Management

Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) assesses personality type under the psychodynamic approach. Click on the following link for a test that uses the Myers-Briggs as its basis.You are asked to share your “dimensions” scores from the assessment.Using what you have learned about yourself through leadership self-assessment and skills analysis, assess your skills based on the scoring for each “dimension.”Take an extra step and apply how each “dimension” can guide your management style.Critically analyze how your career path and MBTI scores come together. Keep in mind that “marginal or no preference” for a dimension, may place you in a different category which could change results. Consider this in your self-analysis.

Hide Assignment InformationInstructionsFurther, develop your Crisis Communication Plan by updating it according to the top Human-caused hazard facing Bobsville as identified in your Hazard Vulnerability Assessment that you developed your ~1-2 page updates to the Crisis Communication Plan should have:Pregathered Informationregardingyour hazardKey Messages to be distributed via:WebsiteSocial MediaTraditional MediaPossibleTrick QuestionsKnown Local ProdromesUse the description of Bobsville for existing information, and create any details necessary to create your plan that is not already in the description.

Please write an 8-10 pages’ long essay analyzing and discussing the following topics following the order of Tasks 1 to 6: 1. Task 1(5 points): Summarize the case. Length suggestion: 1 page. 2. Task 2 (15 points): Identify (list) the ethical issues that have arisen in this case. Please offer some details about each ethical issue (e.g. including what’s occurred, who’s affected, etc.). Length suggestion: 1 page. 3. Task 3 (20 points): Identify (list) all of the stakeholders of the company (i.e., Chimerix) in the case, and discuss each of their viewpoints (e.g., needs, desires, concerns, costs, benefits, power, etc.). Length suggestion: 1-2 pages. 4. Task 4 (20 points): Explain in detail which of the stakeholders should be involved and helpful to solve the ethical issues that have arisen in the case, and why, given their viewpoints. Length suggestion: 1-2 pages. 5. Task 5 (20 points): List all of the ethical theories and principles (i.e., 14 ethical principles under the part “Principles of ethical conduct” from Page 228 in Chapter 8 of the textbook) that are appropriate for solving the ethical issues in this case. Explain in detail why each principle is appropriate for solving the particular ethical issue. Length suggestion: 2 pages. 6. Task 6 (20 points): Using certain ethical theories and principles to recommend a plan of action for the company that will help the company (i.e., Chimerix) remain competitive and avoid such problems in the future. Explain the expected positive and negative consequences of the plan of action you recommend. Length suggestion: 2 pages. You should not conduct outside research for the case analysis. In other words, you should pretend that you are facing exactly the same situation and information presented in the case. 5. Your answer should be specific to the six tasks specified above and follow the order to organize your analysis. Please keep in mind that those topics are actually interconnected. You need to integrate your answers into a report with smooth logic and internal consistency. You are suggested to use appropriate sub-titles to make your paper easier to follow. 6. The analysis must be professionally written. Don’t use bullet or lists. Write your answers in complete sentences. Please conduct spelling check, grammar check, and virus-check before submission. 7. Avoid laundry lists. Focus and organize your analysis. Look for frameworks from the readings or the textbook that help you organize and present your analysis. 8. Consider ‘turning the question’ into the beginning of your answer. That is, if the question is, “What are the key issues?” begin your answer with; “The key issues” (include or are). This may seem simplistic, but is a very effective way to help you focus your answer on the question(s) asked and to earn full credit. Don’t repeat the entire question in your answer. 9. You need to highlight the names of the ethical principles in your paper. 10. Please follow APA format for your writing (URL: APA Format website). Indicate any 3 references you cited in your report. The references list does NOT count for length requirement purpose.

ESF4 FIREFIGHTING ANNEXAs part of integrating with Bobsville’s Crisis Management Plan/Emergency Operations Plan begun  that you have been developing in each course, develop a 1 page maximum ESF4 annex (Firefighting).

Prepare the paper using the American Psychological Association (APA) format; this format is described in detail in the APA Publication Manual. Grading will stress content, analysis, and style. Seek to creatively apply leadership theory. The paper work must be more than a mere review of facts and articles. It must demonstrate reasoning, by applying at least three relevant theories and models together to analyze the topic. The paper must be at least three thousand words in length, not counting tables, figures, and any (optional) Appendices; it must correctly cite and use at least 10 references, NOT counting the textbook. ALL cited sources must appear both within the body of the text and in the References list. NOTE: for an “A” grade, the paper must use articles from at least 2 respected journals or books, such as those in the SUGGESTED READING list. Most of these periodicals are available on line from the Troy University Library. Here is a suggested outline. TITLE PAGE ABSTRACT — Limit to one page. INTRODUCTION — Short! Explain why the topic is important! Include objectives of the paper. LITERATURE REVIEW ANALYSIS — Apply the models; make inferences, draw conclusions. DISCUSSION — Discuss the implications of your findings above, especially for managers. CONCLUSION – Restate your conclusions and sum up, in about one half page REFERENCES APPENDICES (optional) In choosing a topic, avoid shallow, insipid generalities (e.g., “the importance of leadership”). Exemplify your concepts and conclusions by consistently referring to a single, real, focal leader.

Follow the Instructions Below: You will start this project by picking an organization that you are interested in profiling. Because you will need to get a good bit of information on this organization, pick an organization that you either have a personal connection to, or one that has a large amount of publicly available information. 1. Create an organizational chart of the management of the organization. 2. Choose three management positions and provide a job description of each one. 3. List three external environmental factors affecting the organization. 4. List three internal cultural factors described in your text. What do these factors tell you about the culture of your organization, and what it holds most important? 5. Develop a S.W.O.T. analysis for your organization. 6. After you have completed the S.W.O.T. analysis, conclude your presentation with the following: a. 1 long-term strategic goal and description of how they can reach that goal b. 1 short-term tactical goal and description of how they can reach that goal The deliverable: The deliverable is a slide presentation using the presentation software of your choice (PowerPoint, Prezi, etc.). The presentation should start with a description of your organization. It should then include all of the information from above in steps 1-6.

Utilizing the journal databases accessible via online library at Consequence Management | Course Guide page – (the Selected journal article databases for Emergency & Disaster Management and the selected journal article databases for Terrorism & Consequence Management):Source and select a journal article that postulates or asserts a current or an emerging WMD threat to the Homeland. Cite the selected journal article and further:Identify the environmental setting the article describes;Discuss the related vulnerability it discusses; andEnumerate the specific threat it postulates along with why the author argues the threat is relevant.Discuss your stated agreement/non-agreement and support your position.Can the specific threat be mitigated? How so?

In order to evaluate recruiting effectiveness design and describe a grading system with at least five metrics. Comment on the challenges each presents

1. How can a business or organization benefit from using a consultant? 2. Have you or your organization used consultants in the past? If so, give a brief description of how the consultant interacted within your organization. If not, why do you feel they have not used a consultant service in the past?

Who really has power in your current workplace (or at the last position you held)? Discuss three different leaders all having the different types of power as listed below. Describe in detail why you think they had this power. What actions might their supervisor take to improve the perception (negative or positive) and the impact from this type of power? A leader having Legitimate Power A leader having Expert Power A leader having Referent Power A Plagiarism report must be attached.