be evaluated as 169 they are the main pillars of support for the patients. Patients and family members should be educated on information pertaining to community support services and resources that are available to them and how to access it. Subtheme 1: Having a social support network. Nurses shared that having a discharge destination is not only about the patients having a physical place to stay after discharged, but also to have good social support when they leave the hospital especially for patients who stay alone. They will need more support as compared to patient who has caregiver or family’s support. Because some patients, there is not much to do for their medical condition, but more of social intervention. It’s more of, because sometimes there is no main carer, or they were left alone at home. That’s why you need to try and get service on board to… you know, make sure…they have high risk on fall, for example, then you need to make sure that there are some services on board to help support patient at home. [S1] So … what about the social support is the social support there or not there. Because if they are alone, if they have social support they have somewhere to go to or they have someone to turn to they can call. [M4] Subtheme 2: Caregivers coping abilities. Assessing the caregivers’ coping abilities and comfort level during discharge planning is needed to ensure a smooth transition from hospital back to home. Often, patients return home with new needs that require caregivers’ attention and sometimes even competence. However, the short transition time from hospital to home is often not enough time to prepare the caregivers’ competency to handle the care demand. This may le … Purchase answer to see full attachment Student has agreed that all tutoring, explanations, and answers provided by the tutor will be used to help in the learning process and in accordance with Studypool’s honor code & terms of service . Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10